On 8/20/25 10:39 AM, Ondrej Pokorny via fpc-devel wrote:
On 20.08.2025 16:15, wkitty42--- via fpc-devel wrote:
On 8/20/25 9:20 AM, Werner Pamler via fpc-devel wrote:
Sending this "test" message because I received the last message from this
mailing three weeks ago.
same here... it s
On 8/20/25 9:20 AM, Werner Pamler via fpc-devel wrote:
Sending this "test" message because I received the last message from this
mailing three weeks ago.
same here... it seems to be working, tho...
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing l
On 2/23/25 6:19 AM, Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel wrote:
On 22/02/2025 18:40, Werner Pamler via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 22.02.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel:
Many of them have been blacklisted automatically already by fail2ban. I'll
manually blacklist all of their IP ranges now.
Thank
On 3/1/23 8:53 AM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 14:10:28 +0100
Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
[...]
I can't remember the proverb that Florian used, but it essentially
boils down to very small changes, individually not amounting to
much, but which accumulate into a
On 1/13/23 5:35 AM, Bart via fpc-devel wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:13 AM wkitty42--- via fpc-devel
wrote:
First of all, adding a 'end;" for the "with" compiles under Linux.
That's because widestring=unicodestring on Linux.
i'm a little surprised the
On 1/12/23 10:29 AM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:58:34 +0100
Bart via fpc-devel wrote:
[...]
begin
with WideStringManager do
begin
writeln(1);
Wide2AnsiMoveProc(pwidechar(WSource),RawByteString(ADest),
CP_UTF8, Length(WSource));
writeln(2);
On 8/22/21 1:56 AM, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
It might be to do with the order that directories are searched. If it finds the
64-bit version
ghost, then it will throw an error. I've requested to change the error to a
warning instead in the
post, but was shot down.
if that Common.
On 6/9/20 2:55 AM, Christo Crause via fpc-devel wrote:
for c := 'A' to 'Z" do write(c);
oops! i failed to note that the above is character by character whereas what i
spoke of in my previous post is line by line :/
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Pl
On 6/9/20 2:55 AM, Christo Crause via fpc-devel wrote:
I will of course submit a patch once I'm satisfied it is good enough. My
concern with the current patch is that a low level flush is called after every
write statement, so a simple loop like the following:
for c := 'A' to 'Z" do write(c);
On 5/1/20 10:50 AM, Bart via fpc-devel wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:59 PM Sven Barth wrote:
Bart had only replied to me, thus I fully quote his mail here.
There is something fishy going on with this ML.
Whenever I click on reply in this list, the reply doesn't go to the
list, but to th pr
On 1/29/20 8:54 AM, Ozz Nixon via fpc-devel wrote:
Would/Could, LANG/LOCALE affect socket output?
wouldn't they affect what the server decides to transmit based on the selected
"character set"?
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing li
On 10/12/19 7:54 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
Generally speaking, I would expect any compiler that is *capable* of realizing
that the while loop has zero chance of *ever being entered at all* in the first
place to remove the loop from its final codegen entirely, because there's no
logical reason for
On 7/12/19 5:56 AM, Bart wrote:
Hi,
User tomas platz attached a pdf (119.pdf) to
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29332
This attachment seems to be a document that has nothing to do with
programming (in freepascal or any other language).
It is either some sort of spam or maybe even somet
On 7/7/19 10:43 AM, Marģers . via fpc-devel wrote:
Well, trunk i use still has no string quote
character " .
Maybe it's time add that too while Ben Grasset on
implementing multi line strings? Just kidding...
hahahaha! i guess my memory is worse than i thought! :rotflmao:
truth be known, i've
On 7/6/19 4:50 PM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
const MultiLine =
`Sentence one.
Another sentence.
A third sentence.
A fourth sentence.
A fifth sentence.`;
procedure foo
procedure bar
const MultiLine1 =
`Sentence one.
Another sentence.
A third senten
On 7/6/19 12:05 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Ryan Joseph wrote:
You can of course shift the strings all the way to the left (which is ugly)
Is it though? I think it looks fine, personally, if you place the initial
backtick on the next line after the equal sign, l
On 7/4/19 9:54 AM, Ben Grasset wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:28 AM wrote:
personally speaking, i liked the initial idea but i can now easily see why
it is only allowed in source code comments... there's a world of difference
between them... in one case, the formatting stays put an
On 7/4/19 3:27 AM, Pascal Riekenberg wrote:
What about a Lazarus-Addon / Codetools extention that generates an old style
multi-line string from a selection and the other way around to make old style
multi-line strings editable again, so you can keep indention and trailing and
leading whitespaces
On 7/3/19 12:53 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:22 AM Marcus Sackrow wrote:
I use an operator overload(not for constants but inside the code)
because I'm used to our script engine have the '/' as operator for
strings as line break.
That's certainly a neat use of op
On 7/1/19 8:10 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
Fails with exception:
EHTTPClient
Error reading data from socket
#0 fpc_raiseexception(0x145fb14, 0x0, 0x) at ..\inc\except.inc:158
#1 FILLBUFFER(0x145fb14) at fcl-web\src\base\fphttpclient.pp:731
#2 READSTRING(0x15e1c30, 0x0) at fcl-web\src\base
On 6/28/19 12:39 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
Yikes, I didn't realize the "preformatted" code from the Lazarus HTML exporter
would show up with a bunch of asterisks outside of a real email client.
FWIW: it did that because it *BOLD*ed those lines or at least attempted to...
yeah, it is another reas
On 6/26/19 1:48 AM, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
Maybe I'm misreading this, but does that mean you're not a fan of the "pure"
directive, Jonas?
i've been quietly reading along on all this "pure function" stuff since it was
first brought up but somehow i've missed exactly what "pure" means... pure
On 6/17/19 4:56 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 17.06.2019 um 19:56 schrieb wkitt...@windstream.net:
And yes, both are again different from classes.
yeah, i'll have to see if i can figure out what classes are and if they are
one of the old-school objects or records... yeah, i'm getti
On 6/17/19 12:49 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
schrieb am Mo., 17. Juni 2019, 14:15:
On 6/17/19 1:54 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
> schrieb am Mo., 17. Juni 2019, 02:07:
>
> what always confused me these days is that records and objects were
one thing
On 6/17/19 1:54 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
schrieb am Mo., 17.
Juni 2019, 02:07:
what always confused me these days is that records and objects were one
thing
back in the (TP6) day but today they are something quite different... i had
to
be very careful when i wrote my s
On 6/16/19 6:44 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Jun 16, 2019, at 6:00 PM, Benito van der Zander wrote:
Objects are much more useful than classes or records
Now that’s an inflammatory statement! :) But seriously, I do miss record
inheritance from C++, C#, Swift when I’m in Pascal.
what always
On 6/16/19 4:41 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am 16.06.2019 um 17:43 schrieb wkitt...@windstream.net:
On 6/16/19 10:23 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
Charlie, I’m still not seeing my own messages posted
if gmail can determine that a message coming in from a list is one you sent,
it does not pa
On 6/16/19 10:23 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
Charlie, I’m still not seeing my own messages posted
if gmail can determine that a message coming in from a list is one you sent, it
does not pass it on back to you... there's no way to turn this off that i've
found... they want you to use their interfa
On 5/23/19 5:10 AM, Jinke Fan wrote:
{ return base type of processor: 0 - is Unknown, 10 - is AMD
(AuthenticAMD), }
+{10 - is Hygon (HygonGenuine) }
is there a problem here? AMD and Hygon are both listed as 10...
{
On 5/18/19 9:42 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
A warning from the compiler is hence an appropriate response, telling the
programmer to check the source and make a decision, even if it is adding an
empty else clause to the offending case statement. Everything else is just
"lazy programming", like it or n
On 5/17/19 9:44 AM, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
It's a constant set to equal 2^n, or in binary, 1 followed by n zeroes.
ugh! yeah, i see that now... the layout confused me as i'm used to CONST being
on its own line or prefixed to every constant defined...
eg:
const
n=12;
s=1 shl n;
OR
con
On 5/17/19 4:47 AM, Marco Borsari via fpc-devel wrote:
In the code below
program test;
const n=12;
s=1 shl n;
var a,b,c,h1,h2:word;
ummm... what is 's'? you've used it before it has been defined...
begin
a:=77;
b:=0;
(*c:=(a XOR b)*(a SHL 5+b SHR 2);*)
h1:=((a XOR b)*(a SHL 5+b SHR 2)) SHR
On 3/24/19 6:21 PM, Bart wrote:
Extract from fpc.cfg from 3.0.4 (created by offcial installer)
# searchpath for units and other system dependent things
-FuC:\devel\fpc\3.0.4/units/$fpctarget
-FuC:\devel\fpc\3.0.4/units/$fpctarget/*
-FuC:\devel\fpc\3.0.4/units/$fpctarget/rtl
Extract from fpc.cfg
On 3/9/19 1:06 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote:
Whenever the programmer grows annoyed of jumping to the declaration section
and back to code, he knows it is time to cut his spaghetti into more
manageable parts.
BINGO! give this man a cigar!
FWIW: this annoyance at jumping back and forth is also a si
On 2/20/19 12:58 PM, James via fpc-devel wrote:
Someone pointed out that a main goal of Pascal was to keep one from shooting
oneself in the foot. It is this spirit that I think should be extended (if
possible) to adopt at least the memory safe aspect of Rust. There are other
programming constr
On 2/20/19 1:28 PM, Giuliano Colla wrote:
Keeping all declarations separated from code is just good programming
practice. Mixing declaration and code is bad programming practice, IMO, and I
appreciate Pascal for not supporting it.
this falls in the same line as keeping business logic separate f
On 2/20/19 2:08 PM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
20.02.2019 18:24, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via fpc-devel:
[...]
I'd like to see an example how this is less safe.
Well one of the answer in the Cantu blog has this ( which I changed to
lets say a "real world" relative big function ) :
How this exampl
On 1/17/19 1:23 PM, Bart wrote:
It seems this code at one time needed to be compilable with TP.
AFAIK TP however does not support {$IF CONDITION} nor the Declared()
macro(?), so the source should not be compilable anymore with TP?
if we set TP mode, what will happens if $IF is removed/changed?
On 12/16/18 7:01 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Op 2018-12-15 om 22:27 schreef wkitt...@windstream.net:
i'm guessing that VFP is Virtual Floating Point which i would understand as
being emulated kinda like we used to do when a machine didn't have a math
co-processor in it... >>
No, VFP is hard
On 12/15/18 11:57 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
15.12.2018 19:09, wkitt...@windstream.net:
On 12/15/18 10:36 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
So I suppose I should be using CROSSOPT="-CpARMV7A -CfFPV4_S16" ?
is this a typo? should it be -CfVPF4_S16 with F and V swapped?
No. From ppcrossarm.exe -i:
Sup
On 12/15/18 10:36 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
So I suppose I should be using CROSSOPT="-CpARMV7A -CfFPV4_S16" ?
is this a typo? should it be -CfVPF4_S16 with F and V swapped?
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list u
On 12/15/18 9:29 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
I suspect this is an inintended flag set by my arm-linux-as.exe for some
reason... Probably have to get rid of it somehow...
so the real questions are:
1. is this flag being set erroneously?
2. are the .o files being built properly?
3. should ./
On 12/2/18 8:56 AM, Franz Müller wrote:
@Tomas Hajny
Ah - thank you. Very strange. I did not expect and did not notice that when I
click on "reply to list", the reply uses another mail address than the one
the mail was sent to. >
Looks like an error of the thunderbird mailprogramm,
are you us
On 11/4/18 10:31 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
It may really truly be the case that you somehow have a codebase that you're
still in the process of porting,
no one said "still in the process of porting"... porting of those hasn't even
started...
but in all honesty /just /setting {$mode TP} and not
On 11/4/18 10:26 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
I'm not young. You're making all kinds of assumptions here. TP7 /is /generally
speaking, irrelevant in the fast majority of cases nowadays. FPC is 1000x more
advanced in every conceivable way than any version of Turbo Pascal ever was.
There is nothing "in
On 11/3/18 7:09 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
(The same could be said about the various other wildly outdated bits of
information on the overall site and the fact that it gives
now-hugely-irrelevant topics like "porting from TP7" such precedence, but
that's a different issue.)
porting from TP/BP 6/7 i
On 09/17/2018 02:20 AM, Alexander via fpc-devel wrote:
I obtain lazarus_1_8_4 sources and make it.
See about dependent Lazarus: GTK widgets. GTK is C widgets, but not native
Pascal widgets.
AFAIK, the term "native" is about OS widget look... not about language vs
language...
--
NOTE: No o
On 08/31/2018 08:50 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 08/30/2018 03:46 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
Hello,
is there a way not to get a "Variable xyz does not seem to be initialized"
hint/warning for a fixed-size array?
program Project1;
uses
On 08/30/2018 03:46 AM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
Hello,
is there a way not to get a "Variable xyz does not seem to be initialized"
hint/warning for a fixed-size array?
program Project1;
uses Classes;
var
Buffer: array[0..255] of Byte;
what about
Buffer: array[0..255] of Byte = [0];
wo
On 07/31/2018 02:29 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:30 PM, wrote:
i agree completely and asked him about this a week or so ago...
Everything is fine here, can the people reporting an issue describe
their email client and service provider?
that's really weird, then, since none
On 07/31/2018 12:14 PM, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
I've sent a message to my ISP to see if that sheds any light.
once upon a time, vote with your feet was a valued option... you can easily set
up another free email address and use that with a better reader if
needed/desired... you never have ha
On 07/31/2018 06:10 AM, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via fpc-devel wrote:
Hi Gareth,
could you please try again to fix the threading for your messages ?
he'll have to switch readers or somehow cause the one he's using to properly use
and update the References line(s) in the headers... right n
On 07/30/2018 11:35 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, R0b0t1 wrote:
It might be hard to imagine FPC taking that much longer than it does
currently but ~30min for a large program is the standard with other
compilers. I very much enjoy the speed of FPC. >
30 *Minutes*, is this
sorry for this off-topic post but are you aware that your messages are not
threading into the topic under discussion? every one of your posts looks like a
separate thread and there's nothing to link it to the message you are actually
responding to... looking at them, there's no references lin
On 05/18/2018 11:16 AM, Thorsten Engler wrote:
The for-loop variable is undefined after the loop if the loop ran to
completion. It retains its last value if the loop exited in a controlled way
(goto, break, exit, ?) before running to completion.
speaking from the peanut gallery, FWIW, i like th
On 04/28/2018 09:33 AM, Thorsten Engler wrote:
I've attached the source (I'm using Delphi 10.2.3, 64bit to compile it) in
case anyone wants to try it out on different cpus and with different
alignments (change the {$CODEALIGN 1} and add nops to the XXX1 .. XXX8
procedures to finetune alignment).
On 04/28/2018 07:01 AM, Thorsten Engler wrote:
The effects of code alignment beyond a granularity of 16 on such short code is
interesting:
Code address:
Frac1: 00536430 (48)
Frac2: 00536480 (0)
Frac3: 005364D0 (80)
Frac4: 00536520 (32)
Frac5: 00536570 (11
On 11/23/2017 04:19 AM, NetSpirit wrote:
Are you shure? How this is possible? I received email from 'fpc-devel [at]
lists.freepascal.org'
the original post didn't arrive here like that... it arrived here from the list
as from "Gina Hansen "
Question author can send to this list without re
On 04/27/2017 01:26 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
1) Why not call it 3.0.4?
I would also think that we should aim at a quick 3.0.4 then.
+1
Just a linux i386 version (where the problem is acute) or all platforms ?
personally speaking, i would do them all to maintain version consistency
ev
On 10/31/2016 04:01 PM, Gennady Agranov wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue with loading JNI library for Raspberry :(
what does this have to do with the "A generic function for (multicore) cache
flush?" topic you attached it to by replying to that topic? you should use the
[write] or [post] button an
On 10/25/2016 10:09 AM, bla...@blaise.ru wrote:
On 25.10.2016 16:06, Maciej Izak wrote @
http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/2016-October/037375.html :
I'd like to take over work on closures/anonymous methods
In theory, that is fine by me (the author).
However, if I were to formal
On 06/30/2016 06:01 AM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:09:54PM +0100, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
[...]
So the output is correct in trunk, and the bug has been fixed. I expect the
fix to be in 3.0.2.
It doesn't lo
On 06/29/2016 01:51 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 29.06.2016 17:16 schrieb :
> ok, thanks! that's what i've used this time... can i assume that 3.0.0 should
> also be used to build trunk?
That is correct.
thanks!
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please ke
On 06/29/2016 12:09 PM, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56:30AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
FPC 3.0 indeed contains a bug. This has meanwhile been fixed.
If I compile the program with trunk, I get:
home: >fpc tt.pp
home: >./tt
Offset :-120
Local Time :10:53:16
UTC
On 06/29/2016 10:13 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, wkitt...@windstream.net said:
which starting compiler should be used to build fixes_3_0? 2.6.4 or 3.0.0?
A complete install (with all utilities) of the last release, so 3.0.0
ok, thanks! that's what i've used this tim
On 06/20/2016 11:02 AM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
i cannot find binaries of:
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 2.6.4
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 3.0.0
i've looked in
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.4/bootstrap/
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/3.0.0/bootstrap/
help??
which starting compiler should be used to build fixes_3_0? 2.6.4 or 3.0.0?
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
__
On 06/28/2016 03:18 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Russ Davies wrote:
[...]
Comparing dateutil.inc for both versions, in functions UniversalTimeToLocal()
and LocalTimeToUniversal() the signs of the offsets have been changed
Correct. This was in response to some bugreports
On 06/27/2016 11:55 PM, Russ Davies wrote:
Hi,
My local time zone is GMT +2, and have noticed that with V3.0.0, that the
LocalTimeToUniversal() function is adding the offset instead of subtracting it:
i get the same over here...
Comparing dateutil.inc for both versions, in functions Universa
i'm trying to build trunk with my newly minted fpc 3.0.0 but i'm running into
the following...
[ 53%] Compiled package utils-fprcp
Start compiling package utils-h2pas for target x86_64-linux.
Executing command "/home/wkitty42/development/fpc/trunk/bin/plex h2pas/scan.l
h2pas
i cannot find binaries of:
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 2.6.4
x86_64-linux-ppcx64 for fpc 3.0.0
i've looked in
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.6.4/bootstrap/
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/3.0.0/bootstrap/
help??
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior ap
On 05/08/2016 04:34 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
i thought this was a very interesting discussion...
https://gist.github.com/rygorous/e0f055bfb74e3d5f0af20690759de5a7
thanks to john carmack (@ID_AA_Carmack) for retweeting this from Fabian
Giesen (@rygorous)...
The p
i thought this was a very interesting discussion...
https://gist.github.com/rygorous/e0f055bfb74e3d5f0af20690759de5a7
thanks to john carmack (@ID_AA_Carmack) for retweeting this from Fabian Giesen
(@rygorous)...
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Pleas
On 03/02/2016 08:22 AM, Maciej Izak wrote:
we should do the things in proper way. that can't be explained as "by design".
while i do not understand all the deep reasonings and such, i question the "do
things in the proper way" comment... who says that delphi is "doing it in the
proper way"??
On 02/23/2016 10:38 AM, Denis Kozlov wrote:
On 23 February 2016 at 15:24, mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>> wrote:
is there something wrong with what is already available??
Yes, as highlighted in my original post.
ahhh... sorry... i missed all that as it appeared similar to a signature ov
On 02/23/2016 06:25 AM, Denis Kozlov wrote:
Can someone apply the patch for adding %DATETIME%, if there are no objections?
is there something wrong with what is already available??
eg:
procedure TMyApplication.DisplayVersion;
begin
writeln;
writeln(prog_name + {$IFDEF DEBUG} ' DEBUG' + {$
On 01/14/2016 11:22 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 01/13/2016 05:01 PM, Mathias wrote:
I wanted a test following compile 1'000'000x WriteLn.
Procedure too
complex, it requires too many registers Fatal: Compilation aborted Error:
/usr/bin/ppcx64 returned an err
On 01/13/2016 05:01 PM, Mathias wrote:
I wanted a test following compile 1'000'000x WriteLn.
programProject1;
begin
WriteLn(1);
WriteLn(2);
// ...
WriteLn(100);
end.
Then breaks the compiler from the following error.
$ fpc pascaltes
On 10/13/2015 09:40 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
a... my bad... sorry 'bout that... i've been thinking about this, too...
'else' and 'otherwise' mean the same thing... what they seem to be looking for
is 'aswell'...
foo := 0;
while foo < 100 do
begin
in
On 10/13/2015 04:32 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 10/12/2015 03:43 PM, Martin Frb wrote:
Actually the above does not represent what the actual feature request is about
The "else" is to be executed, after the while (even if the while lo
On 10/12/2015 06:15 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:11:18 -0400, Wkitty42 (wkitt...@windstream.net)
wrote about "Re: [fpc-devel] Fwd: While - Otherwise Statement" (in
<561c05d6.4010...@windstream.net>):
On 10/12/2015 02:02 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
The
On 10/12/2015 05:19 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 12.10.2015 22:48 schrieb mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>>:
> anyway, it seems that no matter what the discussion, it won't make it into
the compiler... that according to another post from a compiler dev ;)
I said that I'm not sure.
it wasn't you th
On 10/12/2015 04:10 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:47 PM, mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>> wrote:
by checking the value that caused the break ;) deity knows i've done it many
times before back in the TP/BP 6&7 days... i did it exactly as described,
too... we
On 10/12/2015 03:43 PM, Martin Frb wrote:
Actually the above does not represent what the actual feature request is about
The "else" is to be executed, after the while (even if the while looped ZERO
times).
But it is to be skipped if the while exited via break (and only then).
For that reason "e
On 10/12/2015 03:33 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:11 PM, mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>> wrote:
On 10/12/2015 02:02 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
The next step would probably be controlled "break", where a user would
be able
to specify ho
On 10/12/2015 02:02 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
The next step would probably be controlled "break", where a user would be able
to specify how many nested loops needed to broken from.
ROTFLMAO! if you need or desire something like that then set a breakcounter and
break... in the next outer b
On 10/12/2015 01:47 PM, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Ralf Quint wrote:
Either the while loop is executed or it isn't, depending in the expression.
I don't see an actual use case for any else/otherwise extension to it...
You probably want to reread python w
On 10/10/2015 07:12 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
One thing that bothers me about these approaches is that sooner or later some
awkward cuss (such as myself) will start whining about how much better Pascal
would be if there were a decent macro preprocessor so that CaseOf() could be
specialised int
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:24 PM, Leif Ekblad wrote:
> DOS extenders are even worse candidates for multitasking than DOS. And if
> you aim to use 32-bit anyway, I see no reason to use an DOS extender over a
> real multitasking OS.
does that include old systems like PC-MOS?
ok, maybe
On Monday, September 9, 2013 8:41 AM, Michael Schnell
wrote:
> I feel like throwing up when I am supposed to use the Term ANSIString
> for things potentially being encoded as UTF-8, UTF-16 or such, which
> for me is the contrary of "ANSI".
i agree... ANSIstrings should be ANSI only... UTF8
90 matches
Mail list logo
