In our previous episode, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za said:
Are there replacements for the deprecated CreateShellArgV and FreeShellArgV
functions and procedure that are currently defined in genfuncs.inc?
Not currently. What do you need them for?
___
Hi guys
Tinkering with Findfirst, Findnext functions within Linux, I discovered that
the file attribute pointing to the parent dir and the curent dir (. + ..) are
missing from filutilh.inc - Am I looking in the wrong place?
I found that the following works;
procedure Test();
const
On 10 May 2009, at 11:44, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Tinkering with Findfirst, Findnext functions within Linux, I
discovered that
the file attribute pointing to the parent dir and the curent dir (.
+ ..) are
missing from filutilh.inc - Am I looking in the wrong place?
I found that
On Sun, 10 May 2009, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Hi guys
Tinkering with Findfirst, Findnext functions within Linux, I discovered that
the file attribute pointing to the parent dir and the curent dir (. + ..) are
missing from filutilh.inc - Am I looking in the wrong place?
I never
On Sunday 10 May 2009 11:03:00 Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za said:
Are there replacements for the deprecated CreateShellArgV and
FreeShellArgV functions and procedure that are currently defined in
genfuncs.inc?
Not currently. What do you need
On Sunday 10 May 2009 12:11:55 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Hi guys
Tinkering with Findfirst, Findnext functions within Linux, I discovered
that the file attribute pointing to the parent dir and the curent dir (.
+ ..) are missing from
Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 20:25 schrieb dmitry boyarintsev:
How can I find out if a socket connection in a nonblocking mode is
established?
according to the man page, you're doing correct path:
http://linux.die.net/man/2/connect
i did use non-blocking connection for both Linux and OSX, and
On Sat, 9 May 2009 22:29:51 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
ANY OS must call it (both Linux and OSX), otherwise function variables
are not initialized!
But this is an FPC restriction not an OpenGL one. My own OpenGL headers did not
need this and they worked.
Anyway,
On 06 May 2009, at 20:29, Lourival Mendes wrote:
Dear all, I would like to write a program that must work in MS DOS
with an input from file and output to another file, also I would like
to compile the same program in linux with the same premises (input and
output to files).
There should be
On 05 May 2009, at 06:21, leledumbo wrote:
I'm almost there to have Write(Ln) works for my OS. I've made
SysInitStdIO
call OpenStdIO(Output,fmOutput,StdOutputHandle); and calling
Write(Ln) gives
no error (i.e. IOResult = 0). But where does it actually write to?
If I can
access the
In our previous episode, Lord Satan said:
On Sat, 9 May 2009 22:29:51 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
ANY OS must call it (both Linux and OSX), otherwise function variables
are not initialized!
But this is an FPC restriction not an OpenGL one. My own OpenGL
On Sat, 9 May 2009 22:29:51 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
uses
...gl, glext...
...
if not Load_GL_version_2_0 then begin
writeln('OpenGL 2.0 is not supported');
Halt;
end;
...
This does not work for me. I added it to the Init function of my
On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:54:49 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
hope it helps.
It does, thanks.
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make
sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true?
Nonetheless, I don't
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make
sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true?
Judging from glext, it's true.
You'll also need to initialize any OpenGL extension you might to use.
Nonetheless, I don't understand why the ARB
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make
sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true?
Judging from glext, it's true.
This makes no sense to me.
Lord Satan wrote:
Nonetheless, I don't understand why the ARB version does not work.
AFAIK it has the same entry points as the core functionality and
OpenGL versions are required to support the ARB version of functions
even if the non ARB version is in the core now.
No. OpenGL doesn't
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to
2.0 to make sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are
initialized. Is this true?
Judging from glext, it's true.
This
On Sun, 10 May 2009 22:40:59 +0200
Michalis Kamburelis michalis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean you want to change Load_GL_version_2_0 to also call
Load_GL_version_1_5 under the hood,
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:47:07 +0200
Lord Satan reimg...@web.de wrote:
I uploaded the patch to the bug tracker as issue #0013687
S.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:47:07 +0200
Lord Satan reimg...@web.de wrote:
I uploaded the patch to the bug tracker as issue #0013687
Looking quickly at the patch, it doesn't seem to set Result values
correctly. For example, all Load_GL_version_xxx will always return true,
if
20 matches
Mail list logo
