On 17.07.2015 18:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I'm working in a new lib and I'm having several problems
to keep compatibility betten FPC and Delphi, so I'm using a lot of
IFDEFs,
even using mode delphi.
To improve this situation I advocate NOT yet to spend effort on new
language modes, but fir
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, silvioprog wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
On 2015-07-17 15:08, silvioprog wrote:
Using the generics I could do a generic
DAO that could be used by any class, avoiding TPersonDAO, TProductDAO,
TOtherMyEn
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <
mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, silvioprog wrote:
>
> Hello,
>> I need to call a method dynamically by its name over string and pass some
>> parameters to it. OK, I don't know if it is possibly in the current version
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2015-07-17 15:13, silvioprog wrote:
> > I need to call a method dynamically by its name over string and pass some
> > parameters to it.
>
> You mean like what FPCUnit, DUnit or FPTest unit testing fram
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2015-07-17 15:08, silvioprog wrote:
> > Using the generics I could do a generic
> > DAO that could be used by any class, avoiding TPersonDAO, TProductDAO,
> > TOtherMyEntityDAO and providing a simple a
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, silvioprog wrote:
Hello,
I need to call a method dynamically by its name over string and pass some
parameters to it. OK, I don't know if it is possibly in the current version of
the compiler, but I'm trying to do something
like this:
TMethodInvoker.Invoke(VMyObj, ['Para
On 2015-07-17 15:13, silvioprog wrote:
> I need to call a method dynamically by its name over string and pass some
> parameters to it.
You mean like what FPCUnit, DUnit or FPTest unit testing frameworks do?
If so, just take a look at any of them to see how they call the test
methods.
Regards,
-
On 2015-07-17 15:08, silvioprog wrote:
> Using the generics I could do a generic
> DAO that could be used by any class, avoiding TPersonDAO, TProductDAO,
> TOtherMyEntityDAO and providing a simple and useful CRUD layer: just
I fully appreciate that there could be some uses, but I don't agree it
m
Hello,
I need to call a method dynamically by its name over string and pass some
parameters to it. OK, I don't know if it is possibly in the current version
of the compiler, but I'm trying to do something like this:
TMethodInvoker.Invoke(VMyObj, ['Param 1', 'Param 2', 1, True]);
I already get so
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2015-07-17 03:34, silvioprog wrote:
> > TPersonDao = class(TObject)
> > public
> > procedure Save(APerson: TObject);
> > end;
>
> Simply change that to the following:
>
> TPersonDao = class(TObject)
>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 17.07.2015 08:06 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" <
> mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk>:
> >
> > On 2015-07-17 03:34, silvioprog wrote:
> > > TPersonDao = class(TObject)
> > > public
> > > procedure Save(APerson: TObject);
> > > end;
> >
> > Simpl
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 17.07.2015 11:06 schrieb "Nikolay Nikolov" mailto:nick...@gmail.com>>:
> Btw, just an idea: why not make the generic syntax a {$modeswitch}?
> This way people will be able to switch on the delphi generics syntax in
> objfpc mode.
That's on my ToDo list for quite some time
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I'm not the list admin,
And hence please send such remarks to the list admin, rather than to the
list.
Thank you.
Jonas
One of the fpc mailing list admins (contact address:
fpc-pascal-ow...@lists.freepascal.org)
___
fp
Hi Everybody,
I'm not the list admin, but please be considerate and trim some quotes
before you reply. Most email client support the ability to select a
piece of text, then click the Reply button, instantly trimming your
quotes. Also, just about all email clients support a hierarchy of
conversati
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 17.07.2015 11:06 schrieb "Nikolay Nikolov" :
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/16/2015 11:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16.07.2015 21:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>>
>> sadly - no, only in De
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 17.07.2015 08:12 schrieb "ulrich" :
>
> Dne 15.7.2015 v 10:16 Michael Van Canneyt napsal(a):
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, ulrich wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have this unit, but when I compile it, I get this error:
>>>
>>> Illegal unit name XXX_Pars
Am 17.07.2015 11:06 schrieb "Nikolay Nikolov" :
>
>
>
> On 07/16/2015 11:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> On 16.07.2015 21:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>>
>>> In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>
> sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from
objfpc.
>
Am 17.07.2015 08:12 schrieb "ulrich" :
>
> Dne 15.7.2015 v 10:16 Michael Van Canneyt napsal(a):
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, ulrich wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have this unit, but when I compile it, I get this error:
>>>
>>> Illegal unit name XXX_Parser. The unit is saved under dfm_rrparser.pas.
Am 17.07.2015 08:11 schrieb "Chris Moody" :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently working on an app which needs to be able to read an XML from a
website. Looking at the page at http://wiki.freepascal.org/XML_Tutorial it
appears there is no way to get XML directly from a URL.
>
> Do I need to pull the page down
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 07/16/2015 11:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
On 16.07.2015 21:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from
objfpc.
Then let me tell you that generic m
On 07/16/2015 11:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
On 16.07.2015 21:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
sadly - no, only in Delphi mode. btw. this thing keep me away from
objfpc.
Then let me tell you that generic methods will arrive in mode ObjFPC
(and
thus its
On 2015-07-17 08:24, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> And this is why I firmly believe we need more libraries to actually
> do things, instead of more changes to the language.
Exactly. And why I love the concept of FCL so much. There are tons of
useful stuff in there. I'm not saying all libraries s
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2015-07-17 07:57, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Simple: there is a bigger community, and more ready-to-use code
floating on internet. The language itself has absolutely nothing to
do with it.
+1 Well said.
I know this is a huge generalisation
On 2015-07-17 07:57, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Simple: there is a bigger community, and more ready-to-use code
> floating on internet. The language itself has absolutely nothing to
> do with it.
+1 Well said.
I know this is a huge generalisation (normally not a good thing), but
most web (JS)
24 matches
Mail list logo
