http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/145735
Something sure stinks here...
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-chat-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:48:12 +0200, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please give me a (preferrably widely used) example of
columnizing calls which cross different levels of indentation?
It's not so uncommon as it may initially seem...
I've seen switch() cases in
David Kelly wrote:
On Apr 14, 2009, at 6:24 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:46:26AM +0200, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
Tabs are better, because they allow the programmer to specify the
desired width, and is dynamically changable at any time.
Brett Glass wrote:
Google itself harvests users' personal data
from their Gmail users' e-mail
What? I create a new box and drop an old one several times a day. :D
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
Oliver Fromme wrote:
The symlinks don't hurt Windows-readability at all.
There's nothing that needs to be fixed.
Show me that what sucks is actually my Windows system only instead of
all Windows systems: try opening
7.0-RC2-CD2\packages\any_dir_except_All\any_symlink
on your Windows system
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, Rock Ridge is a nonstandard extension, and I don't see why it is
needed. Also, Windows sees these files as 0 length empties.
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any
My gcc 3.4.6 behaves weirdly when left shifting, and I couldn't find any
info on this.
the program:
#include stdio.h
int main( void ) {
unsigned n;
for( n = 13; n 100; n += 7 ) {
printf( 0x42f1u %u = %u\n, n, 0x42f1u n );
}
return 0;
}
the
int x[N];
Values in x[] are (rand()%10)+268435410, aka 268435410..268435419.
The algorith counts each individual value.
// v1.0 uses if( x[n] == ___ )'s
// v2.0:
int k[268435420] = {0}; // k uses almost 1GB of memory
for (n = 0; n N; n++) {
k[ x[n] ]++;
}
// v2.1:
int k[10] = {0};
What does it take to transition to the international standard for
representing times?
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Sunday 04 November 2007 14:10:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does it take to transition to the international standard for
representing times?
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
alias date to date +%Y-%m-%d I suppose.
In reality how difficult it is for you
Jason C. Wells wrote:
This is just a short little complaint. Could we please make mail
exchange error messages just a little more understandable? For the rare
occurrences where I actually get a legit non-spam induced bounce it
would be nice to be able to quickly discern what happened.
1 -
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's talk about file system timestamps. What kind of timestamps are
there currently, and what are they used for?
This is a late reply, but I haven't seen that question of
yours answered so far, so I try to give it a shot.
First of all, time
Oliver Fromme wrote:
All properties (meta data) of a file are stored in
the inode. That includes owner, permissions, flags,
and all the time stamps, including the birth time.
So if you have multiple
entries (hard links) pointing to the same inode,
they point to the same meta data. In other
I rememeber ~approximately~ something like this:
On Windows, a given setup task will take 3 days to do, if you are lucky, and
requires constant monitoring and user input. On FreeBSD, the task may take up to
3 days, out of which at most 10 minutes of administration time is required.
I don't
Michael Hernandez wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 12:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt, I'm wondering how many people are behind the Mall, what the
order statistics are, and how much the income is. If the Mall is just
a secondary job, and you donate a considerable excess amount, then I
have
Diane Bruce wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:44:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I have multiple subscriptions, one going all the way back to 3.2 and
most since mid-4.x.
Actually shipping is $4.95 on top of the purchase cost, IIRC. But then,
...
penguin
I've just looked at the prices at www.freebsdmall.com, and found that they are
overwhelming. A full FreeBSD release costs like 40$. 40$?! HOLY SHIT! Who would
buy it for that much money when you can download it for free? Now you might
think that giving 40$ is a great way for supporting the
Michael S. Eubanks wrote:
I'm just curious if anyone knows of a place that will accept relatively
extinct hardware and/or good UNIX starter machines? If not, I'll just
wait until I meet someone who wants some stuff for fun or otherwise.
You can sell them on eBay for some fee (if you think
Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards, series
9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have 1 fps)
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any
Oliver Fromme wrote:
The question doesn't make sense. A file that doesn't end
with a newline character is not a legal UNIX text file.
The standard UNIX text editors (ed, vi) don't even let
you create files that don't end with a newline character.
Oh really? Is it just that they do not show
I've set up a poll here for this here:
http://www.misterpoll.com/2553298996.html
Oh and.. Why?
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jzyjack wrote:
i don't know why i keep getting your mail. please stop
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:00 PM
Subject: rm --clear-directory /home/me/another_dir
Is there a way to clear a directory with
Gray, David W wrote:
Is that a 48*6* or a 48*7*??? You MUST HAVE a floating point emulator if
you don't have a '487
(also known as a '486 overdrive), or no boot. I'm at work, so I don't
know if we still ship
the emulator(s), but you need it.
That might be it. How to add FPU emu support to the
This is so goddamn. I've disabled almost everything in the kernel and the 486
still wont boot!
OK, forget about the router, just get FreeBSD running on it! Any suggestions?
ident BAREv6
machine i386
cpu I486_CPU
#cpuI586_CPU
#cpuI686_CPU
# To
spellberg_robert wrote:
ok - first, you have what des said and what i said back.
that covers most of this [ must've crossed in the mail ].
yeah i received his mail later
all i'm doing is removing anything i don't recognize
[ i am a minimalist at heart ],
but my needs aren't necessarily
OK now I've tried everything. Most minimal kernel I could get without
compilation error. No optimizations. And it still reboots the system! Something
more: now I've tried to pull out the floppy cables, and that 4slot-isa expantion
card stuff, played around with all jumpers (IRQ, EPC
Returning topic. Archives are here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2007-January/subject.html
I've just tested dangerously dedicated mode, and it worked!
Next stop: it can't load the kernel (only on the 486).
--- PART OF OUTPUT:
Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just tested dangerously dedicated mode, and it worked!
Next stop: it can't load the kernel (only on the 486).
--- PART OF OUTPUT:
Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
/boot/kernel/kernel text=0x51a2e4
readin failed
Oliver Fromme wrote:
I assume that you don't have enough RAM. If I remember
correctly, your 486 machine only has 8 MB of RAM, which
is not enough to load a GENERIC kernel nowadays. You
will have to compile a smaller kernel by removing all
things that you don't need.
Making progress. With my
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but server-client apps, such as games, where 32bit integer timers
must be restarted every 3 weeks
I don't understand qwhat you're saying there. Why do they
have to be restarted every three weeks? I don't see a
reason for that. If an application
Jan Grant wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-03-25 01:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
FreeBSD's UFS2 already uses 96bit timestamps, where 64 bits are used
for seconds and 32 bits are used for
Oliver Fromme wrote:
What's your problem? In your first mail you seemed to be
complaining that there isn't sufficient range and accuracy
in the time stamps. I explained to you that there is
indeed more accuracy than you thought, and now you complain
that there's too much of it?
I am in not
UNIX Timestamp:
32 bits, starts from year 1970, ticks every second
capable of representing the time from 1970 to 2106
'til then, computers will change
sufficient for file timestamps, comparing file times
Let's see what 64 bits can do!
2^64, that is 18446744073709551616 different values
Matthew McDonald wrote:
Well, because if it involves hacking it's obviously not as legitimate as
anything that a corporation would do. After all, hackers are malicious by
nature.
-Matt McDonald
The idea of hacking may conjure up stylized images of electronic vandalism,
espionage, dyed hair,
PWNT
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Baldwin wrote:
Did you install boot0? (The MBR boot block that will list the partitions?)
If so, you need to use boot0cfg to turn off 'packet' mode to instruct boot0
to not use LBA. I think I mentioned this earlier in the thread. You can do
this by booting the disk up in the newer
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5.1-RELEASE tested, yielded the same result: Missing operating system.
The installation can boot on a new machine, but can not boot on the 486.
Seems like the source of the error is the capabilitiy of the mainboard.
I've given up. FreeBSD will
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8MB RAM
That's likely the issue, although I don't remember if you've mentioned
exactly when it fails. The installer attempts to create a memory disk
that's a good bit larger than 8MB; IIRC, with current FreeBSD versions
you can't even install
David King wrote:
Can you see the hard drive if you boot from a floppy?
Is the hard drive in the boot path in the BIOS? Are you using a 40-pin
cable for an EIDE drive? It sounds like you can't see the drive at all
Can't boot FreeBSD from a floppy. That is, it boots, but gives an error.
Can you install FreeBSD on a 486 machine?
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Capozzoli wrote:
I know this isn't related to FreeBSD at all, but I wanted to see what
other people thought about this. What if google set up a mechanism
where emails are shared between user accounts? Like, suppose this
email is submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED], right, and the gmail mail
42 matches
Mail list logo
