Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:11:10 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 20:51:40 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > Please back it out or do it properly! > > > > this IS the backout.. it's now how it was before, including in 4.x > > I mean - back out this backout - it

Re: kernel boot messages absent

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:55:17AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > Also sprach Bernd Walter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > You can verify with conscontrol. > > It should list consolectl for vga console and Muting off. > > from dmesg: > sc0: on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> Now

Re: NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robe rt Watson writes: >> > It looks like the client is basically hung waiting for an RPC response. >> > I'd be glad to provide more debugging information if someone can point me >> > in the right direction. >> >> I haven't seen this seen this problem with a 5.0-CU

Re: NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

I have seen something strange behavior related to NFS version 2. NFS server is Solaris 2.6. NFS client is 5-CURRENT, cvsuped today. Using NFS version 2, I can create file but cannot append(?) to file. [version2] # mount_nfs -2 SERVER:/export/home/SOMEWHERE /mnt ... $ echo > /mnt/aho $ ls -l /

Recent lock order reversal:

With a kernel from late 2 Oct 2002: lock order reversal 1st 0xc048db40 spechash (spechash) @ ../../../kern/vfs_subr.c:2743 2nd 0xc1efede0 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ ../../../kern/vfs_subr.c:2746 - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > > cause bug: > > ... > > revision 1.539 > > ... > > Please back it out or do it properly! > > this IS the backout.. it's now how

Re: PCI brokenness

> ># I could be wrong, please correct me :) > >I think that Libretto 110CT doesn't have PCI-ISA bridge , so no isab, > >no isa, no isahint (requires isa) w/ acpi enabled. > > Hmmm, \_SB.PCI0.EIO has no _ADR, _HID instead. > But I think ISA or LPC controller exists in this system. Adding some dev

alpha tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: kernel boot messages absent

Also sprach Bernd Walter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > from dmesg: > > sc0: on isa0 > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> > Now that you wrote it isolated - the flags are missing: > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > Seems like your hints are ignored.

Re: kernel boot messages absent

erm, no. acpi.disable="0" _doesn't_ disable acpi for me. Seems like you are right and the hints are ignored. I'll try to find out why, thanks :) Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: kernel boot messages absent

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:20:02PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > erm, no. acpi.disable="0" _doesn't_ disable acpi for me. > Seems like you are right and the hints are ignored. acpi.disabled="1" -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: kernel boot messages absent

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:55:17AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > > Also sprach Bernd Walter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > You can verify with conscontrol. > > > It should list consolectl for vga console and Muting off. > > > > from dmesg: > > sc0: on

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 14:40, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:17:53PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > This is just to note that I have updated the JKH page with a lot of new > > stuff, so if your coding-pencil itches: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/TODO/ > > |M

Re: expat2 in the base system?

In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". I have no opinion >on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down >functionality, but I thin

Re: NFS hang on rmdir(2) with 5.0-current client, server

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robe > rt Watson writes: > >> > It looks like the client is basically hung waiting for an RPC response. > >> > I'd be glad to provide more debugging information if someone can point me > >> > in the right direction. > >> > >

Re: expat2 in the base system?

> In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: > > >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have > >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". I have no opinion > >on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down > >functionality,

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > In message , Garance A Drosihn > writes: > > > > Any famous last words before the fat lady sings ? > > My biggest concern is the minority of users installing expat2 from > ports/packages and then not being able

Re: expat2 in the base system?

> > Any famous last words before the fat lady sings ? I think we should go for it. :) > Well, playing the devil's advocate -- isn't this the type of discussion the > preceeded the introduction of Perl into the base system, the introduction of > which created such a mess that we finally took Perl

Re: expat2 in the base system?

In message <007f01c26ae2$09b11ab0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matthew Emmerton" w rites: >> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have >> >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". I have no opinion >> >on whether that should be the full expat2 or a stripped down >> >functiona

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

Hi Stefan, I tried this patch and it paniced my (almost-) current machine with a pagefault in the kqueue code: Bravo! I can see that there is some amount of #ifdef stuff in your patch, in light of that, would it be possible to make an #ifdef'ed version of your patch which we could commit ? Th

Re: kernel boot messages absent

My sc0 device was "at" flags until I changed the hints line to: hint.sc.0.at="acpi" A few days ago... On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:55:17AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > > > Also sprach Bernd Walter ([EMAIL

panic trying to chroot(2) on a script(?)

Hello. Last night I was trying to start an anonymous ftp server on my -current box for my local network. I made a mistake in vipw: ftp:*:4:4:Unprivileged user:/sbin/nologin:/home/mp3 i.e., wrote a path to a script where directory is needed, and directory where path to shell is needed. Wi

Re: panic (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode) today

>Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:16:03 -0700 (PDT) >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Saw Alfred's commit to un-break -CURRENT, did likewise locally, >built today's -CURRENT, and an attempted multi-user boot panics: > Today's -CURRENT did not panic, so I'm hoping it's fixed. :-) freebea

Re: kernel boot messages absent

On 03-Oct-2002 Alexander Langer wrote: > erm, no. acpi.disable="0" _doesn't_ disable acpi for me. > Seems like you are right and the hints are ignored. > > I'll try to find out why, thanks :) For acpi it's 'disabled' for some reason, which is rather non-intuitive. > Alex -- John Baldwin <[

Re: PCI brokenness

On 03-Oct-2002 Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: >> ># I could be wrong, please correct me :) >> >I think that Libretto 110CT doesn't have PCI-ISA bridge , so no isab, >> >no isa, no isahint (requires isa) w/ acpi enabled. >> >> Hmmm, \_SB.PCI0.EIO has no _ADR, _HID instead. >> But I think ISA or LPC contr

Re: panic (Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode) today

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT) David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today's -CURRENT did not panic, so I'm hoping it's fixed. :-) > > freebeast(5.0-C)[2] uname -a > FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #11: > Thu Oct 3 07:28:05 PDT 2002 But it kill

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:58AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > cause bug: > > > revision 1.539 > date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state:

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 07:20:38AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Hodel writes: > > >the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the > >CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom. > > Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD

GEOM

Seems to work fine on this machine (dmesg attached) apart from an apparently spurious kerneldump and a couple of odd lines in the dmesg. -- Michael McGoldrick: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 19

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > cause bug: > > > revision 1.539 > date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrie

Re: expat2 in the base system?

At 9:37 AM -0400 10/3/02, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > Garance A Drosihnwrites: >> >> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have > > >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". > > >> It sounds to me like this sums it up nicely. The thing about it >> I like is that i

Re: [Call for testers] acpica-unix-20020918

> [forgot to announce] > Please try the latest version acpica-unix-20020829, patches for > FreeBSD at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20020815-20020918-test20020920.diff > > CHANGES.txt can be fould as always at: > http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGE

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > > cause bug: > > > > > > revision 1.539 > > date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22

usermount with devfs

Hi, I'm trying to get all users in wheel to be able to mount floppied and CD-ROMs. I've set vfs.usermount=1, and found the devfs man page to add a rule (devfs rule add path acd0\* mode 664 group wheel). Now, the device entries look like: [root@nik: /etc] ll /dev/acd0* crw-rw-r-- 1 root whee

Re: usermount with devfs

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: >[root@nik: /etc] rm /dev/acd0c >[root@nik: /etc] umask 0007 && ln -s /dev/acd0c /dev/acd0 >ln: /dev/acd0: File exists > >Which is really a strange error, since /dev/acd0c is gone: Nothing which the kernel has created in /dev/ is really gone wh

Re: usermount with devfs

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: > > >>[root@nik: /etc] rm /dev/acd0c >>[root@nik: /etc] umask 0007 && ln -s /dev/acd0c /dev/acd0 >>ln: /dev/acd0: File exists >> >>Which is really a strange error, since /dev/acd0c is gone: > > > Nothing which the k

Re: usermount with devfs

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: >So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there >another way to have the symlinks be created with the different >permissions (since devfs rules don't seem to apply to them)? Symlinks permissions are not used in FreeBSD,

Re: usermount with devfs

On 21:08+0400, Oct 3, 2002, Lars Eggert wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: > > > > > >>[root@nik: /etc] rm /dev/acd0c > >>[root@nik: /etc] umask 0007 && ln -s /dev/acd0c /dev/acd0 > >>ln: /dev/acd0: File exists > >> > >>Which is really a stra

Re: usermount with devfs

Maxim Konovalov wrote: > [maxim@miss maxim]$ ls -ld /cdrom > drwxr-xr-x 2 maxim wheel 512 13 ÓÅÎ 2001 /cdrom [larse@nik: ~] ls -ld /cdrom drwxrwxr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 27 03:26 /cdrom Ah, that's the difference. My mountpoint is owned by root. It works if I create one owned by larse and

Re: expat2 in the base system?

> At 9:37 AM -0400 10/3/02, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > > Garance A Drosihnwrites: > >> > >> >I think it would be very prudent that any base-system expat have > > > >it's own name, even if it's just "expat2fb". > > > > >> It sounds to me like this sums it up nicely. The thing about it > >>

Re: usermount with devfs

Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: > > >So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there > >another way to have the symlinks be created with the different > >permissions (since devfs rules don't seem to apply to

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:49:10 -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > Good sleuthing! Just divide desert by a half to catch a lion. I mean backward/forward date-based cvsup rollback narrowed to one commit in question. > > ***Value out of range > > ***file > > "/tmp/a/ports/lang/ezm3/work/ezm

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:34:09 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > I haven't seen any problems with cvsup since the return to the older way > of doing this. What do you mean by 'older way'? With or without this commit? See Bruce's note in this thread explaining copying over ucontext, it seems he

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:00:53 +0400 "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I test it with exact the same cvsupd data set and system files, but > with different kernels. Kernel without the commit in question not > show any signs of signal 6 in 12 hours. Kernel with this commit show > sign

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:37:36AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > Well, playing the devil's advocate -- isn't this the type of discussion the > preceeded the introduction of Perl into the base system, the introduction of > which created such a mess that we finally took Perl out of the base syste

Re: PCI brokenness

÷ Wed, 02.10.2002, × 11:31, Mark Murray ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: > > I noticed both of yours and the other "me too" reply indicated ACPI was in > > use. Is the behavior different when acpi is disabled? > > Yeah. Booting fails completely. Hard hang after probing the parallel port. Just notice same problem on 4

Re: expat2 in the base system?

[ excessive cc: list attacked with a machete ] > > Well, playing the devil's advocate -- isn't this the type of discussion the > > preceeded the introduction of Perl into the base system, the introduction of > > which created such a mess that we finally took Perl out of the base system > > in -CU

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:58AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > cause bug: > > > revision 1.539 > date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state:

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:58AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit > > cause bug: > > > > > > revision 1.539

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Can you try the patch at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > I'll try it a bit later, but now have a question about it: why you redefine _MC_FP* constants? They are for different fields in anycase. -- Andrey A

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Can you try the patch at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > > > I'll try it a bit later, but now have a question about it: why you > redefine _MC_FP* cons

Re: expat2 in the base system?

David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:37:36AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > Well, playing the devil's advocate -- isn't this the type of discussion the > > preceeded the introduction of Perl into the base system, the introduction of > > which created such a mess that we finally to

Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

Are there any users who use the matcd(4), mcd(4) or scd(4) drivers? These drivers are for rather old non-standard CD-ROM controllers most of which only support 1x speeds. :) There are several changes being made to the kernel API's used by device drivers in -current. Unless we can find some people

Re: Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

On 03.10-17:01, John Baldwin wrote: [...] >So, is anyone out there still using this old hardware? [...] i still have an old creative 1x drive in a 486 i use (i think they are matsumi ???) -- anyway i haven't even compiled support so i'm not going to cry abo

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Wednesday 02 October 2002 22:05, Juli Mallett wrote: [...] > I seem to remember a discussion with Robert Watson and myself about a year > ago where we discussed some sort of classy parser in libc for the MAC > config files, etc., and we discussed XML at some point... Having libexpat > around m

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:00:06AM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > On Wednesday 02 October 2002 22:05, Juli Mallett wrote: > [...] > > I seem to remember a discussion with Robert Watson and myself about a year > > ago where we discussed some sort of classy parser in libc for the MAC > > config files

GEOM && -CURRENT on sparc64

Works just fine. dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Sat Aug 17 16:48:56 EDT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Are there any users who use the matcd(4), mcd(4) or scd(4) drivers? > These drivers are for rather old non-standard CD-ROM controllers > most of which only support 1x speeds. :) There are several changes > being made to the kernel API's used by device dri

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Friday 04 October 2002 00:20, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: [snip] > > I believe the decision to put expat -in a wise manner- in the base system > > will show that FreeBSD is keeping up with major movements and that it > > will make FreeBSD more attractive to potential users. > >

RE: aic7890/91 controller

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, attila! wrote: > Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:20:08 +0200 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] > + Sent: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:53:27 -0700 by Scott Long > + * On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, attila! wrote: > + * > Adaptec's > + * > documentation expliciely states that the bus speed is the > + * > rat

alpha tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: kernel boot messages absent

Also sprach Bernd Walter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > erm, no. acpi.disable="0" _doesn't_ disable acpi for me. > > Seems like you are right and the hints are ignored. > acpi.disabled="1" Well, that's actually what I tried. Only disabling acpi from the loader ("unset acpi_load") worked. Anyways, I

PCI problems with today's current

I have a Supermicro P3TDE6 motherboard (Serverworks HE-SL chipset) that won't boot with today's -current. -current from August 23rd sources boots fine. It looks like the PCI bus probe is failing somehow. I've seen other folks complaining about PCI problems, and I suppose this is related, but I

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:49:05AM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > I interpreted the same as you. But the fact that the base of a UNIX system > uses XML makes that UNIX system more attractive than other unices, IMO. You would absolutely *love* Apple's MacOS-X then. It uses XML for many low lever

Re: expat2 in the base system?

David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:57:59PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > David O'Brien wrote: > > > The created mess that caused us to take Perl out of the base system is > > > that it cannot be cross built. This library is C/C++ code; so we can > > > easily cross compile it. > >

Re: Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

I tried using the matcd(4) driver nearly a year ago and was having problems with it. I tried contacting the author to remove some of the unreasonable licensing restrictions he'd put on the driver and see if he could help me, but I never got a response. I think that it should be orphaned in 4.

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:57:59PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > The created mess that caused us to take Perl out of the base system is > > that it cannot be cross built. This library is C/C++ code; so we can > > easily cross compile it. > > I thought cross-building was

Re: usermount with devfs

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Lars Eggert wrote: > So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there > another way to have the symlinks be created with the different > permissions (since devfs rules don't seem to apply to them)? We used usermounts with devfs in our last TrustedBSD dem

Re: usermount with devfs

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert writes: > > > > >So there is no more usermount under -current with devfs? Or is there > > >another way to have the symlinks be created with the different > >

Re: Any users of matcd(4), mcd(4), or scd(4)?

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Are there any users who use the matcd(4), mcd(4) or scd(4) drivers? > These drivers are for rather old non-standard CD-ROM controllers > most of which only support 1x speeds. :) There are several changes > being made to the kernel API's used by device dri

Re: expat2 in the base system?

Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If most file formats would be XML-based (yes I know XML should not replace all > file formats, but it comes a great way) then these formats would be leveraged > by the fact that there are a lot of XML tools available, like XML editors and > XML transfo

sys/event.h EV_SET macro suggestion

I'd suggest this: #define EV_SET(kevpin, a, b, c, d, e, f) do { \ struct kevent *kevp = kevpin; \ (kevp)->ident = (a);\ (kevp)->filter = (b); \ (kevp)->flags = (c);\ (kevp)->fflags = (d)

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:22:11PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If most file formats would be XML-based (yes I know XML should not replace all > > file formats, but it comes a great way) then these formats would be leveraged > > by the fact that ther

Re: GEOM && -CURRENT on sparc64

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:41:41PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote: > FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Sat Aug 17 16:48:56 EDT 2002 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/sparc64/compile/OBERON As some of you might have been able to tell, this is an old kernel. For whatever reason, the kernel wasn't getting buil

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Can you try the patch at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > It works! Already 5 hours without a single signal 6. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death (signal 6))

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:52:50 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > Can you try the patch at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > > > It works! Already 5 hours without a single signal 6. Details: I _h

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you try the patch at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > I haven't had a chance to compile or test it, but it should > be easy enough to fix if it doesn't (compile). > > I'm still not exactly s

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 16:37:21 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > Can you try the patch at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > > > It works! Already 5 hours without a single signal 6. Thanks! Let me test it myself a

Re: Reason: releng4 comp. hack, machdep.c 1.539 (was: cvsupd death(signal 6))

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you try the patch at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/sys.diffs > > > > I haven't had a chance to compile or test it, but it should > > be easy enough t

Re: expat2 in the base system?

On Friday 04 October 2002 04:22, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If most file formats would be XML-based (yes I know XML should not > > replace all file formats, but it comes a great way) then these formats > > would be leveraged by the fact that there are a lo

Re: PCI brokenness

This works, thanks! :-) :-) Domo Arrigato! M > I'm not sure, but my thought was something like following patches. > > Thanks > > Index: dev/acpica/acpi.c > === > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c,v > retrieving revis