Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
Hello,
Here the messages that appears in console: The panic appears randomly
after the boot , it can be an hour as can be 3 or more hours .
Could you please try to upgrade to -CURRENT?
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy
On Monday 10 March 2003 17:28, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jun Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To help myself more easily check the kernel dump, I added two new
command. One is ps, the other is kldstat. I know we can print the kernel
data manually to get the same information. I still think this
Hi,
I have a 2U Rackmount system that I have inherited. This box has a
standard Intel RC440BX Desktop Motherboard in it. The actual chassis
covers the whole board so that none off the expansion slots or on board
connectors are visible. There is a network connector on the back off the
chassis that
Is there any example code available that just tests (a proof of
concept-like) the KSE system on FreeBSD 5-current?
--
Ashes to ashes, DOS to DOS
ivoras @ fer.hr
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk
write cache and ata tags.
My question is:
It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache
(without
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many programs (from ports too) defines _ISOC99_SOURCE to get C99
functions, but we don't sense this define currently. Here is the fix for
review:
Cool. I didn't realize there was an existing precedence, or I would
have used it.
--- cdefs.h.bak
Nuno Teixeira wrote:
sendmail_enable=NONE doesn't appear in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Can
anyone update this file to include NONE option?
Do you mean you want it to default to NONE, or do you mean
that you want the option documented in this file? If the former,
then it's not going to happen; by
Hello,
Is there a way to configure sendmail on my 4.7 system to keep a backup
of all mail going out?
Thanks,
Chris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Garrett Wollman wrote:
`#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to read
and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' and
`#endif' can be recognized).
I thought that the other discussion had concluded that:
#if 0
...
#else
Or:
cfowler Is there a way to configure sendmail on my 4.7 system to keep a backup
cfowler of all mail going out?
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section4.html#4.20
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On 09-Mar-2003 Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'n not shure if this is still the place to drop these???
I haven't seen may off these lately on the list...
Found in my dmesg of yesterday, system is now 5 days up:
/usr/src5/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:243: could sleep with buf queue lock locked from
On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar
before. addr2line(1) reports the faulting address to be
../../../kern/kern_fork.c:395
which is in the inner loop of
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:01:55 -0800
Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cfowler Is there a way to configure sendmail on my 4.7 system to keep a backup
cfowler of all mail going out?
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section4.html#4.20
What about
Thus spake Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any example code available that just tests (a proof of
concept-like) the KSE system on FreeBSD 5-current?
See src/tools/KSE/ksetest.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any example code available that just tests (a proof of
concept-like) the KSE system on FreeBSD 5-current?
See src/tools/KSE/ksetest.
also the library is mostly working
so:
cd
unsubscribe freebsd-current-digest
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:00:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar
before. addr2line(1) reports the faulting address to be
I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
diff (cat file1) (cat file2)
errors out with:
diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
diff: /dev/fd/62: No such file or directory
Apparently, the nodes for the named pipes are
Hi,
Write cacheing is automatically enabled if tagged queueing is enabled
and supported by the disk, so I doubt you're seeing any improvement at
all.
I must admit: My statements are based on experience with SCSI Tagged Queuing
and SCSI Write Cache. I hope I'm correct if I assume that the
Jun Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To help myself more easily check the kernel dump, I added two new command. One
is ps, the other is kldstat. I know we can print the kernel data manually to
get the same information. I still think this is useful. This can help the
newbies to get the
Matthias Schuendehuette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled
and working.
(The performace gain of WriteCache and TaggedQueuing is more or less the
same, the combination of both adds less than 10% of performance and you
shouldn't
On 10-Mar-2003 Tim Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:00:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen similar
before.
On Tue, 2003/03/11 at 08:43:46 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:00:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Mar-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:46:34AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Just got this crash on -current, and I belive I have seen
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Conrad Sabatier writes:
I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
diff (cat file1) (cat file2)
errors out with:
diff: /dev/fd/63: No such file or directory
diff: /dev/fd/62: No such file or
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:38:08 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Has anybody found out what the standards conformant thing is for /dev/fd ?
There is no standard, other than Tenth Edition and Plan 9. Most
programs which use it expect it to behave like one or the other.
-GAWollman
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:47:15 -0500 (EST), Alien Space Bats attacked
and caused me to utter:
There is no standard, other than Tenth Edition and Plan 9. Most
programs which use it expect it to behave like one or the other.
s/one or the other/that/
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Sizi anadolunun 7 harikas seimine katlmaya aryoruz.
7 harika seiminde halen aday belirleme srecindeyiz.
Seime katlmasn istediiniz adaylarnz
http://www.7woa.com adresinden bizlere iletebilirsiniz.
Sayglarmzla
www.7woa.com
Not : Bu mail size tek bir defalk 7 wonders of Anatolia
Hello list.
Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here. I've
noticed an interesting problem: I am using FreeBSD 5.0-p4 and GCC 3.2.1
and if I use CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird and CFLAGS= -O2 -mmmx -m3dnow
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe, ezm3 refuses to compile AT ALL and even
though
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:53:40AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
cd /usr/lib/libpthreads
make
make install
This installs a libkse which, when we are happy with it will become
libpthreads, but until then it has this special name..
get some test threads programs and link with -lkse
remember
On 11 Mar 2003 03:52:18 +0200
Dan Naumov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list.
Since my issues are related to 5.0, I though I'd rather ask here. I've
noticed an interesting problem: I am using FreeBSD 5.0-p4 and GCC 3.2.1
and if I use CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird and CFLAGS= -O2 -mmmx -m3dnow
Hello,
Starting pppd(8) on yesterday -current produces a panic:
miss# gdb kernel.84 -k vmcore.84
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Simon 'portlint
' Schubert writes:
These files, conventionally called /dev/fd/0, /dev/fd/1, /dev/fd/2,
and so on, refer to files accessible through file descriptors. If file
descriptor n is open, these two system calls have the same effect:
fd =
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 00:38:08 +0100 Poul-Henning Kamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Conrad Sabatier
writes:
I've noticed that bash's process substitution fails under -CURRENT.
For (an admittedly stupid, trivial) example:
diff (cat file1) (cat file2)
errors
Lately Larry Rosenman told:
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 00:38:08 +0100 Poul-Henning Kamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Conrad Sabatier
writes:
Apparently, the nodes for the named pipes are not being created as they
should.
Is this a bash problem, or
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
In sys/syslimits.h, I see:
#if __GNUC__
#warning No user-serviceable parts inside.
#endif
Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
#if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files?
Yes. It is a preprocessor directive specific the GCC preprocessor.
This was discussed
Hello.
For a long time with FreeBSD 4.X we ran and still run a bunch of
diskless stations, X11 Terminals, some special workstations and
now a growing system with several nodes for usage as PVM.
Now I want to switch to FreeBSD 5.0 and run into massive problems.
I searched for similar problems in
37 matches
Mail list logo
