On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Rene de Vries wrote:
> I know that ipsec has some handles to be able to filter on address,
> protocol and/or port. But for more complex situations this is not
> enough. In these situations it would be nice to be able to use
> ip-filter (& co) on traffic from the tunnel (and a
¸ÞÀÏ ³»¿ëÀÌ º¸ÀÌÁö¾ÊÀ¸¼¼¿ä?
¿©±â¸¦ Ŭ¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä...
[redirected to -chat from -hackers.]
Munish Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> > Now that's tempting
> Heh. And 386's seem ancient to me. I really *was* born 10 years too
> late.
Look at it the other way around, and consider the 10 years worth of
hardware you're liable to see that those of
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > Compile up the real sar. SCO released the sources a year
> > > or two back, now.
> >
> > If that's the case, then where are they? The only publicly available SCO
> > sources I've been able to find are those for csope (which is hosted at
> >
In a message written on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:33:49AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I'm guessing that, even though you are not saying it, that the DTR
> drop occurs *immediately* after the probe and attach, and not some
> short time after the init scripts have fully rung, and the getty's
> are s
Skye Poier wrote:
> It seems that it is possible to call untimeout and then have your timer
> called immediately thereafter. However, we haven't actually seen this in
> practice, this is a theoretical bug. If this is indeed the case, it will
> break lots of our code (misunderstood semantics..)
Ye
Hello,
By experimenting with ipsec and looking at the source of "ip_input.c" a
co-worker and I found the following out.
When a ipsec tunnel packet is received this (protocol 50/51) packet is
passed through ip-filter (& co). After filtering and when it has been
determent that the current host
On 11-Jan-02 Skye Poier wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> While doing an audit of the timer code in FreeBSD's kernel one of our
> developers came across a theoretical bug and I thought I'd run it by the
> gurus on this list before we hack around it.
>
> It seems that it is possible to call untimeout
Hello Hackers,
While doing an audit of the timer code in FreeBSD's kernel one of our
developers came across a theoretical bug and I thought I'd run it by the
gurus on this list before we hack around it.
It seems that it is possible to call untimeout and then have your timer
called immediately th
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > Start with:
> >
> > "A Quick Guide to Configuring IPsec on OpenBSD v2.9"
> > Robert Sigillito, Carol Thompson
> > http://www.daemonnews.org/200111/ipsec.html
> >
> > Once you have the OpenBSD side configured, the FreeBSD
> > should be fgairly straight forwa
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:37:04AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Robert Thoelen III wrote:
> >
> > I am looking to set up a secure tunnel between a
> > machine running FreeBSD 4.4 and OpenBSD 3.0. Does
> > anyone have scripts for both platforms that would set
> > up a simple ESP tunnel between t
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > Compile up the real sar. SCO released the sources a year
> > or two back, now.
>
> If that's the case, then where are they? The only publicly available SCO
> sources I've been able to find are those for csope (which is hosted at
> SourceForge.)
I downloaded them. I
Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Compile up the real sar. SCO released the sources a year or two
> > back, now.
>
> Well, they published a press release saying they would, but the web
> page referenced in the announcement never had any download links, and
> is now 404.
Most intersting SCO web pages have 4
Robert Thoelen III wrote:
>
> I am looking to set up a secure tunnel between a
> machine running FreeBSD 4.4 and OpenBSD 3.0. Does
> anyone have scripts for both platforms that would set
> up a simple ESP tunnel between the two?
>
> The reason I ask is because the commands look
> different and
Leo Bicknell wrote:
> The software is clearly lowering DTR on the console briefly between
> the kernel probes and init running. That is the issue here. Yes,
> it can be hacked around, breaking other things in the process.
> I'd like to zero in on why the software is doing this and fix it
> thoug
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On 11 Jan 2002 13:58:30 GMT, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > I'm not an OpenSSL wizard, but this sounds like either a self-signed
> > certificate, or a root CA which isn't in Outlook's trusted list of
> > root CA's.
>
> In Outlook's case (although the problem exists with some N
> Dustin Puryear wrote:
> >
> > After a month of futile searching I am unable to find a sar-like tool
> > available for FreeBSD. I was alerted to the SNMP capabilities of
FreeBSD.
> > However, it would still be nice to have a system-level tool available
that
> > doesn't require SNMP. Does anyone k
In the last episode (Jan 11), Terry Lambert said:
> Dustin Puryear wrote:
> > After a month of futile searching I am unable to find a sar-like
> > tool available for FreeBSD. I was alerted to the SNMP capabilities
> > of FreeBSD. However, it would still be nice to have a system-level
> > tool avai
Dustin Puryear wrote:
>
> After a month of futile searching I am unable to find a sar-like tool
> available for FreeBSD. I was alerted to the SNMP capabilities of FreeBSD.
> However, it would still be nice to have a system-level tool available that
> doesn't require SNMP. Does anyone know of anyt
I am looking to set up a secure tunnel between a
machine running FreeBSD 4.4 and OpenBSD 3.0. Does
anyone have scripts for both platforms that would set
up a simple ESP tunnel between the two?
The reason I ask is because the commands look
different and I haven't used ipsec much before.
Thanks,
At 10:48 AM 1/11/2002 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
>In the last episode (Jan 11), Wilko Bulte said:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:03:36PM -0600, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> > > tool available that doesn't require SNMP. Does anyone know of
> > > anything for FreeBSD that is sar-like? If a sar-like tool is
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In a message written on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:48:10AM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Okay, on the terminal server side wire DSR, DTR, and CD together. This
> should let you open the port at any time ragardless of the state of
> the remote sio port.
But this will break the 'type exit and the c
At 05:16 PM 1/11/2002 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:03:36PM -0600, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> > However, it would still be nice to have a system-level tool available that
> > doesn't require SNMP. Does anyone know of anything for FreeBSD that is
> > sar-like? If a sar-like too
In the last episode (Jan 11), Wilko Bulte said:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:03:36PM -0600, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> > After a month of futile searching I am unable to find a sar-like
> > tool available for FreeBSD. I was alerted to the SNMP capabilities
> > of FreeBSD. However, it would still be
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:03:36PM -0600, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> After a month of futile searching I am unable to find a sar-like tool
> available for FreeBSD. I was alerted to the SNMP capabilities of FreeBSD.
> However, it would still be nice to have a system-level tool available that
> does
After a month of futile searching I am unable to find a sar-like tool
available for FreeBSD. I was alerted to the SNMP capabilities of FreeBSD.
However, it would still be nice to have a system-level tool available that
doesn't require SNMP. Does anyone know of anything for FreeBSD that is
sar-
hi,
> Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is ridiculous. Why the hell you felt compelled
> to fill my mailbox with *nine* copies of this
> message is beyond me, and spamming
> in the name of project evangelism is hardly getting
> things off on the
> right foot!
i had no inten
On 11 Jan 2002 13:58:30 GMT, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> I'm not an OpenSSL wizard, but this sounds like either a self-signed
> certificate, or a root CA which isn't in Outlook's trusted list of
> root CA's.
In Outlook's case (although the problem exists with some Netscape
messaging client and a
[ This message does not pertain exclusively to FreeBSD and was sent ]
[ to this mailing list more for the clue resident here. ]
Hi folks,
Several people on the exim-users mailing list have reported problems
with various Wintendo e-mail clients using SMTP TLS against Exim.
A good ex
Title: Investors
Emerging Growth Stock Alert Wasatch Pharmaceuticals: A Company on the Rise Key Points about WSCH: The products and medical therapies developed by WSCH represent possibly the most important breakthrough in the field of Dermatology in the last fifty years. WSCH anticipates F
Hi,
I have freebsd 4.2. I configured prefixes as follows.
prefix rl0 3ffe:501::100::
andprefix rl0 3ffe:501::100::
prefixlen 32
I got some error messages. But when i checked ndp and
ifconfig rl0 two
prefixes and two addresses were there.
Now when i delete them
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Randell Jesup wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Randell Jesup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Back to the original question: do people care about floppies and
> bad-sector recovery anymore? Aren't floppies on the very verge of
33 matches
Mail list logo
