Andrew wrote this message on Thu, May 04, 2006 at 19:57 -0500:
I'm reading through /usr/src/sys/dd/dd.h, and I noticed the following
lines:
39 u_char *db;/* buffer address */
40u_char *dbp; /* current buffer I/O address */
Why was u_char
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:03 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Andrew wrote this message on Thu, May 04, 2006 at 19:57 -0500:
I'm reading through /usr/src/sys/dd/dd.h, and I noticed the following
lines:
39 u_char *db;/* buffer address */
40 u_char *dbp;
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 06:11:24PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
hi,
sched_newthread(struct thread *td)
{
struct td_sched *ke;
ke = (struct td_sched *) (td + 1);
bzero(ke, sizeof(*ke));
td-td_sched = ke;
ke-ke_thread = td;
ke-ke_state=
Is there anyone who can explain me, why when i say 'kill -HUP
id', and its failed to restart, kill say nothing?
It is such an easy to implement...
Your application could be choosing to ignore SIGHUP
(restarting on SIGHUP is a convention, not a OS defined
requirement)?
--
FreeBSD Volunteer,
roma.a.g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone who can explain me, why when i say 'kill -HUP id',
and its failed to restart, kill say nothing?
Because the kill command has no way to know about it.
The kill command only instructs the kernel to deliver
a signal to a process (or to a process
Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
roma.a.g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone who can explain me, why when i say 'kill -HUP id',
and its failed to restart, kill say nothing?
Because the kill command has no way to know about it.
The kill command only instructs the
Roman Gorohov. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply. My question was about standard bsd daemons, not
about some apps with unpredictable behaviour.
But the kill command doesn't know what kind of daemon it
is sending a signal to. It just sends a signal to a PID.
That PID could belong
In the last episode (Dec 16), Roman Gorohov. said:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
roma.a.g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone who can explain me, why when i say 'kill -HUP id',
and its failed to restart, kill say nothing?
There is no way for the kill command to know what
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:52:25AM +0300, roma.a.g wrote:
Is there anyone who can explain me, why when i say 'kill -HUP id', and its
failed to restart, kill say nothing?
That's because all kill is responsible for is sending the signal;
see kill(2).
As to whether or not the process in question
On Thursday 29 September 2005 03:36 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:14 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
Actually, you would think that it could be initialized
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:55:38PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
Hi,
dev_lock() looks this way:
void
dev_lock(void)
{
if (!mtx_initialized(devmtx))
mtx_init(devmtx, cdev, NULL, MTX_DEF);
mtx_lock(devmtx);
}
I wonder why is the mtx_initialized checking
On Thursday 29 September 2005 01:04 pm, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:55:38PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
Hi,
dev_lock() looks this way:
void
dev_lock(void)
{
if (!mtx_initialized(devmtx))
mtx_init(devmtx, cdev, NULL, MTX_DEF);
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
Actually, you would think that it could be initialized either via an early
SYSINIT() or in the init_mutexes() function in kern_mutex.c and thus not need
the early check and avoid penalizing dev_lock().
phk, how early his dev_lock needed?
Far
On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:14 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
Actually, you would think that it could be initialized either via an early
SYSINIT() or in the init_mutexes() function in kern_mutex.c and thus not
need the early check and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:14 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
Actually, you would think that it could be initialized either via an early
SYSINIT() or in the init_mutexes() function in
My question is:
Is it not possible, that vkbd_dev_intr() could be
interrupted at any position before the VKBD_LOCK()
and then vkbd_dev_write() called?
in theory it is possible.
If yes, how should vkbd_dev_write() know, that it should
call task_enqueue(), as TASK is still set?
Norbert,
When looking at /sys/dev/vkbd/vkbd.c I found
one thing, that I do not understand.
There are three places, where a flag TASK is used:
1. in vkbd_dev_close():
while(state-ks_flag TASK) VKBD_SLEEP (...);
2. in vkbd_dev_write()
VKBD_LOCK ();
...
if (!(state-ks_flags TASK)
Err, sorry.
I meant the linux version of this is using outl_p to communicate with the
device, and write the values.
/Cole
- Original Message -
From: Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:04 PM
Subject: Pci Question
Hi
Im trying to
Nevermind,
I figured it out and got it working.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: Pci Question
Err, sorry.
I meant the linux version of this is using outl_p to communicate
Open /dev/io to use out*/in* functions.
Warner
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 02 May 2005 13:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a #ifdef SPARSE_MAPPING at line 701,and again a #ifdef
SPARSE_MAPPING at line 713.I just can't understand the second
one.Does it have any special mean ?
thanks .
It's just conditional compiling construct...however as you can
thanks for all your responses.I know that it is just conditional
compiling construct,but I just can't understand the nested *test* of
SPARSE_MAPPING( the 2nd #ifdef ... is nested in the 1st one).
Thanks .I think I get it now.
On Monday 02 May 2005 13:35, gerarra at tin.it wrote:
There is a
There is a #ifdef SPARSE_MAPPING at line 701,and again a #ifdef
SPARSE_MAPPING at line 713.I just can't understand the second
one.Does it have any special mean ?
thanks .
It's just conditional compiling construct...however as you can see in the
tag For whatever reason, SPARSE_MAPPING is not
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to set it up
under a new machine? Should I simply load the old vinum.conf file and
enable vinum? Thanks
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to set it up
under a new machine? Should I simply load the old vinum.conf file and
Matt wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It
is configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to
set it up under a new machine? Should I simply load the old
vinum.conf
* Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050414 18:43]:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:50:20AM -0700, Matt wrote:
I have a two disk array that I want to move to another machine. It is
configured with striping using vinum. What is the best way to set it up
under a new machine?
i noticed the documentation hasn't been migrated to gvinum, though.
anyone have a config suggestion to stripe two mirrors? I tried this:
drive diska device /dev/ad4s1a
drive diskb device /dev/ad6s1a
drive diskc device /dev/ad8s1a
drive diskd device /dev/ad12s1a
volume mirrorone
plex org
* Rex Roof [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050414 19:34]:
i noticed the documentation hasn't been migrated to gvinum, though.
anyone have a config suggestion to stripe two mirrors?
Short answer: you can't. Longer answer:
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?423CAE7E.4070009
qvb
--
pica
can I stripe two mirrors with vinum that were created with gmirror?
On 4/14/05, Joan Picanyol i Puig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Rex Roof [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050414 19:34]:
i noticed the documentation hasn't been migrated to gvinum, though.
anyone have a config suggestion to stripe two
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:21:14AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
No we don't. We use what the BIOS provides, but will lazily allocate
the BARs as necessary. We don't open the resource windows on the
bridges, however.
This 'sorta' works now.
I program a hard-coded window into the PCI bridge
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:21:14AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: No we don't. We use what the BIOS provides, but will lazily allocate
: the BARs as necessary. We don't open the resource windows on the
:
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I have acquired a Mobility Electronics EasiDock 5000. As some of you may
already know, this is a device which allows you to connect regular PCI
cards to your laptop, using a device called a 'Split Bridge'. (*)
Ok. Cool toy, you may be thinking. Indeed.
But I want to make
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:25:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Asking for 'hotplug support' is pretty generic and non-descriptive. Are
you asking for device level hotplug support, where we carefully drain
transactions out of a device, device driver, and whatever I/O or network
or whatever layers
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:25:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
: Asking for 'hotplug support' is pretty generic and non-descriptive. Are
: you asking for device level hotplug support, where we carefully drain
:
this works perfectly because I moved MGPMrUpgrade into
the same .c file so it would be a static function:
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 01:40 pm, you wrote:
this works perfectly because I moved MGPMrUpgrade into
the same .c file so it would be a static function:
structProperty* property;
pthread_t threads[NTHREADS];
pthread_create( threads[0], NULL, zzMGPMrUpgrade, property );
When
On Monday 14 March 2005 08:57 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Hi, I've just reached a point in a program I'm writing where I'd
like to do threading.
When I try to start a thread like this:
pthread_create(thread, attr, MGPMrUpgrade, property );
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Daniel, sorry to bother you again but I ran into something that is
either a bug or I am missing a vital piece of information somewhere.
Here is the situation:
this works perfectly because I moved MGPMrUpgrade into
the same .c file so it would be
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 10:19 am, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Daniel, sorry to bother you again but I ran into something that is
either a bug or I am missing a vital piece of information
somewhere. Here is the situation:
this works perfectly
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[cut]
The answer is probably something like what you just said, scope being
lost when making the call to a shared library. Why is it ok going to a
static library but not a shared though?
There is probably a race condition, so your code will work
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:02 pm, you wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[cut]
The answer is probably something like what you just said, scope
being lost when making the call to a shared library. Why is it ok
going to a static library but not a shared though?
There is
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Hi, I've just reached a point in a program I'm writing where I'd like to
do threading.
When I try to start a thread like this:
pthread_create(thread, attr, MGPMrUpgrade, property );
On Monday 14 March 2005 08:57 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Hi, I've just reached a point in a program I'm writing where I'd
like to do threading.
When I try to start a thread like this:
pthread_create(thread, attr, MGPMrUpgrade, property );
On 2005-02-25 11:34, Kathy Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
ATM it is written in codevisionAVR which is where the function is
called, so I guess for now I will just break the AVR support;)
Ahh..
So.. are you talking about
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
ATM it is written in codevisionAVR which is where the function is
called, so I guess for now I will just break the AVR support;)
Ahh..
So.. are you talking about getting the coding running _in FreeBSD_ or compiled
on FreeBSD
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:00, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the
other FreeBSD.
What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the
serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout)
Or would I be better #ifdef the commands and
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:00, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
I have some code that I build for two targets, one an Atmel uC and the
other FreeBSD.
What is the best way to redefine getchar and putchar (in uC they use the
serial port, in FreeBSD stdin stdout)
Or would I be better #ifdef
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one strange thing about 'ln' command.
my box is 5.2R.
This is not strange, it works exactly as expected, but you do not
seem to understand how ln works. Read on for the explanation...
I built some directory on $HOME , such as $HOME/a/b
I want to create a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 05:17:07PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi hackers !
I have one strange thing about 'ln' command.
my box is 5.2R.
I built some directory on $HOME , such as $HOME/a/b
I want to create a symbolic link for 'b' under top directory , $HOME.
The confusion is caused
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like some insight on the following; Me and a friend were discussing
tech stuff and he said that, when using dual (or more) CPU systems, it
is the hardware itself (and alone) choosing which CPU will execute this
or that process.
But I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I'd like some insight on the following; Me and a friend were discussing
tech stuff and he said that, when using dual (or more) CPU systems, it is
the hardware itself (and alone) choosing which CPU will execute this or
that process.
The OS and the OS alone chooses
Hey,
Thanks for the replies Robert and Ryan! That was insigthful.
I didn't know about the BP and the shutdown thingy, always learning :-)
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like some insight on the following; Me and a friend were discussing
tech stuff and he said that, when
--- Ryan Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
CPU cares about is
endlessly executing instructions fed to it and
delivering
interrupts/exceptions. What your friend might be
Im not sure to how many types of hw FreeBSD has been
ported, but the POWER4 processor
Apparently, On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:59:24PM -0700,
Chuck Tuffli said words to the effect of;
I'm having some trouble adding a bus resource and am hoping someone
can point out where I goofed.
The host bus to a new x86 chipset has a memory mapped region in PCI
space that provides
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:54:53PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
...
Generally, one doesn't need to set the resource value. Doing so
usually indicates the presence of some bug in the system. Also, just
I realize now that the original email wasn't clear. This is a bus
driver for a new bus.
Apparently, On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 09:51:25AM -0700,
Chuck Tuffli said words to the effect of;
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:54:53PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
...
Generally, one doesn't need to set the resource value. Doing so
usually indicates the presence of some bug in the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck Tuffli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I'm having some trouble adding a bus resource and am hoping someone
: can point out where I goofed.
:
: The host bus to a new x86 chipset has a memory mapped region in PCI
: space that provides access to status and
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 11:04 am, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
Hello,
I'm in charge of upgrading a number of boxes from 4.8-RELEASE from
4.10-RELEASE. My problem is this section of notes from the 4.9-RELEASE
errata:
(28 Oct 2003) Very late in the release cycle, a change was made to the
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, ghos wrote:
You wrote 29 mar 2004, 8:05:55 +0500:
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL
You wrote 29 mar 2004, 8:05:55 +0500:
Hi,
I traced sshd using ktrace and it says:
..
10198 new CALL setuid(0)
10198 new RET setuid -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
10198 new CALL execve(0x80485d0,0xbfbfed8c,0xbfbfed94)
10198 new NAMI
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:49:07PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
maybe I'm stupid and blind ;-) but I still can't fugure out how can I ask CVS
to get diff between two states of a branch with known dates (such as today and
yesterday). All that I found was 'cvs get
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE maybe I'm stupid and blind ;-) but I still can't fugure out how can I ask CVS
RE to get diff between two states of a branch with known dates (such as today and
RE yesterday). All that I found was 'cvs get -jBRANCH:date1 -jBRACH:date2' but
RE this
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 08:50:45PM -0500, Michael E. Mercer wrote:
Hello peoples,
I posted this to questions with no reply, I was hoping
someone here may be able to give some insight.
Question: Should I be able to open /dev/ugen0 more than once?
I am using FreeBSD 4.9-Stable,
Craig,
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:11:22PM -0500, Craig StJean wrote:
I have a prism2 USB wireless device. I've never written drivers before but I have
been developing for the past 8 years. Could someone guide me to a website or
something that would help me write a USB wrapper for the wi
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Craig,
:
: On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:11:22PM -0500, Craig StJean wrote:
: I have a prism2 USB wireless device. I've never written drivers before but I have
been developing for the past 8 years. Could someone
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Are there any SCSI raid controllers that have real-time array rebuild
: capabilities/tools for FreeBSD?? All of the ones I have used so far
: require reboot for rebuilding/modifying. Also are there any good tools for
:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:34:03AM +0200, Stalker wrote:
Hi
I would like to know if it is possible to write a program to check which
mbuf's are allocated to which programs that are currently running, or is
this totally not possible?
If it is possible, could someone point me in the right
Stalker wrote:
I would like to know if it is possible to write a program to check which
mbuf's are allocated to which programs that are currently running, or is
this totally not possible?
If it is possible, could someone point me in the right direction as in which
libraries / functions /
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:10:34PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
I've to confess this my first serious profile session, and
i found something really strange (at least for me... =P)
[flag@law3 src]$ gprof proto3
[snip]
% cumulative self self total
time seconds
Apparently, On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:11:47AM +0400,
Serguei Tzukanov said words to the effect of;
On Thursday 11 July 2002 02:45, Jake Burkholder wrote:
I think this is because your console driver (hc) doesn't have a tty
interface, just the low level cn* stuff. If you look at
On Thursday 11 July 2002 18:43, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Where exactly in init are you trying to print? If you're in the
single_user function, you can only use stdio in the forked child
after it calls setctty. Before that you have to open an fd on
/dev/console yourself and write(2) to it, or
On 10-Jul-2002 Serguei Tzukanov wrote:
Some working notes.
I've written the libc/csu part, kernel successfully starts init and init
forks off for the execve of -sh,
(http://tzukanov.narod.ru/freebsd390/bootlog.txt)
but there is problem with printing from userland, e.g. output from
td_retval[0] is the low word, and td_retval[1] is the high word, you
just need to make sure the values from those two words get returned
properly to userland.
1) syscall returns 32-bit value:
r2 = rv[0];
r3 = rv[1];
r3 is irrelevant here (ABI: 32-bit values returned
On 10-Jul-2002 Serguei Tzukanov wrote:
td_retval[0] is the low word, and td_retval[1] is the high word, you
just need to make sure the values from those two words get returned
properly to userland.
1) syscall returns 32-bit value:
r2 = rv[0];
r3 = rv[1];
r3 is
It sounds like a tty driver problem.
Does the emulator even support this?
Do you have a package, so that people can install your developement
environment and use your patches so they can participate in helping
you code?
-- Terry
Serguei Tzukanov wrote:
Some working notes.
I've written
John Baldwin wrote:
Why does the cast from 32 to 64 treat r3 as the lower 32-bits when
a 64-bit return value treats r3 as the upper 32-bits and r2 as the
lower 32-bits? That is inconsistent and you are going to have
problems with either one or the other. I also don't understand
exactly
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 23:04, Julian Elischer wrote:
OK so I have to ask.. S/390 as in IBM Mainframem S/390?
Yeas, ESA/390.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Thursday 11 July 2002 02:45, Jake Burkholder wrote:
I think this is because your console driver (hc) doesn't have a tty
interface, just the low level cn* stuff. If you look at the
ofw_console driver, it provides a rudimentary tty interface using
polling and cngetc, cnputc equivalents.
Thus spake Lamont Granquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does the FreeBSD VM system do O(1) or O(N) searches for gaps in a
processes virtual memory space?
I'm not a VM guru, but if I'm reading vm_map.c right, it's O(n)
w.r.t. the number of map entries. But since map entries are merged
when possible, I
On Wed, 1 May 2002, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Lamont Granquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does the FreeBSD VM system do O(1) or O(N) searches for gaps in a
processes virtual memory space?
I'm not a VM guru, but if I'm reading vm_map.c right, it's O(n)
w.r.t. the number of map entries.
* Zhihui Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020307 08:28] wrote:
Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than
one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c
could be made cleaner IMHO.
There is only enough linkage in the vm page to support it being
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than
one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c
could be made cleaner IMHO.
When you need to reclaim the page, you would have to identify
all owners, rather than a single
which one does the data come from?
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than
one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c
could be made cleaner IMHO.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail
The bogus page is owned by the system object, not by individual objects
associated with the files. If a page could be owned by more than one
objects, then we could let the object associated with a file to own the
bogus page.
-Zhihui
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
which one does
:which one does the data come from?
:
:On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
:
:
: Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than
: one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c
: could be made cleaner IMHO.
:
: -Zhihui
:
I think
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:58:09PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules implementation been given
to a module dependency facility, in the
In the last episode (Feb 20), Cliff Sarginson said:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:58:09PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:42:40PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 20), Cliff Sarginson said:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:58:09PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for
At 16:32 20-2-2002 -0600, Lane, Frank L wrote:
Hi List,
I'm facing a serial write problem. Posix provides a function tcdrain ()
that blocks until all serial data has been written from the card. Is there
an analogous function in the gnu c compiler for windows platforms? Does the
gnu c compiler
Lane, Frank L wrote:
I'm facing a serial write problem. Posix provides a function tcdrain ()
that blocks until all serial data has been written from the card. Is there
an analogous function in the gnu c compiler for windows platforms? Does the
gnu c compiler try to give you posix
In the last episode (Feb 19), Cliff Sarginson said:
Hello,
Someone suggested this may be the right list for this.
- Has consideration in the loadable modules implementation been given
to a module dependency facility, in the manner of depmod in Linux ?
So that any module loaded will
be open source. It's a simulated web client and web server, running
inside the kernel. It's good for load-testing and performance-testing
many kinds of network devices. With two 1-GHz PIII boxes (one acting
as the client and the other acting as the server) it can generate
around 5
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Polstra writes:
Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not necessarily caused by interrupt latency. Here's the assumption
that's being made.
[...]
Thanks for the superb explanation! I appreciate it.
My apologies for never getting the timecounter
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: But the i8254 is a piece of shit in this context, and due to
: circumstances (apm being enabled0 most machines end up using the
: i8254 by default.
:
: My (and I belive Bruce's) diagnosis so far is that most
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], M. Warner Losh writes:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: But the i8254 is a piece of shit in this context, and due to
: circumstances (apm being enabled0 most machines end up using the
: i8254 by default.
:
: My
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like, If X is never locked out for longer than Y, this problem
cannot happen. I'm looking for definitions of X and Y. X might be
hardclock() or softclock() or non-interrupt kernel processing. Y
would be some measure
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Polstra writes:
That's the global variable named timecounter, right? I did notice
one potential problem: that variable is not declared volatile. So
in this part ...
This may be a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Polstra writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like, If X is never locked out for longer than Y, this problem
cannot happen. I'm looking
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Polstra writes:
Agreed. But in the cases I'm worrying about right now, the
timecounter is the TSC.
Now, *that* is very interesting, how reproducible is it ?
Can you try to MFC rev 1.111 and see if that changes anything ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX
201 - 300 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
