Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 09:15 PM 02/11/2005, Michael VInce wrote:
I have seen some network based SMP related performance problems
vanish in 6.0 tests, admittedly I haven't done hard drive based tests
but I wouldn't surprise me of performance drops on HDs in SMP on 6.0
are gone as well.
Yes,
On Nov 2, 2005, at 4:47 AM, Achim Patzner wrote:
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
use the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more
details.
Did you ever have to replace a failed drive? You might try it, just
to see if you're stil
Actually, read performance drop is still there under FreeBSD 6.0 RC1
Yours
Markus Kovero
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 09:15 PM 02/11/2005, Michael VInce wrote:
I have seen some network based SMP related performance problems
vanish in 6.0 tests, admittedly I haven't done hard drive based tests
but
At 09:15 PM 02/11/2005, Michael VInce wrote:
I have seen some network based SMP related performance problems
vanish in 6.0 tests, admittedly I haven't done hard drive based
tests but I wouldn't surprise me of performance drops on HDs in SMP
on 6.0 are gone as well.
Yes, I noticed that well.
I have seen some network based SMP related performance problems vanish
in 6.0 tests, admittedly I haven't done hard drive based tests but I
wouldn't surprise me of performance drops on HDs in SMP on 6.0 are gone
as well.
Mike
Markus Kovero wrote:
Dell's CERC sata raid thingy works fast for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:29 AM 11/2/2005 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| At 05:47 AM 02/11/2005, Achim Patzner wrote:
| >>For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
| >>use the 'aac'
| >>Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
| >
| >Did y
At 07:29 AM 11/2/2005 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| At 05:47 AM 02/11/2005, Achim Patzner wrote:
| >>For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
| >>use the 'aac'
| >>Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
| >
| >Did you ever have to replace a fa
Am 02.11.2005 um 13:29 schrieb Mike Tancsa:
At 05:47 AM 02/11/2005, Achim Patzner wrote:
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
use the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more
details.
Did you ever have to replace a failed drive? You
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 05:47 AM 02/11/2005, Achim Patzner wrote:
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
use the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
Did you ever have to replace a failed drive? You might try it, just
to see i
At 05:47 AM 02/11/2005, Achim Patzner wrote:
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
use the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
Did you ever have to replace a failed drive? You might try it, just
to see if you're still happy a
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
use the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
Did you ever have to replace a failed drive? You might try it, just
to see if you're still happy afterwards.
Achim
_
Dell's CERC sata raid thingy works fast for me but when I turn SMP on
read performance drops 50%+ (raid1,raid5,raid10 and single volumes).
I don't know if its aac problem or what.
In leenox it works very well though.
Yours
Markus Kovero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:17 PM 11/2/2005 +1100, M
At 09:17 PM 11/2/2005 +1100, Michael VInce wrote:
| For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which use
| the 'aac'
| Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
| Dell supply them with a 64meg cache and are hardware raid, I have always
| just install
At 04:22 PM 11/1/2005 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| At 07:23 PM 31/10/2005, Francisco Reyes wrote:
| >On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| >
| >>>
| I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the
| fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native
| Fre
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which use
the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
Dell supply them with a 64meg cache and are hardware raid, I have always
just installed FreeBSD on them and only 1 hard drive comes up as RAID
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 13:22, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 07:23 PM 31/10/2005, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> >On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the
> fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native
> FreeBSD s
At 07:23 PM 31/10/2005, Francisco Reyes wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the
fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native
FreeBSD support and they are FAST
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-s
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I would for sure check pricing with Areca
Will do.
I think I have a new server we will be making in a few months and thinking
will go with an Areca card card for it.
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing
At 12:52 AM 01/11/2005, Francisco Reyes wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Which 3ware were they comparing ? The 9500SX was a little bit more
than the 4 port ARECA here in Canada.
It was the 9500SX.. Don't recall the models for the ARECA, but they
compared it to two.
I would fo
Am 01.11.2005 um 01:23 schrieb Francisco Reyes:
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not
the fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native
FreeBSD support and they are FAST
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-sata.htm
Saw a review last night of the
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Which 3ware were they comparing ? The 9500SX was a little bit more than the
4 port ARECA here in Canada.
It was the 9500SX.. Don't recall the models for the ARECA, but they
compared it to two.
___
freebsd-per
At 07:23 PM 31/10/2005, Francisco Reyes wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the
fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native
FreeBSD support and they are FAST
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-s
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the fastest.
For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native FreeBSD support and
they are FAST
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-sata.htm
Saw a review last night of the Areca
-7740 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/28/2005 9:24 PM
To: Francisco
Cc: FreeBSD Performance
Subject: Re: SATA: RAID 5 controller recommendations
At 12:11 AM 29/10/2005, Francisco wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
>&
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the fastest.
For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native FreeBSD support and they
are FAST
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-sata.htm
Where did you get your area controller
At 12:11 AM 29/10/2005, Francisco wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the
fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native FreeBSD
support and they are FAST
http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-sata.htm
At 12:31 AM 10/20/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| - Original Message -
| From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > I have been thinking about getting one. The guy I bought my 3ware 9500S-12
| > card has one he's getting ready to benchmark. I asked him to send me the
| > details and I will pass
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been thinking about getting one. The guy I bought my 3ware 9500S-12
card has one he's getting ready to benchmark. I asked him to send me the
details and I will pass them along here if I get them. He did mention it
supports SATA2 -
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tancsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/spool/test bs=32k count=2
2+0 records in
2+0 records out
65536 bytes transferred in 7.587819 secs (86370011 bytes/sec)
Interesting results there that's very similar to what I get here (
At 11:04 AM 10/19/2005 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| At 07:23 PM 18/10/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >At 11:36 PM 10/18/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| >| Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
| >| 64Bit PCIX.
| >|
| >| Steve
| >
| >Hi Steve,
| >
| > I am using the 3W
No problem I was initially very impressed with this card, great throughput
( after tweaking ), easy install and cheap; but then this problem hit.
It gets a DMA timeout on one of the disks which it then drops from the
RAID5 unfortunately it then gets the same error on another disk and does
the sam
At 07:23 PM 18/10/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:36 PM 10/18/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
| 64Bit PCIX.
|
| Steve
Hi Steve,
I am using the 3Ware 9500S-12 on our servers and like it very
much. It's very
easy to setup,
t way for nearly a month now so time to send it back
and move to another manufacture.
Steve / K
- Original Message - From: "Tulio Guimarães da Silva"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 19 October 2005 14:29
Subject: Re: SATA: RAID 5 controller recommendations
For price/ben
email. Been that way for nearly a month now so time to send it back
and move to another manufacture.
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: "Tulio Guimarães da Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 19 October 2005 14:29
Subject: Re: SATA: RAID 5 controller recommendations
For price/benefit, I too recommend the HPTs, specially the 1820A. It´s
not THE killer for speed, but it´s fairly stable, factory-supported on
FBSD, has good management utils (including remote, via daemon) and is
about half the price of its competitors. Besides, the "A" model has its
own XOR pr
+0 records in
2+0 records out
65536 bytes transferred in 7.587819 secs (86370011 bytes/sec)
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: 19 October 2005 04:45
To: Steven Hartland; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:
ad much cause to use the CLI management utils, so I
can't really comment there.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: 19 October 2005 04:45
To: Steven Hartland; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re
At 06:36 PM 18/10/2005, Steven Hartland wrote:
Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
64Bit PCIX.
I use the 3ware line (8xxx) and they are very stable, but not the
fastest. For speed, check out the cards from Areca. Native FreeBSD
support and they are FAST
http://www.ar
At 11:36 PM 10/18/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
| 64Bit PCIX.
|
| Steve
Hi Steve,
I am using the 3Ware 9500S-12 on our servers and like it very much. It's very
easy to setup, very fast and also directly supported by the defau
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 03:36 pm, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
> 64Bit PCIX.
I personally would reccommend the HighPoint RocketRAID series (we use the
1820A here on a dual Opteron system running 5.4/amd64) We are using the
HP-provided hp
Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
64Bit PCIX.
Steve
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is pr
41 matches
Mail list logo
