to include that back in the Makefile,
is it safe to assume > 900044 will compile arlib?
but I don't see it in 900044, AMD64.
%find /usr/lib -name 'libares*' -ls
%pwd
/usr/src/contrib/ntp/arlib
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network
ainers, to get anything right. It sure makes life easier
when they do, but we can't take it for granted.
and, in this case, maintainer is working on a fix as we speak.
As committers, we are that QA step.
mcl
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNA
ist, which left eggs all over the place.
Dragging in when all you needed to do was drag in '.
Either case, from a pure theoretical case study, taking out one byte
would speed things up.
(in theory, theory and practice are the same.. but in practice, it is
often different)
--
Michael S
T_CONFIG?= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/libnet11-config
.if exists(${LIBNET_CONFIG})
LIBNET_CFLAGS!= ${LIBNET_CONFIG} --cflags
LIBNET_LIBS!= ${LIBNET_CONFIG} --libs
.else
LIBNET_CFLAGS= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/libnet11
LIBNET_LIBS=-L${LOCALBASE}/lib/libnet11 -lnet
.endif
--
Michael Scheidell, CT
WAS broken, and is now fixed, what OSVERSION, and what
ARCH's was it fixed in?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Final
es, and hgfs
issues worked out, but, I guess there isn't enough commercial interest.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist
y of mysql-workbench52, and submit patches against
that.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Sec
ong, no
matter what I do.
(ps, that small change, and a recompile made tinderbox recompile 19
modules.. that didn't change except for that change)
so, behind the covers, does := do something BAD?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security C
s
swatch is running as pid 22595.
atrium-ru.hackertrap.net# ps -auxww | grep swatch
root22595 0.0 0.7 28080 13812 ?? Is 12:45AM 0:00.00
/usr/local/bin/perl //.swatch_script.22591
root22620 0.0 0.1 7884 1380 p1 S+ 12:47AM 0:00.00 grep swatch
0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/perl //.
On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.2008
what happens with:
# portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44
?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Soluti
day.
maybe someone here has it in a tinderbox somewhere.
what OS version, mach do you need?
(output from uname -a)
or, maybe someone with a tinderbox would compile it for you for beer
credits.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporat
s?
is this enough in the Makefile to do that?
NO_PACKAGE= requires manual acceptance of license agreement
IS_INTERACTIVE= yes
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusi
, therefore no packages and no Pavmail.
Port test to check for leftover files will help.
yes, I did test it.
ok, ill fire this away to the maintainer in a pr
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product
re you don't have odd things in your make.conf or option knobs.
compiles fine here on amd64, 9.0. tinderbox. something is borked in
your server.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of
n the pants' we want to give them.
if they want FreeBSD based business, they need to give us some love.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
swatch_enable="YES"
ps -auxww | grep swatch
root 86920 0.0 0.7 7496 6960 ?? Is9:33AM 0:00.01
/usr/local/bin/perl /tmp//.swatch_script.86918
./swatch status
329
swatch is not running.
./swatch status
223
swatch is not running.
./swatch status
-n "${swatch_rules}" ]; then
for i in ${swatch_rules}; do
eval swatch_flags=\$swatch_${i}_flags
+len=`echo $swatch_flags | wc -c`
+if [ $len -gt 222 ];then
+ procname=%%LOCALBASE%%/bin/perl
+fi
eval swatch_user=\$swatch_${i}_user
eval swatch_chdir
arch/perlversion/osversion
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certif
On 1/26/12 12:41 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/26/12 12:36 PM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
Also, it looks like swatch is creating a temporary script that is
actually run, so the status command is not supposed to find it.
It's a design issue upstream that you want them to find a b
nstall: ranlib /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a
test -z "/usr/local/share/gir-1.0/" || .././install-sh -c -d
"/usr/local/share/gir-1.0/"
clean your portstree, (portclean -C)
make sure you don't have odd things in make.conf
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-500
Several ports miwi was holding on to that depended on other PRs, many of
which have been committed. Other pr's depend on pr's miwi is holding.
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&responsible=miwi>
anyone seen miwi lately?
--
Michael Scheidell,
ends on boost-libs now which is marked as
broken on sparc64, so it cannot actually be tested."
So, how do you want me to handle this?
NOT_FOR_ARCHS sparc64?
or just let PH die trying to include boost-libs?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network
er, and didn't test
it on sparc64.
I commit the pr and if I get a pavmail, I'll just commit it back again.
(and if I need to commit it back again, what is preferred language?)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
*
anyone to take action, it's more FYI.
so, I get a lin_IM_ eh?
mcl
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* B
ribute packages internally,
so, I want the license question to be asked during package_building (so
OP can distribute binary packages internally), but I don't want pavmail
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobi
On 2/4/12 7:27 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
on a certain port, their is a dual/commercial/free license.
(if you are an ISP it is free. if you are not reselling the product,
its free)
If I put this in Makefile, tinderbox (and I assume pointyhat) will
hand, with 'top' in 'd
port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
this?
I know != spawns a shell, but I can't think of another way
(port I am looking at is ../devel/svnmerge)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http:/
On 2/7/12 8:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversion
in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a bet
kefile that
says "please sync portrevision in port x and commit" (then you are on
the hook for two broken ports)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
.include "../subversion16/Makefile.inc"
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
sutils_fusefs-kmod.patch
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified
Public flogging seems to be more enjoyable than a private email to the
developer, the maintainer, and a committer.
But I suppose it beats doing a backup of your envirement first.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
-Original message-
From: Andriy Gapon
To: Steve Ka
ns? Thanks! Yours,
-mi
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-
On 2/14/12 11:18 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 14.02.2012 10:25, Michael Scheidell wrote:
EXAMPLESDIR
I thought, EXAMPLESDIR is for actual examples, such as source code,
not compiled and fully-functional executables... Indeed, the directory
is under ${PREFIX}/share -- which, according to hier
just spotted this on the eve of the 8.3 freeze.
Yikes!
lots of ports affected, many typo's. surprised some of these built.
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157174&cat=ports>
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.56
tch should find this), else all the tinderbox's will be wacking
away all day long trying to keep up.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@f
On 2/15/12 7:29 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
I tried to fix them all but then disclose that PR is already belongs
to wen@ :)
even wen doesn't have that many tinderboxes.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.fre
On 2/15/12 7:15 AM, Alex Kozlov wrote:
Many of those errors was already fixed, thanks to eadler@
I will upload updated list.
can we get them all, and get them /correct/ before the port freeze?
(thanks Alex.. wish I had seen the list earlier, )
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Netw
have issues unless fixed.
Still, would be nice to clean them up somewhat.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
not if it changes the port.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNO
rt of 8.3
ports dvd/cd
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
n't, and some will run it depending on if gnome is
installed before the port, but won't run it if after.
This also causes problems with package building, if package is built on
a different box (one with) , and installed on a box 'without', there are
problems.
so, I think I
SUBDIR += netams
SUBDIR += netams-front
-SUBDIR += netdisco-mibs
SUBDIR += netdisco
+SUBDIR += netdisco-mibs
SUBDIR += netleak
SUBDIR += netmask
SUBDIR += netmond
woops, this one was mine. thanks for finding it.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Netw
in LIB_DEPENDS
it won't take anything like:
= boost_serialization>=.4
what if you needed a minimum version of the library?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org
On 2/24/12 6:57 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
in LIB_DEPENDS
it won't take anything like:
= boost_serialization>=.4
I googled.
all other _DEPENDS uses >=
LIB_DEPENDS uses .[4-9]
(i assume .(1[0-9]|[4-9]))
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security
raphics/cairo
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
;one patch per file" a golden rule or are there exceptions in cases where
one logical patch touches dozens of files?
Thanks,
Michael
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubsc
, YMMV, and are
as trustworthy as any other answer you get on the internet)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company
On Feb 24, 2012, at 14:55, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> b) I also have another massive patch which touches another 20 files which
>> enables some new security features in ice (the history of this patch is that
>> I deve
;-m-DBATCH' or '-mBATCH=yes' was right.
Also, surprised that env in make.conf didn't do it.
one more experiment (I have not tried).. what about
/usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Co
it.
(hence 'Moved Temporarily')
a quick google find it.
http://prdownload.berlios.de/utidylib/uTidylib-0.2.zip
you can manually put this into /usr/ports/distfiles and go about your
merry way, or open a PR and submit a patch to change the master_sites.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 5
eeBSD never needed to set up a 'bounty' system for people wanting to
help pay for a port, have they? I have seen this done on other open
source projects, mostly to add features and re-arrange priorities, based
on ca$h used as a voting system )
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNA
ory?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161231
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
: distinfo added independently by second party
cvs add: pkg-descr added independently by second party
cvs add: pkg-plist added independently by second party
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2
nevermind.
ke...@freebsd.org committed an almost identical port 14 hours ago. (I looked at
his Makefile and pkg-plist. a lot better then the one in 165530)
On 3/2/12 4:49 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
cvs add py-foolscap
? py-foolscap/Makefile
? py-foolscap/distinfo
? py-foolscap/pkg
ndex-fetch -a -y
or portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title --index --no-index-fetch -a
-y > /dev/null
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-p
fixed or the recommended
procedure to circumvent this problem?
submit a pr with a patch to make it build with libxine?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
_
shui if I don't.
Can't wait to get my life back in balance.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
.
what about an emphatic 'hell yes'
does it have to be yes?
can I use YES!
or 'So say we all'?
what if we aren't sure, can we say 'maybe'? or 'i don't know'?
what happens if we type 'no'?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*
On 3/6/12 7:02 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
error Unknown Endianness
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2011-May/007439.html>
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade squeezeboxserver using portmaster and after a short
while it seems to loop for net/p5-Net-HTTP (p5-libwww-5.837) like the
following.
I just cvsupped ports so I'm wondering is that a problem on my side or is
the port broken?
Cheers,
Michael
===>>> P
to p0f, include in the txt of the pr (and
in the Makefile), the necessary changes and take over maintainership.
I am sure everyone who uses this port in the future will thank you for
your efforts.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: h
f I have any failures, I'll update port with (not for arch? only for
arch? if arch broken?), Ill make that decision Saturday.
Thanks.
(post results as followup to pr please)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://
tch.in,v 1.7 2012/01/14
08:56:53 dougb Exp $
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
On 3/15/12 4:29 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
# $FreeBSD: ports/security/swatch/files/swatch.in,v 1.7 2012/01/14
08:56:53 dougb Exp $
or this one?
# $FreeBSD: ports/security/swatch/files/swatch.in,v 1.8 2012/02/10
14:37:30 scheidell Exp $
sb swatch 3.2.3_2
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
t to
execute? what is it?
Pardon my ignorance, I have just never seen this before in any port I have
maintained, or worked on.
(reference this PR for context)
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165765>
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporati
be, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
could basically eliminate
plist-file (save 2k on the disk?)
and put them in PLIST_FILES in Makefile.
what if the 'docs' are in a strange place? like this port?
how would this port be fixed?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://
ps:
someone important, or on x11 group: so that we save a few bytes on 8.3
ports dvd:
please check out http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165820
and commit.
I changed the Makefile and pkg-plist.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.94
hing I think we need to go on the hunt for or publicly but is it something
that committers and ports maintainers should just fix? Right?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
back on: make installkernel.
if it doesn't boot, well, power cycle and it will boot your old 6.4
(but, ps, strange, I have a test machine still running 6.4 and I test
ports on it. never had that issue)
but the real answer is, upgrade so you don't have support problems.
--
Michael Sc
won't do anything.
So, is there a definitive list?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
, bison, things like that, right?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-po
ain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and
someone will complain :-)
10 programmers, 15 opinions.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-po
ng to that 'end user' cult, and me
and the MCP will have to educate you.
There are no end users. The computer exists for the MCP, and the MCP only.
Q: have you now, or do you know anyone who thinks they saw an end user?
Can you give me their names and email addresses so we can re-educat
4 box, that do any good?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
tter do it?
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165507>
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
could cooperate, even then
politicians could not.)
can we tell jokes in ports@? or do I need to put it in my sig?
we joke that politicians has its root in two words. poly, meaning many,
and ticks, meaning little blood sucking insects. So, politicians means
many little blood sucki
/lazarus-gtk2/pkg-descr
I marked port BROKEN for now so INDEX builds. Will get with submitter
on his proposed fixes.
(Master port needs CONFLICTS added for this and lazarus-qt4 also)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.
ed on all systems if I set
WITHOUT_OPENSSL.
I could never get it to work, and google shows lots of issues. Also
shows suggestions to NOT include ssl (yassl) in mysql itself, but wrap
it in stunnel (for performance reasons)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corpo
ng in his statement. PORTREVISION exists for the
maybe Philip forgot to put in the smilie face. and was making a joke.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
fre
ainer, I might spend some time on it. But since
this is a new port, and this person wants to be trusted at a maintainer,
(and I have a day job), I'll see if he can't fix it first.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://
kg-message, Comment
* Updating port maintainer (new one or resetting port maintainer)
* just petting portlint ( after name to ), re-order sections
(notice I left out pointyhat.. if it is overworked, lets send more hardware)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security
no connection to sendmail. You probably want to ask gshapiro.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166248
shouldn't that be freebsd-ports-bugs?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org
per marshaling or unmarshaling in communication with SQL
databases
or between browsers and web servers
WWW: http://www.impredicative.com/ur/
for context:
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/166657>
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security
hing he obviously didn't care
about (or he would submit a pr, and/or rm the 646K from the hd)
and, next 'real' port upgrade, it will disappear anyway.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
__
On 4/5/12 4:04 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/30/12 4:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing
.ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES))
#1 covers this, this is the OPTIONS case (default vs not)
perfect example, real world.
And, in exactly this
that you might as well use '
NOT_FOR_ARCH(s)? '
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
ts an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know
about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
ng or not?
set MFC days? or is that mostly for source code?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On 4/14/12 10:51 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
Grab the PR back and just commit the new files in place.
than it loses history of the -devel branch.
I guess you can't keep it all..
PR taken back.
Will think about it a little more.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network
er to
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/ rm -devel entry in Makefile
put a 'MOVED' entry to document removal of -devel.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
nted by ms.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, sen
n case he knows something about the new version.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
-jgh
except that is a very old version, not supported anymore, and they are
only supporting amd64 8+ right now.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
they used old versions of php (you MIGHT need php52...)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On 5/2/12 6:41 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Tried php52, also php4.. no joy :-(
The base URL doesn't even display. The standard php5 port works best
but bombs out at the "create DB" screen.
let me try to upgrade atmail to 1.0.5 for you and see what happens.
I'll keep you
t PEAR? you running a supported version of FreeBSD?
7.4, 8.3, 9.0?
did you update portstree? (portsnap fetch update, or cvsup, or cd
/usr/ports && make update)?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http
/log/${name}
chown -H ${u}:${g} ${serverlogfile}
fi
?
don't forget to make sure that pkg_add also works.
check pkg_delete also to make sure that pkg-plist removes it.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
g the default something that comes out of the
box, less secure than the old version.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
201 - 300 of 1083 matches
Mail list logo
