: Connection refused
BTW:
whois usd217.org
[...]
Name Server:GALLEY.USD217.ORG
Name Server:OTTO.USD217.ORG
From Sydney, AU, the DNS records seem to have propagated:
$ nslookup.exe
Default Server: x
Address: 10.168.100.10
set type=ns
usd217.org
Non-authoritative answer:
Server: x
Jerod Prothe wrote:
Greetings all,
On my network, we used to have some NT box acting as the mail exchanger
and a faulty dns for our domain. That box has nearly crumbled. It's
still active, but no longer accepting mail. I set up a computer (called
galley) with 5.4 and it is (supposedly
Greg Barniskis wrote:
Jerod Prothe wrote:
Greetings all,
On my network, we used to have some NT box acting as the mail
exchanger and a faulty dns for our domain. That box has nearly
crumbled. It's still active, but no longer accepting mail. I set up
a computer (called galley) with 5.4
, unless there's a firewall blocking that port). The real
problem is that some computers/servers haven't noticed the change in the
DNS records yet. i.e., when they try to find out the MX for usd217.org
they'll get :
usd217.org MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = otto.usd217.org
which
to galley will fix this problem.
Also, you may want to make triple sure the serial of your zone gets
updated with every change...else downstream DNS servers wont necessarily
pickup the changes.
I changed it and reduced the
expire time to 10d (I got it out of the Lehey Complete FreeBSD book). I
with every change...else downstream DNS servers wont necessarily
pickup the changes.
I changed it and reduced the expire time to 10d (I got it out of the
Lehey Complete FreeBSD book). I wonder why it is that Australia has
updated but a US State has not?
Hard to say, but as far as a management
to be up-to-date.
well, it really all depends to what delay you're happy to live with.
from memory:
Refresh is the one that tells non-authoritative (downstream) DNS servers
when to refresh the data.
expire when to consider it too old to serve it at all (in case your
authoritative is down
Greg Barniskis wrote:
Hard to say, but as far as a management discussion goes, it is clear
that this problem has really nothing to do with your selection of
FreeBSD as DNS/mail host, and (barring better failsafe procedures like
IP number migration) would have occurred regardless of the OS
to do, i read the handbook, but dont find
any good info on the DHCP setup, only talk about the server but not
about how to setup the client, only say some files, dhcp.conf, etc.
I need to setup those files...?
Try passing the DNS info via dhclient.conf rather than resolv.conf.
eg
HI all.
I have one freebsd box running 5.3, i get my IP from one internal
DHCP running NT 4.0, here we have one PDC on NT 4.0, to get to the
outside we pass thru one http proxy and one firewall, i have my user
and password for the proxy, i want to get outside, i install manually
the cvsup
At 10:07 PM 8/11/2005, perikillo wrote:
HI all.
I have one freebsd box running 5.3, i get my IP from one internal
DHCP running NT 4.0, here we have one PDC on NT 4.0, to get to the
outside we pass thru one http proxy and one firewall, i have my user
and password for the proxy, i want to
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http://www.mail.mydomain.com
to
http://mail.mydomain.com
Many users do first request and my server respond only al the second url.
Tks!
___
freebsd-questions
On 8/10/05, Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http://www.mail.mydomain.com
to
http://mail.mydomain.com
Many users do first request and my server respond only al the second url.
Tks
On 2005-08-10 10:01, Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http://www.mail.mydomain.com
to
http://mail.mydomain.com
Many users do first request and my server respond only al the second url.
Tks!
1. Add
- Original Message -
From: Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:01 PM
Subject: Simple question of dns?
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http
+++ B. Bonev [05-08-05 12:02 +0300]:
| My question is what's the difference between Squid DNS caching and
| BIND
| and other programs that cache DNS requests?
|
| BIND is a DNS server. It will reply to DNS queries from others. Squid
| DNS won't reply to others DNS queries.
|
| I
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Better use djbdns :)
It's simple, fast and reliable.
Maybe I am dense, but I found it much simpler to setup Bind as caching DNS
than to figure out how to setup djbdns.
Perhaps I looked at the wrong tutorials for djdbns, but there are tons
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, B. Bonev wrote:
I think that Squid have a internal DNS server. Now, as understand I must
have configure Squid for HTTP req, and BIND or another DNS cache server
for DNS req...
As others have mentioned perhaps you are missunderstanding what those
programs do. It will help
My question is what's the difference between Squid DNS caching and BIND
and other programs that cache DNS requests?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 8/5/05, B. Bonev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is what's the difference between Squid DNS caching and BIND
and other programs that cache DNS requests?
BIND is a DNS server. It will reply to DNS queries from others. Squid
DNS won't reply to others DNS queries.
Regards,
Shantanoo
My question is what's the difference between Squid DNS caching and
BIND
and other programs that cache DNS requests?
BIND is a DNS server. It will reply to DNS queries from others. Squid
DNS won't reply to others DNS queries.
I want just DNS caching. Is Squid is enough for that task
Hi,
In my point of view you do not understand what's the difference between
caching proxy and caching DNS.
But main difference is that caching proxy is used to cache web requests
and responses (http, https, ftp), while DNS cache is used to chache DNS
queries and responses (when you ping
contained in this message nor for
any delay in its receipt.
B. Bonev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/05/2005 12:02 PM
To
? \(Shantanoo\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject
Re: DNS caching: Squid, BIND or anything else?
My question is what's
My question is what's the difference between Squid DNS caching and
BIND
and other programs that cache DNS requests
BIND is a DNS server. It will reply to DNS queries from others. Squid
DNS won't reply to others DNS queries.
I want just DNS caching. Is Squid is enough for that task?
Better use
+++ B. Bonev [05-08-05 12:02 +0300]:
| My question is what's the difference between Squid DNS caching and
| BIND
| and other programs that cache DNS requests?
|
| BIND is a DNS server. It will reply to DNS queries from others. Squid
| DNS won't reply to others DNS queries.
|
| I want just DNS
Problem: I just got my named up and working however resolving a domain
takes an unusual amount of time and the only way to go to a domain on a
user computer is to ping it on the server first. I'm sure it is just an
option I forgot to set, however can not figure it out. Any help is
greatly
On Aug 3, 2005, at 12:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem: I just got my named up and working however resolving a
domain takes an unusual amount of time and the only way to go to a
domain on a user computer is to ping it on the server first. I'm
sure it is just an option I forgot to
Hi, all:
Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip address
without setting DNS Server in /etc/rc.conf.
Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial installing
stage, where the installation wizard asked for me about the settings step by
step
At 01:46 AM 7/27/2005, Xu Qiang wrote:
Hi, all:
Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip
address without setting DNS Server in /etc/rc.conf.
Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial
installing stage, where the installation wizard asked
On 7/27/05, Xu Qiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all:
Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip address
without setting DNS Server in /etc/rc.conf.
Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial installing
stage, where the installation
Yet, where is the DNS setting? If not in this file, which file
does this setting reside in?
/etc/resolv.conf
P.S.: In solaris, I can use dos2unix to transfer txt file from
DOS/Windows format to Unix format, what is the corresponding
command in FreeBSD?
The same. Just install it from
Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 01:46 AM 7/27/2005, Xu Qiang wrote:
Hi, all:
Last time I asked you that why the machine can map the hostname to ip
address without setting DNS Server in /etc/rc.conf.
Now I remember that I have provided DNS ip address in the initial
installing stage, where
Bruno Gallant wrote:
Hello,
We are redesigning our DNS infrastructure, which has been running on
BIND with the regular flat files for years, and there would be a need
for the data to be in a database. (postgresql or mysql, of course)
On a similar thread, does anyone know of any dns server
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:20:11 +0800, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bruno Gallant wrote:
Hello,
We are redesigning our DNS infrastructure, which has been running on
BIND with the regular flat files for years, and there would be a need
for the data to be in a database. (postgresql
I recently did a reinstall of FreeBSD on my web server (hard drive died)
and I decided to upgrade from 4.11 to 5.4.
Anyway everything is working fine except for this odd sendmail issue.
So the info. I have two servers.
10.0.0.1:extranet.dalegroup.net: DNS and Mail (Windows 2003)
10.0.0.3
Daniel Marsh wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:20:11 +0800, Norberto Meijome
On a similar thread, does anyone know of any dns server software that
would serve different IPs depending on where the query/request comes
from?
i.e., - resolve www.mydomain.com to the IP of my server in AU for all
Quoting Bruno Gallant who wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:02:55PM -0400:
We are redesigning our DNS infrastructure, which has been running on
BIND with the regular flat files for years, and there would be a need
for the data to be in a database. (postgresql or mysql, of course)
I looked
On Thursday 21 July 2005 02:25, Daniel Marsh wrote:
The only issue I foresee is having to have slightly different zone names
that you wish to serve for each IP range.
Not true. Zone *files*, yes. Because of the wonderfulness that is NAT, my
LAN's nameserver gives different answers based on
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Thursday 21 July 2005 02:25, Daniel Marsh wrote:
The only issue I foresee is having to have slightly different zone names
that you wish to serve for each IP range.
Not true. Zone *files*, yes. Because of the wonderfulness that is NAT, my
LAN's nameserver gives
Hello,
We are redesigning our DNS infrastructure, which has been running on
BIND with the regular flat files for years, and there would be a need
for the data to be in a database. (postgresql or mysql, of course)
I looked around the ports to find powerdns, but I don't know if it's
good
On 20/07/05, Bruno Gallant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked around the ports to find powerdns, but I don't know if it's
good or not.
There is also dns/bind9-dlz (http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/).
Supports many database backends. (I never used it, though.)
Is there a port or something
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Gustavo De Nardin wrote:
On 20/07/05, Bruno Gallant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked around the ports to find powerdns, but I don't know if it's
good or not.
There is also dns/bind9-dlz (http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/).
Supports many database backends. (I never used
hello all,
I setup a simple dns server so i can keep all hosts in one place. The
only problem that I have is that from other hosts i am unable to
connect to dns server. When I do a nmap of the dns server, I don't
get the port 53. But when I login to the fbsd system which hosts
dns
Hello Antoine,
do you have a firewall on the box ?
what about:
netstat -an | grep LISTEN
ipfw list
ps auwx | grep named
cat /etc/resolv.conf
cheers,
Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:20:56 PM, you wrote:
AS hello all,
AS I setup a simple dns server so i can keep all hosts in one place
On Jul 18, 2005, at 5:20 PM, Antoine Solomon wrote:
I setup a simple dns server so i can keep all hosts in one place. The
only problem that I have is that from other hosts i am unable to
connect to dns server. When I do a nmap of the dns server, I don't
get the port 53. But when I login
netstat -an | grep LISTEN
doesn't show listening udp ports try instead
netstat -na | more
--
John Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Antoine,
do you have a firewall on the box ?
what about:
netstat -an | grep LISTEN
ipfw list
ps auwx | grep named
cat /etc/resolv.conf
to work most
of the time, but occasionally network traffic gets really slow and I
suspect that its a DNS problem.
Can I set up something on my FreeBSD server to help solve this problem?
Alan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
If you are just looking to be able to resolve DNS internally, you can very
easily setup your FBSD box to be a forwarding DNS server, and point all
your other machines at it for DNS resolution. There are many howtos
covering this subject.
Casey
I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE behind a Linksys
Name Servers for all the
machines. I point them all at the Linksys, which seems to work most
of the time, but occasionally network traffic gets really slow and I
suspect that its a DNS problem.
Can I set up something on my FreeBSD server to help solve this
problem?
Alan
Hello
to assign the Domain Name Servers for all the
machines. I point them all at the Linksys, which seems to work most
of the time, but occasionally network traffic gets really slow and I
suspect that its a DNS problem.
Can I set up something on my FreeBSD server to help solve this
problem?
Alan
Hi
problem how to assign the Domain Name Servers for all the
machines. I point them all at the Linksys, which seems to work most
of the time, but occasionally network traffic gets really slow and I
suspect that its a DNS problem.
Can I set up something on my FreeBSD server to help solve this
problem
suspect that its a DNS problem.
Can I set up something on my FreeBSD server to help solve this
problem?
Alan
Hello,
If you think the problem is on your ISP DNS servers, you have two
alternatives:
1) Set up a local DNS server on all the machines of the network.
2) Set
On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Alejandro Pulver wrote:
If you want examples I can provide you some.
Then let me know if you want option 1) or 2) so I can help you with
the
next step.
1) Have an independent DNS server on each machine (there is one for
Windows called TreeWalk - free
On Jul 3, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Alan Curtis wrote:
I do need some clear instructions. I tried djbdns without success
(see another post) and also the instructions under 'Domain Name
System (DNS)' in the FreeBSD Handbook.
I added named_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf. Used the default
On Jul 3, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Alan Curtis wrote:
On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Alejandro Pulver wrote:
If you want examples I can provide you some.
Then let me know if you want option 1) or 2) so I can help you
with the
next step.
1) Have an independent DNS server on each machine
My problem is that the server I use for DNS keeps going dead.
My ISP is most familiar with windows users who get their DNS
automatically from their connection. When my ISP gives me a good
DNS server number, it seems to go dead six months later, and I have to
call them again.
Is there a way
David Banning wrote:
My problem is that the server I use for DNS keeps going dead.
My ISP is most familiar with windows users who get their DNS
automatically from their connection. When my ISP gives me a good
DNS server number, it seems to go dead six months later, and I have to
call them
Is there a way to get DNS automatically, say from the DHCP connection IP
address given to me? or, is there some great free DNS server that will
stay in business for some time that I can plug into my resolv.conf?
DHCP will normally obtain DNS servers automaticly. It's likely that you
David Banning wrote:
My problem is that the server I use for DNS keeps going dead.
My ISP is most familiar with windows users who get their DNS
automatically from their connection. When my ISP gives me a good
DNS server number, it seems to go dead six months later, and I have to
call them
David Banning wrote:
DHCP will normally obtain DNS servers automaticly. It's likely that you
could release and renew your lease (dhclient -r, maybe?) and cause it to
get new DNS info if the old values are no longer working.
Here may be the answer. I think of DHCP of being a server thing only
message) - a reboot
has fixed the problem.
I assume that the problem is that the server is unable to find a DNS
server. Is that right?
Probably...
Do I have it right that I should point defaultrouter at the firewall?
Assuming that the firewall is your gateway to the outside world
are the dns servers of the other computers the SAME as the freebsd
server? what are the contents of /etc/resolv.conf?
--
John Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you John.
I will try this series of pings the next time my server freezes. I did
try something similiar, if not so methodical last
assume that the problem is that the server is unable to find a DNS
server. Is that right?
Do I have it right that I should point defaultrouter at the firewall?
How do I tell FreeBSD about other DNS servers to use if the firewall
route fails?
Why does pointing defaultrouter at the filewall fail
that the problem is that the server is unable to find a DNS
server. Is that right?
Probably...
Do I have it right that I should point defaultrouter at the firewall?
Assuming that the firewall is your gateway to the outside world, then
yes.
How do I tell FreeBSD about other DNS servers to use
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:31:09AM +0800, Xu Qiang wrote:
Lowell wrote:
We don't either. We do not have enough information.
Showing us your configuration files might help.
What configuration file do you need?
/etc/rc.conf, output of netstat -rn, ifconfig -a would help.
--
Jonathan Chen
(255.255.252.0), so I wonder how the
gateway was added into this file.
And I didn't have any DNS setting here. Yet it can ping www.yahoo.com
successfully. Quite strange. :(
Regards,
Xu Qiang
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
what is the contents of /etc/resolv.conf
--
John Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Xu Qiang
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:16 AM
To: Jonathan Chen; Xu Qiang
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: RE: DNS
Xu Qiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lowell wrote:
Yes, you do. A dhcp client is part of the base system.
But I assigned my machine a static ip address and netmask, and they never
changed. I don't know how the machine detect the gateway ip address and DNS
server ip address which i never
Lowell wrote:
We don't either. We do not have enough information.
Showing us your configuration files might help.
What configuration file do you need?
thanks,
Regards,
Xu Qiang
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
identify the proxy server's name even i
didn't give it an explicit DNS server ip address. (It can ping
proxy.abc.com) And I found the gateway is also found automatically
by the machine. (It is automatically added into the line beginnin
with defaultrouter=)
Is it designed behavior? I can't
)
a secured subnet for databases (10.30.0.0/16)
I have 2 DNS/Bind servers running in the DMZ: 1 for the public web servers that
get NAT'd, and provide public DNS lookups for the outside world. The other DNS
server is for internal queries, providing the cooresponding private IP
addresses to LAN
problem which started on friday at about
noon. This is on four freebsd boxes (4.11) that were updated via
cvsup on May 3 from cvsup10, 11, and 12. These four boxes have
been in use for 18 months without issue. I make connections
to ip addresses and not resolvable names, so dns should not be
the show
-setup.html).
But after that, it can identify the proxy server's name even i
didn't give it an explicit DNS server ip address. (It can ping
proxy.abc.com) And I found the gateway is also found automatically
by the machine. (It is automatically added into the line beginnin
Lowell wrote:
Yes, you do. A dhcp client is part of the base system.
But I assigned my machine a static ip address and netmask, and they never
changed. I don't know how the machine detect the gateway ip address and DNS
server ip address which i never assigned to it. :(
Regards,
Xu Qiang
i didn't give it an explicit
DNS server ip address. (It can ping proxy.abc.com) And I found the gateway is also found
automatically by the machine. (It is automatically added into the line beginnin with
defaultrouter=)
Is it designed behavior? I can't understand that. :(
Regards,
Xu Qiang
it
an explicit DNS server ip address. (It can ping proxy.abc.com) And I found the
gateway is also found automatically by the machine. (It is automatically added
into the line beginnin with defaultrouter=)
Is it designed behavior? I can't understand that. :(
Regards,
Xu Qiang
Xian wrote:
I have just set up a router and would like DNS caching on it. I have tried to
set it up an it kind of works, just computer using it as their nameserver
take ages on DNS queries, up to 4-5 seconds.
To set up the DNS caching I added the ip of another DNS server
to /etc
I have just set up a router and would like DNS caching on it. I have tried to
set it up an it kind of works, just computer using it as their nameserver
take ages on DNS queries, up to 4-5 seconds.
To set up the DNS caching I added the ip of another DNS server
to /etc/resolv.conf and added
On Thursday 12 May 2005 12:43, you wrote:
Xian wrote:
I have just set up a router and would like DNS caching on it. I have tried
to set it up an it kind of works, just computer using it as their
nameserver take ages on DNS queries, up to 4-5 seconds.
To set up the DNS caching I added
to map to the IP of abc.com and
ns2.abc.com to map to the IP of xyz.org.
This will give me my primary and secondary name servers.
I currently only have one computer on my domain, and it provides dns
lookups for itself (and virtual servers)[1]
So if you ask the dotorg root name servers what
Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
[snippage]
I currently only have one computer on my domain, and it provides dns
lookups for itself (and virtual servers)[1]
[snippage]
[1] One could argue that I should have at least two name servers,
but why
should I need greater redundancy on my name servers
* Me:
[1] One could argue that I should have at least two name servers, but why
should I need greater redundancy on my name servers, than I have on my
other services? If my dns is down, so is my mail, and am in the mercy of
the sender to keep retrying anyway.
* Jim Freeze [2005-05
Hi
I am wondering if the following is possible.
Suppose I own two domains: abc.com and xyz.org.
I want to host these domains myself and have them provide
the primary and secondary name servers for each other.
Is this possible? Seems kind of circular.
In theory I would have ns1.abc.com to map to
OK, here we go ...
I'm going to attempt setting up BIND9 for the first time, and I don't
have a lot of experience with DNS. My setup is a LAN behind a router
using NAT on an ADSL connection with a dynamic IP on its interface
assigned by my ISP. I'm not interested in setting up an authoritative
, it would be better to masquerade as a host in the
domain of your ISP or mail service (ie, masquarade as pacbell.net).
Also, is there any sort of guide on how to set up DNS in my situation?
Yes, use an invalid top-level domain like .local, or maybe .lan.
I've read the handbook, and it seems most
up DNS in my
situation?
Yes, use an invalid top-level domain like .local, or maybe .lan.
So, which would be better here? Would it be considered impolite to
assign foo.local to my workstation, if I'm sending email through
Pacbell's (SBC/Yahoo) server? Or would it be more impolite
On Sat 30 Apr 05 20:58, Joshua Tinnin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have been meaning to get Greg Leahey's book as well, but
maybe I'll wait for the next edition, because he recently said he'd
be updating it.
'Scuze me, that should be Lehey, of course ...
- jt
Hi all,
I am registered to this mailing list under a different
e-mail which I can't seem to use to send mails to this
list. FreeBSD MXs kept rejecting my server with 450
Client host rejected. cannot find hostname,
[202.71.100.92] (in reply to RCPT TO command)
I've checked and rechecked with
ideas already.
Did you recently (i.e. last couple of days) change your DNS for that
host-IP combo? It might take some nameservers (esp. ones with long cache
lifetimes) a bit of time to acquire the new information. I had this
problem when I first tried to subscribe to this list. A couple hours
the reverse information.
I checked, and your DNS ids your box as the MX for your domain as well.
The first thing I would do is telnet *from* your mailserver to the FreeBSD
mailserver and try a manual SMTP session and see what happens. If you get
rejected then, you *know* it's a problem
FreeBSD servers couldn't get the reverse
information.
I checked, and your DNS ids your box as the MX for your domain as
well.
The first thing I would do is telnet *from* your mailserver to
the FreeBSD
mailserver and try a manual SMTP session and see what happens. If
you get rejected then, you
(including this one).
I'm not a DNS expert but for the life of me I can't see the correlation between
a TTL and reverse lookup.
--
Thank you for your time,
Ihsan,
http://ihsan.synthexp.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
rainier.sbcglobal.com
but host or bind won't run correctly, as the name of my network/dhcp
setup is really not in the DNS of my ISP. I believe that's cause cvsup
misbehave (as well as browser's behaving very slowly or timedout).
cvsup only worked once, it always came back with a network read
won't run correctly, as the name of my network/dhcp
setup is really not in the DNS of my ISP. I believe that's cause cvsup
misbehave (as well as browser's behaving very slowly or timedout).
cvsup only worked once, it always came back with a network read error
after connecting to the freebsd host
Well i read couple of how,to artical on the internet
regarding setting up a ipfw firewall with nat to allow
your private network client to setup internet access ,
but their isnt one thing clear to me , which was not
present in any of the articals , which is how there
internal clients gona resolve
will consult DNS via the
network. DNS uses port 53 and it can use either TCP or UDP, though in
practice a client will never use TCP. (TCP is used mainly for zone
transfers and the like, which are server-to-server.)
The rule of thumb for Unix is not to use hostnames in startup scripts,
because
In the last episode (Apr 05), Martin Petraschek said:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:36:35 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Apr 05), Martin Petraschek said:
The operating system is caching DNS name resolutions in order to
avoid repeated DNS requests for the same hostname. Is it possible
Martin Petraschek wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank you, Dan. I was not aware of the fact that FreeBSD does not cache
DNS entries unless you are running a name server.
At least some versions of the standard C library will cache the last DNS
looked up, and reuse that value if the process asks about the same
Hi!
The operating system is caching DNS name resolutions in order to avoid repeated
DNS
requests for the same hostname. Is it possible to display the entries of that
DNS cache?
Under Windows, the command ipconfig /displaydns exists, and I would need that
functionality under FreeBSD.
Thank
In the last episode (Apr 05), Martin Petraschek said:
The operating system is caching DNS name resolutions in order to
avoid repeated DNS requests for the same hostname. Is it possible to
display the entries of that DNS cache?
Under Windows, the command ipconfig /displaydns exists, and I
801 - 900 of 1415 matches
Mail list logo
