On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:00:54PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:33:25 -0600, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 09:26:07 AM +0100 Gert Cuykens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is what i dont understand only need perl to compile
so if i go to a ports tree directory how do i display a list of all
dependencies without compiling it ?
I am guessing something like make info :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:23:09PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
so if i go to a ports tree directory how do i display a list of all
dependencies without compiling it ?
I am guessing something like make info :)
'make pretty-print-run-depends-list' or
'make pretty-print-build-depends-list'
ps who is the imake developer ?
Believe me i am going to mail every developer where perl comes in
between me and the application :P
I dont want perl , i know it can do great things but i dont want it.
Its a bit like internet explorer browser or msn messenger in windows.
I just want a windows
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:41:56PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
ps who is the imake developer ?
Believe me i am going to mail every developer where perl comes in
between me and the application :P
That would mostly just irritate developers and point out your own
ignorance.
I think you need
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I will start with the cvsup developer :P
cvsup itself doesn't require perl to build (as you can see from the
lack of mention in the makefile), it's one of the other build
dependencies.
Well I think Modula-3 is find totally useless and even obsolete and dead
as far
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:51:28PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I will start with the cvsup developer :P
cvsup itself doesn't require perl to build (as you can see from the
lack of mention in the makefile), it's one of the other build
dependencies.
Well I think
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:47:32 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:41:56PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
ps who is the imake developer ?
Believe me i am going to mail every developer where perl comes in
between me and the application :P
That would mostly
--On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:59:54 PM +0100 Gert Cuykens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no why would it irritate developers ? Its just a question ? i only
want them to think a bit before they bring in perl to build there
application.
I am not a developer so i can not think for them i can only ask
Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:47:32 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
no why would it irritate developers ? Its just a question ? i only
want them to think a bit before they bring in perl to build there
application.
I am not a developer so i can not think for them
Gert Cuykens wrote:
I want a freebsd with cvsup x11 and a gnome-lite desktop. Its what i
like about freebsd filosofie you have a house and you can chose your
own freebsd port furniture. For me perl is a closet that i dont want
because it doesnt go well with my php painting and my apache carpet
Let me get this straight. You're not a developer, so you don't know
languages or how to code. Yet you're completely convinced that perl is
insecure and should never be used anywhere, and you're equally convinced
that no developer should be using it for their programs.
Is that about right
--On Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:35:32 AM +0100 Gert Cuykens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me freebsd is build as a base that
can handle everything designed for it. If application need something
to help it build, it should belong to the base and not to a external
perl tool.
Then it wouldn't
For me freebsd is build as a base that
can handle everything designed for it. If application need something
to help it build, it should belong to the base and not to a external
perl tool.
Then it wouldn't hurt for you to know that perl *is* part of the base of
FreeBSD. There is *also
For me freebsd is build as a base that
can handle everything designed for it. If application need something
to help it build, it should belong to the base and not to a external
perl tool.
Then it wouldn't hurt for you to know that perl *is* part of the base of
FreeBSD
Let me get this straight. You're not a developer, so you don't know
languages or how to code. Yet you're completely convinced that perl is
insecure and should never be used anywhere, and you're equally convinced
that no developer should be using it for their programs
So if want to (install) buy a car and go to the (ports) shop i dont
expect to bring my (perl) wrench to the (ports) shop .
No, you expect a competent shop to have the tool and know
how to use it. Otherwise you wouldn't take your car there.
Ok thats true but a toolbox belongs in the car
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
make and make install clean should do a good thing too, if the sourcecode
itself isnt perl, nor any part of it, you should get the results wanted with
these commands.
please correct me, if im not right, but the Makefile is not pl, right?
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
http
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
Only if you want to do certain things like 'make index
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:54:50 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:02:13AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:54:50 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use
need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
Only if you want to do certain things like 'make index', but not for
general use (this has been the case for years).
So i can
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
Only
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:25:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl
:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :)
Only if you want to do certain things like 'make index
24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up
space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:12:12AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
So if i want to completly wipe out perl where in my freebsd 5.3 ports
tree do i do make deinstall ?
Use pkg_info and pkg_delete to remove the installed packages. See the
manpages.
Kris
pgpzrqfa4Va8E.pgp
Description: PGP
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:20:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:12:12AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
So if i want to completly wipe out perl where in my freebsd 5.3 ports
tree do i do make deinstall ?
Use pkg_info and pkg_delete to remove the installed
On Monday 24 January 2005 09:25 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:20:16PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:42:24AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Do we still need perl to make use of ports
On Monday 24 January 2005 10:23 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:20:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:12:12AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
So if i want to completly wipe out perl where in my freebsd 5.3
ports tree do i do make
does cvsup need perl ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
does cvsup need perl ?
Yes
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:15:12PM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
And if you want to install packages using the ports tree.
Eh?
depend on installing packages only, ok. Of course, you have to wait
for them to be built.
I just ran pkg_info -R perl-5.8.5, too many to count
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:30:05PM +1000, Warren wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:28 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
does cvsup need perl ?
Yes
Only to compile it from ports, not to run the resulting package.
Kris
pgpuTO1yuKsMX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:55:19 -0900, Andy Firman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see the perl module for Text::Aspell in the ports, by doing
all sorts of permutations of this:
cd /usr/ports make search name=p5 |grep Aspell
Ah, sorry, didn't see that in your posts about this.
So, once again
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 06:55:19AM -0900, Andy Firman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:29:05AM -0500, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:20:49 -0900, Andy Firman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 03:08:23PM +, Gary Hayers wrote:
[snip]
I don't see the perl
Using FreeBSD 4.10 stable, perl-5.8.5 installed from ports.
su-2.05b# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int
When using perl -MCPAN -e shell, I can install the bundle fine,
but the when I try to install XML::DOM, or Text::Aspell, they fail.
Where can I go for help on getting
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:34:33 -0900, Andy Firman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using FreeBSD 4.10 stable, perl-5.8.5 installed from ports.
su-2.05b# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int
When using perl -MCPAN -e shell, I can install the bundle fine,
but the when I try
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 09:42:06AM -0500, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:34:33 -0900, Andy Firman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using FreeBSD 4.10 stable, perl-5.8.5 installed from ports.
su-2.05b# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int
When using
Andy Firman wrote:
Using FreeBSD 4.10 stable, perl-5.8.5 installed from ports.
su-2.05b# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int
When using perl -MCPAN -e shell, I can install the bundle fine,
but the when I try to install XML::DOM, or Text::Aspell, they fail.
Where can I go
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 03:08:23PM +, Gary Hayers wrote:
Andy Firman wrote:
Using FreeBSD 4.10 stable, perl-5.8.5 installed from ports.
su-2.05b# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int
When using perl -MCPAN -e shell, I can install the bundle fine,
but the when I
. But I am having a hard time figuring out how Perl modules
should get installed on a system.
The generally preferred way on a FreeBSD system is to use the FreeBSD
ports as noted above.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html
Bryan
# cd /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-DOM make install clean
Understood. But I am having a hard time figuring out how Perl modules
should get installed on a system.
The generally preferred way on a FreeBSD system is to use the FreeBSD
ports as noted above.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc
I am using FreeBSD 4.10 stable with the perl 5.8 port
and can't install Text:Aspell. I need some help because
I don't know much about bsdpan perl stuff.
What am I doing wrong?
I did this:
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Bundle::CPAN
with no problems.but then I did this:
cpan install Text
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
CC: Karl Agee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: installing a linux rpm, wants perl
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:41:38 -0800
On Monday 03 January 2005 09:24 pm, Karl Agee wrote:
freebsd 4.11-pre with linux compatibility.
I'm trying
freebsd 4.11-pre with linux compatibility.
I'm trying to install a linux rpm but I am getting the following errer:
-su-2.05b# rpm -i --ignoreos --root /compat/linux --dbpath /var/lib/rpm
package.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
/usr/bin/perl is needed by package
-su-2.05b# whereis
On 01/04/05 00:24:38, Karl Agee wrote:
freebsd 4.11-pre with linux compatibility.
I'm trying to install a linux rpm but I am getting the following
errer:
-su-2.05b# rpm -i --ignoreos --root /compat/linux --dbpath /var/lib/
rpm package.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
/usr/bin/perl
:
/usr/bin/perl is needed by package
-su-2.05b# whereis perl
perl: /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/man/man1/perl.1.gz
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl
So I am guessing that compat/linux ought to have perl in /usr/bin. I
tried making a soft link but that didnt work.
I havent found a port for perl
Karl Agee wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of
the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp since
5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version.
I am
--On Thursday, December 30, 2004 7:54 PM -0800 Karl Agee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of
the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp since
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:46:09PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote:
I haven't found big differences between 5.6 and 5.8, so I'd suggest you
use 5.8. The main reason to stick with an older version is that you
might develop scripts for platforms where the newer are not available.
I've noticed some
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x that
is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of the
learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp since 5.6.x
some of the features arent in this older version.
I am considering
Karl Agee wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most
of the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp
since 5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version.
I am
Karl Agee wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most
of the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp
since 5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version.
I am
Greetings list.
All of a sudden, I am experiencing wierd functionality with my
5.2.1-Release installation. My perl compiles don't succeed, due to the
following error. nsl is on Solaris, and I have never had an issue prior
to a few days ago. I was planning to reinstall, after backing up my
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 01:45:32PM +0300, Martes Wigglesworth wrote:
Greetings list.
All of a sudden, I am experiencing wierd functionality with my
5.2.1-Release installation. My perl compiles don't succeed, due to the
following error. nsl is on Solaris, and I have never had an issue
On Friday 24 December 2004 08:17, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm trying to read /proc/*/status, specifically to find what processes
belong to what jail ... but, doing 'direct views' on it tends to generate
errors since processes come-n-go ...
I had the same problem when I was writing JailAdmin
I'm trying to read /proc/*/status, specifically to find what processes
belong to what jail ... but, doing 'direct views' on it tends to generate
errors since processes come-n-go ...
So, I loaded p5-Proc-ProcessTable, since it looked the closest to what I'm
looking for, but it doesn't report
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:10:36 +0100, thomas leveille wrote
also is this make switch suppesed to be provided when building perl or
when building openwebmail - which port please?
You need to build perl with this switch, according to the commit
history :
Update to 5.8.1.
Also
Perl-5.8.5 SUIDPERL set
openwebmail-2.41
FreeBSD-4.9
I didnt get a clear answer on this at the moment - so I am asking agian.
any clues why its complaining about this? and how to fix it?
snip
# /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/openwebmail.pl --init
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:22:03 -0200, Luís Vitório Cargnini wrote
maybe you don't have this package and if you recompiled your pelr
you must recompile the package too
Its possible? But I portupgrade -Rr perl and then I portupgrade -Rr
openwebmail. and I still get the same response from
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Lapo Nustrini wrote:
If you have just gone from a 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5,
you are probably running into the following:
(From the Openwebmail README file at
http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt )
If you are using FreeBSD and your perl
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Lapo Nustrini wrote:
If you have just gone from a 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5,
you are probably running into the following:
(From the Openwebmail README file at
http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt )
If you are using FreeBSD and your perl
Perl-5.8.5 SUIDPERL set
openwebmail-2.41
FreeBSD-4.9
any clues why its complaining about this? and how to fix it?
snip
# /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/openwebmail.pl --init
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/speedy_backend: Undefined symbol Perl_
malloc
speedy[24754
FreeBSD-4.9
perl-5.8.5
openwebmail-2.41
just portupgraded perl
now I am having difficulties reinitializing openwebmail.pl
any clues on this?
--- snip ---
# /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/openwebmail-tool.pl --init
Args must match #! line at /dev/fd/9 line 1.
speedy_backend[44225]: perl_parse
If you have just gone from a 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current
5.8.5, you are probably running into the following:
(From the Openwebmail README file at
http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt )
If you are using FreeBSD and your perl is compiled from port,
then please note
Hello,
I am having issues with Perl and wondered if someone might be able to
help. For example, I installed from ports, anomy-sanitizer.
Occasionally I see the following error when run from procmail:
/usr/local/bin/sanitizer.pl,/usr/local/etc/sanitizer.cfg
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
/usr/local/lib
I planed on writing a perl script on my FreeBSD laptop over the holidays,
that would ultimetly be deployed on Solaris.
I was planing on using the Proc::ProcessTable perl module in this script to
collect memory usage data.
Looks like this module does nt support memory statistics under FreeBSD
Gustafson, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any way to turn on threaded Perl in the base system, instead of
using the Perl port? I need to use p5-Sendmail-Milter which requires
threads, but I would rather not install the Perl port over the base Perl
installation. Is there any flag I
--On Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:30:01 PM -0500 Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe so, but note that the perl port will *not* install
over the base system one; they will coexist on your system, and you
can switch back and forth. [The port will install a script called
Hello!
Is there any way to turn on threaded Perl in the base system, instead of
using the Perl port? I need to use p5-Sendmail-Milter which requires
threads, but I would rather not install the Perl port over the base Perl
installation. Is there any flag I can set in /etc/make.conf
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:30:44AM -0500, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Is there any way to turn on threaded Perl in the base system, instead of
using the Perl port? I need to use p5-Sendmail-Milter which requires
threads, but I would rather not install the Perl port over the base Perl
installation
Hello list,
i need the perlversion 5.005 on Freebsd 5.3.
I tried to compile it by hand, but when i try make i got an error like
make: don't know how to make built-in. Stop
I need this perl-version only for one application :-/
Perhaps anybody has an idea.
I also need version 5.8.5, but thats
Volker Lieder wrote:
Hello list,
i need the perlversion 5.005 on Freebsd 5.3.
I tried to compile it by hand, but when i try make i got an error like
make: don't know how to make built-in. Stop
I need this perl-version only for one application :-/
Perhaps anybody has an idea.
I also need version
Greetings:
Is there a way to use TK with perl 5.6?
is there a way to have two seperatate installs of perl on the same system (5.6)
and (5.8) so i can run
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Tk?
Thanks
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 05:04:43PM -0600, Brian Henning wrote:
Greetings:
Is there a way to use TK with perl 5.6?
Not according to the port makefile. Discuss this further with the
authors of that perl module.
is there a way to have two seperatate installs of perl on the same
system (5.6
code
101010101000111010111
code
hello.html
html
look at me
html
And i would defenatly want something with classes
So i gues we have php java perl phyton or (asp :P)
And NO i am not going to learn all 4 of them, i have only one
braincell to put some syntax in and it is going
On 2004-10-26 08:02, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i want to learn something that is capable to run applications on the
web but is totally separated from the html meaning i HATE doing this
hello.php
code
11010111010101001010
code
html
he look at me
html
code
Dame you, now i still don't know which one to use PS what about python
? Doesn't google and nasa use python, i wonder why. It has defenatly
the coolest name meaning i can make phyton aplications sounds way
cooler then perl or php or java :P
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:19:48 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
meaning i can make phyton aplications sounds way
cooler then perl or php or java :P
I'd appreciate it if you stopped using damn, damned, their derivatives or
other possibly offensive terms in a mailing list with thousands of subscribers.
If you are only learning how PHP or mod_perl works, it doesn't
google and nasa use python, i wonder why. It has defenatly
the coolest name meaning i can make phyton aplications sounds way
cooler then perl or php or java :P
I'd appreciate it if you stopped using damn, damned, their derivatives or
other possibly offensive terms in a mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Gert Cuykens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:50 AM
To: Giorgos Keramidas
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: perl vs php round 1
ok i will try my best not to use any bad words but sometimes they are
really needed to say
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:56:36 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gert Cuykens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:50 AM
To: Giorgos Keramidas
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: perl vs php round 1
ok i
In the immortal words of Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dame you, now i still don't know which one to use PS what about python
? Doesn't google and nasa use python, i wonder why. It has defenatly
the coolest name meaning i can make phyton aplications sounds way
cooler then perl or php
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:18:02AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Can you do as much with perl as you can do with php ?
Yes, in the strict comp. sci. sense of Turing Completeness and yes
in the practical sense of what modules and extensions exist to help
you program stuff. In fact, perl
i want to learn something that is capable to run applications on the
web but is totally separated from the html meaning i HATE doing this
If using PHP then give Smarty a try:
http://smarty.php.net/rightforme.php
Thanks,
--
Scott A. Gerhardt, P.Geo.
Gerhardt Information Technologies
On Oct 26,
Gert Cuykens wrote:
Can you do as much with perl as you can do with php ?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should think so.
In fact, I
Attempting to install perl 5.8 on a newly install FreeBSD 4.10 Machine.
I have done the following..
Compiled Kernel with IPFW support
Install cvsup and updated the ports tree
then cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql40-server
make install
and cd /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl
make install
I
Can you do as much with perl as you can do with php ?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the immortal words of Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can you do as much with perl as you can do with php ?
Depends on who is doing it. I can do more with Perl than with PHP, but
I know someone else who can do more with PHP than Perl. It isn't the
language that is the limiting factor
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 08:42:27 PM -0400 Danny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not know you could install Perl module's through the ports.
Thank you, Christopher, Erik, Paul, Donald, and everyone else that
replied.
Bottom line: due to the fact that I did not know you could install
Perl
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 22:57:45 -0400, Christopher Nehren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 14:40 -0400, Danny wrote:
I am trying to install a perl CPAN module:
mx1# perl Makefile.PL
Perl 5.006 required--this is only version 5.00503, stopped at
Makefile.PL line 3.
BEGIN
hi,
to resolv type:
# use.perl port
The OS will use perl 5.8
regards
Bilouro
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to update perl on FreeBSD 4.9R?
Thank you!
...D
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Friday, October 08, 2004 02:22:13 PM -0400 Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How to update perl on FreeBSD 4.9R?
Define update. Do you mean use the ports version instead of the src
version? Do you mean update the ports version? Update the src version?
It might be helpful if you described
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:28:59 -0500, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Friday, October 08, 2004 02:22:13 PM -0400 Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How to update perl on FreeBSD 4.9R?
Define update. Do you mean use the ports version instead of the src
version? Do you mean update
--On Friday, October 08, 2004 02:40:06 PM -0400 Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Whatever is easiest; I do not feel like rebuilding the src, but I
don't know if I need to.
I am trying to install a perl CPAN module:
mx1# perl Makefile.PL
Perl 5.006 required--this is only version 5.00503, stopped
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:20:56 -0500, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Friday, October 08, 2004 02:40:06 PM -0400 Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Whatever is easiest; I do not feel like rebuilding the src, but I
don't know if I need to.
I am trying to install a perl CPAN module
901 - 1000 of 1476 matches
Mail list logo
