Re: make buildworld fails

Jamie Avery wrote: > put KERNCONF=/kernelname/ into /etc/make.conf. However, when I make > buildkernel, I get the following error 7.x+ src.conf, below make.conf grep KERNCONF /etc/make.conf /etc/src.conf /etc/src.conf:KERNCONF?= RIDERWAY NO /s neccessary. --

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

At 08:19 PM 7/27/2007 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:12:26AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > so I deleted /usr/src > redownloaded from a different mirror and tried > make buildworld again... > > It still failed -but this time at a different point: Standard behaviour of faili

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:12:26AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > so I deleted /usr/src > redownloaded from a different mirror and tried > make buildworld again... > > It still failed -but this time at a different point: Standard behaviour of failing hardware - most likely memory. -- Jonathan Chen

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

so I deleted /usr/src redownloaded from a different mirror and tried make buildworld again... It still failed -but this time at a different point: mkdep -f .depend -a-DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc/..

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

At 09:16 AM 07/26/2007, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: Am Donnerstag 26 Juli 2007 15:54:36 schrieb J.D. Bronson: > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. Mo

Re: make buildworld fails on 6.2-STABLE

Am Donnerstag 26 Juli 2007 15:54:36 schrieb J.D. Bronson: > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. Most probably a (physical) memory error. As the message s

Re: make Buildworld fails...why?

Mark Stout wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to upgrade a 5.4-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE and having a bit of > a problem. > > Downloaded and untar's the source files for base, catpages, dict, doc, > games, info, manpages, proflibs, and src directories per INSTALL.TXT in the > releases/.../src dire

Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On 5/9/06, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /us

Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? [] is

Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:21:52PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.

[SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set

On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? # (Intel CPUs) nocona pentium4[m] prescott pentium3[m] pentium

Re: make buildworld fails

Here's what I would try. Upgrade to RELENG_4 via the cvsup/buildworld process, read Bruce Mah's 4.11-5.X Migration Guide, and be sure and include "mergemaster -p" in your buildworld cycle. Can you tell me where is that migration guide? When I google for it, I only get posts about that gui

Re: make buildworld fails

gandalf wrote: Hello, I have this file /etc/sup.sys: *default host=cvsup.hu.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Then I traverse to /usr and execute this command: cvsup /etc/sup.sys

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:12:50AM -1000, Robert Marella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Anthony > > Did you remove everything under the /usr/obj directory before make > buildworld? > > Good luck > Robert I now have, and that fixed the problem. Thanks for you help! Anthony _

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 03:11:46 -0600 Anthony Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to upgrade from 5.4 to 6.0. I ran cvsup and tried a make > buildworld, but it failed. So I checked out the handbook and noticed > that it mentioned I should run a mergemaster -p first. So I did t

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Monday 05 December 2005 09:51, Anthony Philipp wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:41:15AM +, > > Benjamin Sobotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey! > > > > You might want to have a look at > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > > > > especially

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:41:15AM +, Benjamin Sobotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey! > > You might want to have a look at > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > > especially subsection > > 20.4.16.6. What do I do if something goes wrong > I w

Re: make buildworld fails from 5.4->6.0

Hey! You might want to have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html especially subsection 20.4.16.6. What do I do if something goes wrong Further, I believe that you run mergemaster -p before make installworld. Not buildworld, after all I believe bu

Re: make buildworld fails on step 1.2 and questions

On Sep 20, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Chris wrote: A few things - If you are using CURRENT (anything) you have posted to the wrong list - try FreeBSD-CURRENT. K. If your a newb (as you seem to be), you should be using either 5.4-RELEASE or 4.11-RELEASE Meh. I just want to get my hands dir

Re: make buildworld fails on step 1.2 and questions

Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello, > I'm building my OS from source from the first time, and I realize > that I must have missed a step in configuring it properly. I just hate > treading through a lot of documentation when there isn't a really nice > search feature involved, so if someone can gi

Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED]

Marius Korsmo wrote: That does not look like an *old* version, it looks like a completely different file. Did you install anything not from ports that might have overwritten it? Did you try and install a port into a target hierarchy that /usr/local? (The same copyright header as the real 5

Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED]

Quoting Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Marius Korsmo wrote: It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few questions. The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. < /*- < * Cop

Re: make buildworld fails in openssl/colldef [SOLVED]

Marius Korsmo wrote: It took two weeks to fix this problem, and therefore I do have a few questions. The error turned out to be in err.h. The file located in /usr/include was totally different from the one located in /usr/src/include. < /*- < * Copyright (c) 1993 < *The Regents of the Univer

Re: make buildworld fails

Yes. You're using unsupported optimizations. Please read very carefully the comments above CFLAGS in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf - Giorgos Thanks a lot! I'll use a safer optimization. Valeiro ___ freebsd-questions@freebs

Re: make buildworld fails

On 2005-06-22 14:38, Valerio Daelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then I started to make buildworld. But it fails with this error: > __ > > cc -O3 -mtune=pentium4 -march=pentium4 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math > -march=pentium4 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include > -I/usr/src

RE: make buildworld fails and a reboot?

-Original Message- From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD questions List Subject: Re: make buildworld fails and a reboot? Eric F Crist wrote: > Hey all. I figured out why my system doesn't se

Re: make buildworld fails and a reboot?

Eric F Crist wrote: Hey all. I figured out why my system doesn't seem to be working. For some reason, make world failed and the system rebooted. Now, I can't cvsup any new sources. How do I recover from this? "make world" doesn't always result in a working system, which is why the procedur

Re: make buildworld fails

On Monday 19 January 2004 01:56 pm, Nick Rogness wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Monday 19 January 2004 11:55 am, Nick Rogness wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > > > > Nick Rogness wrote: > > > > >I cvsup'd just a few minutes ago and tr

Re: make buildworld fails

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Monday 19 January 2004 11:55 am, Nick Rogness wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > > > Nick Rogness wrote: > > > >I cvsup'd just a few minutes ago and tried a make buildworld. Any > > > > hints as to why I'm failing o

Re: make buildworld fails

On Monday 19 January 2004 11:55 am, Nick Rogness wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > > Nick Rogness wrote: > > >I cvsup'd just a few minutes ago and tried a make buildworld. Any > > > hints as to why I'm failing out? Details below: > > > > > >/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/

Re: make buildworld fails

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Nick Rogness wrote: > > >I cvsup'd just a few minutes ago and tried a make buildworld. Any hints > >as to why I'm failing out? Details below: > > > >/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/objdump/../../../../contrib/binutils/binutils/objdump.c

Re: make buildworld fails

Nick Rogness wrote: I cvsup'd just a few minutes ago and tried a make buildworld. Any hints as to why I'm failing out? Details below: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/objdump/../../../../contrib/binutils/binutils/objdump.c:1553: unterminated character constant mkdep: compile failed Yes ;-)

Re: make buildworld fails

On Monday 19 January 2004 10:12 am, Nick Rogness wrote: > I cvsup'd just a few minutes ago and tried a make buildworld. Any > hints as to why I'm failing out? Details below: For starters, what did you cvsup? Kent > > > # uname -a > FreeBSD cody.jharris.com 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: M

Re: make buildworld fails

On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Maarten de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to upgrade an old P166 from 5.0 to 5.1-R using freshly cvsup'ed > sources. After a couple of hours (heh...) it suddenly halts: > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libtermlib_p.a -> libncurses_p.a > /usr/obj/usr/

Re: Make buildworld fails (many times)

On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:25:33PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:15:46PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote: > > > > > Other info: > > > AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192MB. > > > Current install: 5.0-RELEASE-p7 > > > > This is likel

Re: Make buildworld fails (many times)

Kent Stewart wrote: It doesn't matter. My rule is that if you are the only one with problems, it is your computer that has the problem. There haven't been a number of complaints of buildworld failures in -current, which is where they would be if 5.x was failing. In the past, IIRC, many of the

Re: Make buildworld fails (many times)

On Sunday 22 June 2003 05:25 pm, Charlie Schluting wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:15:46PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote: > > > Other info: > > > AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192MB. > > > Current install: 5.0-RELEASE-p7 > > > > This is likely to be a hardware

Re: Make buildworld fails (many times)

On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:15:46PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote: > > > Other info: > > AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192MB. > > Current install: 5.0-RELEASE-p7 > > This is likely to be a hardware issue. AMD k6's are very sensitive to > temperature and require lot

Re: Make buildworld fails (many times)

On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:15:46PM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote: > Other info: > AMD K6-2 450MHz, 192MB. > Current install: 5.0-RELEASE-p7 This is likely to be a hardware issue. AMD k6's are very sensitive to temperature and require lots of CPU cooling. Or maybe you have bad RAM or other fail

Re: Make buildworld fails for 5.0

On Tuesday 04 March 2003 09:40 pm, Mike Loiterman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'm getting the following error in my: > > 'make buildworld' > > I'm currently running 5.0-RELEASE #0 and I've cvsup'ed to '.'. So then this belongs on -current. See http://www.FreeBSD.

RE: Make buildworld fails for 5.0

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Mike Loiterman wrote: > [21:02:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/src]# swapinfo > Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Type > /dev/ad2s1b 78008515362647266%Interleaved > > I don't know what to make of either of these commands. > > Which logs sh

RE: Make buildworld fails for 5.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:47 PM Andy Farkas wrote: >> I'm getting the following error in my: >> >> 'make buildworld' >> >> ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int >> /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools/

Re: Make buildworld fails for 5.0

> > I'm getting the following error in my: > > 'make buildworld' > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools/genattrtab > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.md > > insn-attrtab.c > Killed > *** Error code 13

Re: make buildworld fails on RELENG_4_7 - solved, but now buildkernel fails...

Well, It appears that my problem in running "make buildworld" was that I had uncommented the line: #NO_OPENSSL= true in my /etc/make.conf. This makes sense (except with respect to libncurses) given how many libs and apps rely depend on OpenSSL... But 4.7 has just successfully built world.

Re: make buildworld fails on RELENG_4_7

E.S. wrote: I'm not sure if this is the right list for this question, so I'll ask here first... I've been cvsup'ing /usr/src/ for the last couple of days, and every time I try "make buildworld' the build fails when building libncurses (it failed on Nov. 8 on libm, but that appears to have since

Re: make buildworld fails

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:09:43 -0600 Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:11:34 + > Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think it's worth trying NO_OPENSSH=true in /etc/make.conf together > > with your C_INCLUDE_PATH thing to see if you can get to the en

Re: make buildworld fails

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:11:34 + Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's worth trying NO_OPENSSH=true in /etc/make.conf together > with your C_INCLUDE_PATH thing to see if you can get to the end of the > buildworld process. If you can get the rest of the system up to > 4.7-STAB

Re: make buildworld fails

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:11:10 +0200 Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2002-10-31 20:26, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:32:40 +0200 > > Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Compile with OPENSSH and use sshd_program="/usr/local/sbin/

Re: make buildworld fails

Chris Pressey wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:32:40 +0200 > Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've done this now with NO_OPENSSH=true in make.conf, but I *still* > > > get errors! > > > > > I had the exact same results when I tried NO_OPENSSH=true. Kernel > >

Re: make buildworld fails

On 2002-10-31 20:26, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:32:40 +0200 > Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Compile with OPENSSH and use sshd_program="/usr/local/sbin/sshd" at ur > > rc.conf if you are trying to use the new sshd. U will also need to > > c

Re: make buildworld fails

On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:32:40 +0200 Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've done this now with NO_OPENSSH=true in make.conf, but I *still* > > get errors! > > > I had the exact same results when I tried NO_OPENSSH=true. Kernel >

Re: make buildworld fails

Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2002-10-30 19:12, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:41:49 +0200 > > Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + Remove everything under /usr/obj. > > > > > > # chflags -R noschg /usr/obj > > > # rm -fr /usr/obj/* >

Re: make buildworld fails

On 2002-10-30 19:12, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:41:49 +0200 > Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + Remove everything under /usr/obj. > > > > # chflags -R noschg /usr/obj > > # rm -fr /usr/obj/* > > + CVSup your sources. > > + Start a new

Re: make buildworld fails

> I've done this now with NO_OPENSSH=true in make.conf, but I *still* get > errors! > I had the exact same results when I tried NO_OPENSSH=true. Kernel ^World wouldn't compile. Seems like kernel is broken with NO_OPENSSH=true.

Re: make buildworld fails

Chris Pressey wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:41:49 +0200 > Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2002-10-29 19:26, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:28:39 + > > > Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think what has happened

Re: make buildworld fails

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:41:49 +0200 Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2002-10-29 19:26, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:28:39 + > > Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think what has happened is that one or more of the Makefiles

Re: make buildworld fails

On 2002-10-29 19:26, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:28:39 + > Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think what has happened is that one or more of the Makefiles in the > > src tree hasn't been updated properly, possibly because cvsup(1) > > doesn't t

Re: make buildworld fails

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:26:15PM -0600, Chris Pressey wrote: > Unfortunately, no luck there. No Makefile-type files were updated. So, I > toasted my *entire* source tree (including the 'checkouts' files) and > grabbed it all anew, tried rebuilding the world... and got the same error. Well, I'm

Re: make buildworld fails

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:28:39 + Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:47:30AM -0600, Chris Pressey wrote: > > > I do indeed have /usr/src/include/glob.h, and it is 4480 bytes and it > > defines the macros in question. However, the copy in /usr/include is > > o

Re: make buildworld fails

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:47:30AM -0600, Chris Pressey wrote: > I do indeed have /usr/src/include/glob.h, and it is 4480 bytes and it > defines the macros in question. However, the copy in /usr/include is only > 4055 bytes and is older (Aug 21 2001) and it does NOT define the macros in > questio

Re: make buildworld fails

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:29:07 + Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:31:43AM -0600, Chris Pressey wrote: > > > I've been following the -STABLE development tree for a while now > > without any problems, using cvsup from 'make update'. But sometime > > over the

Re: make buildworld fails

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:31:43AM -0600, Chris Pressey wrote: > I've been following the -STABLE development tree for a while now without > any problems, using cvsup from 'make update'. But sometime over the > summer, a problem crept in somewhere and 'make buildworld' now fails. Curious. It's n