On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:55:32 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get the portupgrade to just accept all of the defaults
for the configurations of the individual ports. I tried # env BATCH=yes,
but it still just goes on hanging on the port configuration menus. It
seems as
?? wrote:
You can try with
portupgrade -a --batch
Regards.
Vivian
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:55:32 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to get the portupgrade to just accept all of the defaults
for the configurations of the individual ports. I tried # env BATCH=yes,
but it still
On 20/gen/08, at 01:22, RW wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100
Giorgio Valoti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should
try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of
the times it tries to fetch the package
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:49:29 +0100
Giorgio Valoti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/gen/08, at 01:22, RW wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100
Giorgio Valoti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which
should try to fetch the
Giorgio Valoti wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should try
to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of the times
it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it fails and then
proceed to build it from the sources.
While I
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Giorgio Valoti wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should
try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of the
times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it fails
and then proceed to build it from
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Giorgio Valoti wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should
try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of
the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it
fails and then proceed to build
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100
Giorgio Valoti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which should
try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of
the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it
Kiffin Gish schrieb:
When I try to upgrade my ports:
# portupgrade -arR
I keep getting the error meessage:
Stale dependency: python24-2.4.4_2 -- evolution-data-server-1.12.1_1 --
manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force.
So I run:
# pkdb -F
and all I get is:
--- Checking
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 12:18:01AM +, James wrote:
[...]
So you don't need to uninstall pkgs before starting to use ports, but you
can't go back once you've started using them.
That's not true. Packages are just precompiled ports, and you can mix
and match if you know what you're doing. If
On Nov 6, 2007 8:16 AM, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 12:18:01AM +, James wrote:
[...]
So you don't need to uninstall pkgs before starting to use ports, but
you
can't go back once you've started using them.
That's not true. Packages are just
I really should rephrase what I said, because you're both right and I knew
you were right.
*I* can't mix packages and ports, because *I* can't be bothered keeping
track of things.
Like everything in UNIX there are several ways:
1. The default (simplest way)
2. The simple but manual
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:15:54AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I really should rephrase what I said, because you're both right and I knew
you were right.
*I* can't mix packages and ports, because *I* can't be bothered keeping
track of things.
Like everything in UNIX
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:15:54AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I really should rephrase what I said, because you're both right and I knew
you were right.
*I* can't mix packages and ports, because *I* can't be bothered keeping
track of things.
Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Donovan R. Palmer wrote:
A total noob here with FreeBSD, but am liking it so far. I went to run
portupgrade for the first time and encountered quite a few problems. I
have googled around and found some of my answers, but it's been slow
going. For
So how do I fix this? Is there a HOW-TO or tutorial on a webpage out
there that will help me learn how to fix these things? The handbook
makes no mention of how to resolve these issues... unless I missed
something?
While portsupgrade does work on packages it is usually better to do
stuff
Here is a script I use to automate the procedure I posted in the
previous reply:
#!/bin/sh
cd /usr/src
csup ports-supfile
csup standard-supfile
cd patchs # optional
./apply # optional
portupgrade -a
--
Aryeh M. Friedman
Developer, not
Donovan R. Palmer wrote:
While portsupgrade does work on packages it is usually better to do
stuff from ports... even though this may be time consuming you may want
to deinstall every last package you have installed then select a few
high level ports to install (i.e. enough to drag in almost
Very interesting. Without sounding too daft, how do I determine what
a high level port is? Thanks!
oops forgot to include on that list:
1. lyx tex editor
2. linux-flashplayer7
3. acrobat reader 7
4. The latest firefox
a. Install both native and linux verions
b. Use linux to
While portsupgrade does work on packages it is usually better to do
stuff from ports... even though this may be time consuming you may want
to deinstall every last package you have installed then select a few
high level ports to install (i.e. enough to drag in almost everything
you need)... in
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Donovan R. Palmer wrote:
A total noob here with FreeBSD, but am liking it so far. I went to run
portupgrade for the first time and encountered quite a few problems. I have
googled around and found some of my answers, but it's been slow going. For
example:
cairo#
The thing you should be doing first is checking /usr/ports/UPDATING. Major
things can change, and portupgrade may not be able to handle them without
help.
Ah, i c. I am starting to make sense out of some of this from my fighting
around on this.
The -f option to pkg_delete/pkg_deinstall will
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Here is a script I use to automate the procedure I posted in the
previous reply:
#!/bin/sh
cd /usr/src
csup ports-supfile
csup standard-supfile
cd patchs # optional
./apply # optional
portupgrade -a
??
On Nov 5, 2007 7:11 PM, Jack Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Here is a script I use to automate the procedure I posted in the
previous reply:
#!/bin/sh
cd /usr/src
csup ports-supfile
csup standard-supfile
cd patchs # optional
*cd patchs # optional
./apply # optional
*
patchs are some local patchs and yet to be committed patchs I use
--
Aryeh M. Friedman
Developer, not business, friendly
http://www.flosoft-systems.com
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
*cd patchs # optional
./apply # optional
*
patchs are some local patchs and yet to be committed patchs I use
ok, thanks :)
I was wondering why I couldn't find them on my system :)
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:50:59 +0200
Petre Bandac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hallo
when portupgrading I have the following segfault
dell# portupgrade -Rr zsh
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkginfo.rb:67: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.6
I used to have issues with portupgrade as well. I traced my problem to
using the wrong portupgrade. I have been using portupgrade for several
months without an issue ( except the Xorg 7 transition ). Make sure to
use
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade
and not
Antonio Arredondo wrote:
I used to have issues with portupgrade as well. I traced my problem to
using the wrong portupgrade. I have been using portupgrade for several
months without an issue ( except the Xorg 7 transition ). Make sure to
use
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade
and not
P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any
more! Always an issue, either
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:12:49 -0400
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any
more! Always
Jona Joachim wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:12:49 -0400
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any
more!
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:12:49 -0400
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any
more! Always
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:38:39 -0500
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:12:49 -0400
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of
those ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's
because portupgrade
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of
those ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's
because portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is
not fun any more! Always an issue, either a port conflicts with
another port or it fails
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:38:39AM -0500, Chris wrote:
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 05:34:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I have used (and still do) both flavors of the above and I have to tell
y, updating the installed apps is as easy as apt-get update ot yum
update/upgrade.
. . . except when they break something. It's a lot easier to fix broken
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those ports
that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because portupgrade doesn't
work the way it used to work. It is not fun any more! Always an issue,
either a port conflicts
P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any
more! Always an issue, either
On 10/27/07, E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those
ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because
portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any
more! Always an issue, either a port
Jonathan Horne wrote:
i have had a crazy month with my ports and keeping things updates (more
specific to successfully building a kde set, but thats not what i want to ask
about right now). a minute ago, i tried to update my ports on my jail-host
server. autoconf was one of the recent
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 19:25:24 Rem P Roberti wrote:
This has no doubt been covered before, but for some reason I am unable
to get to the archives. Anyway, is there a way to accept the default
prompts that occasionally occur while doing a ports upgrade? If I've been
a way for a while
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:35:37 -0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs
Hello dear FreeBSD user
After I had cvsuped FreeBSD-6.1-R amd64 I tried to portupgrade it but
Have you got a chance to read/answer/etc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs
After I had cvsuped FreeBSD-6.1-R amd64 I tried to portupgrade it but
I got the following mssg:
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade
Moved, see below.
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/net/openldap22-client
Removed, outdated.
Am 29.9.2007 22:55 Uhr, Ihsan Dogan schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# portupgrade -a
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg ... - 655 packages
found (-2 +1) (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:429: [BUG]
Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13) [i386-freebsd6]
Abort
Hello,
When using portupgrade -fr I need to specify an argument that I do not
want X11 binaries installed during the upgrade process. Now from man I
read it is the -m switch. But how do I pass the argument:
portupgrade -fr -m WITHOUTX11 php4
but this does not do the trick. Many
On Friday 07 September 2007 18:10:13 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
When using portupgrade -fr I need to specify an argument that I do not
want X11 binaries installed during the upgrade process. Now from man I
read it is the -m switch. But how do I pass the argument:
portupgrade -fr -m WITHOUTX11
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:10:13 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When using portupgrade -fr I need to specify an argument that I do not
want X11 binaries installed during the upgrade process. Now from man I
read it is the -m switch. But how do I pass the argument:
Thanks a lot.
By the way, will it attempt to use -j4 for make
install?
--- Fatman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael S wrote:
Good day all,
I was wondering how to pass options from
portupgrade
to make. Say I wanted use -j4 for max. number of
jobs.
Where should I specify that? When
Fatman writes:
The portupgrade system will honour any variables in
/etc/make.conf.
So will every other port (as well as any attempts to rebuild
the OS) whether this is desirable behavior or not.
Putting settings in make.conf is a club; seek instead for a
scalpel.
Michael S wrote:
Good day all,
I was wondering how to pass options from portupgrade
to make. Say I wanted use -j4 for max. number of jobs.
Where should I specify that? When building world
it's possible to be done from the command line: make
-j4 buildworld.
Also is athlon the correct CPUTYPE
Michael S wrote:
Thanks a lot.
By the way, will it attempt to use -j4 for make
install?
Should do, yes. Robert Huff is correct when he says this will affect
everything using make. I can't think why that would be inappropriate,
but no doubt Robert has some scenarios in mind.
I'm too
Roland Smith wrote:
Fortunately, there is a way to turn the axe into a scalpel. :-)
You can put stuff in make.conf so that it will only affect the ports
you want. Like this;
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/multimedia/mplayer}
WITH_DVD_DEVICE=/dev/cd1
WITH_CDROM_DEVICE=/dev/cd1
.endif
If the directory where
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:04:16PM +0100, Adam J Richardson wrote:
Michael S wrote:
Thanks a lot.
By the way, will it attempt to use -j4 for make
install?
Should do, yes. Robert Huff is correct when he says this will affect
everything using make. I can't think why that would be
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:23:21AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
Good day all,
I was wondering how to pass options from portupgrade
to make. Say I wanted use -j4 for max. number of jobs.
Where should I specify that? When building world
it's possible to be done from the command line: make
-j4
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
Nikola Lecic wrote:
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to
be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to
Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get
the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt
dependencies.
Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:40:30AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:01:51AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:01:51AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that recent version(s?) of
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it
here, is the old Is anyone else seeing this. When/if you use portupgrade,
does
it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some how to
inherit
on atleast 2 of my
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:55:34 -0400 (EDT)
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for
posting it here, is the old Is anyone else seeing this. When/if you
use portupgrade, does it do the same for you? Or is it just something
At 2:55 AM -0400 8/6/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for
posting it here, is the old Is anyone else seeing this. When/if
you use portupgrade, does it do the same for you? Or is it just
something that I happened some how to inherit on at
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update
the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to
actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:43:37 +0200
User Nocturnal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
First of all i just went through the UPDATING instructions to upgrade
my xorg to 7.2. It did not go very well because i can't finish the
upgrade process. When i try to pkg_delete xorg-manpages it says
they're
-Original Message-
From: Yuri Pankov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 juillet 2007 11:29
To: Ian Lord
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade and mysql5-server
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:25:54AM -0400, Ian Lord wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick question.
When
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:25:54AM -0400, Ian Lord wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick question.
When there is a new version of mysql5-server port, I use portupgrade -a
to update it.
Everytime I need to do a /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start to start
it manually after the
In the last episode (Jul 25), Ian Lord said:
Hi,
Just a quick question.
When there is a new version of mysql5-server port, I use portupgrade
-a to update it.
Everytime I need to do a /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start to
start it manually after the upgrade.
Shouldn't it be done
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 17:12 +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
Make sense. I've been using these
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a
central
repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
across most/all of them).
in situations where new packages are built from
Josh Tolbert wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Josh Tolbert wrote:
(15:38:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~) $ pkg_info | grep bison
bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with
Yacc
(15:38:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~) $ sudo
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
It doesn't look like what I was suggesting is the issue so it's all
moot, but the example I can see:
sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison
is different from what I was suggesting:
sudo portupgrade -f -o devel/bison2
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Josh Tolbert wrote:
(15:38:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~) $ pkg_info | grep bison
bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with
Yacc
(15:38:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~) $ sudo portupgrade -o devel/bison2 bison
On 07/06/07, Josh Tolbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Having successfully completed my update from Xorg 6.9 to Xorg 7.2, I decided
to install a few things, one of which required devel/bison2 instead of bison.
Usually, portupgrade -o would handle this for me, but lately it seems like
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:00:55AM -0400, Gerard wrote:
On Friday June 08, 2007 at 02:34:32 (AM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confirmed, -o worked as advertised here
before the move to portupgrade-devel and
now does not.
Have you filed a PR regarding this apparent bug?
Hello Gerard,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:39:33PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
On June 08, 2007 at 11:25AM Josh Tolbert wrote:
Filing a PR would be the obvious thing to do now that I know there's
actually
a problem, isn't it? Seems like you enjoy stating the obvious, though.
Actually, no. I think you
On Thursday June 07, 2007 at 04:59:05 (PM) Josh Tolbert wrote:
Having successfully completed my update from Xorg 6.9 to Xorg 7.2, I decided
to install a few things, one of which required devel/bison2 instead of bison.
Usually, portupgrade -o would handle this for me, but lately it seems like
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:53:49PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
Posting two identical questions except for the Subject, eighteen
minutes apart, to the same list does seem a bit tacky.
Yeah, sorry about that. Got a message deferred notice about the
first message, jumped the gun and sent another one.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:51:18AM +1000, Warren Liddell wrote:
Quite a lrge portion of my packages are failing in portupgrade due to
either the ports distinfo file apparently being out of date OR the
pckage is spelt incorectly, when i had only just finished running a
CVS to update it
== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
= libXext-1.0.3.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/x11/libXext/distinfo.
= Either /usr/ports/x11/libXext/distinfo is out of date, or
= libXext-1.0.3.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly.
*** Error code 1
You have an incomplete ports tree or some kind
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:55:20PM +1000, Warren Liddell wrote:
== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
= libXext-1.0.3.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/x11/libXext/distinfo.
= Either /usr/ports/x11/libXext/distinfo is out of date, or
= libXext-1.0.3.tar.gz is spelled
Just a follow up. The most sensible solution to me is, to append the
option --batch to portupgrade in the cron job. Then in cron job
portupgrade will not bug me any more.
On 11/6/06, Josh Carroll josh.carroll at psualum.com
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions wrote:
*
Drew Sanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](/usr/ports)# portupgrade gnome-vfs
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16885
port entries found
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Drew Sanford wrote:
I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](/usr/ports)# portupgrade gnome-vfs
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16885 port
entries found
Thomas wrote:
Hello
Today i tried to upgrade postfix 2.3.x to new port postfix 2.4 with
portupgrade.
I got this error:
** Port marked as IGNORE: mail/postfix:
is marked as broken: Does not apply. Waiting to a new version
Even portupgrade -o mail/postfix postfix23 did not work:
Hi
The problem was VDA (Virtual Delivery Agent) support. ATM, this is
broken with postfix 2.4. Thats why the portupgrade refused it to upgrade
Thanks.
Regards,
Thomas
Josh Paetzel schrieb:
Thomas wrote:
Hello
Today i tried to upgrade postfix 2.3.x to new port postfix 2.4 with
portupgrade.
Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, what to do next? Should I continue this command until all packages are
processed and none of them skipped and failed? Or can I continue upgrading
all my ports as from now?
Well, it depends on what failed. If those ports work, you're probably
okay.
On 3/22/07, Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I saw this in usr/ports/UPDATING:
20070318:
AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (ie: YOU)
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a result of the upgrade to gettext-0.16.1, the shared library version
of libintl has changed, so you will need
Kyrre Nygård wrote:
Hey!
I was wondering if anybody could give me a quick cheat sheet for how to
automatically:
1) Download all outdated ports
2) Switch to single user mode
3) Upgrade those ports
Running portupgrade -a doesn't work very well when it's time to upgrade
running
On Friday March 23, 2007 at 07:24:52 (AM) Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Kyrre Nygård wrote:
Hey!
I was wondering if anybody could give me a quick cheat sheet for how to
automatically:
1) Download all outdated ports
2) Switch to single user mode
3) Upgrade those ports
Running
On 3/22/07, Kyrre Nygård [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey!
I was wondering if anybody could give me a quick cheat sheet for how
to automatically:
1) Download all outdated ports
man portupgrade
(hint: -F option)
2) Switch to single user mode
3) Upgrade those ports
Please someone correct me if
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:17:48PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on an i386 test box with apache
1.3.37/PHP-5/MySQL-5. As the subject says, I'd like to replace
apache 1.3 with apache 2.2.
I understand httpd.conf will change
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on an i386 test box with apache
1.3.37/PHP-5/MySQL-5. As the subject says, I'd like to replace apache
1.3 with apache 2.2.
I understand httpd.conf will change and that I'll have to edit that by
hand, but is there a portupgrade
201 - 300 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
