Using compression flag on the ssh client ?
Hmm, I seem to have missed this. Are you on an open network ?
Yes my network is open to Internet, I have an Apple Airport
Station which handles my pppoe connection, with portmapping
enabled. Rules of portmapping is :
- we don't serve anything here (
What does your switch say ?
switch says 100 full.
I have a (NetBSD) box here which, for some
reason, refuses to go into full duplex mode, though it claims it is in
full duplex.
And there is no way to know about reality ? I just can't trust
ifconfig ?
By the way I've set net.inet.tcp.sendspa
What does the CPU utilization look like on each machine ?
On the server side, CPU never goes up to 3%
On the client side, I don't know since I don't have top compiled
on Windows (to able to execute it in X). But the computer is
really fast.
How
much of that is the SSH process ?
sshd is about
On Monday, 16 December 2002 at 2:51:10 +0100, Raphal Ding wrote:
>> Using compression flag on the ssh client ?
>
> No. But I've just tried. It slows down a little, but not much. I
> would say that pictures do not takes 2 seconds but 2.5 seconds.
> Well. But it's quite far from 1/4 ;)
Hmm, I seem
On Monday, 16 December 2002 at 2:30:15 +0100, Raphal Ding wrote:
>> One common problem is when your NIC is set to half-duplex operation
>> and everything else is set to full duplex.
>
> I've done an ifconfig as mentioned in the handbook, and it says
> that my card (rl0) :
> media: Ethernet autosel
On Sunday, Dec 15, 2002, at 21:49 US/Pacific, Raphaël Dingé wrote:
I've been using another configuration where I switched from ssh to a
complete xdcmp system.
Loading of pictures is very faster now, in rt2_demo it is quick, so in
normal desktop environment it is quite perfect.
I found that inc
I've the following configuration :
- an ASUS mini-pc with FreeBSD on it, 900 MHz, 256 MBytes,
connected on an ethernet local network.
- 2 PC running Windows with X server via cygwin (each with
1,4GHz Athlon CPU, 256 MBytes RAM)
- All of them are connected with a 100 Mbits switch.
Basically in cy
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 02:51:10AM +0100, Rapha?l Ding? wrote:
> >Using compression flag on the ssh client ?
>
> What would be a good value ? Should I only test ? Do I need to
> reboot after having set those values using sysctl ?
I don't think that in your environment the network latency is
high
Using compression flag on the ssh client ?
No. But I've just tried. It slows down a little, but not much. I
would say that pictures do not takes 2 seconds but 2.5 seconds.
Well. But it's quite far from 1/4 ;)
processing power of either station getting overwhelmed by the bursty
graphics demands
One common problem is when your NIC is set to half-duplex operation
and everything else is set to full duplex.
I've done an ifconfig as mentioned in the handbook, and it says
that my card (rl0) :
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
and of course it is active.
I check on the PC running Window
ember 15, 2002 2:56 PM
Subject: X over ethernet is too much slow...
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've the following configuration :
> - an ASUS mini-pc with FreeBSD on it, 900 MHz, 256 MBytes,
> connected on an ethernet local network.
> - 2 PC running Windows with X server via cygwin (
On Sunday, 15 December 2002 at 23:56:18 +0100, Raphal Ding wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've the following configuration :
> - an ASUS mini-pc with FreeBSD on it, 900 MHz, 256 MBytes,
> connected on an ethernet local network.
> - 2 PC running Windows with X server via cygwin (each with
> 1,4GHz Athlon
Hi everyone,
I've the following configuration :
- an ASUS mini-pc with FreeBSD on it, 900 MHz, 256 MBytes,
connected on an ethernet local network.
- 2 PC running Windows with X server via cygwin (each with
1,4GHz Athlon CPU, 256 MBytes RAM)
- All of them are connected with a 100 Mbits switch.
B
13 matches
Mail list logo
