Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com writes:
The issue is of some interest because the wiki page documenting
candidates to replace GPL software in base list the OpenBSD copies of
the diff tools: [...]
We already have working BSD-licensed versions of diff and diff3 in the
SoC repo.
DES
--
working BSD-licensed versions of diff and diff3 in the
SoC repo.
That's the repository here? (not coming up for me at the moment)
https://socsvn.freebsd.org/socsvn/soc2012/jhagewood/
Those files are using the 3-clause BSD license?
Thanks,
CY
Looking at the original code for diff:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/csrg/usr.bin/diff/
The licensing that applies to it seems to be simply that of the standard
BSD license:
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/license.html
Is that correct? If so, what's the relationship between that code
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:01:03 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
Again me
Last time I try to make some T-shirts which I have on my redbubble page. It
is
not a big nmoney, I didn't sell anything just one card :) but I like to make
a
T-shirt design with Beastie on it too. Do I need a permission for
Again me
Last time I try to make some T-shirts which I have on my redbubble page. It is
not a big nmoney, I didn't sell anything just one card :) but I like to make a
T-shirt design with Beastie on it too. Do I need a permission for using
Beastie or it is free or I cannot use.
Thank you.
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:01:03 -0500
ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:
Again me
Last time I try to make some T-shirts which I have on my redbubble
page. It is not a big nmoney, I didn't sell anything just one card :)
but I like to make a T-shirt design with Beastie on it too. Do I need
FreeBSD, as specified here [1] uses 2-clause BSD license,
but /usr/bin/true [2] (as empty as it is) uses something like
3-clause BSD license, is that desired?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/usr.bin/true/true.c
On 01/31/12 12:55, vermaden wrote:
FreeBSD, as specified here [1] uses 2-clause BSD license,
but /usr/bin/true [2] (as empty as it is) uses something like
3-clause BSD license, is that desired?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi
You might have to re-write it from scratch. It's still copyrighted by
the university. I'd say write it in c++ to dispel all doubt that you
didn't copy. Then true and groff will be c++.
There's still software in the tree that uses the four clause license.
But because of the advertising
Hello,
What is the license on the fonts in /usr/share/syscons/fonts,
especially swiss-8x8? Who/what is their origin? Would it be acceptable
to include these binaries with a GPL-licensed program?
Thanks in advance,
--
Sean Hamilton seanhamil...@gmail.com
In the last episode (May 09), Sean Hamilton said:
What is the license on the fonts in /usr/share/syscons/fonts, especially
swiss-8x8? Who/what is their origin? Would it be acceptable to include
these binaries with a GPL-licensed program?
I submitted the swiss fonts back in 1997, and I have
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon May 9 18:04:36 2011
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:04:30 -0500
From: Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com
To: Sean Hamilton seanhamil...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: License for console fonts
In the last episode (May 09
2011/3/3 Kouichiro Iwao m...@club.kyutech.ac.jp:
I'm writing a script based on the code in freebsd docs, and caring
about the license of it. The original scripts are example 6 and 7 of
the following page. How do I have to treat my code if I distribute it?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en
Thank you for your information. I will treat them under FreeBSD license.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:46:40PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
Since those scripts have been contributed to the FreeBSD project, I
would treat them as if they had the standard FreeBSD license.
If you do that, then you
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:53:14PM +0900, Kouichiro Iwao wrote:
I'm writing a script based on the code in freebsd docs,
and caring about the license of it. The original scripts are
example 6 and 7 of the following page. How do I have to treat
my code if I distribute it?
http
I'm writing a script based on the code in freebsd docs,
and caring about the license of it. The original scripts are
example 6 and 7 of the following page. How do I have to treat
my code if I distribute it?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/ldap-auth/client.html
I know freebsd docs
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important
data
can do without
On 11/08/10 13:52, krad wrote:
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smithrsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important
On 08.11.2010 16:37, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 11/08/10 13:52, krad wrote:
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smithrsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
features of zfs.
On 11/08/10 16:08, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
On 08.11.2010 16:37, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 11/08/10 13:52, krad wrote:
On 6 November 2010 21:38, Roland Smithrsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
The GEOM_ELI class provides optional authentication/checksumming. See
geli(8),
especially the -a option.
snip
im not sure on whether that you be a viable replacement, as it has to be
a fairly good checksum
On 08.11.2010 18:47, Arthur Chance wrote:
*snip*
Presuming you're talking about ZFS, the hash isn't intended to correct
hardware errors, it's only there to detect them. Correction comes from
mirroring or the use of RAIDZ{1,2,3}. (I have personal experience of how
well that works, as I had a
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
wrote:
But it's still not capable of true forward-error-correction. If we are
to embark upon creating a new solution, using something that is cheap
On 08.11.2010 21:44, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
wrote:
But it's still not capable of true forward-error-correction. If we are
to embark upon creating a new
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
And I'm ... all too familiar with redundancy strategies (and backups).
Including their shortcomings. Speaking of which: Has there been any
progress on properly backing up ZFS on FreeBSD yet?
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:44:29PM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
wrote:
But it's still not capable of true forward-error-correction. If we are
to
On 8 November 2010 22:35, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:44:29PM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail
account) wrote:
But it's
couldn't sue for patent violations on software that they (or
their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
That's legitimate use under license from the software's originators.
Nor could they sue successfully over some completely novel
implementation that avoided patented areas
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Saturday, 06 November 2010:
Chip == Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
Chip The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
Chip truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
Chip that there was a
? It seems somewhat likely,
somehow.
Oracle couldn't sue for patent violations on software that they (or
their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
That's legitimate use under license from the software's originators.
Nor could they sue successfully over some completely novel
development projects? It seems somewhat likely,
somehow.
Oracle couldn't sue for patent violations on software that they (or
their predecessors) had released and that people were using as-is.
That's legitimate use under license from the software's originators.
How long are you planning to use
under license from the software's originators.
How long are you planning to use it as-is, without making any changes, if
Oracle ceases support for an open source version?
Nor could they sue successfully over some completely novel
implementation that avoided patented areas.
1. That's kind
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 17:45:07 -0500
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net articulated:
LibreOffice (Libre is Latin for free) is a functional
name as is (personally I don't like the name, but I hated
StarOffice's name too!) and has potential. But DF faces an uphill
battle in re-educating the world
Chip == Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
Chip I hope it's more than wishful thinking on their part. I would trust
Chip Oracle to keep hands off for precisely as long as they do not perceive
Chip any reason to put hands on.
Understood... clearly, the suits can do whatever they
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com wrote:
Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about.
Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using
the Java VM there would be no lawsuit. Sun was able to successfully
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com wrote:
On 11/5/10 5:19 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
[...]
It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see how
this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory words like
exploit
don't have to fight open source, we have to exploit open source.
/quote
Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto041820061306424713
It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see
how this is a bad thing, other
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:05AM +0200, App Deb wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com wrote:
Android uses the Java language, but this is not what that suit is about.
Oracle claims the Dalvik VM infringes on their patents. If Android was using
the Java
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than
Solaris from using it?
Whether you think concerns like
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on
On 06.11.2010 17:44, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
who aren't
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps
flagging
your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's nothing
bad :D
I suppose they are the PGP
On 5 November 2010 19:11, Alejandro Imass aim...@yabarana.com wrote:
Hey folks,
A while back I started the thread Troubles on SATA drives ZFS. I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
and
On 5 November 2010 22:19, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
wrote:
Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
On 06.11.2010 19:52, krad wrote:
On 5 November 2010 19:11, Alejandro Imass aim...@yabarana.com wrote:
Hey folks,
A while back I started the thread Troubles on SATA drives ZFS. I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:52:19PM +, krad wrote:
the main problem is geom and ufs isnt a like for like replacement yet. Good
as though geom is it just not as easy as zfs from an adminsistration point
of view in my opinion. It may potentinally get a block checksum class but it
will be a
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +, krad wrote:
this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affected
by all the same licensing issues
While we're at it, OpenOffice.org, MySQL, Solaris, Java, and VirtualBox are
also entangled with Oracle. There may be others that
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps
flagging
your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:30:16PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Having said all that it really depends on whether you need the extra
features of zfs. Personally I cant see how anyone with any important data
can do without checksuming.
I guess that depends on what you're doing with the data
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail?
Quoth Chad Perrin on Saturday, 06 November 2010:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:56:11PM +, krad wrote:
this thread shouldnt be limited to just zfs really, dtrace is also affected
by all the same licensing issues
While we're at it, OpenOffice.org, MySQL, Solaris, Java, and VirtualBox are
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.comwrote:
The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle.
I
App Deb appde...@gmail.com!appdebgr@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com wrote:
Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons
in 1997 (incomplete implementation of the Java standard).
If I remember correctly, the Microsoft
Chip == Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com writes:
Chip The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
Chip truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
Chip that there was a movement gaining steam to break off from Oracle.
When I
Chad == Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com writes:
Chad I have not really spent any quality time with ZFS, so I'm a little
Chad sketchy on the details. Is there anything the checksumming capabilities
Chad of ZFS do that cannot be duplicated with an external tool -- perhaps
Chad something like a
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:00 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
App Deb appde...@gmail.com!appdebgr@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com
wrote:
Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons
in 1997 (incomplete
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:00:53PM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
App Deb appde...@gmail.com!appdebgr@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com wrote:
Sun was able to successfully sue Microsoft for similar reasons
in 1997 (incomplete
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:09:57PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.comwrote:
The one in that list that worries me the most is VirtualBox -- that's a
truly useful solution that isn't easily replaced. But I read somewhere
Hey folks,
A while back I started the thread Troubles on SATA drives ZFS. I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This
really pissed me
Hey folks,
A while back I started the thread Troubles on SATA drives ZFS. I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This
really pissed me
the opinion and position of people
here on ZFS before I continue using it.
Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox?
//Svein
--
+---+---
/\ |Svein Skogen | sv
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing
to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very
reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people
here on ZFS
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:11:47PM -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
A while back I started the thread Troubles on SATA drives ZFS. I
decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the
pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links
and Oracle made me
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox?
I think Alejandro's more worried about what will happen with future
versions of ZFS based
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
wrote:
Well ... CDDL was (iirc) based on the Mozilla Public License. Are you
similarly worried about Thunderbird or Firefox?
I think Alejandro's
Oracle change the license for subsequent releases of ZFS in a way
unacceptable to us, FreeBSD's ZFS will either stagnate and rot, or
it will get developed independently in FreeBSD (and perhaps in IllumOS?)
along a different path, a.k.a. a fork.
This leaves us the problem of patents... and here we're
Source: Financial Times interview, 18-Apr-2006
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto041820061306424713
It sounds like he's probably a big fan of the BSD license. I do not see
how this is a bad thing, other than he uses potentially inflammatory
words like exploit. The basics of what he
On 11/5/10 4:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Will Oracle start using patent suits to try to stop people
who aren't paying for ZFS or who are using it on platforms other than
Solaris from using it?
Whether you think concerns like these will prove reasonable in the long
run, they make a lot more sense
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:43 PM, tristan tristan@hotmail.com wrote:
the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz is under some compilation copyright. what
does this mean, and can i freely edit the iso, rename it, and sell it?
can i get a copy of the license for the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz? i
is the FreeBSD-8.0-amd.iso itself under the bsd license?
i mean the free bsd operating system, not the software
i plan to modify then redistribute it, under a new name. it will remain under
the same license, with the same copyright docs, but the help or other docs will
be gone, my own put
On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:38 AM, tristan wrote:
is the FreeBSD-8.0-amd.iso itself under the bsd license?
Mostly; there's a compilation copyright associated with the FreeBSD ISO images,
but some of the components of FreeBSD are under the GPL (notably the GCC
compiler toolchain), and possibly CDDL
the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz is under some compilation copyright. what
does this mean, and can i freely edit the iso, rename it, and sell it? can i
get a copy of the license for the 8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz? i want to do
what Apple did with FreeBSD - edit, rename, and sell, can i do
not understand about the previous answer you just got?
Most of FreeBSD is under a BSD license, which means do nearly anything you
want with it. Some *parts* of a standard FreeBSD distro are under more
restrictive licenses, and you need to either comply with those licenses, or
remove those parts from your
(redirecting to freebsd-emulation@, please trim freebsd-questions@)
Rich Winkel r...@math.missouri.edu writes:
I'm trying to run mathlm for mathematica version 7 under linux_base-fc-4_13 on
freebsd 7.1-release-p7.
It demonizes and appears to be happy until I try to run mathematica,
then it
I'm trying to run mathlm for mathematica version 7 under linux_base-fc-4_13 on
freebsd 7.1-release-p7.
It demonizes and appears to be happy until I try to run mathematica,
then it crashes with signal 11. Even running monitorlm causes it
to crash. Maxing out the loglevel doesn't produce any
at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
It is available for the low low price of $0 or the equivalent in your local
currency. Yes really :)
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 7/21/08, Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That wouldn't solve the problem of the US dollar being a fiat currency.
Basically, under a fiat currency, trying to financially plan for the
future is a matter of gambling the economy won't blow up in your face in
the interim -- which is
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 7/21/08, Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That wouldn't solve the problem of the US dollar being a fiat currency.
Basically, under a fiat currency, trying to financially plan for the
future is a matter of gambling the economy won't blow up in your face in
the interim
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:40:20AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:55:22PM +0700, OutBackDingo wrote:
How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
measurement for approximations to zero...
I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:02:01AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:40:20AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:55:22PM +0700, OutBackDingo wrote:
How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
measurement for
Mike Jeays a écrit :
On July 19, 2008 04:21:03 pm Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
... or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't help it ...
You made me spit my pepsi all over my
How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
measurement for approximations to zero...
I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
manner, but there are alot of locations in the world using FreeBSD
quite effectively where most people live on less
OutBackDingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
measurement for approximations to zero...
I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
manner, but there are alot of locations in the world using FreeBSD
quite
ROFL, right, whatever..!!!
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 04:40 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
full of fallacies, false assumptions and one or two non
sequiturs.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Let's see, ... that would be approximately $149*10^12 Zimbabwe.
10^3 - one thousand
10^6 - one million
10^9 - one billion
10^12 - one trillion
10^100 - one mugabe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:18:13PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
Regardless of how far Off Topic some seem to want to go,
the reply by Kris is correct. FreeBSD is free. The only
cost is media to burn your own
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:55:22PM +0700, OutBackDingo wrote:
How many Zimbabwe dollars, I wonder? This seems to give the finest
measurement for approximations to zero...
I think this is a bit uncalled for, it might have been in a candid
manner, but there are alot of locations in the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:49:30AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:18:13PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
Regardless of how far Off Topic some seem to want to go,
the reply by Kris
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:40:20 -0600
Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The US Dollar hasn't really been worth anything since 1975 at the
latest. People just haven't figured that out yet.
In that case, would you be so kind as to forward all of those worthless
US Dollars to me. I will be more
On Jul 20, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote:
Mike Jeays a écrit :
On July 19, 2008 04:21:03 pm Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
... or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Your comments are useless and stigmatizes people who suffers (Zimbabwe).
Stigmatizes people in Zimbabwe? Huh? If anything it draws sympathy for them
Two or so years ago, I used to tell a fellow from
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
It is available for the low low price of $0 or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
... or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't help it ...
You made me spit my pepsi all over my desktop !
Thanks!!
--
Blessings
Gonzalo Nemmi
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What price at the license of FreeBSD 7?
it's important for me. I must know.
It is available for the low low price of $0 or the equivalent in your local
currency. Yes really :)
Let's see, ... that would be approximately
On July 19, 2008 04:21:03 pm Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2008 15:40:53 Kris Kennaway wrote:
... or the equivalent in your
local currency. Yes really :)
Kris
ROFL to death !
Sorry .. couldn't help it ...
You made me spit my pepsi all over my desktop !
Thanks!!
How many
Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like install
freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its free ? Or FreeBSD
free for individual using ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Free BSD wrote:
Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like
install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its
free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ?
Yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Hello,
2008/1/21, Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Free BSD wrote:
Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like
install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its
free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:09:07PM +0300, Free BSD wrote:
Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like
install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its
free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ?
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
