- Original Message -
From: "dick hoogendijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lorin Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "freebsd-questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: sendmail configuration - how to route
On 26 Jan Lorin Lund wrote:
> I have a static IP and a domain but I can't send e-mail out directly
> because my ISP blocks it. I need to send all my e-mail out through my
> ISP. How do I tell sendmail to route all my mail out through my ISP's
> mail server?
The smarthos
Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lorin Lund wrote:
> > I have a static IP and a domain but I can't send e-mail out directly
> > because my ISP blocks it. I need to send all my e-mail out through my
> > ISP. How do I tell sendmail to route all my ma
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-25 12:51:11 -0500:
> Lorin Lund wrote:
> >I have a static IP and a domain but I can't send e-mail out directly
> >because my ISP blocks it. I need to send all my e-mail out through my
> >ISP. How do I tell sendmail to route all my mail ou
Lorin Lund wrote:
I have a static IP and a domain but I can't send e-mail out directly
because my ISP blocks it. I need to send all my e-mail out through my
ISP. How do I tell sendmail to route all my mail out through my ISP's
mail server?
1) cd /etc/mail
2) edit freebsd.mc and
I have v 4.7 of FreeBSD.
I have a static IP and a domain but I can't send e-mail out directly
because my ISP blocks it. I need to send all my e-mail out through my
ISP. How do I tell sendmail to route all my mail out through my ISP's
mail server?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 01:22, Gene Bomgardner wrote:
>
> thanks for the help.
> Now, care to take a shot at this one:
> Same machine, when I telnet to it (ie. telnet guardian1), regardless
> of kernel, I get the following:
> -
> td:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:40:48PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> I had a look at the attachment, but could see anything (to my eyes) that
> look untoward in there, except the fact that you've got "maxusers" set
> to 0. This value tells the kernel how many "new file / processes can be
> opened.
>
On 30 Dec 2002 at 0:44, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>Thanks for that information.
>
Found it.
>From the block of ipfw definitions, under ipfilter,
options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by
Commented it out, recompiled and voila.
thanks for the help.
Now, care
Hi Gene,
Thanks for that information.
Now, could you try pinging a remote host and 192.168.123.8, then check
/var/log/messages & /var/log/security to see if anything is recorded
there, please? You should post any output from both files here.
At the same time, post what is actually returned on
Below is the output of "ipfw show" and netstat -rn
-
> ipfw list
65535 allow ip from any to any
>netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGateway
Hi Gene,
From what I've just been reading here, maxusers after about FreeBSD
4.5 can be safely left at 0 (as long as there is > 64MB RAM), which
replaces the previous default of 32.
Could you post /etc/hosts & the output from "netstat -rn" as well
please?
Cheers,
Stacey
--
Stacey Roberts
B.
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 21:20, Gene Bomgardner wrote:
> On 29 Dec 2002 at 18:04, Stacey Roberts wrote:
>
> >
> > Run an sdiff on both kernels and post the output so that members can
> > take a look at the actual differences between the two kernels.
>
> sdiff only reports that the two binary files
"Gene Bomgardner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sdiff only reports that the two binary files are different. I don't see
> any options to force a display. Did you mean to run a diff on the
> conf files? If so, they are attached as an rtf file.
Do you still have the old and new kernel configurati
On 29 Dec 2002 at 18:04, Stacey Roberts wrote:
>
> Run an sdiff on both kernels and post the output so that members can
> take a look at the actual differences between the two kernels.
sdiff only reports that the two binary files are different. I don't see
any options to force a display. Did
"Gene Bomgardner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did that. It really is set to accept all.
Can you send the output of 'netstat -rn', and perhaps of 'ipfw list'
(just to make sure).
norbert.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the mes
Did that. It really is set to accept all.
On 29 Dec 2002 at 10:52, Sarah Woolley wrote:
> Someone had this problam a few days ago. It seems that although he
> thought his kernal was set default to accept, it really wasn't. You may
> want to try ipfw show to check and make sure it really is work
pfw stuff (including
> default_to_accept) and the netgraph definitions. All compiled and
> installed without a hitch. However, any attempt to access the
> network (telnet, ping, whatever) results in "No route to host". Even
> when trying to ping 127.0.0.1 Booting the origina
piled and
installed without a hitch. However, any attempt to access the
network (telnet, ping, whatever) results in "No route to host". Even
when trying to ping 127.0.0.1 Booting the original kernel back up
restores networking. I get the feeling I've missed something. Any
ide
> > #ipnat -l
> > List of active MAP/redirect filters:
> > map x10 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap
> tcp/udp
> > 4:6
> > map x10 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32
> ^^^
> Shouldn't that be "xl0"?
>
>
> Fer
DOH! Dang fonts!
I guess that ends my short car
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Adam Lofstedt wrote:
> >
> #ipnat -l
> List of active MAP/redirect filters:
> map x10 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp
> 4:6
> map x10 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0/32
^^^
Shouldn't that be "xl0"?
Fer
>
> List of active
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Adam Lofstedt wrote:
> > yes, your message was posted. keppt it easy, it's a
> > world-wide holiday,
> > so the answers can take while. :)
> >
> Thanks... Sorry about this. I didn't mean to make it
> seem hysterical or anything.
>
> > >
> > > I have a freeBSD machine with tw
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Lofstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 11:24 AM
Subject: Can't route past gateway
> I tried to send a message to the list earlier, but my
> email server was down. I ch
> yes, your message was posted. keppt it easy, it's a
> world-wide holiday,
> so the answers can take while. :)
>
Thanks... Sorry about this. I didn't mean to make it
seem hysterical or anything.
> >
> > I have a freeBSD machine with two NICS that I am
> using
> > as a NAT gateway. No matter w
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Adam Lofstedt wrote:
> I tried to send a message to the list earlier, but my
> email server was down. I checked the archives, but I
> can't tell if my message has been posted already, so I
> apologize if it has. If anyone has already replied,
> could you forward your respons
I tried to send a message to the list earlier, but my
email server was down. I checked the archives, but I
can't tell if my message has been posted already, so I
apologize if it has. If anyone has already replied,
could you forward your response to this address?
I have a freeBSD machine with two
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, at 00:44 [=GMT+0100], Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Could somebody please confirm that the place to add a static route at
> boot time is rc.conf? For instance
> static_routes="192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.1
Maybe that works. This worked for me (just in case the abov
Could somebody please confirm that the place to add a static route at
boot time is rc.conf? For instance
static_routes="192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.1
Is there a way to ensure that the route is added before all network
daemons are started?
Thanks,
/per olof
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
Josh Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> route_route3="10.20.30.1 198.78.1.1"
>
> So i have added another alias, and another route. Now, here's the
> question - in the past when I have done this, I have just rebooted the
> machine and let these sett
.255.255.0"
> ifconfig_fxp1_alias1="inet 10.20.30.0 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> static_routes="route1 route2 route3"
> route_route1="10.10.10.193 198.78.1.1"
> route_route2="10.10.20.1 198.78.1.1"
> route_route3="10.20.30.1 198.78.1.1"
>
.192 netmask 255.255.255.224"
ifconfig_fxp1_alias0="inet 10.10.20.0 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_fxp1_alias1="inet 10.20.30.0 netmask 255.255.255.0"
static_routes="route1 route2 route3"
route_route1="10.10.10.193 198.78.1.1"
route_route2="10.10.20.1 198.78.1.
me you don't require any
> assistance.
Sure don't! Thanks for your time.
For anyone who reads the linux-igd documentation. Their route add line is
incorrect (at 'netmask') for FreeBSD, and the corrected route add line (with
'-netmask' - thanks Paul) does not work ei
> I recommend not assuming the least of individuals who ask for help.
> -netmask doesn't work either :)
The error you reported was due to the fact that you specified 'netmask'
rather than '-netmask'. Since you didn't mention that you also tried the
latter, I could only assume you didn't try. Oth
I recommend not assuming the least of individuals who ask for help.
-netmask doesn't work either :)
Quoting "Paul A. Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 11/22/02 3:43 PM, "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > route add -net 239.0.0.0 netmask 2
On 11/22/02 3:43 PM, "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> route add -net 239.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 [int_if]
> Where int_if is my internal interface (xl1). I get:
> route: bad address: netmask
> How might I modify this to get it to work?
use -netmask
For future re
I created an alias.
Perhaps this will work :)
Quoting James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to get linux-igd working. The INSTALL says to add a route
> using:
>
> route add -net 239.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 [int_if]
>
> Where int_if is my internal interfa
I'm trying to get linux-igd working. The INSTALL says to add a route using:
route add -net 239.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 [int_if]
Where int_if is my internal interface (xl1). I get:
route: bad address: netmask
How might I modify this to get it to work?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:56:55 + (UTC) in lucky.freebsd.questions, Karl Timmermann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These
> commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X
> as the arp and route co
Hello,
I'm new to the list and was hoping maybe someone could help me. These
commands work in Linux (and in this order), but not in FreeBSD/Mac OS X
as the arp and route commands are different:
arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1
arp -s 10.10.10.0 00:00:ca:13:4b:54 -i eth1
rout
Yep that's it. It was resolving LAN IPs via the default route, which when
down, caused it to take a long time to time out.
I did not properly configure the router to consult the internal DNS server: my
IPF rules were blocking it. Once I modified them, it works like a charm, with
or withou
provider
> -- the link has gone down several times.
>
> The problem is that when the link goes down, within five or ten minutes the
> router's network services become unreponsive. I can't SSH in, can't ping, the
> DHCP and interal DNS services are non-repsonsive -
the link goes down, within five or ten minutes the
router's network services become unreponsive. I can't SSH in, can't ping, the
DHCP and interal DNS services are non-repsonsive - nothing. Not only does is
not route, it does not communicate with any hosts on the LAN. Is it trying
Charles Pelletier
Tech. Coordinator
St Luke's School
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Münk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:33 AM
Subject: No route to host
> Hello FreeBSD Team.
> My name is Christian
Maybe I didn?t explain it enough. My Prob. is that I can?t ping in my LAN or anywhere
else. When I wanna go online i do ppp and dial and i get the PPP. But that?s it.
Network interface is o.k. Worked fine yesterday and works fine in an M$ environment.
Normal realtek chipset.
Any other ideas wha
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:33:31 + (UTC) in lucky.freebsd.questions, Christian M?nk
wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD Team.
> My name is Christian and I have a problem.
> I looked through the FAQ and the docs about the prob. when you get the No route to
>host reply when trying to ping. B
Hello FreeBSD Team.
My name is Christian and I have a problem.
I looked through the FAQ and the docs about the prob. when you get the No route to
host reply when trying to ping. But my nic is intact. I made some Kernel
configurations cause I want this one PC act as a router. So I thought
ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> > ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> >
> > So, as you can see I have one default route, and both /24s use that
>single
> > 10.10.10.10 as the default router. But,
sk 255.255.255.0"
> ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>
> So, as you can see I have one default route, and both /24s use that
single
> 10.10.10.10 as the default rou
ot;
ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
So, as you can see I have one default route, and both /24s use that single
10.10.10.10 as the default router. But, because I have simply added the
192.168.1.1 IP as one more plain old alias, I now get this in my logs:
/ke
Nathan,
If you know what your other routes are you can flush the whole route
table by using
#route flush
James
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Kinkade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: bad ro
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:40:54PM +0800, Craig A. Beasland wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I mistakenly typed in the wrong route command...
> route add -net 203.33.30.96 255.255.255.224 203.33.30.1
>
> And now I have this entry in the netstat -rn output...
> 203.33.30&0xcb211e0
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:40:54PM +0800, Craig A. Beasland typed:
> Hi there,
>
> I mistakenly typed in the wrong route command...
> route add -net 203.33.30.96 255.255.255.224 203.33.30.1
>
> And now I have this entry in the netstat -rn output...
> 203.33.30&0xcb211e0
Hi there,
I mistakenly typed in the wrong route command...
route add -net 203.33.30.96 255.255.255.224 203.33.30.1
And now I have this entry in the netstat -rn output...
203.33.30&0xcb211e01 255.255.255.224UGSc148006 fxp1
And I cant delete it. It fills up my log files
I'm running 4.6 release on a pc that I have configured as
a router. The problem occurs when an app on this router
establishes a tcp connection to some other app several hops
away. The route caching code adds a static host route to the
forwarding table. This is fine as long as nothing ch
Hi,
I am currently trying to get a route dump in
freebsd4.4 using sysctl with NET_RT_DUMP.
I am running into problems while parsing the returned
rt_msghdr structures.
The sockaddr structures returned after the rt_msghdr
are messed up and it is not giving correct gateway or
netmask.
For ex
Hi
I have 2 FreeBSD 4.7 PRERELEASE servers, connected via analogue leased
lines using ddial on the 1 server, I want to add a static route to the
receiving server, I have the following in my ppp.linkup file on the
receiving server:
# $Id:$
spear:
route add -net 10.0.0.0/24 HISADDR
mountd: here we go
Cannot register service: RPC: Unable to send; errno = No route to host
What's wrong? I can ping 192.168.0.2 and the firewall is completely open
towards 192.168.0.0/24. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Daniel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
no
> new gateways
> > and routed -t just shows the repopulation of the local subnet
> routes). Are
> > there other better options?
> >
> > One of the main problems I'm having is that to get data to flow
> over the T1
> > circuit, I have to change the sta
lems I'm having is that to get data to flow over the T1
circuit, I have to change the static default route from the DSL connection
to the T1. This is fine since all connections on the T1 then operate as
expected. But after switching the default gateway, the incoming connection
(example SMTP
the new subnet normally, and list
> ip addresses in that subnet underneath it with 255.255.255.255 as the
> subnet mask.
>
> All I need to know now is ... currently the only router interface I am
> using is defaultrouter="xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" ... How do I add the second
> int
neath it with 255.255.255.255 as the subnet
mask.
All I need to know now is ... currently the only router interface I am using
is defaultrouter="xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" ... How do I add the second interface for
my new subnet? Is it a simple route -add thing? I've never done this
before...
301 - 361 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
