So, some idiot is using a cgi or php or something to send mail out of his
website that he shouldn't be sending. With a bunch of sites on the server,
can't tell who.
System accounting can tell me that sendmail was executed 32,976 times, but
is there a way to tell what process /file name
Hi Glenn,
I once wrote some (quick-and-dirty) perl script that monitors network
traffic and logs (for matching outgoing connections) the process command
line and (if apache) the respective vhost and request.
But this would not help if they are calling the sendmail program directly to
inject
did. It was something like pointing mailer.conf to my
own program which did some logging and then called the real sendmail.
Actually, I might just have hacked mailwrapper directly. I think there
was some way I managed to cross-reference to the httpd logs, or that
might be what I tried to do
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name, not the IP of origin.
--
On Jun 4, 2013 9:00 AM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name, not
name, not the IP of origin.
I don't use sendmail, but aren't the login attempts at least logged in
maillog as well? If so, you could use fail2ban to ban them. We do this
with postfix/exim/dovecot/etc.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log only
notes the attempted user name,
On 06/04/2013 04:51 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall?
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so they can be blocked at the firewall? auth.log
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 06/04/2013 04:51 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 June 2013, at 08:47, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am seeing login dictionary attacks on a FreeBSD mail server being
reported. Is there a way to determine the IPs that are doing this
so
List,
Step1: Make a new user::
root@localhost# pw useradd foo -m -s /bin/tcsh -h 0
password for user foo: (secret)
Step 2: Does sendmail know them::
root@modunix# sendmail -bv foo@localhost
foo@localhost... deliverable: mailer local, user foo
# Good...
Step 3: Make a new
Hi,
On Sun, 26 May 2013 18:44:41 -0600
Modulok modu...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
Step1: Make a new user::
root@localhost# pw useradd foo -m -s /bin/tcsh -h 0
password for user foo: (secret)
Step 2: Does sendmail know them::
root@modunix# sendmail -bv foo@localhost
foo
), but
regarding mail... that sounds problematic.
Without fighting an epic battle with with the sendmail configs, is
there a simple way to make this work?
Use lowercase usernames only. Make it a convention.
Verify it.
The obvious answer is probably, usernames should be lowercase! and for
new
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2013 18:44:41 -0600, Modulok wrote:
I know usernames are case-sensitive, I thought emails were
too.
If I remember e-mail basics correctly: No. They're not.
For example, f...@example.com, f...@example.com
is reality today,
i. e. sendmail rewriting uppercase to lowercase prior to
further processing.
The local part of an address (before the @ sign) is case-sensitive (with
the exception of postmas...@example.com)
So it depends on how sendmail is configured that it does
not matter today.
Everything
Everything to the right of the @ is indeed case insensitive, but
everything
to the left might be case sensitive, depending on local policy. This
means
you must preserve the case of everything to the left of the @ sign.
According to the link provided by Erich Dollansky, FreeBSD's
default
On Sun, 26 May 2013 21:31:09 -0600, Modulok wrote:
Everything to the right of the @ is indeed case insensitive, but
everything
to the left might be case sensitive, depending on local policy. This
means
you must preserve the case of everything to the left of the @ sign.
According to
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able
to figure out how to turn
Matthew. Your second suggestion solved it for me. No default and I
still have sendmail listening on port 1025 so it's just what I wanted.
'Wish I understood everything I know about that.'
--
Jim Flowers jflow...@ezo.net
___
freebsd-questions
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I
On 27/04/2013 17:43, doug wrote:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E')
If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
who can reach that port.
You see where it says 'M=E' in that DAEMON_OPTIONS line? That should
probably be changed to 'M
2013-04-27 18:43, doug skrev:
If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
who can reach that port.
Only if it is listed in /etc/mail/access file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able
to figure out how to turn off the default. Sockstat shows:
root
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I sometimes see fetchmail complain:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 ad...@system.mail... Domain of sender
address ad...@system.mail does not exist
Add FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains) to your sendmail configuration.
--
Christian naddy
From free...@edvax.de Fri Mar 8 07:50:06 2013
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:55:57 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
And Matthias already helped me sort it out.
Could you write to the list how you solved the problem?
I'm running sendmail, and using fetchmail to fetch
my mail from the university IMAP server.
I sometimes see fetchmail complain:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 ad...@system.mail... Domain of sender
address ad...@system.mail does not exist
And this is doubled in /var/log/maillog:
sm-mta[14642
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:40:47 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
How do I set fetchmail and sendmail to fetch
such emails?
Maybe it helps if you add the options fetchall flush to
your .fetchmailrc configuration file? I've had a similar
problem some years ago and I think this was the solution.
See man
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:40:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm running sendmail, and using fetchmail to fetch
my mail from the university IMAP server.
I sometimes see fetchmail complain:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 553 5.1.8 ad...@system.mail... Domain of sender
address ad
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:48:45 -0700
From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fetchmail/sendmail: Domain of sender address does not exist
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:40:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:55:57 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
And Matthias already helped me sort it out.
Could you write to the list how you solved the problem?
I think it would be interesting to those running into
similar problems.
I remember that in the end, my clever solution involved
logging
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012 amd64
make buildworld fails with this:
cc -O -pipe -g -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB -DNIS
this:
MALLOC_PRODUCTION=yes
WITH_BSDCONFIG=yes
WITH_BSD_PATCH=yes
WITH_ICONV=yes
WITH_IDEA=yes
WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS=yes
WARNS=2
NO_WERROR=yes
and make buildworld again...
You can use all the options, but
for sendmail
make buildworld fails with this:
cc -O -pipe -g -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB -DNIS
-DTCPWRAPPERS -DMAP_REGEX -DDNSMAP -DNETINET6 -DSTARTTLS -D_FFR_TLS_1
-I/usr/local/include/ -DSASL=2 -std
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
Switching to postfix and editing mynetworks in main.cf might be simplest
solution.
Peter
___
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Zyumbilev, Peter
pe...@aboutsupport.com wrote:
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
Switching to postfix and editing mynetworks in main.cf
2013-02-14 03:07, Chris Maness skrev:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Zyumbilev, Peter
pe...@aboutsupport.com wrote:
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
That looks like
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access to the i-net. I think I remember reading that it is
possible for the i-net attached sendmail to relay mail for a domain to
another host
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access to the i-net. I think I remember reading that it is
possible for the i-net attached sendmail
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robison, Dave
david.robi...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access to the i-net
2013-02-13 06:30, Chris Maness skrev:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robison, Dave
david.robi...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet
Progress has been made.
After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
accepting connections, but maillog is still full of:
jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r05KsfdB048780: smtpquit: mailer
for the banner?
(if there's a DNS problem, it can be 90 seconds befre the banner line)
Good catch - yes sendmail does seem to be hooked to port 25.
Jan 8 10:12:44 jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r05KsfdB048780: forward
/home/huff/.forward.jerusalem+: Group writable directory
Supposedly you
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:30:01 -0500,
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com said:
R After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
R However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
R accepting connections, but maillog is still full of:
R jerusalem
to
figure out how to recompile mail.local to fix this. Recompiling all
of sendmail didn't seem to catch it
Thanks,
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jan 10 17:04:06 2013
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:00:42 -0500
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sendmail not working
Karl Vogel writes:
R After looking into several things, I can now send mail
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the cyrus-sasl port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way. /var/log/maillog
has this:
Jan 7 21:07:42 jerusalem sm-mta[69792
On 08.01.2013 07:39, Robert Huff wrote:
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the
cyrus-sasl port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way.
/var/log/maillog has
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 8 07:43:00 2013
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:39:39 -0500
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, free...@dreamchaser.org,
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Subject: Re: sendmail not working
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM
On 1/8/2013 9:18 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the
cyrus-sasl port. Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either
way. /var/log/maillog has this:
No clue, except the first message might be saying it's not going to
honor
On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
WHAT HAPPENS when you 'telnet' to your mailserver port(s) and try
doing smtp transaction(s) manually?
I don't get the SMTP prompt.
OK, so sendmail either isn't starting, isn't binding to port 25, or some sort
of network/firewall issue
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 8 11:12:57 2013
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:09:36 -0500
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Subject: Re: sendmail not working
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 1/8/2013 9:18 AM, Robert Bonomi
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012 amd64
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the cyrus-sasl
port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way. /var/log/maillog
I have followed the canonical procedure to get Sendmail to use
SASL.
Yesterday this worked.
This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
bumps the library version from .2 to ,3. This appears to break
sendmail in at least two places.
I have added
In the last episode (Jan 05), Robert Huff said:
I have followed the canonical procedure to get Sendmail to use
SASL.
Yesterday this worked.
This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
bumps the library version from .2 to ,3. This appears to break
On 1/5/2013 8:30 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 05), Robert Huff said:
This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
bumps the library version from .2 to ,3. This appears to break
sendmail in at least two places.
I have added a mapping
In the last episode (Jan 05), Robert Huff said:
On 1/5/2013 8:30 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 05), Robert Huff said:
This morning I updated cyrus-sasl to the latest version, which
bumps the library version from .2 to ,3. This appears to break
sendmail in at least
On 1/5/2013 8:55 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
Base sendmail doesn't link with sasl by default. If you had edited
Makefiles or make.conf to enable that, running make clean all install
clean in /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/ should build and install just the new
sendmail. Or, if you had installed
sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8M050394: SYSERR(root):
savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere
Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask?
It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a domain
specified with a trailing dot, since I thought
.net # the hostname of the machine; and
kode5.net # my domain
I haven't put those comments in it either, just the host and domain information.
The Sendmail site does have quite a bit of information actually about
configuration. I was setting up Sendmail on my machine just a week
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:19 -0600
From: Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org
Subject: sendmail local-host-names questions
Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the
local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, and
it doesn't seem
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask?
It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a domain
specified with a trailing dot, since I thought that was how one specified a
fully qualified domain name
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav
[ Andrea Venturoli wrote on Tue 14.Aug'12 at 10:22:14 +0200 ]
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav
the above). At least, that's how I do it.
or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and
implement content filters.
depends of who is talking and how easiness is defined.
Postfix is different. That's all.
___
AN writes:
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The
problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I
send or receive email. I would like the server to do the
following:
This has been running fine for years on one of my machines.
Do
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 21:55:24 2012
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: AN a...@neu.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon
Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send
I have a machine (call it ADAM) running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jul 24 08:55:46 EDT 2012 amd64
which has had no change to the mail components since that
time.
Approximately 12 hours ago, something in sendmail broke.
Symptoms:
1) It works
On 10/08/2012 14:32, Robert Huff wrote:
I have restarted sendmail and get this in /var/log/messages:
Aug 10 08:26:56 jerusalem sm-mta[87853]: sql_select option missing
Aug 10 08:26:56 jerusalem sm-mta[87853]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism
available
I'm (obviously
Perhaps that should be WORKING AGAIN because I'm not sure I
did anything to actually fix the problem.
In any event: thanks.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 02/08/2012 16:07, Mervyn Passmore wrote:
We've made installed 8.14.5 and both the new and old versions seem to be
installed and running according to PS. Whatever is starting sendmail is
initiating the old version.
If you're replacing the system sendmail with the version from ports
Hi,
Hope someone can help. we're stuck trying to update Sendmail from 8.14.3 to
8.14.5
We've made installed 8.14.5 and both the new and old versions seem to be
installed and running according to PS. Whatever is starting sendmail is
initiating the old version.
How can we remove the 8.14.3
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Darren Pilgrim list_free...@bluerosetech.com writes:
I'm removing sendmail entirely from an installed system. I had
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL in /etc/src.conf when I updated to RELENG_8_3, but
that left an old version of sendmail rotting away on disk. This is
the list I have so
Darren Pilgrim list_free...@bluerosetech.com writes:
I'm removing sendmail entirely from an installed system. I had
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL in /etc/src.conf when I updated to RELENG_8_3, but
that left an old version of sendmail rotting away on disk. This is
the list I have so far:
/etc/mail
I'm removing sendmail entirely from an installed system. I had
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL in /etc/src.conf when I updated to RELENG_8_3, but that
left an old version of sendmail rotting away on disk. This is the list
I have so far:
/etc/mail/* (excluding mailer.conf)
/etc/rc.d/sendmail
/usr/bin
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:16:33 -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Even though I have WITHOUT_SENDMAIL specified and the world was built
with that, mergemaster still installs /etc/mail/aliases and
/etc/rc.d/sendmail. Is there a way to prevent this other than adding
them to IGNORE_FILES
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
From: Mark Felder f...@feld.me
Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
When you
A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
and use, and the second is presumably part of Sendmail, which I have not
installed and do
On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
Sendmail?
You don't need to remove the base system sendmail. All you need to do
is set up /etc/mail/mailer.conf
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
During subsequent system upgrades, of you build from source, you should
watch out for thus during the mergemaster piece.
Brian
On Jun 22, 2012 11:44 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base
is presumably part of Sendmail, which I have not
installed and do not use.
It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
Sendmail?
BSD Unixes have shipped with Sendmail for decades, much as BIND is also
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
Thanks! (Thanks too to the other responders.)
Looks like
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
From: Mark Felder f...@feld.me
Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail
_
Have you added this to /etc/make.cnf?
WITH_SENDMAIL_PORT= yes
Yes, I have
So if you go into
/usr/ports/mail/sendmail and:
# make config
You will be able to enable tls and sasl2 (amongst a whole bunch of other
stuff) giving you the correct functionality.
No, this is not give me
hello!
i use bundle sendmail and milter greylist on my e-mail freebsd server.
every time I want upgrade milter-greylist it wants install sendmail
port. But I use sendmail+tls+sasl2 port.
There is conflict. I should deinstall sendmail+tls+sasl, install
milter-greylist, deinstall sendmail
Andrey S. Rybak wrote:
hello!
i use bundle sendmail and milter greylist on my e-mail freebsd server.
every time I want upgrade milter-greylist it wants install sendmail
port. But I use sendmail+tls+sasl2 port.
There is conflict. I should deinstall sendmail+tls+sasl, install
milter-greylist
On 15/06/2012 13:17, Andrey S. Rybak wrote:
i use bundle sendmail and milter greylist on my e-mail freebsd server.
every time I want upgrade milter-greylist it wants install sendmail
port. But I use sendmail+tls+sasl2 port.
There is conflict. I should deinstall sendmail+tls+sasl, install
I've a problem with sendmail setup,
for which I have no satisfactory solution.
I've several hosts, all on the university
network. I'd like to forward all root's mail
from all these hosts to my personal email.
The problem seems to be with the From field.
If I leave the root exposed, the From
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:49:43 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
If I leave the root exposed, the From
field looks e.g. r...@mech-anton240.men.bris.ac.uk,
which is rejected by the university mailer,
because it has no knowledge of this address.
You should be able to use sendmail's masquerading
On 12/04/2012 02:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write
to queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:17:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/04/2012 02:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write
to queue
You should not be changing the ownership and permissions on any of the
directories used by sendmail(8), or the group membership of any of the
groups used by sendmail. Not even if you think you know what you are
doing. This is extremely security sensitive, and getting it wrong means
at minimum
On 12/04/2012 14:40, Ian Lord wrote:
What are the permissions on /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail ? They should
look like this:
% ls -la /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
-r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 662136 Apr 1 08:38
/usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
# ls -al /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
-r-xr
Hi,
I am trying to use sendmail to send emails from a php script (I tried
phpmailer and mail function with the same result).
I always got messages like Could not execute: /usr/sbin/sendmail
Sendmail is World executable:
# ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Jan 3 02:57
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write to
queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25):
Permission denied
I found very old threads
On 14/02/2012 05:12, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Is that rebuild as in cd /usr/src make buildworld or
cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail make
Either of those should do it.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On 14/02/2012 08:05, Bernt Hansson wrote:
I have rebuilt and installed world, but no cigar.
Feb 14 08:50:40 reader sendmail[1147]: q1E7oe7l001147:
to=b...@bananmonarki.se, ctladdr=bernt (1001/1001), delay=00:00:00,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30064, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250 DSN
starttls
220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/freebsd/sendmail.html
That is a good site. Learnt me how to build sendmail at least
a certificate from the isp.
My tought was more in line of MY sendmail is sending
starttls first thing before auth login.
Actually, this makes sense. It seems appropriate to establish an
encrypted connection before sending the username and password.
A parallel would be SSH.
At the same time the use
1 - 100 of 2960 matches
Mail list logo
