I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put only splash_bmp_load=YES and bitmap_load=YES. It
dosent work. Where am I going wrong.
Any help appreciated.
Daniel - BSD rocks!
Hey,
i wanted to ask, if support for Xen3 as DomU is built-in in FreeBSD 6.0 or
6.1.
Thanks in advance.
Roger
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:51:26PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
+ Can someone with knowledge of the UFS internals please confirm one way
+ or the other if this is dangerous or not?
+
+
+ I'm curious to know this as well, as i have some systems using gmirror,
that were setup in this fashion.
On 4/6/06, Daniel Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put only splash_bmp_load=YES and bitmap_load=YES. It
dosent work. Where am I going wrong.
I cvsuped RELENG_6 and went through the usual motions to make the world,
kernel and install them. Everything was ok until I rebooted and started
KDE and the x-session stopped. I could login for other computers and
xorg was using 97% of the cpu.
After rebooting it 2x and using root the 2nd time
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 10:08 +0200, Roger Grosswiler wrote:
Hey,
i wanted to ask, if support for Xen3 as DomU is built-in in FreeBSD 6.0 or
6.1.
Unfortunately it doesn't sound like it'll make 6.1 which is a pain for
us as we wanted to use it ourselves where I work, now we seem to be
going
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put only splash_bmp_load=YES and bitmap_load=YES. It
dosent work. Where am I going wrong.
Any help appreciated.
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put only splash_bmp_load=YES and bitmap_load=YES. It
dosent work. Where am I
Chris wrote:
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put only splash_bmp_load=YES and bitmap_load=YES. It
dosent
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris wrote:
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put only
Chris wrote:
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris wrote:
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and start. The
loader.conf, i put
Hello,
This output is from make installworld from today in attempt to upgrade fresh
6.0-BETA4
to RELENG_6.
=== share/syscons/scrnmaps (install)
./armscii8-2haik8.mk armscii8-2haik8.tmp
uuencode armscii8-2haik8.tmp armscii8-2haik8 armscii8-2haik8.scm
uuencode: not found
*** Error code 127
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:20:09PM +0300, SoHo.NET wrote:
Dear Sir,
Can you notify me with date of FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE?
It have to be released in 1 or 2 weeks after Announcement 20 march 2006 As
I can see here http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/schedule.html
I don't think the final
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris wrote:
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris wrote:
Quoting [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include
Miguel wrote:
Hi, looking at the messages i see errors with ntp everytime i reboot my
server:
shiva2# tail /var/log/messages
Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a
Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: ntpd 4.2.0-a Tue Mar 14 04:43:54 UTC
2006 (1)
Apr 5
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then 6.0
i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't
finish old, 6.0 ?!
finish 6.0, make
Hi,
i have followed the thread in freebsd-stable.
I would point you to my sources of splash-screen-handling,
the second Page also offers some nice splash images,
my preferred is emily_black_1024
http://wiki.unixboard.de/index.php/FreeBSD_-_Bootvorgang_verschönern/verkürzen
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
needs, make a mirror, make a test server/workstation/notebook/PDA
etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just admin and a user.
your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is
SOLARIS.
but your's is so unstable ...
I never could really undertand
On 4/5/06, David Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, I've been through 4 AMD64 motherboards. Commonly,
AE_BAD_CHARACTER stops ACPI (or apic?) from figuring out the system
--- this has happened on 3 out of four boards. On this latest board,
it can turn off APIC. If I do that,
Greetings,
Firstly, let me preface this with an appology for not directing
this to the questions list. But my mail box is quite full already
and I'm not sure I could cope with the additional volume that list
generates and I'm already subscribed here. So I beg your endulgance
this once.
I have
On 4/6/06, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sue if this will work:
1. install FreeBSD/i386
2. Copy the FreeBSD/amd64 kernel to /boot/kernel_amd64
2a. Set ldconfig32_paths = ${ldconfig_paths} in /etc/rc.conf
3. reboot the system
4. break into the boot loader, and tell it to
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then 6.0
i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't
Quoting Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
needs, make a mirror, make a test server/workstation/notebook/PDA
etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just admin and a user.
your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is
SOLARIS.
but your's is so
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:20:09PM +0300, SoHo.NET wrote:
Dear Sir,
Can you notify me with date of FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE?
It have to be released in 1 or 2 weeks after Announcement 20 march 2006 As
I can see here
Sorry, forgot to add the list into CC...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 06.04.2006 16:12
Subject: Re: Disappointed
To: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexey,
2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi.
i think, this unstablity
2006/4/6, Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey,
2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I can't give you an authoritative answer, because I don't know UFS
internals so well. All I know is that it (UFS) thinks the last sector is
available and may want to use it at some point getting EIO then.
I'm not using this method, but I've heard of many people using
Quoting Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/4/6, Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey,
2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and
On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:23, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
FreeBSD is an advanced operating system to FreeBSD is
an advanced operating system in stage of forever development, etc.
thank god and specially the developers that it is so !
I hope that this never change ..
João
A mensagem foi
2006/4/6, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/4/6, Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey,
2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems
On Apr 6, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote:
$200 bucks got me a Athlon 64 3000+ Venice and a ASUS A8V Motherboard.
I'll be converting my Pentium 4 2.26GHz desktop system that has
FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE i386 on it, gcc is currently set to build with
-march=pentium2 and -mtune=pentium4
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:23:53PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
ok. then, freebsd-developers may change The Power To Serve to The Power
To Test, FreeBSD is an advanced operating system to FreeBSD is
an advanced operating system in stage of forever development, etc.
pay money to use stable
Quoting Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/4/6, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/4/6, Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey,
2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because
On Apr 6, 2006, at 4:12 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I can't give you an authoritative answer, because I don't know UFS
internals so well. All I know is that it (UFS) thinks the last
sector is
available and may want to use it at some point getting EIO then.
Well, my ovservation from
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 06:03:55PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
and again. if *NIX developers can't answer user's question, they say get
out or it's your problem or try something else or For that matter;
you're not required to use it at all. everytime one answer for multiple
question WE ARE
On 4/5/06, Garance A Drosehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:08 PM -0400 4/5/06, Rong-En Fan wrote:
I just updated my world from Feb's RELENG_6 as of today. I
noticed that the column header of ps's output is changed
from upper to lower case.
$ ps awx -r -o user|head -1
user
This is used
Igor Robul wrote:
Please tell me name of any OS which works on all current and future
hardware without any problems and without rewriting drivers.
MS-DOS. Runs on all current and future 32-bit or 32-bit-compatible
x86-based computers. Hardware it actually supports (we're talking the OS
itself,
On 4/6/06, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then 6.0
i want to ask developers,
If your running a desktop, I'd recommend sticking with 32-bit. For a
server doing a lot of I/O, go with 64-bit. The Athlon will run very
fast in both modes, but your software compatibility is better in i386
mode.
Interesting comment - I have a server at home with a pair of Opteron
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
Igor Robul wrote:
Please tell me name of any OS which works on all current and future
hardware without any problems and without rewriting drivers.
MS-DOS. Runs on all current and future 32-bit or 32-bit-compatible
x86-based
On Apr 6, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Pete French wrote:
I was thinking of moving this to amd64, but was kind of put off by
results
from a test system I setup using an Athlon 64 3700+ to talk to this
machine. The opteron box is currently running 6.1-PRE/i386, and the
3700 is
Let me comment that
I recently acquired a CanoScan LiDE 60.
It basically works but it is very unstable: It often stops during the
scan and sane returns an error, or it just hangs during the scan (making
ugly noises). The only remedy is to re-plug the usb cable. (which
sometimes causes a panic)
I tried on my
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 16:53 +0200, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
I recently acquired a CanoScan LiDE 60.
It basically works but it is very unstable: It often stops during the
scan and sane returns an error, or it just hangs during the scan (making
ugly noises). The only remedy is to re-plug the usb
Quoting Igor Robul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
Igor Robul wrote:
Please tell me name of any OS which works on all current and future
hardware without any problems and without rewriting drivers.
MS-DOS. Runs on all current and future
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
2006/4/6, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ ... ]
and again. if *NIX developers can't answer user's question, they say get
out or it's your problem or try something else or For that matter;
you're not required to use it at all. everytime one answer for multiple
question WE
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 06:45:11PM +0400, Igor Robul wrote..
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
Igor Robul wrote:
Please tell me name of any OS which works on all current and future
hardware without any problems and without rewriting drivers.
MS-DOS.
Let me comment that my 64-bit commentary about I/O is based on
experience with Opterons, which have excellent I/O bandwidth. The
Intel EM64T boxes do ok, too, but I have no experience with other 64-
bit CPUs. The opterons are just a notch above anything else that
I've used.
Ah, O.K.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:27:10AM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 4/6/06, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is
SOLARIS.
but your's is so unstable ...
All this is described in many
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 04:58:51PM +0200, José M. Fandi?o wrote:
+ Hello list,
+
+ Last night one disk of my desktop machine dead causing a hard lock of the
+ computer. It was a component of a mirror volume so it wasn't as serious as
+ it initially looked.
+
+ Unfortunately, the metadata
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:20:09 +0300
SoHo.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It have to be released in 1 or 2 weeks after Announcement 20 march
It doesn't *have* to be released on a specific date - it will be
released when the team is convinced it is ready.
2006 As I can see here
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
2006/4/6, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ ... ]
and again. if *NIX developers can't answer user's question, they say get
out or it's your problem or try something else or For that matter;
you're not required to use it at all.
hello,
i have got PCI card with two RS-232 connectors (made by Sunix) and I
managed to add record into pucdata.c to see it in my system.
the problem is that i can only read from port but cannot send any
- if i connect it with other computer (B), everything what i write on
B's terminal I can see
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+ Unfortunately, the metadata structure of my data partition (a geom raid3
+ array with tree components ) seems to be corrupted by this hard lock,
+ the following message is scrolled constantly on the screen:
+
+ GEOM_RAID3: Device datos created (id=3217021940).
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 06:08:43PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote..
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:20:09 +0300
SoHo.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It have to be released in 1 or 2 weeks after Announcement 20 march
It doesn't *have* to be released on a specific date - it will be
released when the
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:29:16PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
# ATTENTION
[...]
(*) which most people will ignore -- they also ignore the
relevant handbook-entries and they would also ignore
different tag-names like -SHOOTYOURSELFINTHEFOOT or
-REALLYVERYUNSTABLE,
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Hello,
I saw in the Porters Handbook this OSVERSION macro:
6.0-STABLE after incorporating scripts from the local_startup
directories into the base rcorder(8)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rcordersektion=8. 600101
I think that change has been merged to
On Thu, 2006-Apr-06 15:38:20 +0100, Pete French wrote:
I was thinking of moving this to amd64, but was kind of put off by results
from a test system I setup using an Athlon 64 3700+ to talk to this
machine. The opteron box is currently running 6.1-PRE/i386, and the 3700 is
runiing either Windows
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then 6.0
i want to ask developers, why you developing new system,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:51:26PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
+ Can someone with knowledge of the UFS internals please confirm one way
+ or the other if this is dangerous or not?
+
+
+ I'm curious to know this as well, as i have some systems using gmirror,
that
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then 6.0
i want to ask developers, why
Hello,
when switching my laptop from LAN to a dialup connection, applications
started _before_ the switch will still try to send DNS queries to my
local DNS server. This isn't ideal, and the only workaround I've found
so far is to restart the application.
Is the resolver supposed to periodically
Hello,
I almost always get a panic when running kismet on my ipw-Interface
under 6.1-PRERELEASE. This has been the case ever since ipw hit the
tree. Sometimes kismet works, sometimes it doesn't. A sure way to
trigger the panic is to switch between bss/ibss/monitor mode prior to
running kismet.
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then 6.0
i
Hello,
when going mobile and scanning lots of APs, the old and no longer
reachable APs don't get flushed from the list. That means, the list can
only grow.
Thus, I currently have a list of 17 APs, yet none of them is even
remotely reachable. I already tried up/down'ing the interface and
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old
There are various degrees of stability:
7-CURRENT: active development, lots of experimental and possibly unsafe
things in there.
6-STABLE: proven changes from 7-CURRENT go in here. API is mandated to
be stable, and only well tested and fucntionally stable changes should
go in.
Is the resolver supposed to periodically check for updates to the
resolv.conf, or are the applications somehow caching the IP of the DNS
server?
No, resolv.conf is only read once when the resolver routines initialize.
The solution is to run a local caching nameserver instance. You should do
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
supporting old version, lower then
On 06/04/06, Jonathan Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
hi.
i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to
make
two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and
On 4/6/06, Norbert Augenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:20:09PM +0300, SoHo.NET wrote:
Dear Sir,
Can you notify me with date of FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE?
It have to be released in 1 or 2 weeks
Hi all,
I got a machine with 8GB of RAM and plenty of disk space. I need gvinum to
manage big number of file systems but PAE enabled kernel does not compile
modules. I couldn't figure out how to get vinum statically compiled in the
kernel if that is the way to go. I am running 6-STABLE.
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I swapped out a TX2000 for a TX4000 today, and naively thought that I'd
just be able to plug in the new card and reboot. Unfortunately, it does
not detect the 4 drives (Maxtor 6E040L0).
Booting off the 6.0R install cd shows the card detected ok, and 6 ATA
channels - 2
72 matches
Mail list logo
