Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol 1.0

2022-04-23 Thread Michael T. Pope
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:29:39 +0930 "Michael T. Pope" wrote: > .. only one that I consider release blocking, > which is Marcin's REF immediate surrender problem in #3246. So that is > now my high priority weekend job. I think we are good for release following git.c9eedcf. The REF is now more stu

Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol Website

2022-04-23 Thread Michael T. Pope
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 18:54:47 + Stian Grenborgen wrote: > We are still running our website www.freecol.org using http. It's possible > switching over to https, while keeping our own domain name, by requesting it > from SourceForge. They would need to manually add our domain to the list of >

Re: [Freecol-developers] GitHub Mirror and "Nightly" releases

2022-04-23 Thread Michael T. Pope
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 17:06:49 + Stian Grenborgen wrote: > > One issue with the process is it isn't consistently timed as I have to > > physically perform each part > > of the process. I also cannot generate the MacOS installer. > > The Mac bundle can be created using GitHub Actions. We can al

Re: [Freecol-developers] GitHub Mirror and "Nightly" releases

2022-04-23 Thread Caleb Williams
I think that's an excellent idea. We should go for it. It's beyond my ability and knowledge (and perhaps access to SourceForge). Anything the developers can do to make FreeCol more accessible to the people that are playing the game, the better. Posting to Facebook and Discord would be really helpfu

[Freecol-developers] FreeCol Website

2022-04-23 Thread Stian Grenborgen
Hi, We are still running our website www.freecol.org using http. It's possible switching over to https, while keeping our own domain name, by requesting it from SourceForge. They would need to manually add our domain to the list of SubjectAlternativeName on their server certificate. Should I r

Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol 1.0

2022-04-23 Thread Stian Grenborgen
> [Mike:] > All this is true and great progress, but we have always said 1.0 will be > fully Col1 compatible (at least in classic mode).  I do not think we are > there yet.  A look at the WWC1D? wiki page will show that we do not even > know how compatible we are:-). Well, I used to say feature co

Re: [Freecol-developers] FreeCol 1.0

2022-04-23 Thread Stian Grenborgen
> How about that, we are in pretty good shape.  I have looked through the > bugs back to 0.11.6, and found only one that I consider release blocking, > which is Marcin's REF immediate surrender problem in #3246.  So that is > now my high priority weekend job. Great :-) > The AI ship fail (3247 =

Re: [Freecol-developers] GitHub Mirror and "Nightly" releases

2022-04-23 Thread Stian Grenborgen
> [Caleb:] > The GitHub mirror was originally configured to be an automatic process. I > believe > it was a Travis CI hook, but at any rate when changes were made to the SF > repository, > the CI hook ran and pushed to GH. We can do this directly from SourceForge.net using a Git server hook. The