iscord.gg/pZsGD5Bu are better options.
Lone_Wolf
P.S. i'm not a developer, just a contributor.
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
On 27-09-2023 19:11, Lone_Wolf via Freecol-developers wrote:
Hi,
While attempting to add something to an existing bugticket I
encountered a 500 internal server error, Testing with multiple
browsers and OSes gave the same result .
I filed https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/25055
Hi,
While attempting to add something to an existing bugticket I encountered
a 500 internal server error, Testing with multiple browsers and OSes
gave the same result .
I filed https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/25055/ with SF
support to hopefully get this solved.
Lone_Wolf
On 07-08-2023 11:05, Lone_Wolf via Freecol-developers wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if it is mentioned somewhere, but from freecol 1..0.0 on
the used java version changed to java 11 .
Looking for java.target.version in
https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/git/ci/master/tree/build.xml
confir
a 11 .
Looking for java.target.version in
https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/git/ci/master/tree/build.xml confirms
it still is java 11 .
Install java 11 and test.
Lone_Wolf
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.s
On 25-09-2022 05:42, David Lewis wrote:
I think I wrote that mod a few years back?
https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/git/ci/master/tree/data/mods/convertUpgrade/
nope, looks like mike wrote it.
LW
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-deve
dependencies that are
illogical and mentioned nowhere in col1 documentation .
Lone_Wolf
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
ed package with
the same version number is prevented.
Is it possible to add a 4th number ?
example usecase
future version 1.2.14 has a bad bug that needs immediate action.
A cherry-picked commit is added to solve the bug but and is the only change.
New version number becomes 1.2.14.
On 21-02-2022 08:21, win...@genial.ms wrote:
Hi,
normally I'd think, its a good idea to require a newer version when the old ones
get deprecated, though it seems no new features are needed and there are people
waiting since years for a release while they are on 0.11.6 or some other
bug-ridde
D())
[javac] ^
[javac] 1 warning
Lone_Wolf
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
copy, gog.com still sells that
same version for a low price.
Please doublecheck your wiki entries against v3 .
Lone_Wolf
___
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol
there may be similar builds for other distros.
Maybe such distro-specifiic builds could be mentioned in the download
section on the website ?
Lone_Wolf (aka lone_wolfsf on sourceforge)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-git
>> A post in freecol forum might work, but a wiki page with subsections
>> seems a better solution.
>> Does the sourceforge supplied wiki allow categories / subsections and
>> such ?
>
> Not directly AFAICT. You just use markdown to write the document.
> However that should be enough IMHO. I have
To compare Col1 and freecol resource output i need to know what the
difficulty setting other > tile production does.
Freecol has 5 levels for this setting, are they intended to correspond
exactly with Col1 difficulty levels ?
Does the setting apply to all tiles or just special ones (like the cent
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:24:21 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>> Unfortunately, that didn't work. Unless I hear from the IzPack
>> developers, the only viable option seems to be to patch
>> com.izforge.izpack.util.os.Unix_Shortcut. However, this might not be
>> worth the trouble, since not many Linux users
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:20:40 AM Pedro Rodrigues wrote:
>> In the old Sourceforge interface, developers were able to claim a bug,
>> to
>> signal it was being worked on and avoid duplicate work.
>>
>> In the new interface, there is an owner field (not sure if its the
>> corresponding field), but d
> As just noted, the sourceforge upgrade has its problems.
>
> 2. Despite the e-mail to contrary, they still claim to be importing our
> repo
> at least according to: https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/code/
> However if you try a checkout it seems to be live. Pity the URLs they
> supply
> are misl
Michael T.Pope Wrote :
> Old games with the old spec remain problematic. Lacking those scopes, the
> relevant bonuses are still picked up per unit, leading to exhilarating
> production levels (particularly of bells). What do you think? Should I
> write
> some *really* special purpose backward co
On 11.11.2012 Michael Vehrs wrote:
> I have committed a first attempt at improved tile improvement styles. I
> did not notice any regressions, but I certainly did not cover all corner
> cases. Further improvements might include folding RiverSection into
> TileImprovementStyle, and extending the new
> Michael Vehrs wrote :
> On 12.11.2012 09:15, Michael T. Pope wrote:
>> I now have only one remaining known problem with TransportMission
>> still to hunt down, so on the weekend I finally got to look at the
>> problem with the REF just hanging around. Not sure what was happening
>> earlier, but
Michael T. Pope wrote :
> With regard to save game breaking, if we do decide it needs to change,
> then the next release should not be 0.10.6, but either 0.11.0 or 1.0.
Personally i feel 0.10.5 is not as playable as 0.9.5 was, and so would go
for a 0.10.6 release .
(REF not working well, indians
Greetings,
i tend to use the http://sourceforge.net/projects/freecol/develop page to
keep track of events, and since 22-10 it no longer shows messages about
code commits.
the link SVN - last code commits is still updated to point to the latest
commit, but date is stuck at 2012-10-22 .
-
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 01:39:25 PM Lone_Wolf wrote:
>> I've been running svn builds compiled for java7 for some time now and
>> noticed the log increased a lot with wanrings, npes etc after playing a
>> while.
>
> Which is to be expected with intrusive AI changes afo
I've been running svn builds compiled for java7 for some time now and
noticed the log increased a lot with wanrings, npes etc after playing a
while.
Qutting and restarting, then loading a game from just before the errors
started often gave a message that AI integrity check failed, but could be
fix
Hi,
Check out this thread in the "open discussion' forum :
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freecol/forums/forum/719661/topic/5897636 .
Imo freecol is far from dead, but i have to agree with the anonymous
poster that on the surface it may LOOK dead.
Maybe a news item (possibly linking to a forum
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:28:17 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>> This looks like a rather hairy problem, since we are basically doing
>> everything right already. Except that in the case of starvation, we need
>> to look into the future.
>
> The higher level fix (starve.diff) is still an option if you thi
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:48:29 AM Lone_Wolf wrote:
>> i'm looking into building latest trunk revision (10124 now) from source on
>> archlinux.
>> When compiling , i get this warning :
>> [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction
with -
I've searched about this warning and found it's a new one introduced in
java 7.
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/language/non-reifiable-varargs.html
http://www.angelikalanger.com/GenericsFAQ/FAQSections/ProgrammingIdioms.html#FAQ300A
The version i use is 7.u7_2.3.2 , and archl
rties:
gitproperties:
manifest:
package:
[jar] Building jar:
/home/panoramix/Documents/WIP/pkgbuilds/freecol-svn/src/freecol-build/FreeCol.jar
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 11 seconds
Is it safe to ignore this warning , or is a change to the sourcecode
necessary for building against openjdk 1.7 ?
Lone
29 matches
Mail list logo
