Hi Michael,
2013/1/10 Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
One further insight: I only encountered minor
performance issues with OpenJDK when I first switched to it about three of
so
years ago. IMHO such concerns are largely outdated and/or overstated, and
outweighed by a preference to
Hi,
2013/1/9 Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
- Java
It is probably time to bump our minimum required Java version from 1.5
to 1.6/6. 1.5 is quite dead, whereas 6 is only under threat of death.
Ubuntu distributes OpenJava instead of Oracle Java, so a lot of people use
that knowingly or
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:30:47 PM Uwe wrote:
2013/1/9 Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
- Java
It is probably time to bump our minimum required Java version from 1.5
to 1.6/6. 1.5 is quite dead, whereas 6 is only under threat of death.
Ubuntu distributes OpenJava instead of Oracle
Hi,
please excuse my unaccurate information.
2013/1/9 Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:30:47 PM Uwe wrote:
2013/1/9 Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
- Java
It is probably time to bump our minimum required Java version from 1.5
to 1.6/6. 1.5 is quite
There are several housekeeping issues pending.
- sourceforge upgrade
Unless there are objections I plan to click the sourceforge `upgrade
project' link fairly soon, albeit not earlier than 20130110 UTC.
AFAICT the world is unlikely to end as a result, although commits made
during the
On 09.01.2013 03:28, Michael T. Pope wrote:
There are several housekeeping issues pending.
- sourceforge upgrade
Unless there are objections I plan to click the sourceforge `upgrade
project' link fairly soon, albeit not earlier than 20130110 UTC.
AFAICT the world is unlikely to end as
