Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Beaglebone Black failed to booting up by using u-boot (2016-01)

On 02/16/2016 08:36 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > On 02/02/2016 01:30 AM, tong hui wrote: >> Today I just upgrade and flash my eMMC's Debian Jessie to latest 201601 >> from BBB official. This upgrade version updated u-boot to 2016-01 as >> well. It could boot up eMMC Debian, but SD card

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] own cloud data folder change

On 02/15/2016 10:21 AM, Ken DeWitt wrote: > I did what Stacy suggested and I can't see the files on the drive. How > can I do that? > I will try to replicate the problem and get back. -- Sunil signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] own cloud data folder change

On 02/15/2016 10:12 AM, Ken DeWitt wrote: > I was hoping not to make it external but internal. Is there a way to > make it internal? Oh! So you wish to setup such that *all* of ownCloud goes to the separate storage device (and not such that external device shows up in ownCloud). I

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] own cloud data folder change

On 02/13/2016 08:21 PM, Stacy Cockrum wrote: > > Can I mount that drive to the data folder that own cloud points to so I > do not have to > change anything in own cloud configuration? > > Yes. That's the configuration I'm using for a Raspberry Pi2 setup. The > external partition is mounted at

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Help creating landing page

On 01/31/2016 12:32 AM, Marc Jones wrote: > Sunil, > > Are you suggesting we move our monthly progress call to Jisti for this > Month? I agree being able to do a screen share would make sense for > looking at the website mock mray created. But just wanted to clear about > the change from our

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Help creating landing page

On 01/29/2016 09:21 PM, mray wrote: > Hello, > > Well that list seems to have disappeared (although I got my own mail!). > I finished a presentable version of a page design and would like to meet > with people interested in creating a landing page. > This could be either mumble or on

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Help creating landing page

On 01/28/2016 05:23 PM, mray wrote: > Since the visual ML has been very quiet lately I want to make sure to > point out that people interested in creating a landing page should > subscribe to vis...@lists.freedomboxfoundation.org > > I just posted there successfully but can't find a subscribe

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] User module diagnostic failed and no more SSH access

On 01/21/2016 03:34 PM, Tim Mohrbach wrote: > I just realized that the slapd package seemed to be marked for removal > or was already removed... how is that possible actually? Output: > [...] > Anyway, I just installed the package slapd again and restarted the > service, seems fine now actually.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How-can-i-help on Freedombox today

On 01/19/2016 03:10 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Sunil Mohan Adapa] >> The dashboard kind of page you have indicated[1] seems like a good >> idea. > > So, which email address could be use for this? Perhaps all the > freedombox related packages should have a common ma

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Easiest way to modify models.py and views.py for Plinth?

On 01/17/2016 02:21 AM, Adrian Gropper wrote: > Hello All, > > I have a FreedomBox up and running, and I want to modify the Django > project Plinth that comes with my FreedomBox. I want to add one or more > models (database tables), and I want to add some view functions and > templates. > > >

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Landing page content

On 01/19/2016 06:03 AM, Philippe Baret wrote: [...] > > Here is a possible structure for a landing/presentation page: > > INTRODUCTION > FEATURES > USER EXPERIENCE > HOW TO START USING IT > > DOWNLOAD | GET HELP | GET INVOLVED > This sounds like a plan. My wire frame proposal[1] is close to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Okay, Let's Encrypt

On Sunday 17 January 2016 06:28 PM, Sandy Harris wrote: [...] > That includes the text "Sets up Apache configuration for the domain > and enables/disables it." Why Apache? Isn't nginx much smaller so more > suitable? Nginx is certainly a better fit for FreedomBox due to better memory footprint

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How-can-i-help on Freedombox today

On Saturday 16 January 2016 02:12 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [...] > > Perhaps we should generate this list regularly and suggest newcomers > look at these issues to get started? The dashboard kind of page you have indicated[1] seems like a good idea. It would be nice to have a single place

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Designing the Ultimate Internet Gizmo

On Friday 15 January 2016 02:42 AM, David Solomonoff wrote: > Possibly slightly off-topic but ... > > I recently connected with hardware developers interested in designing > and manufacturing a low-cost open source router for wireless mesh networks. > > The FreedomBox could potentially be

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] User module diagnostic failed and no more SSH access

On Friday 15 January 2016 10:02 PM, Tim Mohrbach wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that I don’t get inside my box anymore via SSH. > When running the user module diagnostics in plinth, it fails with all tests: > > Diagnostic Results > Module: users > Test Result > Listening on tcp4 port 389failed

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Landing page content

On Saturday 09 January 2016 10:48 PM, Marc Jones wrote: [...] > I create a page with my notes from the call here > (https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls/2016.0901) > > Basically the idea for the site is to present a general overiew, a brief > quick start getting a single board

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Kernel update on BeagleBone Black

On Thursday 14 January 2016 03:25 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm having some problems getting FBX working on a BBB (rev B, for > reference). > > For some reason I couldn't get the latest release working: it would boot > once, but after the initial reboot it wouldn't boot

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Landing page translations

On Saturday 09 January 2016 09:44 PM, Marc Jones wrote: > Thanks everyone for showing up to the Hack call today. I think we made > some progress on ideas for the landing page. > > We need to do a few things to keep it moving forward. We have previously > discussed using Jekyll as the framework

[Freedombox-discuss] Okay, Let's Encrypt

Hello, Given the interest and specific information by our community with regards to setting up Let's Encrypt, I was able to prepare a module for managing certificates in Plinth. It is basic and requires lots of love with respect to improvements and testing. Comments and improvements are

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Tor-Installation disappeared from plinth

On 01/05/2016 03:04 AM, Dieter wrote: > Hello! > > Some time ago, when freedombox-setup was updated in the sid-repo from > 0.6 to 0.7, i "lost" my Tor-installation. > > With that i mean that plinth does not show tor to be installed anymore, > although it is installed and running. > > How does

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] OpenVPN configuration / FreedomBox 0.7

On 01/04/2016 07:38 PM, Stacy Cockrum wrote: > Just downloaded the most recent release of FreedomBox and experimenting > with the freedombox-unstable-free_2015-12-13_all-amd64.vdi.xz > > image. I'm

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Trying to add Lets Encrypt to FreedomBox

On 01/03/2016 12:18 AM, Adrian Gropper wrote: > I'm running FreedomBox on a Digital Ocean VM at https://myas.xyz (ask me > directly if you want access) > > I tried to follow the instructions at > https://letsencrypt.org/howitworks/ and it fails with: > fbx@MyAS:~/letsencrypt$ ./letsencrypt-auto

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Intro and excitement

On 12/23/2015 08:20 PM, Stephen Mahood wrote: > Hey folks, > > Just chiming in, initially followed freedombox in the startup era a > number of years ago but fell off for a while and just recently was able > to get the .7 up and running on a beaglebone black without too much > trouble. Some on

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] force owncloud to https?

On 12/19/2015 02:00 AM, Dietmar wrote: > I wonder if it would make sense to force the usage of owncloud to https? > I just did this on my box by simply copying and adapting the > plinth-ssl.conf and then enabling. > What do the experts think? Does this increase data security? > It might be a

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Plinth service unavailable

On 12/13/2015 04:54 PM, Tim Mohrbach wrote: > Hi, > usually the freedombox is just running flawlessly and great. I’m such a > huge fan already! Today I’m writing because I have a little problem, I > really hope you can help me. > I haven’t gone on the plinth webinterface for a few weeks, but

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] 503 Error when install is complete

On 12/13/2015 03:16 PM, Trevor Best wrote: > I've followed the directions precisely and no matter what, when I try to > go to the freedombox's IP I get a 503 error. It redirects to HTTPS > and /plinth but gives nothing but 503. I'm working from a brand new > install of testing and have done

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Plinth service unavailable

On 12/13/2015 05:39 PM, Tim Mohrbach wrote: > Yes, this works perfectly! Thanks a lot for the help and sorry for > not trying this before writing, I’ll try updating first next time. No problem. We are more than a bit embarrassed it broke in the first place :) We just started paying more

[Freedombox-discuss] Release testing for FreedomBox 0.7

Hello, I have built and uploaded FreedomBox images for 0.7 release[1]. I also updated the QA page for 0.7 release[2]. Please test as well as you can. Many thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen for the hosting server. FreedomBox 0.7 will be announced if there are no major issues found with the builds.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] observations of a semi-technical user

On 12/11/2015 10:57 PM, znot...@hailmail.net wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just installed fbx 0.6 with plinth 0.7.1 on sid. I thought I would > share the bumps I encountered along the way. > > The first I have already mentioned on irc, and Sunil has responded. I > include it here for

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Localization: 0.7 release freeze Sunday [Transifex>Weblate]

On 12/05/2015 11:33 PM, Mikkel Kirkgaard Nielsen wrote: [...] > As a clarifying note these strings are available now to translate in > Transifex as they have been added through a .pot import. > > However any changes to the .po files done outside of Transifex and > comitted to git is unknown to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox UI in your language

On 12/03/2015 06:05 PM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi wrote: > On 2015-12-03 at 10:12:13 +0530, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote: >> This is not too different from our relaxed policy of allowing many >> developers to write to the repository (especially on Alioth). Any of >> their machi

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox UI in your language

On 12/02/2015 05:36 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [...] > This would mean the Weblate web service have commit access to our git > repository, either using a ssh key with no password (scary) or a > password protected ssh key and an ssh-agent with the password available > for the web server to use

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Testing freedombox on A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB

On 12/01/2015 04:29 AM, Jan Costermans wrote: > Hello Nico, > > I just noticed there is an image for the lime2 by Sunil over here > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/2015-November/007008.html > It's waiting for testers... > I am downloading it right now and will let you

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Testing freedombox on A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB

On 12/01/2015 03:58 AM, Jan Costermans wrote: [...] > I would like to use the olinuxino as an access point, connecting the > ethernet port to my rmodem/outer and using the MOD-WIFI-R5370-ANT > to > connect other laptops and devices.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Fwd: Samba on Freedombox

On 11/30/2015 01:41 PM, Tim Mohrbach wrote: > I have pretty naively installed a samba on my freedombox. But the > firewall is very strict and I couldn't access the samba from my local > network at all. So I adjusted the firewall rules, after the next > update they were all gone again, haha. I'm

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [urgent] Wiki screenshot for use in presentation?

On 11/27/2015 01:29 PM, Nico Rikken wrote: > Hello FreedomBox team, > > I'll be giving a presentation this weekend at T-Dose, a Dutch FOSS > conference. It's about the future heading of the (F)OSS community, and > I'd like to highlight FreedomBox's ease of use as an example (having > seen it from

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Installation and general questions

On 11/27/2015 04:02 PM, Daniel Steglich wrote: > Hi Dieter, > > "However, the "fbox"-user has not been created, or can not be used." > There is a default user named "fbx" (but only for SSH / local > console access). If you want to access plinth, you have to create a > user (as you did). >

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Need help with getting start

On 11/26/2015 12:52 AM, ndcd wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Now I have the IP address, but still no > connection to the freedombox. > I started Iceweasel without add-ins to make sure any of them does not > interfere. > Going to the IP-Address gives a > "Unable to connect [...] > Maybe this

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Need help with getting start

On 11/24/2015 12:32 AM, ndcd wrote: > I want to give freedom box a trial. For this I am using an old laptop > with ethernet and WLAN connection and installed first sid then > freedombox according to the manual. setup was run of course. > Now, according to the "Quick Start" I should be able to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] PageKite relay service; risks, community and collaboration?

On 11/22/2015 07:04 PM, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: [...] > I touched on most of the concerns and potential solutions in my > last mail - I think the best "design" for this, would be to > decouple the DNS part of the service from the relays. So the > ecosystem would look something like this: >

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] APU

On 11/20/2015 04:20 PM, Nicolas Duval wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I plan to acquire an APU to replace my Raspberry Pi but I see that it > has been removed from the hardware page > (https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/Hardware/), is there a reason for > that? It is still there[1][2][3]. It got

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Plinth Modules

On Friday 14 August 2015 03:21 PM, Lloyd Smart wrote: Hello, Could you please let me know where I might find online resources about developing Plinth modules for Freedombox? I have a few ideas I wanted to try out. Plinth's Developer documentation on how to write modules is quite outdated.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Getting started with fbx...

On Tuesday 07 April 2015 01:24 AM, tsr.offent...@tsr.se wrote: Hi, I'm interested in getting started with fbx but I don't really know how. I hope you can help me :) But before I do ask for help with what hw to get and how to set it up I would like to explain what I'm hoping to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Raspberry Pi 2

On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:47 PM, Felix Oxley wrote: Is it possible that the Raspberry Pi 2 is or could become an/the ideal platform fro FreedomBox? :-) Despite its shortcomings, it would be nice to have support for this popular device for the mind share that it has. If someone

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FOSDEM 2015

On Tuesday 27 January 2015 08:43 PM, Federico Ceratto wrote: As a passive listener on this mailinglist I was wondering if anyone will be attending FOSDEM this year We could meet at the Debian stand, on Saturday at 3pm. The IRC channel #freedombox@freenode is probably the best place to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] x86 instalation

On Sunday 25 January 2015 06:07 PM, Nick B-T wrote: Please could someone sum up why freedom box is aimed at specific hardware rather than being x86 generic? Thanks. If you are looking to try FreedomBox on x86 hardware, you can: - Install Debian unstable and then install the package

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Intel Compute Stick

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 06:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [...] That was my point too in my proposing to raise the bar now: I no longer see the benefit of tracking boards that are less ideal when we have adequate options that are more ideal. I am quite interested in Sunil elaborating,

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Intel Compute Stick

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 01:08 AM, Blibbet wrote: To me it is unsuitable for a FreedomBox due to firmware, which is probably UEFI-based if hardware comes from Intel. Indeed, proprietary firmware is a deal breaker. We should consider promising FreedomBox users images and devices with only

[Freedombox-discuss] Plinth 0.4.4 released

/ Latest Plinth package is uploaded to Debian unstable (special thanks to Bdale Garbee) and should be available soon. Contributors to this release: - Bob Girard - James Valleroy - Michael Pimmer (fonfon) - Sunil Mohan Adapa Call for help: Plinth is steadily improving and getting

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Intel Compute Stick

On Tuesday 13 January 2015 03:33 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: Even better: ‘The Ubuntu version of the Compute Stick will sell for $89.’ Intel Compute Stick PC Specifications Quad-core Intel Atom Z3735F @ 1.33GHz (1.83GHz boost) 2GB RAM (Windows), 1GB RAM (Ubuntu) 32GB eMMC (Windows), 8GB eMMC

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Monthly Progress Call: 12/28 7 PM GMT?

On Tuesday 23 December 2014 12:19 AM, Markus Sabadello wrote: Hey, I'm also considering going to Hamburg, how about we propose a FreedomBox session here (they still have a free slot): https://events.ccc.de/congress/2014/wiki/Session:WeFixTheNet Let's do it! This is very exciting! I also

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Monthly Progress Call: 12/28 7 PM GMT?

On Monday 22 December 2014 03:35 AM, Nick Daly wrote: Hi folks, let me know if this month's scheduled progress meeting, 12/28, 19:00 GMT, does or doesn't work for you. If it doesn't, we can reschedule for other times. Please offer potential times if asking for a reschedule. This time works

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Setting Up Freedombox Dev Environment

On Tuesday 16 December 2014 06:47 PM, Eli wrote: How do I install/configure a development version of freedombox on a debian testing system? (one pulled from github, not from jessie's repositories). None of the developers are focusing on supporting FreedomBox for Jessie due to the additional

[Freedombox-discuss] Plinth as the front page for FreedomBox

Hello, Currently, if someone visits their FreedomBox as http://freedombox/ they are shown jwchat interface. This has the following problems: - JWChat is only a small part of FreedomBox - Other services available such as /owncloud and not easy to discover - Even Plinth which should help a user

[Freedombox-discuss] Central TODO page

On Monday 01 December 2014 02:31 AM, Nick Daly wrote: Hi folks, the notes from today's call have been posted: https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls Thanks to everyone who attended, we had a great turnout today! One of the items we have decided on was to work on a single common

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] plinth broken in unstable?

On Monday 01 December 2014 05:07 AM, Mike Kuzmiak wrote: I am encountering this same issue, although I don't know what is meant by using d-i and preseeding. Running the test suites in /usr/lib/freedombox/testsuite does not work for IPv4 and IPv6. I see Sunil's suggested fixes in this thread.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] plinth broken in unstable?

On Sunday 09 November 2014 04:01 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Sunil Mohan Adapa] During development, we are directly using CherryPy's web server without Apache/Nginx. In end-user setup, Apache is reverse-proxying requests. I suppose CherryPy is serving the same purpose as uwsgi. I

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] plinth broken in unstable?

On Sunday 09 November 2014 04:01 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Sunil Mohan Adapa] During development, we are directly using CherryPy's web server without Apache/Nginx. In end-user setup, Apache is reverse-proxying requests. I suppose CherryPy is serving the same purpose as uwsgi. I

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Monthly Progress + Development Calls?

On Monday 17 November 2014 11:41 PM, Nick Daly wrote: Hi folks, in order to coordinate better, we should try to put together regular, probably monthly, calls where we discuss ongoing topics of interest. Right now, I'm scheduling the first call for Sunday, November 30th at 6 PM GMT. Further

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] plinth broken in unstable?

On Sunday 09 November 2014 04:01 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [...] I suspect the init.d script starting plinth isn't working as well as it should. When I start plinth with --debug --no-daemon as root from the command line, it work. When it is started as a service, it do not work. :( I am

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Idea for cross freedombox email system not leaking metadata

On Monday 10 November 2014 04:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Jonathan Wilkes (2014-11-10 00:42:12) [...] Currently all I've read is that the project should glue together pre-existing pieces of software, rather than designing or developing software specifically for the project. (Or

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] plinth broken in unstable?

On Saturday 08 November 2014 03:48 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [...] I recommend to try use uwsgi - that allows separation of application configuration from frontend web serving configuration (i.e. tuning of Apache or Nginx or for development using uwsgi's own web serving). Plinth is now a

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] plinth broken in unstable?

On Saturday 08 November 2014 01:30 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Hi. I installed an unstable based FreedomBox using d-i and preseeding, but the resulting installation do not give me a working plinth. Running the test suite show that http://freedombox/plinth/ do not work for IPv4 and

[Freedombox-discuss] Plinth 0.4.1 released

is: https://github.com/freedombox/Plinth/ Latest Plinth package is available in Debian unstable (special thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen). Contributors to this release: - James Valleroy - Michael Pimmer (fonfon) - Nick Daly - Sunil Mohan Adapa Call for help: Plinth is in much better

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] What should we do about Freedombox in the next stable Debian Release?

On Sunday 12 October 2014 12:30 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Hi. The next Debian stable release, Jessie, is getting nearer, and at the moment our freedombox related packages (freedombox-setup, plinth, pagekite) are included in the package set destined for Jessie. But do we want those

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Frontend-libraries in Plinth

On Thursday 31 July 2014 02:27 PM, Michael wrote: TLDR: How about including an up-to-date version of twitter-bootstrap in Plinth instead of using the more than two years old and already deprecated debian package? I suggest waiting until we miss a major feature from the recent version or have

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Why four users with passwords on the freedombox?

On Sunday 15 June 2014 08:54 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [...] One way to get rid of this last one is to either remove the user when the initial user is created by the first-page plinth setup, and create a local unix user for the initial user with sudo access and the password specified on

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Dev: Cross Cutting Concerns in Plinth?

On Wednesday 26 March 2014 12:56 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Nick Daly] Hi folks, Plinth doesn't currently handle cross-cutting concerns very well. For example, if I change the hostname, I need to individually notify every service that depends on that hostname. If Plinth had better

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Getting pagekite into Debian?

On Tuesday 18 March 2014 08:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: [...] non DDs can be given write access to collab maint easily. Thank you for pointing it. I have sent a request to join the collab-maint and I am following the process described (at http://deb.li/3qmXG). -- Sunil signature.asc

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox 0.2 almost ready - please test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 March 2014 09:04 AM, A. F. Cano wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:22:49PM -0500, Nick Daly wrote: A. F. Cano a...@shibaya.lonestar.org writes: Tried to build for virtualbox. It failed. The loop device the script assumes doesn't

<    1   2