Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Johnson Lam
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:20:22 -0600, you wrote: Hi Uso, >3.31 actually (which first did >32 MB partitions) :P I remember crystal clear, this version was release by Compaq. I help my schoolmate to partition his 200MB Connor with this, otherwise drive letter will reach "I", horrible. Rgds, John

[Freedos-devel] Network Guide - Setup MS Client 3.0 w/ 3C905B-TX

2004-03-25 Thread Johnson Lam
Hi, I've written a guide "Setup MS Client 3.0 under FreeDOS with 3COM 3C905B-TX". Since this is a step-by-step guide, it's not conflict with Mike's network howto (it's far more detail and complete). Anyone have time can you please help me to check the integrity? Or add your experience, comment.

Re: [Freedos-devel] EMM386 release candidate #1

2004-03-25 Thread Michael Devore
At 04:13 PM 3/24/2004 -0600, Michael Devore wrote: >The first release candidate version of EMM386 with VCPI support is available at >ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads in the files EMM386.ZIP and EMM386SR.ZIP, as >executable and ASM+C source. Note well: the uncompressed executable name is no

Re: [Freedos-devel] EMM386 release candidate #1

2004-03-25 Thread Michael Devore
At 04:13 PM 3/24/2004 -0600, you wrote: >The first release candidate version of EMM386 with VCPI support is available at >ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads in the files EMM386.ZIP and EMM386SR.ZIP, as >executable and ASM+C source. Note well: the uncompressed executable name is now >EMM386.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Gregory Pietsch
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: Hi, Gregory Pietsch escribió: I don't see anything about edlin or code in there, so I guess they are okay, or am I just not getting any feedback? Oops, sorry! When the list was first posted, EDLIN didn't exist, so I'll add it (to MISC utilities, ok?). Could yo

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: Hi, Alain has introduced in this mail something interesting that was introduced in other posts too: the spec mentions a kernel compatible to MS-DOS 3.30, 3.31 actually (which first did >32 MB partitions) :P Alain escribió: some others like Win 3.11 compat should

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Eric Auer escribió: Hi, some comments on your comments... HIMEM /INT15H=... should not be extremely hard to do, so I vote for it. That's another argument that I like: low cost to implement it. A third opinion (or more) for the untie? Eric, you say DOS5 we have it more or less, I just watch the

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Alain has introduced in this mail something interesting that was introduced in other posts too: the spec mentions a kernel compatible to MS-DOS 3.30, but actually I think that our current FreeDOS kernel is closer to 5.0 and sucessors than 3.30. Also 3.30 and 5.0 have many differences in da

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamari'a Merino
Luchezar Georgiev escribio': Here is a quote from the spec (http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/spec/spec.html): The MS-DOS 3.3 compatibility extends only to the FreeDOS kernel. FreeDOS programs should be compatible with MS-DOS 6.22, because those are the features that users will be most familiar wi

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Gregory Pietsch escribió: I don't see anything about edlin or code in there, so I guess they are okay, or am I just not getting any feedback? Oops, sorry! When the list was first posted, EDLIN didn't exist, so I'll add it (to MISC utilities, ok?). Could you report on the commands already

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Luchezar Georgiev escribiÃ: Thanks, Aitor! 1.0 todo's: http://fdos.org/ripcord/fdos_1_0/official/todos.htm As far as I know, APPEND is considered dangerous and incompatible. It had better stay missing. Well, it is not aware of task switchers, it may have problems with executing nested SH

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, BTW, TO EVERYBODY (I forgot to say): changes will not be commited IMMEDIATELY, ok? tom ehlert escribió: emm386 RAM=m-n range for UMBs + EMS emm386 ROM=m-n range of RAM to be used to shadow ROM as soon as someone finds out what that's supposed to do _exactly_ My guesses: RAM (you can spe

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Many thanks, Bart. Alain, that is what I tried to explain but with nicest words (probably of an English native speaker! ;-)). Aitor Bart Oldeman escribió: I think that SCANDISK is the most important missing program. it may be important, but I respectfully disagree it being a showstopper.

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Nice that you pointed about FAT32. I'll explain what I tried to reflect in the list (because FAT32 was not popular time ago). My point has been: FAT32 support is left as post-1.0. The fact that KERNEL, FDISK and other components already support FAT32 is an extra plus, but maybe we don't need to

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Alain
about fat32 testing: I believe a working DOSFSCK 2.10 just what is needed (not what is whished for). A ScanDisc-alike program would be nice, but IMHO what is really _needed_ is just some way of testing and fixing a fat32 disk, nothing fancy fust functional. This would give time to ScanDisk be i

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Alain
A little more about memory testing: A good teste program must be very long, for one thing that nowdays memory are prone to random errors, not only repeatable ones. What I believe is usefull is something else: just check if it is there at all, if there are no holes (like the one at 16Mb inserted

Re: [Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 25-Мар-2004 21:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA> HIMEM /HMAMIN=m is indeed not very useful. Being able to allocate PARTS EA> of the HMA would be nice but was not introduced before MS DOS 7 or so, EA> and before that time, HMAMIN protected the system from giv

[Freedos-devel] Re: FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, some comments on your comments... HIMEM /INT15H=... should not be extremely hard to do, so I vote for it. HIMEM /HMAMIN=m is indeed not very useful. Being able to allocate PARTS of the HMA would be nice but was not introduced before MS DOS 7 or so, and before that time, HMAMIN protected t

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
Yes, Bart, "the show must go on!" ;-) The FreeDOS spec still states that we should be compatible with MSDOS 3.3. Here is a quote from the spec (http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/spec/spec.html): The MS-DOS 3.3 compatibility extends only to the FreeDOS kernel. FreeDOS programs should be compatible

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Alain, A> tom ehlert escreveu: >> himem /TESTMEM:ON|OFF >> really want a (bad) memory test in 1.0 ? A> As bad as is MS's is, it did save me many times. Consider it not a A> _test_for_100%_ok_ but as a _test_if_exists_ and I disagree. If you want a memorytest (I don't question that), you

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote: > Thanks, Aitor! > > 1.0 todo's: http://fdos.org/ripcord/fdos_1_0/official/todos.htm > As far as I know, APPEND is considered dangerous and incompatible. It had > better stay missing. > I think that SCANDISK is the most important missing program. it

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
If we have a fat32 kernel, and chkdsk is only fat16 we cannot use it :( We can, but only on FAT12 and FAT16 volumes. But SCANDISK must support FAT32. That's why it had better use the DOSFSCK, not CHKDSK engine. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Alain
tom ehlert escreveu: himem /TESTMEM:ON|OFF really want a (bad) memory test in 1.0 ? As bad as is MS's is, it did save me many times. Consider it not a _test_for_100%_ok_ but as a _test_if_exists_ and you can understand how good it is. IMHO if implemented, it should be implemented with that f

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Alain
Hi, I found this: chkdsk Ready 2003-10-6 I don't agree. If we have a fat32 kernel, and chkdsk is only fat16 we cannot use it :( There could be a reference to dosfsck, stating not compatible or something. Alain Aitor Santamaría Merino escreveu: I have committed most of the pending ch

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
Thanks, Aitor! 1.0 todo's: http://fdos.org/ripcord/fdos_1_0/official/todos.htm As far as I know, APPEND is considered dangerous and incompatible. It had better stay missing. I think that SCANDISK is the most important missing program. Whether to borrow code for it from CHKDSK, DOSFSCK, both or n

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread tom ehlert
emm386 RAM=m-n range for UMBs + EMS emm386 ROM=m-n range of RAM to be used to shadow ROM as soon as someone finds out what that's supposed to do _exactly_ himem /INT15H=xxx himem /HMAMIN=m prehistoric crap might be moved to Post 3.0 himem /TESTMEM:ON|OFF really want a (bad) memory test

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Gregory Pietsch
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote: Hi all, I have committed most of the pending changes to the TODO list. While Jim and I acknowledge on the way of reintegrating it on the site, Bernd has kindly posted a preview of the list in the links below: 1.0 todo's: http://fdos.org/ripcord/fdos_1_0/official/t

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list ready (but not yet posted)

2004-03-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi all, I have committed most of the pending changes to the TODO list. While Jim and I acknowledge on the way of reintegrating it on the site, Bernd has kindly posted a preview of the list in the links below: 1.0 todo's: http://fdos.org/ripcord/fdos_1_0/official/todos.htm post-1.0: http://fdos.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Experimental DEVLOAD 3.12 with new features released

2004-03-25 Thread Jim Hall
Eric Auer wrote: ... URLs: http://www.infradead.org/devload/ http://www.infradead.org/devload/source/devload.asm http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~eric/stuff/soft/by-others/ devload-3.12.zip If this turns out to work: Bernd, you said devload is open but no longer maintained. License is GPL but the distro