On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Hello Bernd,
when you have issues about FreeCOM, please, file them at bugzilla or mail
them directly to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]); I'm likely to miss them in huge
mails compiled of many different topics. It is also helpful to mention
something eye catching
Hi,
I've tested some problematic applications (Quickview, MPXplay) with
latest HIMEM64 and DOS32a, seems working fine.
For last few version it use KBC-2 A20 but this version changed to
always on A20. Sorry for my stupidity, is both them same thing or
different?
Thanks.
Rgds,
Johnson.
Hi,
I just notice the TDSK and some EMS application report neither
controller fail or EMS corrupt by using HIMEM64+EMM38664.
I've tried to use NOEMS but still EMS exist but it's size was shrink
to a very small size, maybe it's the reason of failure?
Can I completely disable the EMS handler so
Michael,
how does that MAX work in HIMEM64?
it keeps complaining about /MAX:4000 ignored
I'm trying to reduce memory enough to not let the XMS-version of FreeCOM load in extended memory.
DEVICE=A:\DRIVER\HIMEM64.EXE /MAX:4000
;DEVICE=A:\DRIVER\EMM386.EXE X=A000-
SHELL=A:\COMMAND.COM A:\
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Eric Auer wrote:
This reminds me of the 386 question: How much bigger than the FAT16
kernel is the FAT32 kernel in RAM (low, umb, hma) and how much of
this would be saved by optimizing for 386, experiences?
Low:
the drive data tables take 32 bytes more per drive (depends
At 07:14 PM 4/20/2004 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Michael,
how does that MAX work in HIMEM64?
it keeps complaining about /MAX:4000 ignored
I'm trying to reduce memory enough to not let the XMS-version of FreeCOM load in
extended memory.
DEVICE=A:\DRIVER\HIMEM64.EXE /MAX:4000
At 08:42 PM 4/20/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Michael Devore schreef:
I need to be able to get any application which uses EMS and fails. What is a TDSK
and can it be downloaded?
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/ramdisk/
1)NOEMS
2)NOEMS NOVCPI
3)EMS=1 FRAME=NONE
4)EMM=
At 04:41 PM 4/20/2004 +0800, you wrote:
Hi,
I just notice the TDSK and some EMS application report neither
controller fail or EMS corrupt by using HIMEM64+EMM38664.
There's definitely a weirdness going on with EMS, but not all EMS, since other
applications are using it okay. May have to quick
There's definitely a weirdness going on with EMS, but not all EMS, since other applications are using it okay. May have to quick patch EMM386 if I can find it.
note that tdsk up to and including 2.3x series has sourcecode.
for problems with tdsk 2.4x series you have to contact Matthias Paul.
he's
Hi!
20--2004 18:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego Iastrubni) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Arkady V.Belousov
Because DOS is not reenterable (you can't call most DOS function from
inside TSR, when TSR gets control at time of DOS working), you should check
when DOS is in idle state (see INT28
Hi!
20--2004 18:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+++ int2f.asm 20 Apr 2004 18:43:03 - 1.28
+global NETWORK_REDIRECTOR
+NETWORK_REDIRECTOR:
+pushbp
+mov bp, sp
+mov al,
At 09:42 PM 4/20/2004 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
There's definitely a weirdness going on with EMS, but not all EMS, since other
applications are using it okay. May have to quick patch EMM386 if I can find it.
note that tdsk up to and including 2.3x series has sourcecode.
for problems with tdsk
, 20 2004, 22:09,Arkady V.Belousov:
No. Unfortunately, DOS itself calls INT28 too rarely (only when it
waits onput to fill input keyboard buffer), so you should use other doors.
Ie., for example, you should trap INT21 and, if happen some event (handler
from INT1C sets some flag),
At 09:42 PM 4/20/2004 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
note that tdsk up to and including 2.3x series has sourcecode.
Alright, I've added support for EMS function 58h in EMM386, and TDSK seems to be happy
running under EMS as well as the original XMS.
Big question for you, and any other interested
As melhores listas segmentadas de e-mails para mala direta. Todos os
tipos:
http://www.gueb.de/divulgamail
Cadastros de e-mails segmentados por estados, profissões, empresas e
pessoas físicas. Tudo que você pracisa para fazer a divulgação e
publicidade do seu negócio, programas para spam e
Bart Oldeman escreveu:
How about speed gain?
Perhaps, sometimes 1, 2 or 3 more BUFFERS available can make a difference.
Otherwise I can't see any visible speed difference.
I did som testing some time ago (M$DOS) and my conclusion is that if
other buffers are present (in my case smatrdrv and
At 12:35 AM 4/21/2004 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
20-áÐÒ-2004 15:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD Big question for you, and any other interested parties: Do you want me to
MD hold this version EMM386 and see if any other problems shake out of the
MD
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Isn't better for Watcom declare call_int2f through #pragma aux and do
#define network_redirector call_int2f? Like this:
%ifndef WATCOM
global NETWORK_REDIRECTOR
NETWORK_REDIRECTOR:
...
ret 2
%endif
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Hi!
20--2004 15:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD Big question for you, and any other interested parties: Do you want me to
MD hold this version EMM386 and see if any other problems shake out of the
MD tree, or make it available
At 04:41 PM 4/20/2004 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
Hi,
I just notice the TDSK and some EMS application report neither
controller fail or EMS corrupt by using HIMEM64+EMM38664.
Incidentally,if you get TDSK 2.3 past 32M and/or start playing around with the sector
and cluster sizes, TDSK has a strong
20 matches
Mail list logo
