Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-08-02 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Ladislav Lacina wrote: > > If you have a source code intended for Turbopascal 6 or Turbopascal 7 why > you don't use these compilers? > > Please, don't say any bullshit about warez software. Just download it from > some retrosite and use it.

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-30 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:43 AM, David McMackins wrote: >>> Uh, why are you doing that? Don't do that, you don't need to bootstrap >>> (and it probably won't work like you want). >>> >>> Are you trying to use the Win32-hosted cross-compiler in actual DOS? > > Not sure

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-30 Thread David McMackins
>> Uh, why are you doing that? Don't do that, you don't need to bootstrap >> (and it probably won't work like you want). >> >> Are you trying to use the Win32-hosted cross-compiler in actual DOS? Not sure why it shouldn't work if compiled from source. My ideal is to be able to actually change my

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-30 Thread Eric Auer
Hi David, > I've changed to using the TP compatibility mode, and that has resolved > most of the problems. Now, my biggest problem is getting far pointers to > work, since they're only enabled for msdos. You probably only use those to access the graphics RAM. Check the web, 32 bit compilers

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:45 PM, David McMackins wrote: > > Indeed, the msdos target exists, but it's not in the distribution on the > FreeDOS host. Go32v2 (32-bit DPMI, COFF) is the main DOS target (since the '90s!). The i8086-msdos (OMF) target is new to 3.0.0. >

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Ralf Quint wrote: > > NASM would be another show stopper in that case, as it too has a > different syntax than the inline assembler of Turbo Pascal. Not sure exactly, but FPC can output various assembly formats, and it must convert

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread David McMackins
Indeed, the msdos target exists, but it's not in the distribution on the FreeDOS host. I've changed to using the TP compatibility mode, and that has resolved most of the problems. Now, my biggest problem is getting far pointers to work, since they're only enabled for msdos. I'm attempting to

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread Ralf Quint
On 7/29/2016 7:43 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Ralf Quint wrote: >> On 7/29/2016 5:04 PM, David McMackins wrote: >> >>> I have some modifications I'd like to make to PowerPaint as hosted on >>> the FreeDOS archives, but I'm unable to compile

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Ralf Quint wrote: > On 7/29/2016 5:04 PM, David McMackins wrote: > >> I have some modifications I'd like to make to PowerPaint as hosted on >> the FreeDOS archives, but I'm unable to compile the source. I'm >> attempting to use

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread Ralf Quint
On 7/29/2016 5:04 PM, David McMackins wrote: > I have some modifications I'd like to make to PowerPaint as hosted on > the FreeDOS archives, but I'm unable to compile the source. I'm > attempting to use FreePascal to do the job, but it's failing to compile > some of the units due to assembler

[Freedos-devel] Compiling PowerPaint

2016-07-29 Thread David McMackins
I have some modifications I'd like to make to PowerPaint as hosted on the FreeDOS archives, but I'm unable to compile the source. I'm attempting to use FreePascal to do the job, but it's failing to compile some of the units due to assembler syntax errors. I can't exactly tell what the problem is;