Re: [Freedos-user] Networking stopped working in VirtualBox after upgrade (jer...@shidel.net)

> On Oct 16, 2024, at 5:19 AM, Michael Bernardi via Freedos-user > wrote: > > Thank You Jerome > That worked perfectly. If I had run a “FDNPKG update” prior to running the > VirtualBox update, would this have resolved the issue in advance? Yes. :-) > Thanks again > Michael > > > _

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking stopped working in VirtualBox after upgrade (jer...@shidel.net)

Thank You Jerome That worked perfectly. If I had run a “FDNPKG update” prior to running the VirtualBox update, would this have resolved the issue in advance? Thanks again Michael ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https:/

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking stopped working in VirtualBox after upgrade

Correction > On Oct 15, 2024, at 9:41 PM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-user > wrote: > > > >> On Oct 15, 2024, at 5:56 PM, Michael Bernardi via Freedos-user >> > > wrote: >> >> I installed FreeDos 1.3 on VirtualBox a few months ago and everything

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking stopped working in VirtualBox after upgrade

> On Oct 15, 2024, at 5:56 PM, Michael Bernardi via Freedos-user > wrote: > > I installed FreeDos 1.3 on VirtualBox a few months ago and everything worked > fine (including the packet driver network connection). However on updating to > VirtualBox 7.12 when booting I now get the following me

[Freedos-user] Networking stopped working in VirtualBox after upgrade

I installed FreeDos 1.3 on VirtualBox a few months ago and everything worked fine (including the packet driver network connection). However on updating to VirtualBox 7.12 when booting I now get the following message: “Physical hardware networking is not supported at this time” Any ideal how this

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

I have succesfullyconnect to a synology ds216j NAS through ftp. Now to map it as a drive Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 12 sep 2024 om 20:17 heeft Frantisek Rysanek > het volgende geschreven: > >  >> >> Now let's see if I can connect to my NAS . > > I assume that the NAS principally serv

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

> Now let's see if I can connect to my NAS . I assume that the NAS principally serves CIFS/SMB = runs Samba. Or that's probably what you're after. There's a chance to connect to that using Microsoft networking. That's the *third* flavour of DOS networking, not discussed yet: NDIS. You should ha

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

eedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4 > Load the “lsl.com ”driver by running the command Load the > “e1000odi.com” driver by running the command ... > Many folks use DHCP and mTCP on FreeDOS. I believe that for M.Brutman's software, you need the CRYNWR "packet driver" inter

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

> Load the “lsl.com ”driver by running the command > Load the “e1000odi.com” driver by running the command ... > Many folks use DHCP and mTCP on FreeDOS. I believe that for M.Brutman's software, you need the CRYNWR "packet driver" interface. You have loaded two low-level elements of the driver st

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

And see this thread if you have issues ( https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=47428&start=20) On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 7:13 PM Louis Santillan wrote: > Download the ASUS mobo drivers ( > > https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/lan/intelan/CSA/DOS_OS2.zip?model=P4C800-E%20Deluxe > ). > > Extract &

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

I don’t think anything this complex happened. I imagine that OP ran out of UMB or HMA memory space and the CDROM driver or SHSUCDX failed to load properly. On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:22 AM Frantisek Rysanek via Freedos-user < freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > DOS on "modern" PC hardwa

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

Download the ASUS mobo drivers ( https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/lan/intelan/CSA/DOS_OS2.zip?model=P4C800-E%20Deluxe ). Extract & place onto your DOS machine the files from the PRO1000 folder (PRO100 may also work/work better it would follow the same process). Load the “lsl.com” driver by runn

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

se its drivers and IRQ handling, and run DOS in a VM. Frank To: Date sent: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:00:51 +0200 Subject:[Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4 From: "nico.verduin--- via Freedos-user" Send reply to: "Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.

[Freedos-user] Networking on a Pentium 4

This more or less driving me crazy: I have a ASUS P4C800E Deluxe motherboard with a builtin Intel 82547EI Gigabit LAN controller. Does anybody have a clear instruction how to get this working with freedos 1.3? It is very unclear to me and I trie an ODI driver. That worked but then a can

Re: [Freedos-user] networking over 86box

Le Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:05:10 -0400 Brandon Taylor via Freedos-user a écrit > My apologies for the confusion. I know FreeDOS has internet capability, but > not on 86Box, since FreeDOS for some reason treats 86Box as if it were a > real computer. > > GetOutlook for Android > From

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking on UTM

Docs ( https://docs.getutm.app/settings-qemu/devices/network/network/#hardware) say that the emulated network device is a “virtio-net-pci” device. Docs also mention that the OS will require a driver for it. virtio is a common interface for modern Linux, Windows, and I think Mac OS VMs. For DOS,

[Freedos-user] Networking on UTM

Hello there! I’ve been venturing a bit into DOS world once again just for run, and it seems that my UTM virtual machine doesn’t automatically set up networking. I installed the networking packages from FDIMPLES, but when I boot the machine, I get „QEMU network detected“ and right after that „Ph

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking FreeDOS 1.3 on QEMU

I've found that the ADM PCNet adaptor in QEMU (-device pcnet) with the matching DOS drivers work well under FreeDOS. I wasn't able to get any of the other QEMU emulated ethernet devices to work properly under DOS. I spent a lot of time fighting with the Intel adaptors - it seems the QEMU emulated

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking FreeDOS 1.3 on QEMU

Hi, > On Sep 6, 2022, at 11:43 AM, Phil Reynolds > wrote: > > I had FreeDOS 1.2 working quite nicely, networking included, on qemu, > but I am lost as to (a) how I originally achieved it (b) how I might do > likewise with 1.3 - is there any specific documentation I can follow? By default duri

[Freedos-user] Networking FreeDOS 1.3 on QEMU

I had FreeDOS 1.2 working quite nicely, networking included, on qemu, but I am lost as to (a) how I originally achieved it (b) how I might do likewise with 1.3 - is there any specific documentation I can follow? -- Phil Reynolds mail: phil-free...@tinsleyviaduct.com Web: http://phil.tinsleyviaduc

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Long time ago, I had an orinoco card that was 802.11b that was supposed to work with DOS. Could never get it to work, eventually threw it out in frustration. Some very good and interesting suggestions have been made. However, I believe the cheapest/easiest may be a simple wireless bridge. An ol

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

IMO, ISA is a better option for truly vintage machines. I think if someone combined the ideas PiModem/Wifi232, Pi Virtual Floppy [0], and ISA8019 [2] (which is an NE2000!), then that would be the ideal. An ISA card powered by a Pi Zero W that could emulate a Floppy/HDD/CD-ROM/DVD-ROM and provide

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Hi! Eric as for the wi-fi I have solved the problem in an empirical way: I have long bought a TP-Link TPL-MR3020 mini router which detects available wireless networks and which has an ethernet port to which I can connect my laptop . It also has the possibility to connect - on the move -

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Thanks for the links, Louis :-) While the price could be a lot lower, the https://www.cbmstuff.com/proddetail.php?prod=WiModem232 https://www.cbmstuff.com/proddetail.php?prod=WiModem232&review=all mentioned on one of the pages is pretty similar to what I had in mind: some WiFi controller plus a

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

DOS did networking a lot better with ISA and some PCI NICS. WiFi came after DOS was no longer being developed. There might be some 900MHz WaveLAN things that work for DOS if the point is to make a machine connected wirelessly. If the machine has serial you might consider a Wifi232[0] or one of t

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Hi! To do some additional name-dropping on the DOS WiFi topic here: https://www.olimex.com/Products/IoT/ESP32/ESP32-GATEWAY/open-source-hardware https://www.hackster.io/techbase_group/arduino-esp32-serial-port-to-tcp-converter-via-wifi-66d341 https://github.com/martin-ger/esp_wifi_repeater/blo

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Hi! > Am just wondering if this is the current status, or some old comment: > > "Wireless devices connected via USB can not yet be used with FreeDOS." > > (http://freedos.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/WiFi) This meant "USB dongles which serve as WiFi or Bluetooth modems have no DOS drivers"

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Simon, I can read from a USB stick without any extra tricks, as long as it is inserted before booting (which usually means I have to make sure the bios is set to boot from disk 1st; I find it easier to write the files to the Freedos disk from inside Windows, if I need to do that). However, I'm no

Re: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi

021 10:27:13 Predmet: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi Hi all, Am just wondering if this is the current status, or some old comment: "Wireless devices connected via USB can not yet be used with FreeDOS." (http://freedos.sourceforge.ne

[Freedos-user] networking/wifi

Hi all, Am just wondering if this is the current status, or some old comment: "Wireless devices connected via USB can not yet be used with FreeDOS." (http://freedos.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/WiFi) /Tomas ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-us

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

I'm interested in this approach, but I'm finding it hard to find documentation and software. From what I've heard so far, it seems using the on-board modem will be more of a hassle than just using serial or parallel to connect to something else with ethernet. I'd like to stick with free/libre sof

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

Or DOSPPP. On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:32 PM Louis Santillan wrote: > You could also use something like EPPPD and Arachne includes a dialer > packet driver as well (might even be EPPPD). > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM geneb wrote: > >> > On Jul 10, 2018, 1:23 PM, David McMackins wrote: >> >

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

You could also use something like EPPPD and Arachne includes a dialer packet driver as well (might even be EPPPD). On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM geneb wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2018, 1:23 PM, David McMackins wrote: > > > >> Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected >

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

On Jul 10, 2018, 1:23 PM, David McMackins wrote: Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected to dial-up, will TCP/IP applications still work, or will they complain about drivers since they are trying to access a NIC? David, you might be well served by looking into

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

I understand this. I guess my question was really: where can I get a packet driver that will communicate over my phone line instead of a typical NIC? Happy Hacking, David E. McMackins II Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation (#2296972) Associate Member, Free Software Foundation (#

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:58:01 -0400, dmccunney wrote: > Any chance of posting that somewhere that doesn't require a gopher > client to access it? You mean like http or whatever? Bleh. Where would be the fun then? Gopher-disabled people are free to use one of the few web proxies out there. FreeDOS

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

Afaik, TCP/IP interfaces to a packet driver, which then works directly with the NIC. It shouldn't matter over which medium you're ultimately communicating, as long as it presents the packet interface which TCP/IP expects. Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Jul 10,

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:31 PM Mateusz Viste wrote: > > Does it have a parallel port? If so, then you could run PLIP. I wrote a > gopher article about connecting a no-NIC PC to the LAN through its > parallel port using PLIP: > > gopher://gopher.viste.fr/1/myinfobase/?disp2017-03-05 plip bridge A

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:08:35 -0500, David McMackins wrote: > I have a 1998 Sony Vaio running FreeDOS. This model did not include an > ethernet controller (or wlan), but it does have an old modem in it. I've > been going through the networking guide referred to by Rugxulo, and I > got down to runnin

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:24 PM David McMackins wrote: > > Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected > to dial-up, will TCP/IP applications still work, or will they complain > about drivers since they are trying to access a NIC? I don't see why not. TCP-IP is a prot

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected to dial-up, will TCP/IP applications still work, or will they complain about drivers since they are trying to access a NIC? Happy Hacking, David E. McMackins II Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation (#2296972)

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

Have you tried setting up a Linux box as a dial-up server? [0] [0] https://www.howtoforge.com/linux_dialin_server On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:10 PM David McMackins wrote: > I have a 1998 Sony Vaio running FreeDOS. This model did not include an > ethernet controller (or wlan), but it does have an

[Freedos-user] Networking without ethernet?

I have a 1998 Sony Vaio running FreeDOS. This model did not include an ethernet controller (or wlan), but it does have an old modem in it. I've been going through the networking guide referred to by Rugxulo, and I got down to running NICSCAN.EXE only to realize *oops!* this computer doesn't even ha

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

OK, I think now that there is more than one issue. After reviewing the fact that older Windows PC's have great difficulties connecting to Vista shares, I thought then that it probably shouldn't be surprising that this is very difficult to impossible for the MS-DOS Network Client. To test this

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

ttings? > > >> -Original Message- >> From: John Hupp [mailto:free...@prpcompany.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 10:42 AM >> To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS. >> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: >>

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

gt; Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: > Access has been denied" > > The router provides DNS. > > On 6/16/2015 10:39 AM, Dave Kerber wrote: > > Do you have a DNS server configured? > > > > > > > >> -

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

and general questions about FreeDOS. >> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: >> Access has been denied" >> >> Here's a reference, by the way, on the ipconfig usage that I mention >> below: ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/misc1/BUSSYS/LANM

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Do you have a DNS server configured? > -Original Message- > From: John Hupp [mailto:free...@prpcompany.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:48 AM > To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS. > Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Here's a reference, by the way, on the ipconfig usage that I mention below: ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/misc1/BUSSYS/LANMAN/KB/Q183/8/58.TXT A couple more observations: When I booted up this morning, "ipconfig c:\net" once again reported the lease expired, but the expiration time coincided exactly

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

I found out that ipconfig usage is not as expected for the DOS client. "Ipconfig /all" is meaningless. In my case, the one and only good command is "ipconfig c:\net." This then reports (now again under DHCP), an IP address, gateway, and DNS server as expected. But it reports "Lease Expired."

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Forgive me if I didn't catch it, but are you able to ping successfully w/o a full network setup (just connect via packet driver and DHCP) and are you able to use wget or fdnpkg and download a file? On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Ralf Quint wrote: > On 6/15/2015 10:38 AM, Dave Kerber wrote: > >

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

On 6/15/2015 10:38 AM, Dave Kerber wrote: > Are you trying to connect by dns name, or by IP address? To take one > level of possible trouble out of the equation, try connecting by IP addr. > > If the ipconfig doesn't show any IP info on the host, it doesn't matter how you try to connect from that

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

and general questions about FreeDOS. > Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: > Access has been denied" > > I just tried changing the DOS client from DHCP to static configuration, > and I still get the same net use error. > > Furthermore

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

I just tried changing the DOS client from DHCP to static configuration, and I still get the same net use error. Furthermore "ipconfig /all" still reports "No DHCP data available." Shouldn't it report my static configuration info? On 6/15/2015 11:46 AM, John Hupp wrote: > Fundamentals -- you ma

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Fundamentals -- you may be onto something. Though TCP/IP initialization completes without error, running "ipconfig /all" yields "No DHCP data available." I get the same result from two identical cards, both configured the same way. I do note that both cards are old non-PNP ISA cards, which I

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

for example you can do this by looking at the data coming from the client network interface sniffing with wireshark outgoing data from the client 2015-06-15 6:09 GMT+02:00 Louis Santillan : > Be sure that you have a good IP, gateway, and DNS setting from your DHCP > server. > > On Sun, Jun 14, 20

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

bt you write: "Linux machines on the LAN connect to the server OK with the same account.", record the transaction on that machine and compare. 2015-06-15 0:15 GMT+02:00 John Hupp : > Yes, but in this case I'm not seeing that have any successful case to > compare against. > > On 6/14/2015 6:01 P

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

you can install a normal client on a computer and make and reord the transition data using wireshark, and compare, or just sniff the data and see if for example yhe request exit well formed from client, in some cases the error code in the packet data is more explained that what you can see at appli

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Be sure that you have a good IP, gateway, and DNS setting from your DHCP server. On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 3:37 PM, John Hupp wrote: > Though my initial interest (and testing) was oriented toward moving > files on the LAN, I also find that I cannot ping web sites. I get > "DGN0217: Remote name can

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Though my initial interest (and testing) was oriented toward moving files on the LAN, I also find that I cannot ping web sites. I get "DGN0217: Remote name cannot be resolved." On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, John Hupp wrote: > Thanks, but making that change did not make a difference. > > I have also now

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Yes, but in this case I'm not seeing that have any successful case to compare against. On 6/14/2015 6:01 PM, Roberto Fazzalari wrote: I use to resolve this kind of problem by monitoring the network traffic; capture the traffic data on the network wen the transaction go well aand when not and c

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Thanks, but making that change did not make a difference. I have also now edited the HOSTS file to add the server there, due to what I read at ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/misc1/BUSSYS/LANMAN/KB/Q130/5/38.TXT about not being able to ping the server. So I can indeed ping the server now, but access

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

I use to resolve this kind of problem by monitoring the network traffic; capture the traffic data on the network wen the transaction go well aand when not and compare it, in this way you can understand more, in the past i use to do in this way to resolv problems. 2015-06-14 22:22 GMT+02:00 Rugxulo

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Hi, On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:32 PM, John Hupp wrote: > > I installed MS-DOS Network Client, which successfully initializes with > TCP/IP via DHCP. > > But when I try "net use z: \\server\share" and enter the password (with > a user name that matches the Win Vista peer server account), I get > "

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

Did you check the NTLM compatibility mode in Vista? HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa There should be a DWORD named LmCompatibilityLevel set to value of 1 On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:32:34 -0400, John Hupp wrote: > I installed MS-DOS Network Client, which successfully initializes with > TC

[Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, "Error 5: Access has been denied"

I installed MS-DOS Network Client, which successfully initializes with TCP/IP via DHCP. But when I try "net use z: \\server\share" and enter the password (with a user name that matches the Win Vista peer server account), I get "Error 5: Access has been denied." Likewise, "net view \\server" yi

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking, DOSemu and taprouter (new version, with DHCP!)

I care. :) I don't use dosemu as often as before, but it's good to know. I recall some problems with network slowness in dosemu, so it might be of use if I get around. Cheers, Bojan. On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:36:24 +0200 Mateusz Viste wrote: > Hi! > > Not sure anybody cares, but here I go :) -

[Freedos-user] Networking, DOSemu and taprouter (new version, with DHCP!)

Hi! Not sure anybody cares, but here I go :) I spent a few hours on taprouter today, therefore I am releasing a new version now. The biggest (most visible) change is that I wrote a DHCP server module. This makes taprouter easier to use, because there's no need anymore to configure manually wat

[Freedos-user] Networking, DOSemu and taprouter

Hi all, It has been a long time now that I use DOSemu for most (if not all) of my FreeDOS-related needs, and I'm quite happy with it. However, I noticed that DOSemu is scary for many people when it comes to networking, because setting it is not that much intuitive for people lacking in-depth n

Re: [Freedos-user] networking: virtio, NFS?

> Rugxulo writes: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote: >> I'm interested in running multiple instances of FreeDOS within QEMU. >> So, my questions are: >> • QEMU offers a “simplified” networking hardware (AKA virtio); is >> there a packet driver for it for FreeDOS

Re: [Freedos-user] networking: virtio, NFS?

Hi, On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > > I'm interested in running multiple instances of FreeDOS within > QEMU. So, my questions are: > > • QEMU offers a “simplified” networking hardware (AKA virtio); > is there a packet driver for it for Fr

[Freedos-user] networking: virtio, NFS?

I'm interested in running multiple instances of FreeDOS within QEMU. So, my questions are: • QEMU offers a “simplified” networking hardware (AKA virtio); is there a packet driver for it for FreeDOS? • I've seen mentions of XFS — a (free software?) DOS NF

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

>> Don't read "Dissecting DOS" though. > Why not? Ah, I don't mean to "prohibit" it of course. I looked into the (GPLv2+) RxDOS sources along with that book for some time. In fact I still have the book right next to the other books I mentioned, about two metres from where I'm sitting curren

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Christian Masloch said: > Don't read "Dissecting DOS" though. Why not? -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT manage

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote: >>> conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine. >> Sure, that's the obvious "easy" way out. >> >> But wouldn't it be better "overall" (and wiser) to 1). actually find >> out what MS-DOS does, and 2). "fix" it in FreeDOS' kernel?;-)

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

> Whatever the issue is, it is apparently not that easy to find or > fix. whatever the issue is, nobody is going to fix it anyway > Reading RBIL for INT 21.5C, it seem to indicate that DR-DOS > never was able to figure out how to do it, and it wasn't until > Novell got involved that it actually s

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Thanks. Here's some comments if you care to read them. Not all of them are particularly relevant to our thread's topic. > MSDOS, and presumably FreeDOS, does not natively provide a framework for > safe filesharing and file locks, this needs to come from the server > software > working in combi

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

> Reading RBIL for INT 21.5C, it seem to indicate that DR-DOS never was > able to figure out how to do it, and it wasn't until Novell got involved > that it actually started working correctly. The DR-DOS discrepancy described in RBIL evidently indicates that the owner and applicability seman

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Whatever the issue is, it is apparently not that easy to find or fix. Reading RBIL for INT 21.5C, it seem to indicate that DR-DOS never was able to figure out how to do it, and it wasn't until Novell got involved that it actually started working correctly. (E)DR-DOS could be another possibilit

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

>> conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine. > > Sure, that's the obvious "easy" way out. > > But wouldn't it be better "overall" (and wiser) to 1). actually find > out what MS-DOS does, and 2). "fix" it in FreeDOS' kernel?;-) If you are indicating that you want to volunteer... ;-)

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

On 6/18/2012 11:00 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote: >> conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine. > Sure, that's the obvious "easy" way out. > > But wouldn't it be better "overall" (and wiser) to 1). actually find > out what MS-DOS does, and

[Freedos-user] Networking

Hi, Below is a message I received from the DataPerfect discussion group. Regards, Marcos -- Marcos Fávero Florence de Barros Campinas, Brazil Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:54:57 +1000 From: "Brian Hancock" To: Subject: Re: [Dataperf] Networking DP Hi Marcos,

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

>> conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine. > Sure, that's the obvious "easy" way out. > But wouldn't it be better "overall" (and wiser) to 1). actually find > out what MS-DOS does, and 2). "fix" it in FreeDOS' kernel?;-) sure. as always: talk is cheap good luck Tom --

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Hi, On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote: > > conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine. Sure, that's the obvious "easy" way out. But wouldn't it be better "overall" (and wiser) to 1). actually find out what MS-DOS does, and 2). "fix" it in FreeDOS' kernel?;-) --

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

The highest clock rates that were sold were 200MHz for Pentium, 233MHz for Pentium MMX, and 300MHz for Mobile Pentium MMX. The late mobile chips were made with a finer process (250nm IIRC). On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:25:01 -0400, David C. Kerber wrote: > Pentium definitely came in a 233MHz ver

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Pentium definitely came in a 233MHz version, but I thought the 300MHz version was Pentium II only. > -Original Message- > From: Rugxulo [mailto:rugx...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:10 AM > To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Freedos-u

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

> Tom Ehlert wrote: >> try using MSDOS or linux (or even Windows) for the >> 'server' machine, and see if the problema go away > I did the test with MS-DOS in the server and FreeDOS in the > client. > The problem vanished. > I even used "MODE con rate=32" which is the fastest typematic > rate,

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Hi, On Jun 17, 2012 6:32 PM, "Ulrich Hansen" wrote: > > Ah, and NEOS: > > I didn't have time to really create a NEOS network here. I will look into it some other time. But at least the readme sounds good at first glance. The NEOS installer works on my old laptops (486SX33) but it doesn't in Virtu

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Am 17.06.2012 um 19:21 schrieb Marcos Favero Florence de Barros: > It's good to know that it's possible, but we won't need > passwords, at least for now -- I've checked it twice with > management. As I wrote, if you add: guest account = YOURUSERNAME in the smb.conf global section and public =

[Freedos-user] Networking

Hi again Ulrich, What about NeOS? Is it a possibility in my case? Does it run under FreeDOS? Is it reliable? I downloaded it some time back, but didn't spend much time on it and haven't been able to make it run so far. Marcos -- Marcos Fávero Florence de B

[Freedos-user] Networking

Hi Ulrich, > All in all, I think it is a good to have proof that clients with > FreeDOS and MS Client 3.0 can authenticate, read and write to a > GNU/Linux Samba server. In my opinion such a scenario is a > better idea than to run a server with MS Client [..] Yes, that looks like the best suggest

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Am 17.06.2012 um 07:37 schrieb Rugxulo: > > Excellent details, even better if it actually works! ;-) I just can say that I had Debian 4 running quite a few years on several 486SX33 with 20 MB RAM. Because the installation was the hardest part on such an old machine, I pulled out the drive on

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Pardon the intrusion from my unexperienced self, just a few questions On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Ulrich Hansen wrote: > > I have read that MS Client with MS DOS works OK for you. But if you want to > stick with Free Software, why not use a real Samba server together with the > FreeDO

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Am 15.06.2012 um 23:26 schrieb Marcos Favero Florence de Barros: > It did work, but it turned out to be very fragile. > As soon as the two people use the database more intensively, the > system crashes -- in most cases, both server and client. If on > the other hand they do things slowly, it work

[Freedos-user] Networking

Bernd Blaauw wrote: > [..] test your setup against an MS-DOS environment instead of > FreeDOS? That could determine (or rule out) some issues. Tom Ehlert wrote: > try using MSDOS or linux (or even Windows) for the > 'server' machine, and see if the problema go away I did the test with MS-DOS in

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Hi Tom, This might be irrelevant to the case at hand. > if the answer to 2) is 'FreeDOS' then either SHARE.EXE is not running > or SHARE.EXE is buggy. the latter is quite likely as it was never > really tested against network access. If you know; does FreeDOS's file locking (ie "SHARE") propagat

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

>> but likely that's already being taken care of by caching >> software. > ??? UIDE and LBACACHE will only work with INT 13h (local) drives, not network drives. Caching shouldn't be an issue, at least for the clients -- could be a problem on the server, though. According to RBIL, DR/Novell/Cal

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Hi, On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote: > > Japheth's SHARE is probably the one and only SHARE for FreeDOS. no use > to search the internet If I remember correctly (but haven't tested), Japheth made some minor adjustments for FreeDOS (only) to SHARE to work better with a few weir

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

> I'm running FreeDOS, but yes, Linux is a possibility. This > database project started modestly in 2006, but now the Health > Center is relying more and more on it, so I want it to be very > safe. in that case don't gamble with untested share.exe > Still I would definitely prefer to stay with Fre

Re: [Freedos-user] Networking

Hi, On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > Op 16-6-2012 15:25, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros schreef: > >> I downloaded SHARE from Japheth's site, and it turned out to be >> the same file I had. Where could I find other versions? I Couldn't >> find it by searching the internet

  1   2   >