Hi bruce,
yes, mris_register solves the problem- i had to strugge a bit to see what
works if i wanted to use a specific subject's {hemi}.sphere file for use
in mri_glmfit. Thanks.
shantanu
On Fri, June 15, 2012 10:01 pm, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Shantanu
> What are you trying to register? I don't
Hi Shantanu
What are you trying to register? I don't ink mri_register is what you want.
Possibly mris_register instead (note the "s")?
Cheers
Bruce
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:32 PM, "Shantanu Ghosh"
wrote:
>
> Hi Freesurfer experts,
>
> I am receiving an error message while processing registra
Hi XJ - In your configuration file, you've set both doregflt and doregbbr
to 0. You have to set one of them to 1, otherwise no intra-subject
registration will be done and every step that relies on it will fail.
a.y
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, XJ Kang wrote:
> Hi Priti,
>
> I removed the NaNs in the
Hi Freesurfer experts,
I am receiving an error message while processing registration to fsaverage
using mri_register.
Please tell me why it is happening and how to get this going.
Here is the terminal output:
glia:shantanu[219] mri_register
/autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recon
Hi Priti,
I removed the NaNs in the 4D images and re-ran trac-all -prep. The
warning message is gone (of course) but the error message of
dlable/diff/White-Matter++.flt.nii.gz is still there since no
"White-Matter++.flt.nii.gz" in the diff directory. Only one image in
dlabel/diff/: lowb_brain
It won't be so simple. If you can represent your filter as a matrix,
then you can set the flac.TFmtx, but you'll need to do this in multiple
places. You can do a search for TFmtx in the matlab code to see where
On 06/15/2012 03:23 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
> if i come up with the code for
Hi Priti,
The 3D data are the averages of two or more sets of DWI data. All the
DWIs were already perform the field map correction by "epidewarp.fsl",
and they were also coregistered to T1 images in spm. So probably I don't
need these two step. I may add the b0 inhomogenity correction.
For the
bingo!
thanks a lot!
m
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Douglas N Greve
[gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 1:31 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Free
if i come up with the code for the newey white standard error, where in
selxavg3-sess would i need to plug that in?
caspar
2012/6/15 Douglas N Greve
> I don't know anything about it. Looks interesting.
> doug
>
>
> On 06/15/2012 02:14 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
>
>> Hi Doug,
>> if I filte
Hi XJ,
I'm just starting to look at your log files. Just curious, did you decide
to not do eddy current correction and b0 inhomogenity correction or
accidentally left it out?
When I look at the configuration file, you've given all the parameters for
b0 inhomogenity correction, but it is set to '0
I don't know anything about it. Looks interesting.
doug
On 06/15/2012 02:14 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> if I filter, an alternative might be the Newey-West estimator
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newey-West_estimator), I guess?
> Caspar
>
>
> 2012/6/15 Douglas N Greve
Hi Doug,
if I filter, an alternative might be the Newey-West estimator (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newey-West_estimator), I guess?
Caspar
2012/6/15 Douglas N Greve
> Hi Caspar, it does not make sense to low pass filter and prewhiten.
> Unfortunately, I don't have the precoloring implemented
Can you send us your configuration file (mytracula.conf) and log file (it
should be under scripts/trac-all.log). I can take a look.
Priti
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run the last step of TRACULA. I used the command line:
>
> % trac-all -path -c mytracula.conf
>
> Here is all the info I got on the sc
Hi,
I am trying to run the last step of TRACULA. I used the command line:
% trac-all -path -c mytracula.conf
Here is all the info I got on the screen:
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /home/sata2/FreeSurfer/Subjects.Verio
INFO: Diffusion root is /home/xkang/DTI/
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /home/local/freesurf
Hi Caspar, it does not make sense to low pass filter and prewhiten.
Unfortunately, I don't have the precoloring implemented in FSFAST.
doug
On 06/15/2012 01:36 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
> Hi!
> I am processing a resting state data set, which I would like to low
> pass filter to get rid of
Hi!
I am processing a resting state data set, which I would like to low pass
filter to get rid of some artifacts. The sample will be very small, so I
won't run a RFX GLM, but an FFX GLM and/or single subject analyses.
Since the low pass filter introduces high autocorrelations, it does not
make sens
Hi Mia, I think the problem is that you have a space in the path to the
dicom. Even though you put a backslash there, I think it is still
causing the problem
doug
On 06/15/2012 01:13 PM, Borzello, Mia wrote:
> Yes! I attached a screen shot. Thanks!
>
>
>
Yes! I attached a screen shot. Thanks!
From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:33 AM
To: Borzello, Mia
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon error- too many arguments?
Hi Mia
can you send
Hi Mia
can you send us the actual command and screen output?
thanks
Bruce
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012,
Borzello, Mia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to run a recon, but I keep getting the error: too many arguments
> for the following command:
> econ-all -autorecon1 -autorecon2 -autorecon3 -subject _Su
Hi,
I'm trying to run a recon, but I keep getting the error: too many arguments for
the following command:
econ-all -autorecon1 -autorecon2 -autorecon3 -subject _SurferOutput -i
[path to dicom]
Any help on this would be excellent!
Thanks,
M
___
yes
doug
On 6/15/12 5:07 AM, Richter, Julia wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after comparing two groups in qdec and hitting the question "Does the average
> thickness differ between group 1 and group 2?", do yellow areas mean that
> group 1 has a thicker cortex in that area than group 2?
>
> Thanks,
>
> J
Dear all,
after comparing two groups in qdec and hitting the question "Does the average
thickness differ between group 1 and group 2?", do yellow areas mean that group
1 has a thicker cortex in that area than group 2?
Thanks,
Julia
___
Freesurfer ma
22 matches
Mail list logo