Re: [Freesurfer] PETSurfer individual atlas for subcortocal segmentation

2019-12-05 Thread Boris Rauchmann
External Email - Use Caution Did you already have the time to look at the logfile? Do you have any suggestions how to proceed? Thank you! > Am 02.12.2019 um 19:18 schrieb Boris Rauchmann : > >  > In this example tried it with only the subcortical segmentations from my >

Re: [Freesurfer] topological defect error

2019-12-05 Thread Bruce Fischl
I guess I would try adding control points to the wm in the region that is darker On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Laurel Quinlan wrote: External Email - Use Caution Thanks Bruce! I will chat with my supervisor about uploading the brain to the ftp site, but for now, I can see intensity

Re: [Freesurfer] topological defect error

2019-12-05 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Laurel do you want to upload this subject to our ftp site and we can take a look? Alternatively you can overlay the wm.mgz as a heatmap on top of the brain.mgz with the ?h.orig surface overlaid so you can see where it is missing stuff and why Bruce On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Laurel Quinlan

Re: [Freesurfer] Reporting Results in a three group analysis

2019-12-05 Thread cody samth
External Email - Use Caution Thanks for the help! On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:47 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. < dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Yes, but threshold it first, eg > mri_binarize --abs --i sig.cluster.mgh --min .01 --o newmask.mgh > > On 12/4/19 1:38 PM, cody samth

Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats

2019-12-05 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Laurel yes, the lh.orig.nofix is created using the control points and other things, and so the number of holes in it will definitely change if the placement of control points changes cheers Bruce On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Laurel Quinlan wrote: External Email - Use Caution

Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats

2019-12-05 Thread Laurel Quinlan
External Email - Use Caution Hi Doug, Thank you! Yes, their control point edits were different. Are the number of ?h.orig.nofix defects calculated after reconstruction with control point edits? -Laurel From:

Re: [Freesurfer] Study specific template

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
We currently do not have a mac build of mri_aparc2aseg, and we recommend downloading the freesurfer dev release to resolve this issue. On 12/5/19 1:00 PM, Joshi, Nandita wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Thank you so much for that! The README file instructs to download >

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-05 Thread Ting Li
External Email - Use Caution Dear Dr. Douglas, Thank you so much! Best regards, Ting On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:45 AM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. < dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > I've attached a couple of papers > > On 12/3/19 9:24 PM, Ting Li wrote: > > > > External

Re: [Freesurfer] Study specific template

2019-12-05 Thread Joshi, Nandita
External Email - Use Caution Thank you so much for that! The README file instructs to download make_average_subject and platform specific mri_aparc2aseg. However, the mac version of mri_aparc2aseg is missing in the patch. Could it be possible to download it from elsewhere? -

Re: [Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Yea, not sure. It could be that the uptake in WM near the NAcc is somewhat less than average (GTM assumes constant throughout). If so, then the GTM would subtract too much from the NAcc in an attempt to remove the spill in from WM. This is more of a problem for amyoild and tau ligands because

Re: [Freesurfer] T2 in recon-all: command to correct pial surfaces errors

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
The same one that you would use with the T1 stream, just make sure to include -T2pial On 12/5/19 5:04 AM, Steve Petersen wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Dear Freesurfer experts, > > I used t2 image as input in subjects that have already been processed > without them

Re: [Freesurfer] Question on GLM - correlation

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
It does not create a file with a single voxel. Below, prv.mgz is meant to represent the file that has all the voxels/vertices. Once you know the vertex no you are interested in, you extract it with the pvrvtx line. On 12/5/19 12:47 PM, Barletta, Valeria wrote: > I did what you suggested in your

Re: [Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
If your WM volume is not conformed, you will need to conform it with mri_convert yourwm.mgz --conform wm.mgz On 12/5/19 4:24 AM, Jordi Huguet wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Douglas, > > I have followed the suggested approach, however I get an error related > to the

Re: [Freesurfer] Study specific template

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
See the REAME file here ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/ On 12/5/19 11:47 AM, Joshi, Nandita wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hello, > > I am trying to make a study specific template based on the > instructions at: >

Re: [Freesurfer] Question on GLM - correlation

2019-12-05 Thread Barletta, Valeria
I did what you suggested in your previous email: > That does not have the pvr in it. You can extract the pvr for that > vertex and add it as a column to the X matrix with > pvr = fast_vol2mat(MRIread('pvr.mgz')); > pvrvtx = pvr(:,vertexno+1); Which file shall I look like for the single voxel?

Re: [Freesurfer] Question on GLM - correlation

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
On 12/4/19 11:51 AM, Barletta, Valeria wrote: > Ok I did it and did not get any .mgh file as a result. Did what? > > At this point I wonder, what is the best model to check for > correlation between my continuous outcome CME.mgh and the continuous > variable ficvf.mgh? > Shall I include

Re: [Freesurfer] about label to surface

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Use mri_label2label. Run it with --help to get examples On 12/4/19 1:58 AM, 于倩倩 wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Dear Freesurfer Expert: > First, I got the lh.parsorbitalis.label according to the command: > mri_annotation2label --subject fsaverage --hemi lh --outdir >

Re: [Freesurfer] DWI to T1 registration accuracy with bbregister

2019-12-05 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Are you 100% sure that the DTI and the anatomical are the same subject? Also, please send the bbregister log file On 12/5/19 12:14 PM, VictorM - Gmail wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Freesurfer experts, > > I have been trying to run a registration between my DWi data and

[Freesurfer] DWI to T1 registration accuracy with bbregister

2019-12-05 Thread VictorM - Gmail
External Email - Use Caution Hi Freesurfer experts, I have been trying to run a registration between my DWi data and the T1. I am struggling to obtain a good cortical matching, despite I have previously run it withour problems in other datasets. The mincost for most of the

[Freesurfer] Study specific template

2019-12-05 Thread Joshi, Nandita
External Email - Use Caution Hello, I am trying to make a study specific template based on the instructions at: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates However, on running the first step: make_average_subject --out newtemplate --subjects subj1 subj2

[Freesurfer] T2 in recon-all: command to correct pial surfaces errors

2019-12-05 Thread Steve Petersen
External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer experts, I used t2 image as input in subjects that have already been processed without them following the instructions of the website. Although pial surface segmentation has improved there is still some error. After edit the

Re: [Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-12-05 Thread Jordi Huguet
External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas, I have followed the suggested approach, however I get an error related to the dimensions of the WM volume (see log trace below). ... Found wm edits: 23448857 deletes, 783317 fills > > cp wm.mgz wm.seg.mgz > > > mri_segment -keep