...@mgh.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 7:38 AM
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re:
22 at 7:38 AM
*To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
Oh, I think I see now. In realty, each trial is either self or not
self and then you have a separate valence measure, so your coding
should be
1. Self-offset
2. SelfValenc
lt;mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
I was under the impression that Self and Valence were ratings from the same
event (in that mail archive, they were different events and so needed different
offs
;
*Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list
*Date: *Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 1:07 PM
*To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
I was under the impression that Self and Valence were ratings from the
same event (in that mail archive, they were dif
@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
on behalf of Angela Fang <mailto:angf...@uw.edu>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Monday, August 1, 2022 at 4:35 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Fre
;freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
Those look like they are the same coding scheme. What is different?
You can only have one offset. The Self vs Valence -a 2 -a 4 is not
testing for an interaction. If you want an interaction you
u"
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
Those look like they are the same coding scheme. What is different? You can
only have one offset. The Self vs Valence -a 2 -a 4 is not testing for an
interaction. If you want an interaction you have to create a new variable which
is Self
I describe below), that would also be helpful
to know.
Thanks!
Angela
*From: * on behalf of Angela
Fang
*Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list
*Date: *Monday, August 1, 2022 at 4:35 PM
*To: *Freesurfer support list
*Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
*Exte
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug,
Nevermind to my first question! I read this post (MailScanner has detected a
possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be
https://secure-web
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
Thanks Doug. This wiki page is extremely helpful. However, my question is about
individual subject responses. I could see how you could include a summary
(e.g., average) value of the parametric variable across subjects in your
“weight” column
y, July 28, 2022 at 10:25 AM
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FSFAST first level covariates
Yes, see https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsFastParametricModulation
On 7/25/2022 6:56 PM, Angela Fang wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Fre
Yes, see
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsFastParametricModulation
On 7/25/2022 6:56 PM, Angela Fang wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Freesurfer community,
I have run participants through an event-related fMRI task in which
subjects rate whether trait adjectives
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Freesurfer community,
I have run participants through an event-related fMRI task in which subjects
rate whether trait adjectives are descriptive of themselves or not, and
afterwards asked them to rate each trait word on emotional valence. Is it
13 matches
Mail list logo
