Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Gorka Olaizola
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 05:17:43PM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: > > xine-ui sucks, we have a python wrapper right now, making it possible > only to have the windows itself, nothing more. > Does xine support audio processing? I use mplayer with some audio processing to expand stereo audio to an emulat

[Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Dirk Meyer
Lucian Muresan wrote: > I guess you mean the bug is in mplayer, not in the content. Yes > PAL DVDs with 16:9 or other than 4:3 content also have always the > resolution 720x576, because that's PAL. Only the pixels are'n > square, not even for 4:3 material, and that's the > decoder/postprocessing

[Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Lucian Muresan
Dirk Meyer wrote: [...] I also have no 16:9 TV. The bug is that the dvb stream here is always 720x576, they only set the stream to 4:3 and 16:9 based on the program. So when it switches to 16:9, the 720x576 need to be interpreted different, no matter what tv you have. This makes mplayer useless f

[Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Dirk Meyer
"Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: > On 2/21/06, Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: >> > I wasn't talking about MPlayer design, I was thinking more along the lines >> > of: >> > >> > killall mplayer >> > mplayer /dev/video0 >> > >> > aka. the brute-force way :-) >> >> Th

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Wander Winkelhorst
On 2/21/06, Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: > > I wasn't talking about MPlayer design, I was thinking more along the lines > > of: > > > > killall mplayer > > mplayer /dev/video0 > > > > aka. the brute-force way :-) > > That is way too ugly. Why doing that when

[Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Dirk Meyer
"Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: > I wasn't talking about MPlayer design, I was thinking more along the lines of: > > killall mplayer > mplayer /dev/video0 > > aka. the brute-force way :-) That is way too ugly. Why doing that when you can use xine with that stuff working? Dischi -- I love my work,

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Wander Winkelhorst
On 2/21/06, Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: > > [Snip!] > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I'm very interested in this, and would appreciate the patch being sent > >> >> to me, but I'm not sure how Dischi would feel about it on this list. > >> > > >> > Well, I have to hack a

[Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Dirk Meyer
"Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: > [Snip!] >> > >> >> >> >> I'm very interested in this, and would appreciate the patch being sent >> >> to me, but I'm not sure how Dischi would feel about it on this list. >> > >> > Well, I have to hack a bit more on it to make it really usefull to >> > even developers

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Wander Winkelhorst
[Snip!] > > > >> > >> I'm very interested in this, and would appreciate the patch being sent > >> to me, but I'm not sure how Dischi would feel about it on this list. > > > > Well, I have to hack a bit more on it to make it really usefull to > > even developers but expect a release in a few days. >

[Freevo-devel] Re: Freevo: Still interested in live-TV?

2006-02-21 Thread Dirk Meyer
"Wander Winkelhorst" wrote: > On 2/21/06, Karl Lattimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think it would be more useful to us if you had this submitted back to >> mplayer and included in their next release. That way it is available to >> more people, and would be included in freevo without extra hack