*Old email:*
What a great cascade here... I'm not sure anyone but you and I are
properly enjoying it however grin.
The delete key suffices. And, in the spirit of hiding in plain sight, we
have to populate caches like Arlo's with _something_ to lower the SNR.
Personally, I feel successful
On 10/30/2013 04:54 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
What a great cascade here... I'm not sure anyone but you and I are
properly enjoying it however grin.
The delete key suffices. And, in the spirit of hiding in plain sight,
we have to populate caches like Arlo's with _something_ to lower the
SNR.
Glen -
What a great cascade here... I'm not sure anyone but you and I are
properly enjoying it however grin.
The delete key suffices. And, in the spirit of hiding in plain
sight, we have to populate caches like Arlo's with _something_ to
lower the SNR. Personally, I feel successful enough
On 10/27/2013 06:59 PM, Arlo Barnes wrote:
On 10/27/2013 03:12 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
Colloquially, one might simply say one person's mess is another's
order...
This is a good example. It seems pretty straightforward and obvious that
this is the case, but I think it has more to do with the
Glen -
On 10/27/2013 06:59 PM, Arlo Barnes wrote:
On 10/27/2013 03:12 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
Colloquially, one might simply say one person's mess is another's
order...
This is a good example. It seems pretty straightforward and obvious that
this is the case, but I think it has more to do
Glen -
And just to add a completely different perspective (via a different
physical system metaphor) on this topic:
As a dabbler in holography, this whole problem of a shared information
mess and the idea of constraint sieves reminds me a lot of the process
of recording (in a lossy way of
Glen (and anyone else trying to follow) -
I left out an important point in all of this, I think. The work going
into building ontologies for various (sub)domains is roughly the act
of building a shared, formalized constraint sieve. My interest is in
developing a working environment for
On 10/30/2013 12:21 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
And I seem inclined to try to sieve other's and re-present it contorted
through my own expresser (what is the opposite of a sieve... a pug-mill
or a meat-grinder? I think one of the things I do here in this forum
that is surely maddening to anyone
Glen -
What a great cascade here... I'm not sure anyone but you and I are
properly enjoying it however grin.
But that probably doesn't account for all of creative/production.
There are plenty of others, e.g. your material from earlier foci, or
perhaps a multi-tasking ability to be able to
Carl,
Great to hear your voice.
Link did not work for me. I'm probable the only one.
n
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
Link worked here.
-- Owen
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Nick Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.netwrote:
Carl,
** **
Great to hear your “voice.”
** **
Link did not work for me. I’m probable the only one.
** **
n
** **
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus
Nick -
Mine wants to open directly in Firefox (property of the link or my
settings in Thunderbird, rather than the document?), I am guessing you
might be running MS-only indigenous products, you may want to download
(Ctrl-Click or R/L Click?) and then open in Adobe Reader?
I'm reading the
Carl -
Great link/article... apropos perhaps of our conversations about
cognitive loss with aging and it's prevention/mitigation?
Nick -
I'm reminded of your idea of using Wiki technology (plus some
conventions) for what you called Noodles or Noodling some time
back. I saw that concept as
I'm reminded of your idea of using Wiki technology (plus some
conventions) for what you called Noodles or Noodling some time back.
Found
thishttp://article.gmane.org/gmane.org.region.new-mexico.santa-fe.friam/7818/match=noodlesby
14 matches
Mail list logo
