- Original Message -
From:
Bob
McDaniel
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 11, 2000 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: The Bill of Gates
fallacy
[snip]
In this way may evolve a rationale for paying people for consuming. This is
where some similarity with the Tob
As a Mac user I tend to be somewhat smug when many of my friends/relatives
who use PCs complain of numerous problems and the need to get technical
help. But, then, I use VirtualPC with Windows95 on my Mac because of my
preference for a genealogical application available only for the PC. Ironicall
Well, it had to come to this when the road was taken by the West that
relations with an object as a physical extension of the slave was the
meaning of life rather than the growth of consciousness. Poor Maslow
got the credit due to the fact that his Western readers saw his diagram
as steps rather
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Christoph Reuss wrote:
> How all this _surplus_
> work (that would be UNnecessary with decent software) should be _paid_, is a
> different question (especially for the "end users"!), and this question
> doesn't seem to bother Mr. Gates (as in the quote above).
Considering t
Tom Walker replied:
> Considering that Gates is the recipient of a share of all this unnecessary
> spending it would not bother him.
Moreover, the fact that all those salesmen, PC supporters etc. *also* get
*their* "share of all this unnecessary spending" explains why this
producer of crappy qu
Tom Walker quoted
> MR. GATES: Well, part of the lesson of economics is that there are
> infinite demands for jobs out there, as long as you want class sizes
> to be smaller, or entertainment services to be better, there's not a
> lump of labor where there's a finite demand for a certain n
Microsoft Timeline
Business @ the Speed of Thought
Remarks by Bill Gates
Georgetown University School of Business
March 24, 1999
QUESTION: During the course of the presentation, you mentioned job
reduction a number of times. While, as business students, we can all
apprec
