On 15 Apr 2002 10:05:10 +0100, tim phipps wrote:
>
> Description:
> The symlink put in place to point the old man page to the new is
> in the wrong place. And xpmroot.1 too.
I fixed this yesterday. Should be in the current snapshot.
Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web
ARNING at the top of the
copied version saying "to get rid of this warning, use the real man page".
I may do either thing for 2.6.0.
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> > On 14 Apr 2002 18:03:08 +0200, Giuseppe Della Ricca wrote:
> > >
> > > I
On 16 Apr 2002 15:13:30 +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
>
> Is it time to move the colorset handling from FvwmTheme to fvwm?
Actually moving the FvwmTheme code and replacing it with a pass-through
module was on my todo list, near the top. But if you may do it, fine.
I didn't plan to break any exi
On 17 Apr 2002 17:20:12 +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:02:25PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> >>Why not to have one "if (Pdepth < 2)" when defining colorset 0 or any
> >>unused/dele
On 17 Apr 2002 12:52:53 -0700, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
>
> There seems to be a error in the configure script regarding its checks
> for perl (snap-20020416) - I'm attaching a patch (so that the lines
> don't get wrapped) that corrects that error and realigns that code
> fragment for better readabili
On 17 Apr 2002 17:09:22 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2002 17:20:12 +0100, Tim Phipps wrote:
> >
> > OK here's a patch that does the following:
> >
> > * Replaces FvwmTheme with a dummy module that just sends the
> > Colo
We don't seem to have the png or colorset support in FvwmBanner.
So if a logo with an alpha channel wins, we will not be able to show it
as nicely as we could with such support.
Is it hard to add the colorset or png support to FvwmBanner?
Additionally, I would like to have the following in FvwmB
On 05 Jun 2003 16:43:35 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
>
> > Your feature request should be send at the good place :o)
>
> So I would like to do that hereby ;-)
I think Olivier says that the right place is to ask the application
authors to add EWMH mini icon hint support. :)
> If the big icon is avai
On 05 Jun 2003 18:16:24 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > We don't seem to have the png or colorset support in FvwmBanner.
> >
> > So if a logo with an alpha channel wins, we will not be able to show
On 06 Jun 2003 09:15:10 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:52:00PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 05 Jun 2003 18:16:24 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
On 06 Jun 2003 10:12:57 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:12AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > > I'm speaking about tarball size, not executable size.
> >
> > So it will be 2283442 instead of 2243442 for each new logo. Why not?
>
On 06 Jun 2003 18:43:42 +0200, Winfried Boettcher wrote:
>
> Please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hint override = 0
> flags = 23a
> min_width = 632, min_height = 580, max_width = 634, max_height = 551
> width_inc = 1088303360, height_inc = 634
> min_aspect = 580/256, max_aspect = 230/256
> ba
On 06 Jun 2003 17:41:24 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:39:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > We don't seem to have the png or colorset support in FvwmBanner.
>
> There is png "support" in FvwmBanner. There is just a bug ... fixe
Previously I got "Failed to write descriptor to 'FvwmConsole'" often, but
now I can narrow the problem, this time with FvwmBanner, not FvwmConsole.
Minimal rc file:
*FvwmBanner: Timeout 200
OpaqueMoveSize unlimited
FvwmConsole
FvwmBanner
If you don't do anything during 200 seconds, eve
On 13 May 2003 20:51:22 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2003 11:45:36 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > Anyone wants to build the next releases? Because I won't do it.
>
> Unless someone wants to do it earlier, I will do it later in May.
I would
On 28 May 2003 10:38:05 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On 27 May 2003 at 18:23:26 -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 May 2003 22:05:40 +0200
> > Uwe Pross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I made a couple of banners for the web page. Maybe we can
> > > use one of them:
>
On 29 May 2003 02:08:03 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:35:31PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 28 May 2003 10:38:05 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
> > >
> > > Anybody who can write some sentences for this site?
> >
> > You
On 06 Jun 2005 08:22:28 -0400, Nick Johnson wrote:
>
> AFAIK, unmapping windows upon desk change is a peculiarity of fvwm.
I think it is done to satisfy ICCCM2.
Try to Google "icccm2 unmap windows desk" (or "icccm").
Regards,
Mikhael.
On 21 Jun 2005 23:05:18 +0200, Marc Schlienger wrote:
>
> On 19:26 Tue 21 Jun , Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
>
> FvwmPerl is not running.
>
> > Sorry, fvwm-perllib is totally untested on 64-bit platforms, and should
> > most probably not work. I don
On 06 Jul 2007 11:47:26 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?
Yes, "version 3 or later" would be fine.
Regards,
Mikhael.
On 16 May 2008 13:49:48 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> It is with regret and sadness that I have just found that that Alex
> Wallis (or 'awol' as he was perhaps better known by many on IRC)
> passed away last night. He was 55.
>
> He will be sorely missed by those of us who knew hi
On 26 Nov 2008 19:00:53 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> This isn't really helpful. Why not simply print the while command
> line that is being executed, and why limit it to just complex
> functions (if that's what it does). I'd rather have
> "TraceFunctions" that prints *everything*.
If you conf
On 09 Mar 2009 10:21:05 -0500, Jonathan Kotta wrote:
>
> I use Ubuntu, and use `make deb-inplace` to build fvwm .debs. Nothing
> in my system needs libgtk1.x, and I can imagine many people could say
> the same. Should fvwm get rid of this dependency?
This question is actually two. Whether we sh
On 09 Mar 2009 23:16:21 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> 2009/3/9 Mikhael Goikhman :
> > On 09 Mar 2009 10:21:05 -0500, Jonathan Kotta wrote:
> >>
> >> I use Ubuntu, and use `make deb-inplace` to build fvwm .debs. Nothing
> >> in my system needs libgtk1.x,
On 10 Mar 2009 09:01:22 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> 2009/3/10 Mikhael Goikhman :
> > On 09 Mar 2009 23:16:21 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> >>
> >> 2009/3/9 Mikhael Goikhman :
> >> > On 09 Mar 2009 10:21:05 -0500, Jonathan Kotta wrote:
> >> >
On 10 Mar 2009 01:47:47 +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
> In the gentoo ebuild, Gtk.pm and *FvwmGtkDebug* are removed
> unconditionally since I cleaned up the whole think (for 2.5.25
> I think, it's been long since), and no one has even complained
> about it. This is true for both the official ebui
On 10 Mar 2009 13:02:11 +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
> I don't care if it can work by manually installing whatever perl
> bindings package is needed. The gentoo policy ask from me that if a
> feature is enabled when building from an ebuild, all the required
> deps need to be resolved from the eb
[Start of friendly mode.]
Reasons to remove debian/ from fvwm as I see it:
1) To make a work for one man easier.
BTW, I think Manoj used GNU Arch in the past and it perfectly supports
real merges and file/dir renames as well as the files with the same
names, but different ids in the branches. I
For those who prefer rpms, after a long delay, the packages for the
latest release are available again from the FVWM Download web page.
I needed to apply two small patches (among the committed today) to
the fvwm-2.5.27 sources and then ran "make rpm-dist".
Regards,
Mikhael.
On 10 Mar 2009 22:40:54 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> On the contrary, that's not the impression I mean to give at all. :)
Just don't allow my senile grumbles to discourage you. :)
Regards,
Mikhael.
On 14 Mar 2009 00:15:03 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34:38PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > [Start of friendly mode.]
> > 5) To make Thomas focus more on constructive things and less on
> > destructive. :-) Really, I didn't see an
On 14 Mar 2009 11:34:22 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> 2009/3/14 Dominik Vogt :
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:13:21AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> >> 2009/3/14 Dominik Vogt :
> >> > * html documentation
> >> >
> >> > Became a part of fvwm because people spent a lot of work on it.
> >> > It is *th
On 14 Mar 2009 15:34:52 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> 2009/3/14 Mikhael Goikhman :
>
> [...]
>
> > One of the examples of a pragmatical asciidoc that may be considered is
> > POD (Plain_Old_Documentation article in Wikipadia). Well, all perl
> > documentation i
This is a long post, since I tried to reply to all comments. This is
pretty important to me.
On 14 Mar 2009 11:22:22 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:32:19AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 14 Mar 2009 00:15:03 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote
It is long to reply to the whole Manoj message, so I will try to
summarize and to get directly to the point.
There are very strong reasons in my eyes to leave the deb generation
procedure (the same reasons are valid for rpm), because this procedure:
* is very useful, just run "make deb-..." and
On 15 Mar 2009 00:34:16 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:23:57PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > This is a long post, since I tried to reply to all comments. This is
> > pretty important to me.
> >
> > On 14 Mar 2009 11:22:22 +010
On 16 Mar 2009 00:52:27 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 07:00:05PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 15 Mar 2009 00:34:16 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > To be interactive the module should both listen to fvwm and to the
> &g
On 17 Mar 2009 12:09:15 -0500, FVWM CVS wrote:
>
> * convert my old code to use var_name and function_name coding style
> _ to match the main fvwm (Dominik's) style and my own style
I wanted to do this several years ago, but all these cosmetical changes
are so large and error prone... However I n
Everyone who uses perllib please be aware of the updates in API. See
the man pages ("fvwm-perllib man") and examples in tests/perl/README.
However the basic old API (for main classes) should continue to work,
i.e. for example addHandler or eventLoop are automatically dispatched
to the canonical ad
On 18 Mar 2009 14:32:51 +1100, Scott Smedley wrote:
>
> Hi Mikhael,
>
> > most of the old API continues to work.
>
> Almost.
>
> No method add_defaultErrorHandler in FVWM::Module::Tk=HASH(0x9f8ae10) as
> guessed from FVWM::Module::Tk::addDefaultErrorHandler at
> /home/ss/fvwm/cvs.0/install.0/
On 19 Dec 2008 18:02:16 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> 2008/12/19 Yann Dirson :
> >
> > We needed to trace and hook some actions to layer changes for e-Sidor[1],
> > so here is the functionnality to do so.
> >
> > This patch also:
> >* declare "restack" event to FvwmCommand
> >* declare "re
I don't remember a discussion when the new event type MX_REPLY was
added, so I will tell my observations now.
At the very first I thought, why do we need this event type when we
already have M_STRING. But of course the answer is clear. When a module
requests SendToModule back, then the event is se
On 22 Mar 2009 10:48:55 +0100, Viktor Griph wrote:
>
> 2009/3/22 Mikhael Goikhman :
> >
> > At the very first I thought, why do we need this event type when we
> > already have M_STRING. But of course the answer is clear. When a module
> > requests SendToModule bac
On 13 Jan 2010 13:48:03 -0600, Rich Coe wrote:
>
> This is a module I wrote which allows writing a module in another
> language (java) that does not support direct access to file
> descriptors (java) like 'c'. If you add this module to your fvwm
> config file it listens for connections on a inter
On 14 Jan 2010 13:08:32 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> On 13 Jan 2010 13:48:03 -0600, Rich Coe wrote:
> >
> > This is a module I wrote which allows writing a module in another
> > language (java) that does not support direct access to file
> > descriptors (ja
45 matches
Mail list logo
