Andrew, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure if the latest alpha version is stable for
everything except video on a beige g3 with panther, or if I should
use an older version to keep things stable. Could someone recommend a
particular version for me please?
I've had absolutely great results
I have a wallstreet 292 and haven't been able to get panther installed,
using a15 or a16. I will either get the 'this computer is not compatible'
or whatever that message is, or a circle with a line thought it when it
reboots. I REALLY want panther on here. I've got 10.2.8 right now and it
Rad, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a wallstreet 292 and haven't been able to get panther installed,
using a15 or a16.
Use a14 from OS 9. a11 for instance gave me all of those problem you
mention, so I used a9 then.
I will either get the 'this computer is not compatible'
or whatever that
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:50:17 -0800
Subject: Re: Latest version of OSX for wallstreet/beige g3?
From: Robin Ashe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/24/04 11:01 AM, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I own a wallstreet and beige g3 tower. I'd like
I own a wallstreet and beige g3 tower. I'd like to upgrade them to OSX. I
recall reading that these two computers were only able to run early
versions of OSX. What is the latest OSX version each of these computers can
run?
TIA
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small
On 1/24/04 11:01 AM, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I own a wallstreet and beige g3 tower. I'd like to upgrade them to OSX. I
recall reading that these two computers were only able to run early
versions of OSX. What is the latest OSX version each of these computers can
run?
TIA
For
Well, OS X is now on the Wallstreet! I took out the new memory I
bought from OWC and replaced it with the original 32MB chip that was in
the lower slot. Started up the machine and there it was. Installed
without a hitch.
But this morning the machine did not want to start up. I had to take
But this morning the machine did not want to start up. I had to
take out the HD (Travelstar, 30GB) and tap it. After doing that, it
started up just fine. So that means I need to find a means to
shield it?
I used a double edged razor blade as a 'shield' and have had no
problems since
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:26 AM, G-Books wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:00:23 -0600
Subject: Re: OSX on Wallstreet.
From: James Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the help about the above.
[snip]
Something else this machine is doing is not recognising CD's, in
particular, CD-RW's. It also
with the newer CD-RW discs.
On Dec 23, 2003, at 8:33 AM, Jeff Hubatka wrote:
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:26 AM, G-Books wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:00:23 -0600
Subject: Re: OSX on Wallstreet.
From: James Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the help about the above.
[snip]
Something else this machine
At 4:25 PM -0400 12/22/03, Bill Briggs wrote:
At 11:33 AM -0800 22/12/03, Paul Nicholson wrote:
Yes, you need a material that conducts the magnetic flux so it
doesn't get to the magnetic reed switch.
Precisely. It's got to be a ferromagnetic material with a
sufficiently high permeability to
And the results
Byron
On Dec 23, 2003, at 4:46 PM, James Sanderson wrote:
OK. I decided to try using XPF to install OS X on the computer, but
I get an error: there was a problem writing to NVRAM.
What could cause this problem? Bad PRAM battery? What kind of issues
does this indicate?
Clark wrote:
The solution I use is somewhat simpler. I have the problem and
didn't install any shielding. I just turn the computer around a
little while tapping the shift key and it will wake up.
clyde says:
The problem is not the sleep of death, but that for some reason
someting seems to
MY G3 mounts an OSX install disc. You may try pressing c (or is it d?) at
start up to force it to select the cd.
CD-RWs are not recognized by the internal g3 cd tray. A peripheral device
may recognize them.
Don't worry their not particularly useful, in my opinion.
23/12/03 9:46 am -0800
NOT copper! You need to use steel. It has to be magnetic.
On Dec 22, 2003, at 8:16 AM, chueewowee wrote:
Yes, I seem to remember , that a ssheild can be placEd over the hard
disc, of copper. It is easy to do.
21/12/03 10:17 pm -0500 Clyde Kahrl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, remember that
I recently went through this problem with a hard drive and went to my local
hobby shop with a kitchen magnet and a paper clip. The metal that I found to
be the most effective magnetic shield was tin. Brass has been recommended on
a site but it did not work for me and the magnet was able to easily
Yes, you need a material that conducts the magnetic flux so it doesn't
get to the magnetic reed switch. However I think what you are calling
tin is really plated steel. Elemental tin is not magnetic. Tin cans
aren't tin anymore, they are coated steel.
I trimmed the ends off an blank steel PCI
At 11:33 AM -0800 22/12/03, Paul Nicholson wrote:
Yes, you need a material that conducts the magnetic flux so it
doesn't get to the magnetic reed switch.
Precisely. It's got to be a ferromagnetic material with a
sufficiently high permeability to contain the flux so it doesn't
reach the reed
At 12:20 PM -0600 22/12/03, Andre Ruegg wrote:
I recently went through this problem with a hard drive and went to
my local hobby shop with a kitchen magnet and a paper clip. The
metal that I found to be the most effective magnetic shield was tin.
Brass has been recommended on a site but it did
At 9:35 AM -0800 22/12/03, Paul Nicholson wrote:
NOT copper! You need to use steel. It has to be magnetic.
That would be ferromagnetic. Paramagnetic materials would be too
weakly magnetic to do the job. It's the relative permeability, or µr
that matters.
- web
--
G-Books is sponsored by
I have the drive partitioned at 7.9 GB's, so I don't believe this is
the problem
On Sunday, Dec 21, 2003, at 21:50 US/Central, Gavin Tiplady wrote:
The reason I asked is that are you trying to install on a partition
larger than 8GB?
Or a partition less than 8Gb but which -does not fall
Thanks for the help about the above.
Now, I have a more serious difficulty. For some mysterious reason the
video display will start going haywire during the installation process.
Most of the time--this may be the 3rd or 4th--it will simply go blank
and give me a white-blue screen. This
Allow me to add my experience. I too have had the same situation with a
13 inch Wallstreet. When I try to install OS X, the installation
proceeds until the last part of the process with Disk 1. I have watch
it as it happens. The screen will dissolve to white or dissolve to many
colors and go
James,
Smilar problem installing Panther on my Lombard. Removing top slot
RAM allowed the install to take place. More pertinent to your
situation perhaps, I recently had a conversation with a Wallstreet
owner who said this worked:
I read about someone installing XPostFacto on a Wallstreet
Byron,
This sounds all too familiar to me, running a Lombard 333 G3.
Problems began with the 10.2.8 update, the 'bad' one that was pulled
within hours of its initial release. As soon as I tried to repair
permissions with Disk Utility immediately after the install, I got
the 'color-mental'
On Sunday, December 21, 2003, at 03:17 PM, James Sanderson wrote:
I have been given charge of upgrading a Wallstreet. I have already
upped the memory to 384 MB's. I have installed a new HD, a 30 GB
Travelstar, and partitioned it for OS X. I have installed OS 9.2.1 and
am working on installing
The reason I asked is that are you trying to install on a partition
larger than 8GB?
Or a partition less than 8Gb but which -does not fall entirely within
the first 8Gb- of the physical drive.
--
G-Books is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronics
27 matches
Mail list logo
