> ... I've reached the end of computing altogether. Once my Pismo is
> "officially unofficial" and is forced into retirement, so will I. It's
> been fun!
Why should your Pismo be forced into retirement once it is no longer
supported by Apple? Will the programs you installed on it and which do the
I'm a devoted Lombard user, writing this on said Lombard, and I have to
agree with R.P. on this. Then again, I did as much with my 190 for as
long as I could before getting my Lombard a month ago. With a G4
upgrade and maxxed-out RAM, the ol' Lombard will serve me through my
senior year of High
On 1/12/06, Howard Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Myself, I'd rather use an Apple product, regardless of any personal
> view of specific personnel there, than the wintel boxes I have to use
> at work. And I'm happy with my 520c, 5300, and AL G4--as well as my
> //e--they have function and us
On 1/12/06, Bruce Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You know, Apple dropped support for the Apple ][ decades ago. I
> probably should have forgone this entire Mac thing, it's just a
> passing fad.
Of course, there's a fair number of us who still use the Apple II,
even on a daily basis. :)
Zoltan wrote, "Guess I'm heading down to have my Pismo fitted for a tombstone.
I knew this was going to happen, just wish Jobs would slow down...I believe
I've
reached the end of computing altogether. Once my Pismo is 'officially
unofficial' and is forced into retirement, so will I. It's
been
On Jan 12, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Zoltan Batiz wrote:
It's just another "give Jobs more money" scheme. He didn't make
enough with the iPods, not enough with the Mini. . . not even
enough with the Nano.
Oh, so Apple should just stop making anything new?
So, now it's time to up the anti and
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:17 PM -0500 01/11/2006, Michael Cangelosi wrote:
Interesting; with this switch to the beginning of abandoning Classic
(not only booting to OS9 but rather the entire software that runs
under
classic) 10.4.X will probably be the last
At 12:17 PM -0500 01/11/2006, Michael Cangelosi wrote:
Interesting; with this switch to the beginning of abandoning Classic
(not only booting to OS9 but rather the entire software that runs under
classic) 10.4.X will probably be the last OSX that will include any
support for classic at all.
My
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:13 PM
To: G-Books
Subject: Re: Intel IMacs
My Reply follows quote. On 11/01/2006 08:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
>Tom Ethen wrote:
>> I am at MacWorld and the new Intel IMacs are great and fast and
>>according to t
My Reply follows quote. On 11/01/2006 08:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Tom Ethen wrote:
>> I am at MacWorld and the new Intel IMacs are great and fast and
>> according to the Apple people here, they will run all the old
>>software from X.
>
>Will the new Intel IMacs run the old 9.0 software like
At 9:10 AM -0700 01/11/2006, Woody Duncan wrote:
Tom Ethen wrote:
I am at MacWorld and the new Intel IMacs are great and fast and according to
the Apple people here, they will run all the old software from X.
Will the new Intel IMacs run the old 9.0 software like my
powerbook does ? I would n
On 11/01/06 11:10, "Woody Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Ethen wrote:
>> I am at MacWorld and the new Intel IMacs are great and fast and according to
>> the Apple people here, they will run all the old software from X.
>
> Will the new Intel IMacs run the old 9.0 software like my
> powe
Tom Ethen wrote:
I am at MacWorld and the new Intel IMacs are great and fast and according to
the Apple people here, they will run all the old software from X.
Will the new Intel IMacs run the old 9.0 software like my
powerbook does ? I would not want to invest in new versions
of Photoshop 7.0
13 matches
Mail list logo
