Re: Pismo System Profiler Question

Laurent Daudelin wrote: I'm not sure about the "Valid" attribute, but I think that the dependency is about other extensions that are needed for that one to work. This is off memory, so I could certainly be wrong. I'm not sure that the extension would be able to diagnose as to whether the drive is

Re: Pismo System Profiler Question

Hi Mike, On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:01 am -0400, K wrote: >Greetings 'Listas, >I was just checking out some info in the System Profiler in 10.3.5 on >this Pismo and peeked in the Extensions folder under the Software >section. While scanning through the list I saw th

Re: Pismo System Profiler Question

On 10/09/04 11:01, "K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings 'Listas, > I was just checking out some info in the System Profiler in 10.3.5 on > this Pismo and peeked in the Extensions folder under the Software > section. While scanning through t

Pismo System Profiler Question

Greetings 'Listas, I was just checking out some info in the System Profiler in 10.3.5 on this Pismo and peeked in the Extensions folder under the Software section. While scanning through the list I saw that under the item IODVDStorageFamily Version 1.3.1 it shows something called Valid

Odd Wall St. w/System Profiler

OK, here's an interesting one. I just came into posession of a Wall St. and I'm trying to get it all working and happy. Apple System profiler identifies it all correctly and perfectly (using 9.2.2 for now) but for some reason identifies the speed as a G3 running at 450. Now I don

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frank P. Eigler wrote: > That I knew. I tried that one and got: > > Memory Overview: > Com_TouchMemory: 1 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 1 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 0 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 0 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 1 msec > Com_TouchMemory: 0 msec > > So, it

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

Definitely looks like system_profiler was overhauled between Jaguar and Panther Steve -- G-Books is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks | & CDRWs on Sale! | Su

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 24/06/04 14:51, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > If you don't get any error message, then it's because the c

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Steve Fuller wrote: > > On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:51 PM, Frank P. Eigler wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > >> on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command i

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 24/06/04 14:51, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is recognized. Now, why you don't get

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:51 PM, Frank P. Eigler wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is recognized. Now, why you don't get anything back, I don't know. Did y

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is > >> recognized. Now, why you don't get anything back, I don't know. Did you just > >> do "system_profiler" to s

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

on 23/06/04 20:08, Frank P. Eigler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If you don't get any error message, then it's because the command is >> recognized. Now, why you don't get anything back, I don't know. Did you just >> do "system_profiler" to see or did you also included the 'grep' command? >> >

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Steve Fuller wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> > >>> On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > >> On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >>> >

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote: On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P.

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 23/06/04 13:35, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: >>> On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > > > >> On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > >>> > The Nat

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 23/06/04 13:09, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > >> On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: >>> The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luo

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Laurent Daudelin wrote: > On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > > > >> The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: > >>> > >>> Not sure how to tell how much RAM is installed via

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 23/06/04 12:39, "Frank P. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > >> The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: >>> >>> Not sure how to tell how much RAM is installed via Terminal.app, but there >>> may be one. >> >> username$

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bob wrote: > The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: > > > >Not sure how to tell how much RAM is installed via Terminal.app, but there > >may be one. > > username$ system_profiler -detailLevel -2 |grep Memory > > -> Memory: 1.5 GB system:

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:56 PM, Timothy Luoma wrote: Slick. TjL still looking for a way to do the same for FreeBSD and Linux. "df -h" should work under Linux "free" will show you memory and swap usage under Linux also try "cat /proc/meminfo" under Linux. same info, different format "dmesg | more" wi

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 6/22/04 11:53 PM, "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > username$ system_profiler -detailLevel -2 |grep Memory Slick. TjL still looking for a way to do the same for FreeBSD and Linux. -- G-Books is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.co

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

The National Enquirer reports at 1:22 PM -0400 6/18/04, Timothy Luoma wrote: >On 6/16/04 10:56 PM, "Samantha Goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And I'm thrilled, > > really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB > > of ra

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

0:56 PM, "Samantha Goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And I'm thrilled, really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system profiler, I have 640MB and a 55.76GB capacity hard drive. You can verify the hard dr

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

On 6/16/04 10:56 PM, "Samantha Goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I'm thrilled, > really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB > of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system profiler, I have > 640MB and a 55.76GB capacity har

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

Congratulations. Your System Profiler may MISS some of the stuff inside your Mac (if RAM is loose) but it won't make stuff up that isn't there. If it says you have a bigger hard drive and more RAM than you expected then thats what you have. Live with it. If you doubt it, us

Re: Can System profiler be wrong?

/16/04 7:56 PM, Samantha Goodson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My refurb 12" G4 800Mhz ibook arrived on Monday. And I'm thrilled, > really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB > of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system profiler, I have &g

Can System profiler be wrong?

My refurb 12" G4 800Mhz ibook arrived on Monday. And I'm thrilled, really I am, but, according to Apple, I bought it equipped with 256MB of ram and a 30GB hard drive. According to system profiler, I have 640MB and a 55.76GB capacity hard drive. My local reseller, essentially sai

Re: System profiler.

on 22/3/03 6:23 PM, David M. Ensteness at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually its because they changed how OS X finds the info for the ASP. > It used to be read from a machine profile file, now its read from the > hardware, ie New World ROM Macs, which the Wallstreet is not. > > David I thought

Re: System profiler.

:58 PM, Geno Endicott at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I am running 10.2.4 on a Wallstreet Powerbook. My system profiler >> doesn't show me my >> RAM config. Nothing, not what's in what slot, not what size, etc. Why? >> Does anyone know of a program that will s

System profiler

My Wall Street (originally a G3/250) has always shown my RAM configuration correctly, whether under OS 8.1 or 9.1, whether the original 64 Mb, the later 96 Mb, or the present 192 Mb. -- G-Books is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com

Re: System profiler.

ave a Pismo. When I installed 10.2, I had 384 MB RAM in it, 128 3-2-2 and 256 2-2-2. System profiler showed those separately -- complete details on each. Then I replaced the 128 stick with a 256 2-2-2 stick, and now I see two separate listings for 256 MB SDRAM but no latency stats. :: shrugs :: I&

Re: System profiler.

on 22/3/03 1:58 PM, Geno Endicott at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am running 10.2.4 on a Wallstreet Powerbook. My system profiler > doesn't show me my > RAM config. Nothing, not what's in what slot, not what size, etc. Why? > Does anyone know of a program that will show me

Re: System profiler.

on 3/22/03 12:58 PM, Geno Endicott at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am running 10.2.4 on a Wallstreet Powerbook. My system profiler > doesn't show me my > RAM config. Nothing, not what's in what slot, not what size, etc. Why? > Does anyone know of a program that will show me

System profiler.

I am running 10.2.4 on a Wallstreet Powerbook. My system profiler doesn't show me my RAM config. Nothing, not what's in what slot, not what size, etc. Why? Does anyone know of a program that will show me what RAM I have in my computer, size, speed, etc.? geno. -- G-Books is sp