Lombards have also been known to have problems with their cache (on chip)
memory, which could be why you can't get X to install.
Andrew
On 2/9/05 12:12 AM, Dijkwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My feeling is/was that it is a RAM problem.
On my 400 MHz Lombard installing OS 9 is no problem,
Is there a fix for that?
Peter
Op 9-feb-05 om 9:18 heeft Andrew F. het volgende geschreven:
Lombards have also been known to have problems with their cache (on
chip)
memory, which could be why you can't get X to install.
Andrew
On 2/9/05 12:12 AM, Dijkwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My feeling
Wouldn't that be a problem for 10.0.3 also.
I can get that to install without any problem; problems come with 10.2
and 10.3 when I have to use additional RAM.
Peter
Op 9-feb-05 om 9:18 heeft Andrew F. het volgende geschreven:
Lombards have also been known to have problems with their cache (on
I gather you have a 256MB RAM card; have you tried removing the 64MB
card and putting the 256MB card in the slot the 64MB card was in? I
have a Lombard CPU card which was giving me lots of trouble until I
noticed that one of the contacts in the upper RAM slot was damaged; RAM
in the lower slot
Thanks for the suggestions. Yes, I have a 256 MB card but it isn't low
profile so it won't fit the lower RAM slot. I've had the 64 and the 128
in the lower slot with the upper one empty or containing RAM up to 256
MB. Nothing get me through the installation process of OS X above
10.0.3.
The
As mentioned, CPU L2 cache failure is apparently common on the Lombard
series, and leads to all sorts of odd problems.
My question is - has anyone used third party cache control software to
disable a faulty cache, and did that work to get rid of the errors?
Yes, I know having no L2 cache isn't
-Original Message-
From: G-Books [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Real Seed
Catalogue
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:08 PM
To: G-Books
Subject: help me diagnose The Satanic Lombard please
Hi All, some may have heard this story from other lists but now,
after having used
Hi All, some may have heard this story from other lists but now,
after having used fixed almost every mac ever produced before 1999,
I've met one I can't diagnose! Hoping someone here can help.
We bought a Lombard 400/DVD/256/6 off ebay.. . . .
.. .and it hard-froze all the time under 9.2 (every
1) the RAM. The original was PC-66. The new is PC-100. Maybe PC-133
would cure it?I called Crucial and they were really helpful -
they have sold about 100 modules for that model and had 3% returns,
they are sure it is ok. They were adamant the PC-133 would not help.
I don't think
On Feb 8, 2005, at 3:41 PM, Andrew, a Mac Freak wrote:
1) the RAM. The original was PC-66. The new is PC-100. Maybe PC-133
would cure it?I called Crucial and they were really helpful -
they have sold about 100 modules for that model and had 3% returns,
they are sure it is ok. They were adamant
10 matches
Mail list logo
