From: Tina K. penguir...@gmail.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 30 November, 2010 0:23:15
Subject: Re: DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why are they s different
On 2010/11/29 16:07, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
You left off:
The really, truly final Directors 20th
On Nov 29, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Dan wrote:
At 5:23 PM -0700 11/29/2010, Tina K. wrote:
On 2010/11/29 16:07, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
You left off:
The really, truly final Directors 20th anniversary Redux cut with
all the crap we originally left on the cutting room floor jammed
back
We’re having quite a number of topics in here now, but anyway:
I’ve been asking myself whether it’s better to top post or bottom
post?
My guess is bottom post while deleting from the previous post the part
that is not being answered.
I’m sure the rules are posted somewhere, but anyone inclined to
At 5:07 AM -0800 11/29/2010, Geke wrote:
We're having quite a number of topics in here now, but anyway: I've
been asking myself whether it's better to top post or bottom post?
My guess is bottom post while deleting from the previous post the
part that is not being answered. I'm sure the rules
On 2010/11/29 12:50, Dan so eloquently wrote:
At 5:07 AM -0800 11/29/2010, Geke wrote:
my Digital Audio (466 MHz G4) has the same problems. Some YouTube
videos don't play smoothly and I can forget HD ones. Downloading them
improves things only slightly
Flash. ug. (been lots of threads on
At 3:23 PM -0700 11/29/2010, Tina K. wrote:
Blu-ray's main purpose is to get people to re-purchase their videos in
yet-another format. :\
And when that well isn't producing enough (read: when they think
they can get away with it) they will introduce the Next Big Thing!
VHS.
Standard
On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Dan wrote:
Director's cut on DVD.
Director's cut on DVD with Added Scenes!
The Uncensored Director's Cut on DVD with Added Scenes and the kitchen sink.
You left off:
The really, truly final Directors 20th anniversary Redux cut with all the crap
we originally
On 2010/11/29 15:46, Dan so eloquently wrote:
...And Hollywood wonders why piracy is growing.
Never fear, Homeland Security is on the case, apparently counterfeit and
pirated products are terrorism.
Not that I endorse said activities but that's the FBI's job, not
Homeland Security. Or
On 2010/11/29 16:07, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
You left off:
The really, truly final Directors 20th anniversary Redux cut with
all the crap we originally left on the cutting room floor jammed back
in no matter how disjointed it makes the final product, just because
it was cool having
At 5:23 PM -0700 11/29/2010, Tina K. wrote:
On 2010/11/29 16:07, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
You left off:
The really, truly final Directors 20th anniversary Redux cut with
all the crap we originally left on the cutting room floor jammed back
in no matter how disjointed it makes the
mostly for Mac use and for my blurays. So
I guess what I am asking is, for Mac use is 1080p the way to go and
would you guys buy a lcd or plasma?
-- JML
--- On Wed, 11/24/10, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dan dantear...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
If I could download the same exact file content via the web, would it play,
once resident on my computer, so no processor time is being shared, every bit
as good as the DVD does at 450 MHz!!!
yes you could...but downloads would be
At 3:36 PM -0800 11/25/2010, Jonas Lopez wrote:
I take issue with this line below: Your 450-MHz G4 is simply not
fast enough, I think. AND that is still for the reason that DVD
display is remarkable SO with that in mind I simply do not see the
reasoning for the comment -- NOT to kill the horse
, and Images: why are they s different
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Sunday, November 28, 2010, 6:30 PM
At 3:36 PM -0800 11/25/2010, Jonas Lopez wrote:
I take issue with this line below: Your 450-MHz G4 is simply not fast enough,
I think. AND that is still for the reason that DVD
At 11:32 AM -0700 11/23/2010, Tina K. wrote:
Was Blue Ray designed asymmetrically as well?
To clarify Bruce's post...
This has NOTHING to do with the media format. CD, DVD, Blu-Ray...
those are just media, plastic discs that basically emulate
random-access r/o hard drives. It's the codec
the web and shown using Quicktime or
Real.
JML
--- On Wed, 11/24/10, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dan dantear...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why are they s different
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 6:55 AM
At 11:32 AM -0700 11
On 2010/11/24 07:55, Dan so eloquently wrote:
This has NOTHING to do with the media format. CD, DVD, Blu-Ray... those
are just media, plastic discs that basically emulate random-access r/o
hard drives. It's the codec used to encode/decode the video and audio
data ON the media that's
At 7:26 AM -0800 11/24/2010, Jonas Lopez wrote:
Could a good server operator have done this processing for us and
then downloaded the worked on file, so that the video would play
just as good as a local DVD does?
Yes, but...
Keep in mind that these new $9 per month movie services may have
On 2010/11/16 09:18, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:
DVD's are encoded via MPEG2, which is an asymmetric codec: it's
significantly less computationally intensive to decode versus encode.
(this is how it was developed to be, to allow cheap DVD players. Also
why it takes iDVD all night to
--- On Tue, 11/16/10, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu wrote:
From: Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
Subject: Re: DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why are they s different
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 8:18 AM
On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:21 PM
On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why are they s different
I continue to delve into the various differences on my several Mac
presentations.
When viewing a DVD, even in FULL SCREEN presentation, the picture is perfect,
not a pause
On Nov 16, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
DVD's are encoded via MPEG2, which is an asymmetric codec: it's
significantly less computationally intensive to decode versus
encode. (this is how it was developed to be, to allow cheap DVD
players. Also why it takes iDVD all night to encode a
DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why are they s different
I continue to delve into the various differences on my several Mac
presentations.
When viewing a DVD, even in FULL SCREEN presentation, the picture is perfect,
not a pause or flicker to be found. When I view a canned video downloaded
to keep up with the load of decoding said newer formats.
Chance
On 11/15/10 8:21 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
DVD, Webcam, Pix, and Images: why are they s different
I continue to delve into the various differences on my several Mac
presentations.
When viewing a DVD, even in FULL SCREEN
24 matches
Mail list logo
