Hi Martin:
I guess my take on this is, using the distribution's libraries is the "right"
way to go, then let's make this change now and reap the rewards later when all
the distributions ship the correct versions of the libraries.
Also, I think we have sufficient connections with the various Lin
Bernard,
I am not saying: drop the idea. I am just asking: what do we win if,
with the exception of expat, none of the external packages is widely
available in the "right" version? Is it worth the effort?
Cheers
Martin
--- Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin:
>
> I'll let others re
The FreeBSD ports collection has up to date versions of all three. I
think the library tarball is the right way to go.
-- Brooks
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:40:41PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Martin:
>
> I'll let others respond to the thread, but I'd just like to point out that
> there is a fal
--- Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looking a bit broader at www.rpmfind.net:
>
> apr/apr-devel: varies from 0.9.4 to 0.9.6 for RedHat and Mdk. No
> SuSE.
> In 3.0.3 we moved from 0.9.5 to 0.9.7, because that fixed bz #87. Is
> 0.9.6 enough? I don't know and I do not really w
Martin:
I'll let others respond to the thread, but I'd just like to point out that
there is a fallback - the libs tarball which will include the currently shipped
libraries in our tree. So we just need to add some intelligence into our
configure/build system to auto-detect this...
Cheers,
Be
Folks,
this is certainly not what I wanted to kick off ... If we go that way,
what about:
RHEL4/5
CentOs
SLES
FC5
Ubuntu
???
and the Mandriva stuff is completely outdated.
I am just wondering whether splitting of apr/expat/libconfuse is
really a good thing.
Looking a bit broader at www.rp
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:50:19PM +0100, Stu Teasdale wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Stu, how about for Debian...?
> >
> > From what I can see, its available in Debian repos.
> They're 2.5.x packages unfortunately. I have 3.0.3 packages, but a
> coui
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 21:50 +0100, Stu Teasdale wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Stu, how about for Debian...?
> >
> > From what I can see, its available in Debian repos.
> They're 2.5.x packages unfortunately. I have 3.0.3 packages, but a
> couiple of
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Stu, how about for Debian...?
>
> From what I can see, its available in Debian repos.
They're 2.5.x packages unfortunately. I have 3.0.3 packages, but a
couiple of outstanding issues (stopping libtool from spraying rpaths
around a
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 11:42 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Jarod:
>
> Great - let's hope it gets accepted soon :-)
This has to be some sort of Fedora Extras record for shortest time
waiting on acceptance. Its been approved, and is being built for the
development tree as I type, with a branch for F
Hi Jarod:
Great - let's hope it gets accepted soon :-)
Marcus, is there a RPM for SUSE?
Stu, how about for Debian...?
I believe it was mentioned that there is already one for Mandriva...
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 16/08/
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:43 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Says 404 for me...
Bah, what the heck, who broke the redirectors... Okay, full link, this
works, I promise:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820
> BTW, I don't suppose there'll be any chance for it to get into
> RHEL5
Says 404 for me...
BTW, I don't suppose there'll be any chance for it to get into RHEL5...?
Cheers,
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jarod Wilson
Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 09:28
To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. However,
> without a special exception, it won't be built for FC4, as FC4 has
> entered 'maintenance mode' (meaning generally nothing new gets built,
> only fixes for existing packag
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 08:34 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> --- Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Seems we are safe for "expat", need to check "apr" and are kind of
> > > lost for "libconfuse".
> >
> > I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. However,
> > without a
--- Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 06:13 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi Bernard,
> >
> > as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
> >
> > Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution
> (FC4,
> > yum-uptodate):
> >
> > - apr/apr-devel is
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 06:13 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
>
> Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution (FC4,
> yum-uptodate):
>
> - apr/apr-devel is 0.9.6-3.5, which is older that what we ship (0.9.7)
> - expat/expa
On 2006-08-16 06:13:16 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
>
> Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution (FC4,
> yum-uptodate):
>
> - apr/apr-devel is 0.9.6-3.5, which is older that what we ship (0.9.7)
> - expat/expat-devel is 1.95.8-6, w
--- "Daniel Richard G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006 Aug 15 10:22:09 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> > Daniel:
> >
> > I agree with Martin - perhaps breaking the patch up into more
> manageable
> > pieces would make it easier to integrate - and we sorely need a
> build
> > system specai
Hi Bernard,
as I said, if nobody is hurt :-)
Being curious I did a quick check on my favourite distribution (FC4,
yum-uptodate):
- apr/apr-devel is 0.9.6-3.5, which is older that what we ship (0.9.7)
- expat/expat-devel is 1.95.8-6, which is better thatn what we ship
(1.95.1)
- libconfuse
Hi,
could you check out /var/log/messages and/or your webservers logfiles
for stuff that looks related?
Usually the problem is an incorrect path to the rrdtool binaries, or
you are missing "gd" support (but you *are* seeing the pie graph).
Cheers
Martin
--- Rajendar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hi all,
I have installed the ganglia-3.0.3 and also configured
rrdtool . I unable to get the graph display using the url
http://localhost/ganglia
Iam able to get the pie graph , which says about the cluster load
percentages, but iam unable to get the all other graph.
Help me in this re
22 matches
Mail list logo
