Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
Paul Sobey wrote: >> Just some further comments on Paul's case: >> >> - I note Paul is using gcc, whereas I'm building and testing with Sun >> Studio on the OpenCSW build farm - Sun's compiler is now a free >> download, and it is used to build all the CSW libraries (including >> those used by Ga

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:09:40PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > I note Paul is using gcc, whereas I'm building and testing with Sun > Studio on the OpenCSW build farm - Sun's compiler is now a free > download, and it is used to build all the CSW libraries (including those > used by Ganglia),

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:05:32PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: > > Can you please test this tarball bootstrapped on Fedora 9. It works, but would invalidate all testing that was done for 3.1.3 and the "original" 3.1.4. > If it works I will replace the original tarball with this: > > http://ganglia

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Paul: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Paul Sobey wrote: > > >> Quick note to let you know 3.1.4 beta builds fine without Python support >> using gcc 4.4.1/Solaris ld (and the -std=gnu99 CFLAG). I'll continue to >> monitor the users list for hints as to how to build

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Daniel: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > I guess it needs to be tried - how far back to we want/need to maintain > compatibility?  I need to support RHEL3 for instance. > > However, if it works, I'm all for using the new tools to bootstrap, and I'm > happy to test it too

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Carlo: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon > wrote: > > >> Ideally, which platform is used to bootstrap shouldn't be relevant though >> and IMHO we should be instead aiming to the latest versions of the autotools >> (either installed by hand

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Paul: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Paul Sobey wrote: > Quick note to let you know 3.1.4 beta builds fine without Python support > using gcc 4.4.1/Solaris ld (and the -std=gnu99 CFLAG). I'll continue to > monitor the users list for hints as to how to build with python but it's not > partic

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-30 Thread Bernard Li
Paul: Can you please try this Ganglia tarball which I built on Fedora 9? http://ganglia.info/testing/bootstrapped_on_fedora9/ganglia-3.1.4.tar.gz Thanks, Bernard On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:52:52AM +, Paul Sobey wrote: >

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Carlo: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > Ideally, which platform is used to bootstrap shouldn't be relevant though > and IMHO we should be instead aiming to the latest versions of the autotools > (either installed by hand or provided as part of the distribut

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:10:14PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon > wrote: > > > this is a bug on the autoconf from CentOS 4 which is used to build the > > release packages, therefore you can also workaround the issue by > > rebootstrapping

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:42:05PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote: >>> >>> I note from the Makefile Daniel posted: # Depends:

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:42:05PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote: > > > >> I note from the Makefile Daniel posted: > >> > >> # Depends: some issues exist getting the Python support working on > >

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote: > >> I note from the Makefile Daniel posted: >> >> # Depends: some issues exist getting the Python support working on >> Solaris, >> # Ganglia's configure.in needs to be further enhanced for this t

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:44:59PM +, Paul Sobey wrote: > I note from the Makefile Daniel posted: > > # Depends: some issues exist getting the Python support working on > Solaris, > # Ganglia's configure.in needs to be further enhanced for this to work I think this is a CSW specific problem,

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Carlo: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > this is a bug on the autoconf from CentOS 4 which is used to build the > release packages, therefore you can also workaround the issue by > rebootstrapping the package or making your own with a better version > of th

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:52:52AM +, Paul Sobey wrote: > /usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h:336:2: error: #error "Compiler or options > invalid; UNIX 03 and POSIX.1-2001 applications require the use of > c99" > make[2]: *** [getopt1.o] Error 1 > > Googling leads me to try compiling wit

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-28 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Paul: On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Paul Sobey wrote: > We try to build most things internally. There are good reasons which I'll > gladly discuss with you off-list if you'd like, but suffice to say it would > be useful to be able to compile Ganglia ourselves. I have no idea how to > proce

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-27 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Paul: > > Have you tried these OpenCSW packages: > > http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html > > Or is there a specific reason why you would want to build Ganglia yourself? > > Also see: scripts/build-solaris.sh (I added this recently on 3.1) and https://gar.svn.sourc

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-27 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Paul: Have you tried these OpenCSW packages: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html Or is there a specific reason why you would want to build Ganglia yourself? Thanks, Bernard On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Paul Sobey wrote: > I'm having problems building this on Solaris 10 with python

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-27 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:15:15AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> >> DragonFlyBSD fails to build (tested with 2.4.0 32bit). >> > how do you propose we avoid missing stuff like this in future? Not sure if this can be avoided, but there might be some things we cou

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-27 Thread Daniel Pocock
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > >> Ganglia 3.1.4 is ready for testing at: >> >> http://ganglia.info/testing/ >> > > DragonFlyBSD fails to build (tested with 2.4.0 32bit). > > not a regression (a system header problem which al

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-10-27 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > > Ganglia 3.1.4 is ready for testing at: > > http://ganglia.info/testing/ DragonFlyBSD fails to build (tested with 2.4.0 32bit). not a regression (a system header problem which also affects 3.1.2) and there are some trivial unrelated