Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test - Solaris

2004-07-22 Thread Matt Massie
martin- i only added -Werror to the AM_CFLAGS for gmond right originally.. although i might even take it out there too (since there some benign errors). your right.. i don't simple errors from simple code hosing the entire configure process. -matt On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 22:46, Martin Knoblauch w

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test - Solaris

2004-07-20 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > martin- > > you rock! i've added the -Werror and -Wconversion flags and fixed up > the length variable issue. i'll make a new snapshot of ganglia-apr > soon... your -Wconversion brought up a few more errors that i need to > check out. the gmond test

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test - Solaris

2004-07-20 Thread Matt Massie
martin- you rock! i've added the -Werror and -Wconversion flags and fixed up the length variable issue. i'll make a new snapshot of ganglia-apr soon... your -Wconversion brought up a few more errors that i need to check out. the gmond test code is based on the server example code in the apr dis

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test - Solaris

2004-07-19 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > guys- > > > > i have a 2.6.0 test that i'd like you to run on your respective > > operating systems. > > > > download http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-apr-2.6.0.tar.gz > > > > && ./configure &&

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test - Solaris

2004-07-19 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > guys- > > i have a 2.6.0 test that i'd like you to run on your respective > operating systems. > > download http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-apr-2.6.0.tar.gz > > && ./configure && make > Matt, the problem with gmond coredumping on Solaris com

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-16 Thread Matt Massie
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 05:02, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > b) the resulting binary coredumps when accessing it via telnet i just tested it on a Solaris 7 64-bit box and gcc 3.4.0. when i built a 32-bit gmond ... everything worked great... just a simple ./configure && make. gmond didn't segfault how

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-16 Thread matt massie
Today, Martin Knoblauch wrote forth saying... > no success on Solaris8, 64-bit, gcc-3.3.1. Two problems: > > a) the following libs are missing in order to link gmond > > -lsendfile -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl i caught that yesterday too when i found a solaris box to compile on. i made a new gan

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-16 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > guys- > > i have a 2.6.0 test that i'd like you to run on your respective > operating systems. > > download http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-apr-2.6.0.tar.gz > > && ./configure && make > Matt, no success on Solaris8, 64-bit, gcc-3.3.1. Two pr

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread Matt Massie
sweet! it's nice to know we can keep MacOS support and the ipv6 stuff works correctly. btw guys... after you compile the code.. you can run.. % make check and there are lots of nice unit testing to see if everything is hunkydorry. -matt On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 15:22, Brian Peterson wrote: > Mac

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:10:02PM -0700, Matt Massie wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 10:29, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > Partial success on FreeBSD 5-CURRENT, unless this is supposed to be a v6 > > only test. It's only binding to :: not 127.0.0.1. See below for my tests. > > > > Some thoughts on u

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread Matt Massie
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 10:29, Brooks Davis wrote: > Partial success on FreeBSD 5-CURRENT, unless this is supposed to be a v6 > only test. It's only binding to :: not 127.0.0.1. See below for my tests. > > Some thoughts on using apr. In general, I like the idea. The > config.layout feature look

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:12:48PM -0700, Matt Massie wrote: > guys- > > i have a 2.6.0 test that i'd like you to run on your respective > operating systems. > > download http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-apr-2.6.0.tar.gz > > && ./configure && make > > i think i'm going to scrap the libunp

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread matt massie
Today, steven wagner wrote forth saying... > On my 7.2 box with 2.96 and 3.3.2 compilers, the configure and build appear > to > work OK - running the resulting gmond yields: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gmond]$ ./gmond > Couldn't create socket > > The test daemon then exits to shell. interesting...

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread steven wagner
On my 7.2 box with 2.96 and 3.3.2 compilers, the configure and build appear to work OK - running the resulting gmond yields: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gmond]$ ./gmond Couldn't create socket The test daemon then exits to shell. On my SuSE 9.1 system (which is somewhat mroe vanilla), it configures, buil

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-15 Thread Martin Knoblauch
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > guys- > Matt, looks good on my ipv6 enabled Linus system. No longer confusing ipv4 and ipv6 adresses. No chance to test on the Suns yet. > .. > try this > > % telnet localhost 8021 > > and then > > % telnet :: 8021 > > if your telnet client is IP

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-14 Thread Matt Massie
i forgot to mention. if you take a look at the ./config.layout file you'll see how the apache group does their layouts. i really like this design (especially for gmetad) since we are supporting so many operating systems that each have a different filesystem structures. -matt -- PGP fingerprint

[Ganglia-developers] 2.6.0 test

2004-07-14 Thread Matt Massie
guys- i have a 2.6.0 test that i'd like you to run on your respective operating systems. download http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/ganglia-apr-2.6.0.tar.gz && ./configure && make i think i'm going to scrap the libunp code from steven's book. i think steven's is the master but getaddrinfo() is br