Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 12/5/2007 at 11:33 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Millar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2007 00:09:20 Brad Nicholes wrote:
[...]
METRIC NAME=swap_free VAL=188 TYPE=uint32 UNITS=KB
TN=81296 TMAX=180 DMAX=0 SLOPE=both SOURCE=gmond
Hi Brad:
On 12/5/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could. I just thought that it might be easier for the web frontend if it
didn't have to worry about whether the TITLE existed or not and could just
count on it being there. I am guessing that moving forward an alternate user
Hi Brad:
On 11/21/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calling for PHP web frontend help!
With the introduction of additional metadata, there is some work that needs
to be done to the web frontend. I am not a PHP hacker and I know that many
of you are, so I am asking for help in
On 11/28/2007 at 3:41 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 11/21/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calling for PHP web frontend help!
With the introduction of additional metadata, there is some work that
needs to be done to the web
Hi Brad:
On 11/28/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By default the EXTRA_DATA TITLE is the same as the metric name. However if
you add a Title=blah to any Metric{} block in gmond.conf file, that title
is reflected in the EXTRA_DATA TITLE tag. This way the user is able to
name
Hi Brad:
On 11/26/07, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only info I have now is that the location used to be hidden but now
it's being displayed (with 'unspecified' info). Will drill down into
this later. BTW, gmond crashed again, I'll setup gdb to see if I can
get a backtrace...
Here's
On 11/27/2007 at 1:05 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 11/26/07, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only info I have now is that the location used to be hidden but now
it's being displayed (with 'unspecified' info). Will drill down into
Hi Brad:
On 11/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure yet what is causing this but I have patched the code to prevent
it from happening. The current code was existing gmond if an invalid spoof
message was detected. There is not reason why it needs to exit. Just ignore
On 11/27/2007 at 4:07 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 11/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure yet what is causing this but I have patched the code to prevent
it from happening. The current code was existing gmond if
Hi Brad:
On 11/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, shouldn't I see multicpu entries when I click on Gmetrics?
Currently there is nothing.
No, you should see CPU utilization graphs for each cpu on the system. By
default the multicpu.conf file only enables cpu0. If gmond
On 11/27/2007 at 4:36 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 11/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, shouldn't I see multicpu entries when I click on Gmetrics?
Currently there is nothing.
No, you should see CPU utilization
Hi Brad:
On 11/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attempted to update the man pages but wasn't quit sure how. I haven't
dealt with man pages much.
It's pretty straightforward, just edit gmond/conf.pod.
You could also just post the text here and I'll put it in.
Cheers,
Yes, which is why I wanted to get it into 3.1.0 before we released anything
official. The packets that are being sent between gmond's are significantly
different which means that any older version of gmond will not understand this
new packet structure. The XML content that is produced by
Hi Brad:
On 11/26/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, which is why I wanted to get it into 3.1.0 before we released anything
official. The packets that are being sent between gmond's are significantly
different which means that any older version of gmond will not understand
Hi all:
The latest Ganglia snapshot is available here:
http://www.ganglia.info/snapshots
This includes Brad's recent XDR refactoring work.
Any problems, please post back here.
Cheers,
Bernard
On 11/26/07, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 11/26/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL
On 11/26/2007 at 4:08 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay -- may have a bug with the latest code in trunk causing gmond to crash:
Nov 26 13:03:08 server01 GMOND[14953]: Incorrect format for spoof
argument. exiting.
This happens about 20 mins after
Hi Brad:
On 11/26/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into this error before. I was due to an uninitialized XDR packet.
Basically get gmond that receives the packet is looking for the spoof packet
id so that it can read the packet correctly. If you have a gmond running
On 11/26/2007 at 4:37 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 11/26/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into this error before. I was due to an uninitialized XDR packet.
Basically get gmond that receives the packet is looking for
18 matches
Mail list logo
