--- Seth Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Mark,
> > I have you patch for bugzilla #72 in my local tree now. Two small
> > problems:
> > a) you need to use "fclose" instead of "close". Definitely a bug.
>
> oops! I'll fix our copy.
>
> > b) gcc "-Wall" complain
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Mark,
I have you patch for bugzilla #72 in my local tree now. Two small
problems:
a) you need to use "fclose" instead of "close". Definitely a bug.
oops! I'll fix our copy.
b) gcc "-Wall" complains about an implicit decalration of "getpgid".
Apparently "unistd.h" doe
--- Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Knoblauch said on Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:58:07AM -0700:
> > Hmm. I will look into it again. I do not like it, but it seems
> > harmless enough and I think that the disk-metric stuff is broken
> > anyway. Please open a bugzilla entry and assi
--- Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Knoblauch said on Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:58:07AM -0700:
> > Hmm. I will look into it again. I do not like it, but it seems
> > harmless enough and I think that the disk-metric stuff is broken
> > anyway. Please open a bugzilla entry and assi
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> in my opinion the disk metric stuff needs improvement. I personally
> would like to see a user supplied list of partitions to monitor.
That would definitely be nice. Right now, I run a cron job that does just
that and I turn off all of Ganglia's me
Martin Knoblauch said on Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:58:07AM -0700:
> Hmm. I will look into it again. I do not like it, but it seems
> harmless enough and I think that the disk-metric stuff is broken
> anyway. Please open a bugzilla entry and assign to me.
For what it's worth, we don't really like
Hi Rick,
in my opinion the disk metric stuff needs improvement. I personally
would like to see a user supplied list of partitions to monitor.
But for 3.0.2 I am no going to touch this. The Debian "/dev2" hack may
go in, because it is harmless.
In any case could you open a bugzilla entry, giv
--- Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> michael chang said on Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:59:54PM -0400:
> > Not to mention the patch seems to abandon everyone else who still
> has
> > a /dev/xyz setup (includes some debian and ubuntu users).
>
> Unless we really got the patch wrong, that's n
While we are discussing the behavior of disk metric collection, I should
mention that the current function does not properly handle NFS-root
filesystems. The first couple lines of /proc/mounts look like:
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
/dev/root / nfs 0 0
The current logic (at least in 3.0.1) searches f
michael chang said on Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:59:54PM -0400:
> Not to mention the patch seems to abandon everyone else who still has
> a /dev/xyz setup (includes some debian and ubuntu users).
Unless we really got the patch wrong, that's not true. It still finds
devices in /dev, it just also find
On 10/14/05, Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Knoblauch said on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 06:31:30PM -0700:
> > to your first problem - I actually suspect a problem with your setup.
> > Never seen a "/dev2/" before. Google shows:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/ms
Yeah, I didn't really know what the devs would prefer -- take my
two-line patch as a way to point out the problem, rather than as the fix
I expect to be committed.
Mark explained about the pid file in his mail -- when the daemons fork,
the init scripts write the wrong pids (generally off by on
Martin Knoblauch said on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 06:31:30PM -0700:
> to your first problem - I actually suspect a problem with your setup.
> Never seen a "/dev2/" before. Google shows:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/msg00319.html
It's actually not a problem in our setup, as such
Hi Seth,
to your first problem - I actually suspect a problem with your setup.
Never seen a "/dev2/" before. Google shows:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/msg00319.html
Also, your fix seems very unportable. What happens when there is a
"/dev3/" out there some day? *If* the code ne
Hello,
I've been experimenting with using ganglios to monitor our machines, and
I've run into a couple small problems.
The first is that /proc/mounts looks like this for us (debian sarge,
2.6.8-2-686-smp). I don't know why it's /dev2 instead of /dev, our /dev
directory is normal, there is n
15 matches
Mail list logo
