On Dec 16, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22082
Unfortunately, even with my Apple Developer account I can't seem
to figure out how to look up radar reports that I haven't submitted.
I took a look at the radar. Says, effectively, that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22082
Unfortunately, even with my Apple Developer account I can't seem to
figure out how to look up radar reports that I haven't submitted.
I took a look at the radar. Says, effectively, that the bug has been
fixed in ld64 and will be in the next
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 20, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
I can't seem to build any 64-bit shared library on powerpc-apple-
darwin8.1.0, although I can now run the test suite more
effectively; see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22110
an
On Jun 20, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
I can't seem to build any 64-bit shared library on powerpc-apple-
darwin8.1.0, although I can now run the test suite more
effectively; see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22110
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/m
A wiki page that has the mapping from the old style to the new style
targets is appropriate. I know that I'll hit the, what is x called
now, and I too will be at a loss. Going back and reading the email
archives to find it would be annoying.
Strongly agreed, though once it
On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
$subject - since a day now.
Thanks, fixed.
$subject - since a day now.
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
Cool !!
HP-Compaq ES45
Successful build of 3.4.5 for alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (c,c++,f77,objc,ada).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/GNU/gcc-3.4.5#gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with:
./configure
--host=alphaev68-dec-osf5.1
--prefix=/usr/local
--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,ada
--enable-version-spe
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20051216 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20051216/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 12:01 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:47 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:27 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> >> On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Mark K. Smith wrote:
> >>> Additionally to the obstacles to adopt LLVM mentioned by Diego, I
On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:47 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:27 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Mark K. Smith wrote:
Additionally to the obstacles to adopt LLVM mentioned by Diego, I
named usage of C++ (although it has advantages too) and patents.
LL
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:27 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Mark K. Smith wrote:
> > Additionally to the obstacles to adopt LLVM mentioned by Diego, I
> > named usage of C++ (although it has advantages too) and patents. LLVM
> > should be checked for usage of compiler pa
Hi,
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 19:31 schrieb Dan Kegel:
> Your PR is a bit short on details. For instance, it'd be nice to
> include a link to the source for nbench, so people don't have
> to guess what version you're using. Was it
> http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/nbench-byte-2.2.2.tar.gz
On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Mark K. Smith wrote:
Additionally to the obstacles to adopt LLVM mentioned by Diego, I
named usage of C++ (although it has advantages too) and patents. LLVM
should be checked for usage of compiler patents. Gcc people avoided
many patents especially from Microsoft. We
ON THE CALL: Shin-ming Liu (HP), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Diego
Novillo (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Mark Davis
(Intel)
A fair amount of time was spent discussing the pros and cons of LLVM
vs. LTO. Keep in mind that the next Gelato conference is coming up in
April 06. If you
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:23 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
A simple summary would be very helpful in trying to figure out what i
want to do now.
I'm sure most of the functionality exists, i'm just not sure what it's
called anymore :)
A wiki page that has the mapping from the old style to the new style
On Dec 16, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Ronny Peine wrote:
-ftree-loop-linear is removed from the testingflags in gcc-4.0.2
because
it leads to an endless loop in neural net in nbench.
Could you fill a bug report for this one?
Done.
This is probably the same as 20256.
Your PR i
Hi!
I have plan to make it in near future, if u can help me, ideas or coding,
please se on next thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/threads.html#01005
Subj: Some patches for ARM-GCC
From: Richard Earnshaw
To: tm_gccmail at mail dot kloo dot net
Cc: Jon Beniston , gcc at gcc dot
Ronny Peine wrote:
>> > -ftree-loop-linear is removed from the testingflags in gcc-4.0.2 because
>> > it leads to an endless loop in neural net in nbench.
>>
>> Could you fill a bug report for this one?
>
>Done.
Your PR is a bit short on details. For instance, it'd be nice to
include a link to th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm opening a new branch and would like to request some assistance
> updating the online material. Specifically, how do I add the branch
> information to http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#devbranches. Also, would it be
> possible to create an associated project pa
Dear all,
I'm opening a new branch and would like to request some assistance
updating the online material. Specifically, how do I add the branch
information to http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#devbranches. Also, would it be
possible to create an associated project page (e.g.,
http://gcc.gnu.org/projec
Hi,
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2005 19:50 schrieb Sebastian Pop:
> Ronny Peine wrote:
> > -ftree-loop-linear is removed from the testingflags in gcc-4.0.2 because
> > it leads to an endless loop in neural net in nbench.
>
> Could you fill a bug report for this one?
Done.
cu,
Ronny Peine
formation for humans (oh, this snapshot
> is already two month old, I should get a new one) without having
> to consult a database (for those who only download snapshots).
> And this info is available offline, too.
>
Here are the new patches. I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-4.1]$
Ronny Peine wrote:
>
> -ftree-loop-linear is removed from the testingflags in gcc-4.0.2 because it
> leads to an endless loop in neural net in nbench.
Could you fill a bug report for this one?
Thanks,
Sebastian
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:35:29PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:00:10PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> > I like this, but what if you also did an svn status to see if there were
> > any modifications WRT the branch/revision and then add either 'clean' or
> > 'modified
I normally work in the "gcc" object directory and keep files there built by
the system compiler. That's my starting point.
Then I do a "make" to build, "make bootstrap" to do a bootstrap, "make
gnatlib_and_tools" and "make check-ada" to run acats, and then "make
unstage1" to get back where I s
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Trying to see if a bug was fixed (and an approved patch by me was still
needed), I
noticed that BOOT_CFLAGS was being ignored for profiled_bootstrap.
BOOT_CFLAGS was being ignored, period. :-)
Can you try this (and maybe commit it as obvious)?
Index: Makefile.def
===
Errr, you need to change the assembler to do this . GCC does not care
about what sits inside __asm__ .
cheers
Ramana
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 09:18 -0500, Burt Walsh wrote:
>
>
> I am using SimpleScalar (ARM ISA) to do some simulations. I have
> added an
> instruction to the SimpleScalar machin
I'm sure most of the functionality exists, i'm just not sure what it's
called anymore :)
I've lost track too. I haven't tried to do builds in the last few days,
so I haven't seen what's there now, but my needs are simple:
I normally work in the "gcc" object directory and keep files there
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 08:45 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:35:22AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > H. J. Lu wrote:
> > >How can I rebuild stage 1 compiler with the system compiler? I used
> > >to be able to do
> > >
> > ># cd gcc
> > ># make unstage1
> > ># make restag
Hi,
I am using SimpleScalar (ARM ISA) to do some simulations. I have added an
instruction to the SimpleScalar machine defintion. I would like to use an
asm("newinst"::) to force my instruction to be placed into the object
file. It is saying bad instruction when I do this. Do I have to go in
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
| > Andrew Pinski wrote:
| >
| > >doing the following
| > >$(srcdir)/configure --prefix=${HOME}/libobjc.trunk
| > >--enable-languages=c,objc
| > >make all
| > >make -k check
| > >make i
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andrew Pinski wrote:
|
| > doing the following
| > $(srcdir)/configure --prefix=${HOME}/libobjc.trunk
| > --enable-languages=c,objc
| > make all
| > make -k check
| > make install
|
| Why is it recompiling libcpp? That's the real bug.
I observed that
I am now about half-way through the various phases I proposed for
merging the dfp-branch into mainline. The patch I committed today was
quite big, so in light of David Edelsohn's note tonight, I will sit
back for a bit before dealing with the next chunk.
Here is what remains:
* Merge in middle-
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> >doing the following
> >$(srcdir)/configure --prefix=${HOME}/libobjc.trunk
> >--enable-languages=c,objc
> >make all
> >make -k check
> >make install
>
> Why is it recompiling libcpp? That's the real bug.
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:35:22AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> >How can I rebuild stage 1 compiler with the system compiler? I used
> >to be able to do
> >
> ># cd gcc
> ># make unstage1
> ># make restage1
> >
> >But now ./prev-gcc/xgcc is used to build stage 1 compiler, not the
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:16:49AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >At the moment, we do this deliberately to preserve debug information.
> >However, once libgcc is moved out of to top level - hopefully along
> >with the gcc-provided include files - then gcc can be a pure host
> >directory, and we wo
Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 00:48 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hi,
Someone caused a >10% compile time regression yesterday for CSiBE, see
http://www.csibe.org/draw-diag.php?branchid=mainline&flags=-Os&rel_flag=--none--&dataview=Timeline&finish_button=Finish&draw=sbs&view=1&base
make[2]: Entering directory `/scratch/ogcc/stagefeedback-libcpp'
gcc -I/scratch/gcc/libcpp -I. -I/scratch/gcc/libcpp/../include
-I/scratch/gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic
Hi,
maybe this is some fallout from the toplevel-bootstrap patch...
I configured current mainline with
$SRCDIR/configure --quiet --prefix=$DESTDIR --enable-languages=c++,fortran
--with-gmp=/usr/local/appl/gmp-4.1.4 --enable-checking=release
and the bootstrap stopped at
make[2]: Entering dire
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What about bubblestrap?
>>
>> (See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438)
>>
>>
> A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap"
> or "make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right
> thing, compiling
> 1. contrib/gcc_update creates gcc/REVISION with branch name and
> revision number.
> 2. If gcc/REVISION exists, it will be used in gcc/version.c.
>
> With those 2 patches, I got
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./xgcc --version
> xgcc (GCC) 4.1.0 (gcc-4_1-branch revision 108596) 20051215 (prerelease
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Between Dec 12 and today there has been a ~10% compile-time regression
> and a 1.3% memory usage regression on the tramp3d tester. Due to
> bootstrap problems in between these days I cannot restrict the window
> more.
>
> Richard.
Already noted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/
> Richard Guenther writes:
Richard> Between Dec 12 and today there has been a ~10% compile-time regression
Richard> and a 1.3% memory usage regression on the tramp3d tester. Due to
Richard> bootstrap problems in between these days I cannot restrict the window
Richard> more.
When Mar
Quoting Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes. "make bubblestrap" is now called simply "make". As Giovanni put
> it a few minutes ago:
>
> "I would also note that using "make" in the cp/ directory at least used
> to build cc1plus with the system compiler, without -Werror and with a
> different
Hello,
I found an error in g77 documentation.
Sorry for wrting to this mail address, but I did not find anywhere in
the bug reporting documentation how to report a bug on
the...documentation itself
In particular, here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2.3/g77/Floating-point-Exception-Han
Between Dec 12 and today there has been a ~10% compile-time regression
and a 1.3% memory usage regression on the tramp3d tester. Due to
bootstrap problems in between these days I cannot restrict the window
more.
Richard.
I just did a fresh build testing a patch here and then I try make bubblestrap
and "no target 'bubblestrap'
I'm curious myself. Was this an intentional result of the toplevel bootstrap
stuff?
Yes. "make bubblestrap" is now called simply "make". As Giovanni put
it a few minutes ago:
"I wou
On 12/16/05, Tobias Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ forwarding to gcc@gcc.gnu.org ]
>
> Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > I just did a fresh build testing a patch here and then I try make
> > bubblestrap
> > and "no target 'bubblestrap'
>
> I'm curious myself. Was this an intentional result of t
[ forwarding to gcc@gcc.gnu.org ]
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> I just did a fresh build testing a patch here and then I try make bubblestrap
> and "no target 'bubblestrap'
I'm curious myself. Was this an intentional result of the toplevel bootstrap
stuff?
- Tobi
At the moment, we do this deliberately to preserve debug information.
However, once libgcc is moved out of to top level - hopefully along
with the gcc-provided include files - then gcc can be a pure host
directory, and we won't need to worry about this.
Uhm, we'd still need to have prev-libgcc w
Andrew Pinski wrote:
doing the following
$(srcdir)/configure --prefix=${HOME}/libobjc.trunk
--enable-languages=c,objc
make all
make -k check
make install
Why is it recompiling libcpp? That's the real bug.
Please open a PR because the discussion really belongs in Bugzilla.
Paolo
Christian Joensson wrote:
What about bubblestrap?
(See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438)
A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap" or
"make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right thing,
compiling all that is needed to not h
What about bubblestrap?
(See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438)
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
Will make quickstrap do the same as "make all"?
No, there's no "make quickstrap" at all! Citing from the "Top-Level
Bootstrap" wiki page:
Toplevel bootstrap is able to bootstrap a compiler with separate
reconfigurations and rebuilds of libiberty/libcpp/gcc in all the three
stages. It is
H. J. Lu wrote:
How can I rebuild stage 1 compiler with the system compiler? I used
to be able to do
# cd gcc
# make unstage1
# make restage1
But now ./prev-gcc/xgcc is used to build stage 1 compiler, not the
system compiler.
If the old bootstrap mechanism had already been garbage collected,
Ranjit Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes it does. If nothing else, the archives are used to
> provide canonical URLs for referring to messages.
gmane provides that too.
57 matches
Mail list logo
