Hi Devs,
This is just a reminder that I will do the string freeze for the
Geany-Plugins 0.21 very soon (Most likely tomorrow afternoon UTC). So
please commit all changes on strings until tomorrow afternoon into trunk
as I will create a release branch from it.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uve
Hi folks,
Unfortunately I didn't heard back of developer of
geany-mini-script-plugin so today I like to ask you whether somebody
likes to take over maintenance for geany-mini-script plugin inside
geany-plugins-svn. It's untouched since maybe 2009 and to be honest I
have no idea, what's the curren
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 14:22:46 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Only comment I'd make is that you only listed needing a login on
> Google, but AFAIK every other system also needs a login of some type,
> as does the current SVN so its not a discriminator.
It's a wiki so feel free to add might missing poin
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:11:06 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 25/09/2011 20:01, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
> > Le 25/09/2011 19:36, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
> >> Am 25.09.2011 19:20, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:07:25 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 25/09/2011 18:59, fr...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit :
> > Revision: 2214
> >
> > http://geany-plugins.svn.sourceforge.net/geany-plugins/?rev=2214&view=rev
> > Author: frlan
> > Date: 2011-09-25 16:59:59 + (Sun
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:11:06 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 25/09/2011 20:01, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
> > Le 25/09/2011 19:36, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
> >> Am 25.09.2011 19:20, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >
_emit () from
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
However. I'd add a g_return_val_if_fail (replace != NULL, pos); but not
sure whether this will break anything. Opinions?
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpX4Ud65F8sW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ge
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:03:23 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Ok, just was curious whether the act of submitting code to the Geany
> project implicitly signed over copyright. I guess it doesn't work
> like that :)
Nope, no copyleft as you might no from GNU or OpenOffice/LibreOffice.
Cheers,
Fra
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:33:22 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Would it not make more sense to have a single copyright
> holder for all files in the project, be it a person (ie. the current
> lead/maintainer), or an organization (ie. The Geany Software
> Foundation :)
Well, we can discuss about thi
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:03:10 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Github works pretty well for this, I'm not stingy with commit access
> and I'll add anyone as a contributor, or the Pull Requests works
> quite easily.
After 0.21 there will be some changes on both side, Geany as well as
Geany-plugins. I
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:19:30 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 18/09/2011 04:55, Matthew Brush a écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hey,
>
> > Does anyone have any opinions about me putting GeanyPy into
> > geany-plugins SVN and trying to get it included in the next plugins
> > release?
>
> It depends on w
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:35:13 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> I think someone mentioned about a month later.
Goal is weekend around Oct, 15th.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp3iTfLggdIA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mail
Am 22.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> But why only 1.0?
>>>
>>> GNOME 3.*
>>> KDE 4.*
>>> Scite 2.*
>>>
>>> What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
> just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
> the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead of next release I
disagree. After 0.21 release we got a lot of structu
Am 20.09.2011 00:18, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> [...]
>>> Oh no, I planned to start (again [1]) a discussion about *removing*
>>> ChangeLog committing :D (OK, I though about Geany itself, not GP)
>>>
>>> I'll start it right now then, if you don't mind.
>>
>> I'm open to start a discussion about Change
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:45:04 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 19/09/2011 08:15, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Another episode from topic improving plugins by Frank ;)
> >
> > In last time I saw a lot of changes going in into plugins withou
Hi folks,
Another episode from topic improving plugins by Frank ;)
In last time I saw a lot of changes going in into plugins without having
a ChageLog entry set.
Its not always useful in every case but its a nice thing for users of
trunk and also stable releases to have a middle view between NEW
Hi translators and friends of Geany,
Time is passing by and it's time for doing a new release of Geany!
To manage all translation coming in in time we are having a string
freeze for upcoming Geany 0.21, which will be release around October,
1st.
The list of changes done for this release is long
Am 12.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>>> Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing
>>> and may not run the browser the user expected (depending on the order
>>> in the list). At least when there is only the tools pr
Am 12.09.2011 11:16, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> Am 12.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>> On 12 September 2011 18:16, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>> Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
>>>> Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>>>>&g
Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>> [...]
>>
>> What about adding chrome?
>
> Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one), it's very easy now :)
>
> We might then also want to add also Safari, Epihpany (GNOME) and Midori
> (Xfce).
Am 06.09.2011 05:39, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> I see a gentleman called Linus is doing a test of Github for us:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/4/92
;)
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
Am 06.09.2011 05:29, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>> 1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because
>> > they have the same name as tags and they are ambiguous when doing "git
>> > checkout". Some naming scheme for stable branches should be invented.
> I notice there is some inconsisten
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 16:43:44 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > If nobody is opposed, I will prepare a patch in short order.
> >
>
> My greater concern will be to ensure that replacing all the filedefs
> just before release doesn't break anything.
>
> I guess it will have to be an inspection of t
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:13:38 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 1 September 2011 02:14, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > Am 31.08.2011 17:21, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> >> 1) as expected, it doesn't make merges looks like merges, but as a
> >> single commit. However Thomas
Am 31.08.2011 17:21, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> 3) We won't probably be able to create Git tags from the SVN tags
> because they (at least Geany-0_18 do) don't all tag a single commit
> (e.g. it's a branch)
Can you go into more detail which are not working? IIRC we only had one
or two of tag/bra
Am 31.08.2011 17:21, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> 2) I've got a full commiters list, hopefully OK (that's the only useful
> part of this email actually...):
>
> colombanw = Colomban Wendling
> eht16 = Enrico Tröger
> (no author) = Enrico Tröger
&
Am 31.08.2011 17:21, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> 1) as expected, it doesn't make merges looks like merges, but as a
> single commit. However Thomas said on IRC that SVN didn't knew merges
> either, maybe it makes this impossible to track then?
This is depending on the version of svn. IIRC > 1.6
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:54:29 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 12:53 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > Am 30.08.2011 03:08, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> >> On 08/29/2011 08:35 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> >>> Hi plugin maintainer of geany-plugins,
> >>>
Am 30.08.2011 03:08, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 08/29/2011 08:35 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Hi plugin maintainer of geany-plugins,
>>
>> As 0.21 is near I like to ask you to update your documentation for your
>> plugin. Some of them are pretty out of date and not
Hi plugin maintainer,
A couple of month ago we discussed about adding more code quality to
the plugins. During this discussion we added the make check target to
autotools build environment for geany-plugins project to get a more
pedantic compiler, preventing segfaults, memory leaks and other
unwa
Hi plugin maintainer of geany-plugins,
As 0.21 is near I like to ask you to update your documentation for your
plugin. Some of them are pretty out of date and not very useful to the
user.
Please check that they include the latest information as e.g. authors
mail addresses, web pages, features,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:17:38 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 28.08.2011 23:33, schrieb Jiří Techet:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 20:50, Frank Lanitz
> > wrote:
> >> So I suggest this: Jiri can you help to do so (or does maybe the
> >> github svn clone tools
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:46:37 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 27/08/2011 20:27, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:02:41 +0200
> > Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >
> >> Le 22/08/2011 00:27, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> >>> [...]
> >>
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:02:41 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 22/08/2011 00:27, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> > [...]
> >
> > Well, in my opinion the whole topic of git transition is
> > over-discussed.
>
> Looks the same for me, and I didn't see much new POV or useful infos
> since a bunch of ema
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:06:28 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> My reasoning was based on past discussions around quality control of
> the plugins. As noted in those discussions, plugins are more and more
> providing essential capability and the aggregated plugins are being
> released in the name of the
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:47:25 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 03:27 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the
> >> Gean
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:34:20 +0300
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:27:47 +0200
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
> > Jiří Techet wrote:
> >
> > > About plugins - I'd like to see them converted to git too
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:15:36 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:21:21 +0200
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I had a short email conversation with Prim András the original
> > author of geanyembrace.He did not touch this plu
Hi,
I've got a comment to LaTeX:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:31:40 +0200
"Alexander Eberspächer" wrote:
> +figure=\\begin{figure}\n\t\\centering\n\t\includegraphics[]{%cursor%}
> \n\t\\caption{}\n\t\label{fig:}\n\\end{figure}
I'd like to leave the centering here out.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://f
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:21:21 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I had a short email conversation with Prim András the original author
> of geanyembrace.He did not touch this plugin for quiet a long time and
> doesn't plan to do so in future.
>
> Does anybody
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:47:21 +0200
"Alexander Eberspächer" wrote:
> the default snippets that are installed to
> prefix/share/geany/snippets.conf
> have C/C++ code in the [default] section.
>
> This can lead to C/C++ code in a Fortran file. In the patch attached
> to this mail, I reorganiz
Hi folks,
I had a short email conversation with Prim András the original author
of geanyembrace.He did not touch this plugin for quiet a long time and
doesn't plan to do so in future.
Does anybody of you use the plugin and might like to become maintainer?
If not, what we going to do with it?
C
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> [...]
> > Due the huge number of contributors at the plugins project and the,
> > well quiet often broken build, a more decentralized process would be
> > good for the plugins. We talked about this a couple of days ago
> > inside IRC and we
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> It's not perfect - the branches aren't "glued" to the trunk in merge
> points and the tags are squashed with the previous commits which I
> don't like but it gives you an idea how a complete Geany's history
> looks like.
Is there a way to p
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:37:47 +0400
Alexander Petukhov wrote:
> fixed.
Approved ;)
But still get an compiler warning with waf (@AMD64)
../debugger/src/dconfig.c: In function 'dconfig_save':
../debugger/src/dconfig.c:264:9: warning: cast from pointer to integer of
different size [-Wpointer-to-i
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> About plugins - I'd like to see them converted to git too but for me
> it's much less important. Plugins are usually one-man-show and require
> much less cooperation than Geany itself and their authors already have
> SVN access.
Due the hug
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:01:54 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:28:54 +0200
> Dominic Hopf wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 23.08.2011, 11:47 +0200 schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> > > Hi plugin developers,
> > >
> > > As we discussed a rele
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:28:54 +0200
Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.08.2011, 11:47 +0200 schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> > Hi plugin developers,
> >
> > As we discussed a release for Geany 0.21 around October, 1st I'm
> > thinking also that it would make sen
Hi plugin developers,
As we discussed a release for Geany 0.21 around October, 1st I'm
thinking also that it would make sense to do a geany-plugins release
around this time. Unfortunately I'm not sure, beside the string freeze
and translation stuff, which goals need to be matched until release.
W
use Windows).
About this newsletter
=
This newsletter has been created in cooperation by people from
Geany's international community. Contributors to this newsletter and
the infrastructure behind it, ordered by alphabet:
Colomban Wendling,
Enrico Tröger,
Frank Lanitz,
Russell Dickenson
pgptIEPuJUZLd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:21:40 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> @All, what about plugins?
I guess, once we did this for core, plugins should be switched also.
But here it will need some further discussion as what you are defining
a atomar project / what shall be T for the DVCS.
Cheers,
Frank
--
htt
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:33:50 +
cess...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 2161
>
> http://geany-plugins.svn.sourceforge.net/geany-plugins/?rev=2161&view=rev
> Author: cesspit
> Date: 2011-08-22 00:33:50 + (Mon, 22 Aug 2011)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> debugger:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:18:24 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 19/08/2011 08:40, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:23 +1000
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >>> This would avoid having a broken getter in the API (or whatever)
Even its sometimes a pain in the ass, also
branching on svn is possible and working.
So I'm not talking about sending patches, but feeling responsible and
taking care of which differs a lot IMHO.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpZwy2IBn0XZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:08:16 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 02:11 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:57:36 -0500
> > Josh wrote:
> >
> >> @Lex: That makes sense. After this weekend I'll still have time, but
> >> it'll
what needs to be done in terms of transition. Maybe
you can use the wiki for.
4th step: Setting up plan.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgp9knPSzAcfN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:00:06 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Patch forwarded from AlekzE from IRC to add some more missing Cython
> keywords.
Has been applied with svn r5892. Please check.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpIEK2LGKIvl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:23 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > IMO Geany should use the exact same API than plugins to do one
> > thing.
>
> Of course Geany should call the wrapper too. Basically its ok for
> Geany to do implementation stuff directly, but only if its in one
> place. As soon as
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:23:42 -0500
Josh wrote:
> The subject says it all; why shouldn't we move geany to github? I'm
> willing to help with the migration, especially this weekend. I'd also
> like to note that we could continue to use svn
> (https://github.com/blog/626-announcing-svn-support and
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:11:57 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:45:09 +1000
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> > >> But even so we shouldn't make the assumption that every Linux
> > >> user is a C developer and shouldn't force them to be
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:45:09 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >> But even so we shouldn't make the assumption that every Linux user
> >> is a C developer and shouldn't force them to be one if their
> >> distro is a bit behind, especially with plugin packages.
> >
> > Well, there are only two possibilit
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:21:04 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > We talked about outdated distribution as e.g. Ubuntu LTS. A windows
> > dev could use latest stable release of plugins and Geany as
> > provided on homepage or nightly.
>
> You are right, windows stuff is under our control and shame on us
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:16:00 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Agreed, something like:
>
> /*
>* Does stuff with bar
>* @param bar A bar to perform foo on.
>* @return A new baz
>*
>* @since 0.21 (<= API v212)
>*/
> baz_t *foo(bar_t *bar);
+
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:16:00 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 08:56 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
> > [...]
> >>
> >> That was *extremely* useful information, you should put that on
> >> the Wiki too :)
> >>
> >
> > Sure if no one says its wrong.
> >
>
> Only thing left out is how there's a s
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:14:10 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > However, once a user is compiling its own plugin, they can also
> > compile Geany. The dependencies are most likely similar and the
> > efforts not much bigger, once you have set up gcc, libgtk2-dev etc.
>
> Why would we expect a PHP or P
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:01:09 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Oh yeah the wiki, I forgot about that :-)
>
> @Enrico, When will it be declared online, ie prominently pointed to
> from the website?
There will be a note inside the next newsletter.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp25o
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:39:17 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 12:30 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> >
> > As discussed on some other place this is most likely something
> > needs to be done on compiletime and, well, I don't see any reasons
> >
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:38:49 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 12:26 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:34:11 -0700
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
>
> >
> >> IMO, it's quite useful/important that each function/member's
> >
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:28:17 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/16/2011 11:38 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:19:35 -0700
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
> >
> >> I probably don't understand the topic enough, but to me, it would
> >> be co
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:34:11 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> +1 ... Franks list on the Wiki is an great start!
Thx ;)
> IMO, it's quite useful/important that each function/member's
> doc-comments be annotated with the API version number as well, as has
> been discussed. This would let develope
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:09:53 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> This isn't as bad as it sounds, but at this point I don't think it's
> very important anyway, the current API docs are, for the most part,
> pretty good. My only complaint is that the structs/typedefs are
> documented in the header fil
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:20:14 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:07:06 +0200, Frank wrote:
>
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >Today I'm looking for a nice way how to unmark words which have been
> >marked with Geany's GEANY_KEYS_SEARCH_MARKALL. Does anybody of you
> >know a way through plugi
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:37:15 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> 2. structures should not be visible in the interface, instead they
> should be hidden behind getter/setter functions, and
>
> 3. interface wrapper functions should be used to hide the
> implementation and side effects.
>
> The last two hav
Hi folks,
Today I'm looking for a nice way how to unmark words which have been
marked with Geany's GEANY_KEYS_SEARCH_MARKALL. Does anybody of you know
a way through plugin API or do I need to hack something? ;)
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpJjtSyGpo8u.pgp
Description: PGP s
Hi devs,
I've just put a list with Geany version and its fitting API/ABI version
into wiki. I hope its correct as I harvest them from svn tags :)
However, you can find it at:
https://wiki.geany.org/plugins/development/api-versions
for the meanwhile.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:19:35 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> I probably don't understand the topic enough, but to me, it would be
> cool to say:
>
> PLUGIN_VERSION_CHECK(0, 20, 42)
>
> To mean: "This plugin will only work on the 42nd API change since the
> 0.20 release or later".
This w
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:53:23 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 16/08/2011 10:05, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> > On 16 August 2011 12:19, Matthew Brush wrote:
> >> On 08/15/2011 03:45 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> If I get some time, I could try and do this. Is anybody opposed
> to putt
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:01:42 +0800
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 16/08/2011 20:03, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > Correct. ABI changes do need a recompilation. API changes need
> > nothing.
> >
> > Sometimes both the API and ABI "break", and then you need changes
> > in the source and of cours
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:45:28 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> How would you show API and ABI info?
I think:
Since Geany 0.21 / API 221
or something like that.
> IIRC the theory is that ABI
> changes don't require unchanged plugins to be recompiled (for example
> if a structure is extended) but API
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:45:30 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 08/15/11 10:21, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:57:01 -0700
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
> >
> >> There's a lot of stuff missing from the API reference, even entire
> >> structs
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:57:01 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> There's a lot of stuff missing from the API reference, even entire
> structs and some functions. So I think anything to make it even
> slightly better would be good.
I agree. As you you did a lot of work for your Python binding as well
Hi folks,
Last days I worked a bit using the filetype struct inside a plugin and
I was searching for a constant for some special filetype. At the end
(ok, I didn't search this much ...) I was able to find it inside
filetypes.h, but wondering whether we might could add this (maybe
automatic) someh
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:27:13 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:37:42 -0700, Matthew wrote:
>
> Hola,
>
> >P.S. Above are you saying the Devhelp plugin *won't* build on your
> >system or that it just didn't need any changes to build? I'm just
> >wondering because I've receiv
x27;ve added some info to plugin howto. Please check
http://www.geany.org/manual/reference/howto.html
Maybe it solves a couple of oyur questions.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpE4eP9LvZJ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
ny of the plugin maintainers, don't want that I touch their
> code slightly, either tell me or fix it yourself.
I hope I did fix it for all my plugins.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpmh3t6FlbPd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
e
> summertime alone, leaving time for translation updates too.
OK. Let's set the release date for end of September. Maybe:
Release: October, 1st
String freeze: September, 17th
Feature freeze: September, 17th
I will take care as usual about the i18n stuff.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanit
ays challanging.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpe1bOzkYIqO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:38:27 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> If anyone wants to adopt the Addons plugin, I'd be happy. If not, I'd
> continue maintaining it as well.
As I already added some code to it in past I'd take it over.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpfCH8P
e from time to
time I will add some code to the core but number r size of patches will
not raise from level I currently do.
There are a lot of reasons but most important is lag of time and a bunch
of other projects I'm involved in.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpR
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:42:43 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> has the waf install step gotten very slow for everyone, or only for
> me?
>
> It takes 36s or longer here, and this laptop has an SSD.
Well, I don't think this is caused by waf itself. How do other
IO-actions, in special write actions,
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:16:06 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Next steps (just a few points):
> Colomban did some nice work on creating the pdf from ReST a couple of
> days ago. I will merge his changes into master and will start to
> convert issue 1 and 2 to latest version so news
Hi folks,
I has been about two month since last release of the Geany newsletter
and even not this much happened during this time I'm planning to do a
new release by about first weekend of August so its the right moment
for you to think whether you have something interesting, which might
could be
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:31:21 +0400
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:02:48 +0200
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I saw that the SM-branch is merged with trunk on a regular basis,
> > but not sure what's the current status o
Hi folks,
I saw that the SM-branch is merged with trunk on a regular basis, but
not sure what's the current status of that branch. Can someone help me
out there?
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpocEgMznA6l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
in translatable strings are inside the
list.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz
pgpMooKi6YyN1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Hi folks,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:30:57 +
tec...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> -#include
> +#include
I'm not 100% sure, but is this really correct?
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpqixAosmLUl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:18:33 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 13/06/2011 23:12, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > As currently the dependencies for Geany are getting bumped to GTK
> > 2.12 and GLIB 2.16 I'm wondering whether we shou
Hi folks,
Didn't had any deeper check but with recent svn I'm getting these
compiler warnings on build with waf
../src/plugins.c:341:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
[enabled by default]
../src/plugins.c:341:2: warning: (near initialization for
‘stash_funcs.stash_group
Hi developers,
As currently the dependencies for Geany are getting bumped to GTK 2.12
and GLIB 2.16 I'm wondering whether we should also bump dependencies of
current devel version of geany-plugins to Geany 0.21 and with this step
also to this versions of GTK/glib?
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://fran
201 - 300 of 628 matches
Mail list logo
