On Sep 5, 2011, at 9:34 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I'm also planning on implementing the same behavior in gschem which
currently depends on GTK 2.10. Any arguments to upping this to 2.18 too?
Even the Windows builds use 2.20. I'd say, bump configure.ac to need
2.18 - and do nothing else -
On Sep 5, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 10:38 -0700, Steven Michalske wrote:
On Sep 5, 2011, at 9:34 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Er, what gtk do the Mac builds use?
Macports is at 2.24.5
Fink is at 2.18.9
Homebrew is at 2.24.6
Do you happen to know
I rarely see my own posts, I turned on post acks.
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Bob Paddock graceindustr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record, I'm not sure what our moderation policy is. Are any
of your posts being rejected by moderation? (If so - just what kind of
emails are you
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:18:20 -0500
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
Does the category low end bother you?
Well, I think low-end is not very specific in reality. Does gEDA
really belong in the category of
On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:21 AM, Ethan Swint wrote:
On 08/23/2011 08:47 PM, Matthew Lewis wrote:
I was double checking a pcb layout today and I discovered a rather nasty
gotcha. It seems that gschem and PCB don't agree on which end of a diode
should be pin 1. Gschem views pin 1 as the anode
On Aug 23, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:06 -0400, Mark Anderson wrote:
I'm still planning on an OSX Cocoa HID. I haven't gotten very far, but
I do have the very, very beginning. If any one else is interested, let
me know. I'd like to do the same for
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
Hey all,
I am working on moving the Gtk layer-selector into its
own widget (see bug 699482, for example), and cleaning
up the code.
A question I have for the group is: why are the backgrounds
of the layer buttons in
On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:08:34AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
This advantage wears off as the user uses the feature more often.
Using layers is very basic to PCB. Typical use switches layers
very often in a session.
On Aug 13, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
There is also the 3D board view stuff and SpaceNavigator 6-DOF
controller support, which has not made it to git HEAD.
Please make sure this is properly protected in an autoconfig option. I have to
apply a patch to rip it
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Josh Jordan wrote:
I've had the same trouble with recent ubuntu release looking like osx.
Debian sounds like a good alternative to ubuntu even without the window
manager issues.
Does anyone use geda on osx? I have given osx a good try and found it
Agreed. The majority of my parts come from curbside salvage, I've yet to
find any programmers in the trash, but maybe someday I will?
I have found some in the trash.
For old Cypress chips, and I think some 8051s
But who needs programmers when chips have USB mass storage and RS-232
bootloaders.
On Jul 19, 2011, at 10:59 AM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Jul 19, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Josh Jordan wrote:
We could spite them by implementing all of their features.
Shudder. A powerful toolkit should not be copying features from consumer
software.
We can do better. :-).
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:24 AM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Jul 19, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
We can do better. :-). On a side note Are there features that would be nice
to have?
It would be nice to *remove* features like hierarchy expansion and slotting,
while
Will the gentlest backend for verilog accept symbols with the source attribute
set, like hierarchy symbols, but making them point to Verilog source not a
sch source?
Steve
On Jul 8, 2011, at 1:29 PM, fr...@frankthomson.net wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: gEDA-user:
On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Josh Jordan outerspacema...@yahoo.com wrote:
I could implement a save-symbol-as capability. Can anyone familiar
with gschem code outline a 'right' way to this? Should I add
Looking at connectors for this in the past has lead me to circular connectors.
A search on digikey brings up a selection matrix including ingress protection.
If your going to be connecting and disconnecting this alot, look into push pull
circular connectors.
Lemo makes really nice ones.
Can you still get single sided FR2?
On May 31, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Thomas Oldbury toldb...@gmail.com wrote:
Double sided boards are great, but not so great when the product is
supposed to cost only $3/each, after an MSP430, mains power supply,
heatsink, triac etc.
On 31 May 2011
I was thinking of how to represent all of the connections and relationships.
Then thought of sqlite3, as a database of connections.
a table of symbols,
a table of pins
This table maps the pins to a net and a symbol.
a table of nets
This is a rather simple database, of connections.
To
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:53 PM, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
On 05/21/2011 08:09 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The notion of packages can be seen as a means to isolate dependencies.
Pins in symbols must match pins in footprints. Simulation models are
specific to components.
Metadata can be a parallel task.
In gschem you pick your resistor.
You have two buttons, place lite, place heavy. Place heavy brings up a second
wizard to populate the heavy symbol, probably from your database.
Then place your symbol.
In pcb, when you import a schematic.
Any parts
On May 16, 2011, at 10:21 AM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Why not start with the existing
tools and just rewrite the parts you're interested in?
License?
True. One of the benefits of the GPL is that people can bsae their
work off existing work, but not everyone wants to
On May 16, 2011, at 2:45 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Biggest determent to the open source is now GPLv3
OT here, since our stuff is still GPLv2
Sorry for the OT bit, but v2 got a black eye from v3, commercially that is.
I know of two companies shying away from all
On May 16, 2011, at 4:25 PM, al davis ad...@freeelectron.net wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2011, Steven Michalske wrote:
But lawyers can use that clause as a loophole to invalidate
legitimate patents.
Minor side effect of lawyers can use that clause as a loophole
to invalidate ILLegitimate
On May 16, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Steven Michalske wrote:
In a perfect world this would not be an issue. But lawyers can use that
clause as a loophole to invalidate legitimate patents.
The notion of software patents is by no means obvious
hit send too soon
On May 16, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Steven Michalske wrote:
In a perfect world this would not be an issue. But lawyers can use that
clause as a loophole to invalidate legitimate patents.
The notion of software patents
I have a recipe, I'll send on over when I get to my computer.
On May 4, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 05:23 -0500, Craig Niederberger wrote:
Does anyone have experience compiling PCB on OS X? I've been able to
do it in the past, but am now
One part you will be missing is routing of the true wires.
So if your expecting it to make a list of the wires lengths for
you you would need to integrate it into a 3D mechanical cad
package too.
Steve
___
geda-user mailing list
On Apr 22, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Andrew Miner zmi...@gmail.com wrote:
/*xx
I'm going to go out on a limb and state that I refuse to support
non-flat layers :-)
[1]http://www.allflexinc.com/origamiflex.shtml
Supported or not these things are
This is what I see as a benefit. If you go to a vendor's website you
will find one or two EDA footprint and symbol files. But nothing that
was a bell ringer for commonality. It would be nice to have a
universal starting point.
There is EDIF but I see EDIF as not being so useful, i think they
http://www.avx.com/SpiApps/default.asp
Some cool capacitor tools, like spicap3
Steve
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Kovacs Levente leventel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:58:37 +0200
Uwe Bonnes
b...@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
wrote:
What value do you need? Try
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 23:18 +0800, Steven Michalske wrote:
This is what I see as a benefit. If you go to a vendor's website you
will find one or two EDA footprint and symbol files. But nothing that
was a bell ringer
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:35 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Now we just need to figure out how to enforce it :-)
With a stick!
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Apr 12, 2011, at 2:55 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
TBH, I've not seen SVG anywhere on the main-stream internet.
Wikipedia prefers SVG for anything that is not a photograph. The servers
render SVG graphics to PNG as needed before
Snip.
I agree that we should not special case it. I would prefer varibles that
refered to other attributes.
This example: value = 3v3
net = $value:1
where the default scope is the local symbol and no lookups to higher scopes.
A resistor divider:
R1
Value= 1000
R2
Value =
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Peter Clifton [1]pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:55 +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
I am exploring the idea of using the Scalable Vector Graphics
standard
as an EDA format.
[2]https://github.com/seddona/svgparts
Would be
Pci cards call them A and B sides. But that too is odd. It seems that, like
it or not, top and bottom are the industry standard.
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:24 AM, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
On 04/10/2011 08:26 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
Sometimes the outer layers are called
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Stephan Boettcher boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de
wrote:
rickman gnuarm.g...@arius.com writes:
I have to say I am philosophically opposed to any feature that allows
a design to pass DRC when the layout differs from the schematic.
Just to get the
In theory, we could support that flag in *any* object, but I'm not
sure how to manage the relationship between, say, a non-net trace on
an inner plane and the schematic/netlist. I asked someone who used a
BigName EDA package how they did it, and they had a completely
different class of
On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:35 AM, yamazakir2 yamazak...@gmail.com wrote:
The datasheet is pretty ambiguous, take a look and let me know what
you guys think:
http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74lvc1g3157.pdf
Page 1 and 18 show dip ordering.
And the index mark refers to the bar on the
On Mar 18, 2011, at 2:19 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
I don't want to end up with the current state that some 'specialy
named' layers receive special treatment.
From a practical standpoint, I think it makes sense to have a fast way
to scan for layers of some high-level
On Mar 18, 2011, at 3:07 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
That's the kind of top down design that produces a tool that meets
today's requirements in the minimum amount of time, but produces an
inflexible tool limited to those requirements.
And your kind of bottom-up design
On Mar 18, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Stephan Boettcher boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de
wrote:
DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com writes:
... I think the tool we have is pretty good already. Very good. Thanks!
The tool we have already is nearly impossible to maintain, though.
Please do not expect
On Mar 18, 2011, at 3:43 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
I expect the plugin mechanism to be the way to write *all* the core
bits, though.
The more important it is, that what is below the plugin mechanism is as
general as necessary, and since that is difficult to judge up
On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:02 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Except gerbers have special cases for thermals and pads, for example.
So there need to be attributes on shapes.
No, the exporters really need to have access to the whole collection
of shapes that means pin so they can
On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Stephan Boettcher boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de
wrote:
DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com writes:
I expect the plugin mechanism to be the way to write *all* the core
bits, though.
The more important it is, that what is below the plugin mechanism is as
general
On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:37 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Still, I do not see a need for outline layers anywhere, except as an
attribute on a graphical layer that tells an exporter where to stop
drawing.
Hmmm... so you think PCB should let the user place an element in a
On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:39 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
It is the exporter's job to understand drilling. For geometry
capture, all you need to know is the shape. Modules with no need to
know should not know.
The autorouter needs to know not to run traces across unplated
This message makes me think that COW should remember what master it was copied
from and an edited flag.
On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Stephan Boettcher boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de
wrote:
DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com writes:
Except gerbers have special cases for thermals and pads, for
On Mar 19, 2011, at 8:13 AM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
BTW., there were electronic circuitries before PCBs were invented and the
future of electronics manufacturing is most likely something
three-dimensional, arbitrarily
On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Martin Kupec martin.ku...@kupson.cz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:14:54AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Martin Kupec wrote:
If layers types would be defined by attributes, someone would be able to
declare one layer both as
On Mar 19, 2011, at 12:33 PM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
This is what bothers me about a hole layer, un plated vs plated, the holes
do not define electrical contact, the plating does.
Or, rivits, or the soldered wires
On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 19:17 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
shift-leftclick on object
Don't forget about select-region, select-touching,
select-touching-line, etc.
I guess that is not too common in schematics?
Here
On Mar 19, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 13:14 -0700, Steven Michalske wrote:
Scroll wheel: rotate selection or element under mouse pointer
If nothing is selected and mouse pointer is over unpopulated area
or SHIFT modifier is used
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:52 PM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Martin Kupec wrote:
Generaly you are proposing that there should be a special type of
footpring called 'via' and it should receive extra care.
Why single out via and footprint when they are merely
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Why single out via and footprint when they are merely members of
an open-ended list of possible composite objects?
Because a tool that doesn't deal with real-world concepts in a
user-friendly way is unusable.
User
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:08 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
I agree here, that a via and a footprint are essentially the same
thing.
Except the user doesn't interact with them the same way.
This is a UI representation, not a layer geometry issue.
A via tool that makes the proper
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Martin Kupec martin.ku...@kupson.cz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:36:24AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Ok. So via should be a circle element on hole typed layer.
No. A Via is a composit, consisting of
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Stephan Boettcher
boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de wrote:
DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com writes:
Why single out via and footprint when they are merely members of
an open-ended list of possible composite objects?
Because a tool that doesn't deal with real-world
On Mar 18, 2011, at 1:32 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
But at the core, they work all just the same.
The core includes the autorouters, optimizers, DRC, exporters,
reports, and even simple editing - we have a hide vias button. How
does that work if you no longer have vias
As for mask and paste layers, we may want to have a way for an object
in one layer be a transformed version of another layer.
Example, clearing solder mask for a line, or pad, or whatever would
create a linked object in the adjacent mask layer with a growth in
size of size X.
Where X can be 10%
Looking at the layers I would like to propose that the copper layer be
made not specific to copper, but a conductor.
Some common alternatives are silver ink traces, embedded resistors, or
even more exotics like ITO (used for touch screens).
For the footprints,
They should have a routing keepout,
Can you up the ram available to the graphics? I recall that had a large impact
on performance in prior Email threads.
Steve
On Mar 12, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Thomas Oldbury toldb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have recently got a new laptop, a Lenovo ThinkPad X201. However, I'm
having a rather
relays and computers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3wPBcmSb2U
On Mar 10, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Joe Chisolm - Gmail wrote:
On 03/10/2011 04:10 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Balogh:
http://www.robotika.sk/projects/virtuallab/atxswitch/images/ATXswitch.png
I see, you press the button as soon
PCB supports polygons.
Filled paths yield a polygon. and PCB can cope with outputting to RS-274X
The point is that I wanted something not PCB centric.
RS-274X can support polygons as well, it is RS-274D that can't and
must be vector filled (painted). But footprint to RS-274X translation
is
At work we use odb++ valor files.
But I would not suggest removing gerber file exports. Every board house
understands them.
Steve
On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:11 AM, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
On 03/05/2011 02:41 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
it might be less work to replace or
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:55 AM, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
On 03/02/2011 06:49 AM, Stefan Tauner wrote:
my idea is some combination of the existing propsals:
- Gschem parts manager or parts database (glue)
- IPC Footprint Calculator (pcb)
and my own idea: a stand-alone pcb
Steven Michalske wrote:
Did not apply cleanly against git head at
359a02cfe25e32aec7d2985c8f368fbfdcd954fa
Sorry i can't get it, but i check patch for errors on latest git tree
available
on time of post. (p.s. i'm too novice in git, can you give me exactly
commands
to set git head to your
On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Colin D Bennett wrote:
^__ Properties of the view, not the underlying data - I'd prefer to
abstract this to the renderer.
I agree that color does not belong in the layout file. I may keep
changing my preferences
I use mil grids, as many boards houses expect mil units, like yours.
PCB layout is engineering, engineering involves tolerances...
I start my traces from off grid components so that the stub going from
the pin/pad is off grid byt quickly becomes on grid after the first 45
degree bend.
Steve
Safari and Firefox, on OS X is quite fast, nice smooth scrolling.
Steve
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Felipe De la Puente Christen
fdelapue...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 03:32 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Ethan Swint wrote:
I was expecting just to get back git
clone -o
Woo Hoo!
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
What about just soldering the wires?
On Feb 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, John Luciani jluci...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.
The Phoenix style are a bit too tall.
The Omnetics are too expensive but the Omnetics site did mention the materials
that the 125degC and
Or 1/4 inch quick disconnects.
On Feb 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, John Luciani jluci...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.
The Phoenix style are a bit too tall.
The Omnetics are too expensive but the Omnetics site did mention the materials
that the 125degC and 200degC
Might look into Phoenix contact and their reflow capable parts.
On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:30 PM, John Luciani jluci...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a low profile wire to board connector - either two
contacts 5A per contact or four
contacts 2.5A per contact. I need a temperature rating of
On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:09 AM, three_jeeps jjhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello:
I am considering using gEDA suite to do some design. Is the tool suite
currently actively supported and worked on?
Based on google searches, very little traffic wrt the suite has occurred over
the last 2-3 years.
Some tips about tips.
Remember to always store your iron tips with a ball of solder on them,
this helps prevent the tip from corroding in storage.
Don't wipe the tip before putting it back in the holder, your wipes on
the moist sponge should be when you take the tip out of the holder.
Again
A good pair of tweezers works for me.
note a good pair, not garden variety, I curse when I get to a lab that
has bad/cheap tweezers.
http://www.techni-toolcatalog.com/lg_display.cfm/catalog/128/page/243
I have a set of their ceramic tipped tweezers that are fantastic.
Steve
On Fri, Jan 28,
I can't say enough about using flux for soldering.
I often use the no clean flux with a metal tip dispenser.
like mouser 577-SF-01
Although it seems that if you don't want to buy a gallon of liquid
flux your getting a pen, which I dislike over the dispenser. It is a
matter of taste.
The other
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:30 PM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
You need to invent some 2-pin symbol with some special attributes, and
teach the pcb gnetlist backend(s) to interpret those attributes
Dj you own a tool box, I've seen you build mechanical things.
gEDA is a toolkit (toolbox), with your logic gnu unix is a tool.
If I want to clean up the cylinder an engine block I get out an engine
block hone, I do not get out a wire brush.
Now in gEDA terms.
When you want to edit a schematic,
On Jan 19, 2011, at 12:10 PM, DJ Delorie [1]d...@delorie.com wrote:
gEDA is a toolkit (toolbox), with your logic gnu unix is a tool.
gEDA is more like a design suite, a collection of tools and related
stuff.
And before you said it was a tool.
Not the computer science
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
• gerbv feature request: Add a view mode that shows only the difference
of two layers. This would be handy when I have to asses the changes that
I made to an existing design.
Make the layers XOR logically but
Maybe we are targetting the wrong OS ;-(
Nope, I like my mac os install, and engineering colleges are seeing a
large uptick in mac usage in colleges.
It is a perk to have a computer that can OS X, Linux, and Windows.
Maybe the unofficial windows ports are more important than we think ;-)
On Jan 2, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com wrote:
Den 2011-01-02 13:13:55 skrev kai-martin knaak k...@familieknaak.de:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I didn't add or modify any invisible text except those very
unnecessary (?) author- and license lines. I guess I
Setting it to zero by default could even be used to signal Gschem to add an
extra highlight to those symbols bearing it.
Yuck. Keep tools simple and clean.
Agreed, but if you wanted a DRC highlighter, a ? highlighted would be
a great thing to highlight.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Vanessa Ezekowitz
vanessaezekow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 23:55:04 -0500
al davis ad...@freeelectron.net wrote:
On Saturday 25 December 2010, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
* If the part in question can usually be described by a
single value, for
On Dec 26, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Stephan Boettcher boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de
wrote:
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de writes:
OK, shame on me for missing that option. But I do not think that this
really proves that a gschem rewrite is obsolete.
I may believe that writing a second
I see the need for something akin to a preferred default positioning, where
when a symbol is rotated there is a place where your prefer your attributes to
be placed.
Have geschem do the auto place template not part of the symbols at all
Steve
On Dec 25, 2010, at 4:48 PM, John Doty
There used to be a bug in older versions of pcb where you had to move the
component before you could manipulate the refdes. This also was helped by a
save and reopen of the pcb file.
On Dec 25, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Frank fhri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've tried everything I can think of
See FAQ for pcb
On Dec 18, 2010, at 12:01 PM, jeffrey antony jeffrey_ant...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a functionality in PCB to rotate a component in 45 degree
instead of 90 degree which is available at present?
Thanks and Best Regards
Jeffrey
W:
This is in the silkscreen of the footprint.
Steve
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote:
Am 05.12.2010 um 18:54 schrieb John Luciani:
Arcs aren't allowed in footprints.
D'oh. Neither me nor my copy of PCB knew that so this rectangle with rounded
corners
Anthony,
I look forward to your hard work, it is very impressive, and reminds
me of the layouts from years ago, where they were taped out and
pretty. None of this manhattan grid.
I know that Adding via's are non trivial for an auto router, with
your topological auto router, will it use a via
On Nov 26, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:05 PM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:01 AM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Jan Martinek ho...@dp.fce.vutbr.cz wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard footprint? Since your DIP packages are mounted in the
normal-side-up
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
At 05:01 AM 11/25/2010, you wrote:
I am missing the reason you must mirror the footprints, however.
Aren't the pins still in the same orientation they would be with the
standard footprint? Since your DIP packages are
On local customisiations withthe robo board, with the polygon holes removed.
17 Macbook Pro
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro6,1
Processor Name: Intel Core i7
Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz
with GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M:
Chipset Model:NVIDIA
On Nov 1, 2010, at 9:05 AM, John Doty wrote:
Putting a GUI on non-graphical functions *almost always* torques the design
away from effective scripting. You can claim this isn't necessarily so, but
actual software designers aren't usually smart enough to avoid this trap.
Agreed 100%
This
On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:49 AM, John Griessen wrote:
On 11/01/2010 11:05 AM, John Doty wrote:
Point and click is a seductive time waster*except* for inherently graphical
parts of the job.
A lot of layout is.
Rearranging some sets of files' locations is faster by GUI than by commands,
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:46 AM, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
On 11/01/2010 01:35 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
I like combining GUI and command line, select the files in the gui and
drag to the terminal!
Sounds like a trick!
Does that work with the GUI program known
snip
everything
/snip
I think the point John wants to make is that if you only program for a GUI,
then you loose the scriptability. I have see this many times in software.
Where is you write the GUI first, the scripting is an afterthought. Where as
if you write something scriptable in the
1 - 100 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
