On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:03:14AM +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 04:42, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote:
Am 10.09.2011 um 13:35 schrieb Stefan Salewski:
A lot of documentation can be bad.
Ha! Now that's exactly the right answer to somebody offering
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:56:27AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Just FYI, turns out the place that hosts my secondary DNS was *also*
out for the hurricane. Not much I can do about that - my paranoia
only goes so far ;-)
I could host sec dns for the site in central Europe if that helps.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:35:38PM -0700, yamazakir2 wrote:
Do you guys use your linux box for general desktop usage or only EDA?
I ask because I have tried many times to make the switch to linux for
general desktop usage but can't get over the inconvenience of it. I
have a linux box
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:24:53PM +0100, Thomas Oldbury wrote:
Is there a Python api for gEDA?
I once made a GPMI plugin for PCB. Unfortunately it contains only a
small set of interface libraries so what can be done was limited. I've
written an SVG exporter prototype in tcl, an interactive
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 04:15:16PM -0400, rickman wrote:
On 4/4/2011 11:44 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
A.Burinskiy wrote:
I did not saw satisfactory analog viewer for ngspice. Could you please
send me a link or project name?
Over the years several waveform projects have been tossed around
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:35:28PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Another note - when uploading the EXE, please be sure to upload ALL
the sources used to build it - yes, all the .tar.gz for all the
libraries built. Really. Kai and I can't make the binary available
without also making all those
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
Yes I got this.
OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
it be worth switching to google groups or similar? The interface is
nice and you can use it like a traditional mailing list if desired.
Last
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:20AM -0400, rickman wrote:
On 4/13/2011 8:56 AM, ge...@igor2.repo.hu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
Yes I got this.
OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
it be worth switching to google
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote:
1. Agree! I'd find this much more intuitive and easy to work with. The
layers option will be a big help...
+1
I also like the ieda of dropping component/solder side, replacing it
with whatever else that suggests one side and
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 07:26:12PM -0500, Darryl Gibson wrote:
Hello Group,
I'm curious what folks are using for time tracking and/or billing?
Spreadsheets, software?
We have a custom software called wt (as working time). It is designed
by programmers for programmers, to minimize
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:26:58AM +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On Monday 17 Jan 2011 08:58:18 John Doty wrote:
On Jan 17, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
Due to the way the gschem editing model works, and particularly the undo
system, stuff tends to get shifted to the end of the
Hello Markus,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:11:31PM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
Hi all,
having run an open source electronics project with the intention of
collaborative development for a few months now, the experience is less
than inspiring. So I'm looking for opinions on how to do better.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:22:02AM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
ge...@igor2.repo.hu writes:
If you edit one object, that won't ever move other objects around by
side effect. VCS systems I know depend on this feature. I think PCB
already provides this feature, keeping order of
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:48:00PM -0800, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
Being lazy I am importing footprints other folks kindly made for pcb.
Unfortunately, I am not very trusting, so I want to check they are
correct.
I can measure the size of stuff using gerbv (there may be a better
Hi Karl,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:29:21PM +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
Tibor:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
...
And when that's the case, a clean C-API that can be exported to Guile,
Python, Ruby, C++, Fortran, ... just dreaming.
[the above is about
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
John Doty j...@noqsi.com writes:
On Dec 29, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
I can imagine that it's not a lot, since this is really a classical
case for said design pattern.
The real difficulty here is
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 09:23:17PM -0500, Mark wrote:
snip
So, because I use several methods, a single one-size-fits-all library is just
not going to work for me.
I *could* make use of a library of heavy symbols but I still need the
lightweight symbols, too. If I
was forced to choose
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:27:31AM +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
snip
If I remember correctly, a major factor in the closure of the gEDA-dev list
was that the signal to noise ratio became very low. There were several
people, few of whom *ever* submitted patches, loudly and rudely telling
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:52:26AM -0400, al davis wrote:
On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Rub?n G?mez Antol? wrote:
Gnucap 2009.12 is so stable, why not released?
(In several days, I think even ask at debian maintainer to
include snapshots, at least, in experimental branch of
Debian.)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:26:28AM -0400, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:08:25PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
XML is far too heavy, agreed, and it's signal-to-noise ratio is abysmal.
I think that using a Lisp (or Lispy-looking) format would be extensible,
easy to parse, and
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:16:01AM -0400, Rick Collins wrote:
snip
But I suppose it is better to re-invent the wheel. There is no reason to
try to foster any sort of compatibility in file formats between all the
different CAD tools. There are always conversion programs to be written,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:40:25PM -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:23 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
If
there still is no change, it must be gmane munging header and encoding.
Still in base64. Raw text of your message reads:
Hi all,
sorry for the offtopic; we have a broken part which supposed to be a
transducer in a board driving a tiny CRT. The sticker on the part says
Lucius Baer TYP: VM 102-L (http://igor2.repo.hu/tmp/VM102.jpg).
Has anyone met this part or does anyone have an idea for a
substitute?
Regards,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:41:19AM -0500, John Griessen wrote:
David SMITH wrote:
John Griessen wrote:
David C. Kerber wrote:
If you've got a carbon frame, you could drop it into the seat tube,
where it would never be seen, and therefore never removed by a
thief...
This really does sound
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Miguel S?nchez de Le?n Peque wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
The biggest problem I find any time I start coding is how should I
write this?. You're always talking about deprecated code,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:08:15PM -0500, Stan Katz wrote:
I use gEDA for small projects. One, and two sided boards only. It's
been fine up until now. I now have a transceiver chip with some pins,
a number of which I need to run to pin 1 on an IDE header. No matter
how I draw
26 matches
Mail list logo
