Ok, sounds good. There was one other comment I saw besides the ones about
using = delete which I think is also because of what's in the spec. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/10832). I wanted to
point that out specifically just so it doesn't get lost in all the emails
I'm
Hey Gabe,
This is fine with me. Sorry for putting off reviewing all of these.
If there's anything that you think specifically needs to be looked at more
closely, let us know. Otherwise, as you said, since this is fairly separate
from the rest of gem5 we can be pretty laissez faire about it.
Hi folks. Thank you for all your reviewing efforts so far. I know it's not
easy considering the scope of the effort, and that the dark inner workings
and far reaching expanses of systemc are not familiar to everyone.
To keep the review process open to feedback while at the same time ensuring
Hello again folks. There are currently 90 pending systemc CLs, and more
will be coming. We need to close the incoming vs outgoing gap.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:01 PM Jason Lowe-Power
wrote:
> Hey Boris,
>
> I think that gerrit always sends the first message when a patch is uploaded
> to the
Hey Boris,
I think that gerrit always sends the first message when a patch is uploaded
to the whole list. Then, when adding comments or updating patches gerrit
only sends emails to people that are cc'ed in gerrit. I'm not sure what the
behavior is on merges...
I'm not sure what an easy way to be
> If you also want to be on all the reviews,
> please let me know. I don't want to unilaterally
> bomb people's inboxes if they're not interested.
Wait. I am not sure what you are saying here.
Are you proposing to *add* so Andreas, Jason and
Matthias will receive more emails over those review
ev on behalf of Gabe Black <
> gabebl...@google.com>
> Sent: 15 June 2018 09:55:30
> To: gem5 Developer List
> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] systemc reviews
>
> Oh, by the way, I've been adding Andreas, Jason and Matthias Jung to all
> the systemc reviews I've been posting. I think
Hi Gabe,
please consider myself interested on reviewing SystemC patches ??
From: gem5-dev on behalf of Gabe Black
Sent: 15 June 2018 09:55:30
To: gem5 Developer List
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] systemc reviews
Oh, by the way, I've been adding Andreas, Jason
gt;>>>
>> > > >>>> There will be very little modification to gem5 proper for this,
>> and
>> > > so if
>> > > >>>> this sort of integration doesn't do what you want you can just
>> > ignore
>> > > it or
>&g
gt; > >>>> systemc would be a lot more work that doesn't really gain us
> > anything.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Jason, thanks. Please start with that python CL if you have a
> chance
> > > since
> > > >>>> I think it's abo
t;> Gabe
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:15 AM Jason Lowe-Power <
> ja...@lowepower.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I'll have some time next week to dig into th
gt;> Hi Giacomo, Gabe,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm a large supporter of SystemC because its 'the' IEEE standard for
> >>>>>> simulation, therefore I support always activities towards that
> >>>>> direction.
> >&g
kernel
>>>>> for
>>>>>> gem5 in order to have a proper separation between model and kernel. I
>>>>> think
>>>>>> its very interesting for many people to use gem5 in their SystemC
>>>>>> environment also together with commercia
; commercial
>>>>> SystemC tools like Synopsys Platform Architect etc. could not be used.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> 8. Juni 2018 15:47, "Giacomo Travaglini&quo
gt;>> 8. Juni 2018 15:47, "Giacomo Travaglini"
>>>> schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gabe,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have had a quick glance at the patches and there's one thing I don't
>>>> understand:
>>>>>
>
; I have had a quick glance at the patches and there's one thing I don't
>> > understand:
>> > >
>> > > It seems to me that you are sort of reimplementing the SystemC runtime
>> > kernel inside
>> > >
>> > > gem5 for scratch.
>> > >
>> > > Is t
de
> > >
> > > gem5 for scratch.
> > >
> > > Is there a reason for doing it? Can't we just link to the external
> > SystemC library
> > >
> > > and just write some wrappers?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance for the clarif
r the clarifications
> >
> > Giacomo
> >
> > ____________
> > From: gem5-dev on behalf of Gabe Black <
> gabebl...@google.com>
> > Sent: 08 June 2018 06:32:52
> > To: gem5 Developer List
> > Subject: [gem5-dev] systemc
ppers?
>
> Thanks in advance for the clarifications
>
> Giacomo
>
>
> From: gem5-dev on behalf of Gabe Black
>
> Sent: 08 June 2018 06:32:52
> To: gem5 Developer List
> Subject: [gem5-dev] systemc reviews
>
> Hi folks. I've po
write some wrappers?
Thanks in advance for the clarifications
Giacomo
From: gem5-dev on behalf of Gabe Black
Sent: 08 June 2018 06:32:52
To: gem5 Developer List
Subject: [gem5-dev] systemc reviews
Hi folks. I've posted a lot of systemc reviews recently, and I
Hi folks. I've posted a lot of systemc reviews recently, and I expect to
keep doing so for the foreseeable future. To keep the pool of pending CLs
from growing from a lot to unmanageably a lot please don't let them sit too
long if you feel comfortable trying to review them. Alot of these earlier
21 matches
Mail list logo
