Hi Stewart,
Thank you for the review.
Your review will be acknowledged in the next iteration of the draft [1].
Cheers,
Med
[1]
https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike/commit/8491a1d0acfd9ebb9deec1335f9897d209e16ddf
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Stewart Bryant via
Re-,
> Ah - I missed that draft-ietf-add-dnr was already in the RFC Ed
> Queue.
:-)
I consider that this issue is fixed.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Robert Sparks
> Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2023 18:52
> À : Bernie Volz ; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
>
> Cc :
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the follow-up.
Bernie has provided the context for 162/144 codes.
For your second comment, a first attempt to tweak the text can be seen at:
https://tinyurl.com/opsawg-add-latest. This may be tweaked a little bit for
better readability.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message
Hi Robert,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> Envoyé : vendredi 17 février 2023 21:30
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns@ietf.org; last-
> c...@ietf.org;
Hi Linda,
Sure. Please see
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-13.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
De : Linda Dunbar
Envoyé : mercredi 4 janvier 2023 17:47
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-sap@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
Hi Linda,
Thank you for the review.
SAPs can be seen as an abstraction of customer-facing Termination Points (TPs)
with specific service provisions. However, a difference between SAPs and TPs is
that (1) links are terminated by a single TP, not sets of TPs while (2) an
Attachment Circuit
Hi Tim,
Thank you for the review.
You can track the changes made to address your comments at:
https://tinyurl.com/dots-robust-latest. FWIW, please see inline for more
context.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Tim Evens via Datatracker
> Envoyé : mardi 27 septembre 2022
Hi Dale,
Thank you for the review.
The changes to take into account this review can be tracked at:
https://tinyurl.com/l2nm-latest
Please see inline for more context.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dale Worley via Datatracker
> Envoyé : mercredi 11 mai 2022 03:45
> À :
Hi Roni,
Thank you for the review. It will be ACKed in the next iteration of the draft.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Roni Even via Datatracker
> Envoyé : samedi 7 mai 2022 13:39
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : a...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode@ietf.org; last-
>
Hi Ben, all,
Thank you for zooming on these two points.
Please see below.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dots De la part de Benjamin Kaduk
> Envoyé : mercredi 26 janvier 2022 01:59
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : last-c...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for the careful review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> Envoyé : samedi 22 janvier 2022 00:01
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : d...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dots-telemetry@ietf.org; last-
>
Hi Pete,
Thank you for the review.
I will ack this review in -15.
Cheers,
Med
Orange Restricted
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> Envoyé : mercredi 29 septembre 2021 05:19
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org;
Hi Joel,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Joel Halpern via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : vendredi 30 juillet 2021 18:38
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common@ietf.org;
Hi Ben, Dale, all,
> > > Also, you need to specify whether
> > > the connection to the alternate server is a new session (with
> > > independent state) or whether it is expected to be a continuation
> of
> > > the existing session (carrying the same state).
> >
> > [Med] This is covered here:
Hi Pete,
OK with the proposed editorial change. Fixed in the local copy.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : last-call [mailto:last-call-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Pete Resnick
Envoyé : mercredi 28 avril 2021 01:11
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN
Cc : last-c...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
Hi Pete,
Thank you for the review.
The changes to address your review can be tracked here:
https://tinyurl.com/new-block-latest.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Pete Resnick via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : samedi 24 avril 2021
Hi Dale,
Thank you for the careful review. Much appreciated!
The changes to take into account your review can be tracked at:
https://tinyurl.com/8782bis-latest.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dale Worley via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
>
Hi David,
Thank you for the review.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : David Schinazi via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : samedi 31 octobre 2020 00:30
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dots-signal-call-
> home@ietf.org;
Hi Ines,
Thank you. A new version that takes into account all reviews, including yours
can be seen at:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework-07.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-framework/
Hi Ines,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ines Robles via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : vendredi 9 octobre 2020 00:48
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : ops...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-model-automation-
>
Hi Meral,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Envoyé : samedi 27 juin 2020 08:13
À : draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of
Dear Elwyn,
One quick comment about:
> s7: This is an informational document and, as such, cannot have
> normative
> references. Please combine all references into one refererences
> section.
If we refer to the IESG statement available at:
Hi Christer,
Thank you for the review.
OK with all your suggestions.
FWIW, you can track the changes to address your review at:
https://github.com/boucadair/filter-control/blob/master/Christer's%20Review.pdf
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christer Holmberg via
Hi Roni,
Sure. We can include a suggested value.
Thank you for the review.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Roni Even (A) [mailto:roni.e...@huawei.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 23 septembre 2019 07:01
> À : Jaime Jiménez; Roni Even
> Cc : draft-ietf-core-hop-limit@ietf.org;
Hi Joel,
Good points.
All your technical comments were implemented in my local copy. You may track
the changes at:
https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius/blob/master/wdiff%20draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-23.txt%20draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-23.pdf
Thank you for
Dear Dale,
Thank for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dale Worley via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2019 04:22
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : softwi...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-softwire-
>
Re-,
I hear you,
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Roni Even (A) [mailto:roni.e...@huawei.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 7 mars 2019 13:29
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; Datatracker on behalf of Roni Even; gen-
> a...@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org;
Hi Roni,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Datatracker on behalf of Roni Even [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : jeudi 7 mars 2019 11:21
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
Hi Brian, all,
The changes are now available online:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-02
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De :
Re-,
Seems we are all in agreement.
I implemented the changes to 8113bis in my local copy.
Thank you, Brian.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 21 décembre 2018 00:29
> À : Brian E Carpenter
> Cc : Joel M.
I confirm.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 20 décembre 2018 20:58
> À : Brian E Carpenter; Dino Farinacci; BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN
> Cc : Joel M. Halpern; gen-art@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lisp-
>
Brian,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 20 décembre 2018 20:56
> À : Dino Farinacci; BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN
> Cc : Joel M. Halpern; gen-art@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lisp-
>
Hi Dino,
OLD:
Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned according to
procedures in [RFC8126].
NEW:
Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned via Standards
Action [RFC8113].
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dino Farinacci
Hi all,
Brian, whether to maintain the document standalone was discussed by the WG. You
may refer, for example, to the message from Deborah which clarifies this point:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg07886.html. One of the
outcomes of that discussion is to add an
Hi Roni,
Thank you for double checking.
As per your comment:
> I was just wondering why it went from version -10 to -14
I confirm that the changes since -10 are very minor (mainly fixing some nits).
The version bump was a side effect of addressing the OPS directorate review
which raised a
Hi Francis,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Francis Dupont [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr]
> Envoyé : lundi 9 janvier 2017 15:34
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org
> Objet : review
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Roni Even [mailto:roni.e...@huawei.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 9 janvier 2017 11:36
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; Roni Even; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : softwi...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-
>
Dear all,
This new version integrates the comments received during the IETF Last Call.
Many thanks to John, Fred, and Paul for the review. Please feel free to double
check the changes.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] De la
Dear Paul,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu]
> Envoyé : mardi 23 août 2016 00:15
> À : draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe@ietf.org
> Cc : General Area Review Team
> Objet : Gen-ART Last
Hi Dan,
FWIW, an updated version integrating your comments is available online:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-behave-requirements-update-07.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-behave-requirements-update/
Htmlized:
Hi Dan,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
Envoyé : lundi 15 février 2016 17:18
À : General Area Review Team
Cc : draft-ietf-tsvwg-behave-requirements-update@tools.ietf.org
Objet : Gen-ART review of
Hi Miral,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 13 octobre 2015 18:31
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
> Cc : draft-ietf-pcp-port-set@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
> Objet : RE:
Hi Meral,
Thank you again for your review.
FWIW, the changes you requested have been included in the new revision
available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pcp-port-set-11
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pcp-port-set-11
Cheers,
Med
> -Message
Dear Meral,
Many thanks for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 12 octobre 2015 07:49
> À : draft-ietf-pcp-port-set@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
> Objet : Gen-ART
Hi David,
Thank you for the review.
A new version is available online:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-02
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-02
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De
Hi Ben,
A pre-5378 boilerplate is now present in -07. Please check this diff:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-07.txt
Thank you for your careful review.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Envoyé :
Hi Ben,
An updated version that takes into account your comments is available online:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-06
A diff can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update-06.txt
Cheers,
Med
Hi Ben,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 juillet 2014 21:18
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
Cc : draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update@tools.ietf.org; gen-
a...@ietf.org Team (gen-art@ietf.org);
Dear Ben,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 2 juillet 2014 21:10
À : draft-ietf-6man-multicast-addr-arch-update@tools.ietf.org
Cc : gen-art@ietf.org Team (gen-art@ietf.org);
Dear Christer,
FYI, a new version is now available online. The new version integrates your
comments. You may double check at this url:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiffurl2=draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-10.txt
Cheers,
Med
De : Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]
Dear Christer,
Your proposed text reflects exactly the intent. I updated my local copy of the
draft accordingly.
Thank you for the review.
Cheers,
Med
De : Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]
Envoyé : mardi 25 mars 2014 09:50
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN;
Dear Christer,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]
Envoyé : samedi 22 mars 2014 09:49
À : gen-art@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp@tools.ietf.org
Objet : Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-09
I am the
Dear Roni,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 26 janvier 2014 09:13
À : draft-ietf-pcp-description-option@tools.ietf.org
Cc : i...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Objet : Gen-ART LC review of
Dear Peter,
I changed the text as follows:
OLD:
If the requested external port is not available, the PCP server will
send a CANNOT_PROVIDE_EXTERNAL error response. If a short lifetime
error is returned, the IGD-PCP IWF MAY re-send the same request to
the PCP Server after 30
Dear Peter,
The new version is now available online. A diff is available here:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-08.
Thank you again for the review.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Peter Yee [mailto:pe...@akayla.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 10 avril
Dear Peter,
Thanks for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Peter Yee [mailto:pe...@akayla.com]
Envoyé : mardi 9 avril 2013 10:13
À : draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking@tools.ietf.org
Cc : gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Objet : Gen-ART review of
Hi SM,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 mars 2013 03:52
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN; Peter Yee
Cc : gen-art@ietf.org; Brian Haberman; Suresh Krishnan;
Re-,
Thank you for reviewing the document. Much appreciated.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 mars 2013 07:51
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN; Peter Yee
Cc : gen-art@ietf.org; Brian Haberman; Suresh Krishnan;
Dear Peter, SM,
I didn't received any explicit answer from your side whether the changes in -06
solve your concern.
I would appreciate if you can check the new revision. For your convenience the
diff is available here:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06
Dear Peter,
Many thanks for the review.
A new version with your suggested changes is now online. See the diff available
here:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06.
This version includes also the comments raised by SM here:
Dear Joel,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 5 octobre 2012 17:52
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN
Cc : A. Jean Mahoney; softwi...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
Yong Cui;
Dear Joel,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Joel M. Halpern
Envoyé : vendredi 5 octobre 2012 17:15
À : A. Jean Mahoney
Cc : softwi...@ietf.org;
Dear David,
Thank you for the review.
I adopted in my local copy the text you proposed to describe the IPsec issue. I
can even shorten the text to something like IPsec complications with NAT-PT
(Section 2.1 of [RFC4966]) but I prefer your text because it provides more RFC
pointers.
Cheers,
63 matches
Mail list logo
